Intelligent Design for Simulation Models of Weapon Systems Using a Mathematical Structure and Case-Based Reasoning
Source abstract
Abstract
The armed forces of major nations have utilized modeling and simulation technologies to develop weapon systems corresponding to changing modern battlefields and reducing the development cycle. However, model design is complex owing to the characteristics of current weapons, which require multiple functions. Therefore, this study proposes a method to support the automated design of weapon system models for simulation. We apply module-based modeling and an intelligent modeling process to our devised method. The former formalizes constituents and constraints regarding an element combination to design the required model, while the latter applies case-based reasoning (CBR) to intelligentize the modeling process based on the results of the former. Using a case study, our proposed method demonstrates that models that respond to operational circumstances can be designed based on simulation results. Consequently, when weapon systems can be represented in formalized structures and constituents, the weapon models can be reusable based on the addition, modification, and replacement of modules in the common structure. The CBR process can provide the models that satisfy the requirements by retrieving similar models and modifying the models. The proposed method is applicable to the process of weapon system design or improvement for changing battlefields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Product Development and Customization · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Design Education and Practice
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea University, Seoul KS013, Korea
Funding
Defense Acquisition Program Administration and Agency for Defense Development
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. A multi-agent architecture for modelling and simulation of small military unit combat in asymmetric warfare10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.024 ↗
2. Hill, R.R., Miller, J.O., and McIntyre, G.A. (2001, January 9–12). Applications of discrete event simulation modeling to military problems. Proceedings of the 2001 Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington, VA, USA.
3. Design Configuration of a Generation Next Main Battle Tank for Future Combat10.14429/dsj.67.11426 ↗
4. Kim, D., Seo, Y., and Sheen, D.-M. (2015, January 6–8). Dynamic component reconfiguration system using case-based reasoning for weapons system in DM&S: Guided weapon case. Proceedings of the 2015 European Modelling Symposium, Madrid, Spain.10.1109/EMS.2015.12 ↗
5. Grznár, P., Gregor, M., Krajčovič, M., Mozol, Š., Schickerle, M., Vavrík, V., Ďurica, L., Marschall, M., and Bielik, T. (2020). Modeling and Simulation of Processes in a Factory of the Future. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10134503 ↗
6. Smith, R.D. (1998, January 13–16). Essential techniques for military modeling and simulation. Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, USA.
7. Page, E.H., and Smith, R. (1998, January 13–16). Introduction to military training simulation: A guide for discrete event simulationists. Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, USA.
8. Simulation framework for small scale engagement10.1016/j.cie.2010.06.003 ↗
9. Bowers, J., Elsawah, S., and Ryan, M. (2017, January 15–20). Reusable modules to support rapid model building: A case study of defence force design. Proceedings of the 2017 INCOSE International Symposium, Adelaide, Australia.
10. A two-stage model of adaptable product platform for engineering-to-order configuration design10.1080/09544828.2015.1021305 ↗
11. Functional understanding of assembly modelling
12. A science-based approach to product design theory Part I: Formulation and formalization of design process10.1016/S0736-5845(99)00028-9 ↗
13. Modelling and Implementation of Internet-Based Virtual Machine Tools10.1007/s001700300061 ↗
14. Seo, Y., Hong, D.-P., Kim, I., Kim, T., Sheen, D., and Lee, G.-B. (2005, January 4–7). Structure modeling of machine tools and Internet-based implementation. Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.
15. A development of the dynamic reconfigurable components based on software product line: Guided weapon system
16. Module-based structure design of wheeled mobile robot10.5194/ms-9-103-2018 ↗
17. An Adaptive Model for Identification of Influential Bloggers Based on Case-Based Reasoning Using Random Forest10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925905 ↗
18. Literature review on the creativity of CBR applications10.1007/s10462-011-9286-y ↗
19. Applying case-based reasoning for product configuration in mass customization environments10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.026 ↗
20. Rapid Locking Assembly Variant Design Based on Product Configuration Model and CBR10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.48-49.868 ↗
21. DoD (2011). Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items, DoD.
22. Product family design and platform-based product development: A state-of-the-art review10.1007/s10845-007-0003-2 ↗
23. A module-based service model for mass customization: Service family design10.1080/07408171003705383 ↗
24. Lu, J., Bai, D., Zhang, N., Yu, T., and Zhang, X. (2016). Fuzzy Case-Based Reasoning System. Appl. Sci., 6.10.3390/app6070189 ↗
25. Towards an ontology-supported case-based reasoning approach for computer-aided tolerance specification10.1016/j.knosys.2017.11.013 ↗
26. Multi-Colony Ant Colony Optimization Based on Generalized Jaccard Similarity Recommendation Strategy10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949860 ↗
27. Collaborative Filtering Based on Gaussian Mixture Model and Improved Jaccard Similarity10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936630 ↗
28. (2020, September 28). Results of the 123th Defense Acquisition Committee Work (DAPA Press Release). Available online: http://www.dapa.go.kr/dapa/na/ntt/selectNttInfo.do?bbsId=326&nttSn=32309&menuId=678.