journal article·2020-06-25Open access

Energy Consumption Analysis of Beamforming and Cooperative Schemes for Aircraft Wireless Sensor Networks

Seung-Hwan Kim, Jae-Woo Kim, Dong-Seong Kim

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 12

Abstract

In this paper, the eight schemes for aircraft wireless sensor networks are investigated, which are single-hop array beamforming schemes (including analog beamforming (ABF), and digital beamforming (DBF)), non-cooperative schemes (including single-hop and multi-hop schemes), cooperative schemes (including amplify and forward (AF), decode and forward (DF)), and incremental cooperative schemes (incremental decode and forward (IDF), and incremental amplify and forward (IAF)). To set up the aircraft wireless communication environment, we design the aircraft channel model by referring to the experimental parameters of the ITU (International Telecommunication Union)-R M.2283, which is composed of path loss, shadowing fading, and multi-path fading channel responses. To evaluate the performance, the conditions energy consumption and throughput analysis are performed. Through simulation results, the incremental cooperative scheme outperformed by 66.8% better at spectral efficiency 2 than the DBF scheme in terms of the energy consumption metric. Whereas, in terms of throughput metric, overall SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) ranged from −20 to 30 dB the beamforming scheme had the best performance in which the beamforming scheme at SNR 0 dB achieved 85.4% better than the multi-hop scheme. Finally, in terms of normalized throughput metric in low SNR range between −20 and 1 dB the ABF scheme had the best performance over the others in which the ABF at SNR 0 dB achieved 75.4% better than the multi-hop scheme. Whereas, in high SNR range between 2 and 30 dB the IDF scheme had the best performance in which the IDF at SNR 10 dB achieved 62.2% better than the multi-hop scheme.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization · Antenna Design and Optimization · Cooperative Communication and Network Coding

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Kumoh National Institute of Technology, ICT Convergence Research Center, 61 Daehak-ro, Gumi 39177, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Software and hardware certification of safety-critical avionic systems: A comparison study10.1016/j.csi.2014.02.005 ↗
2. Kiepert, J., Loo, S.M., Klein, D., and Pook, M. (2011, January 17–21). Wireless sensor networks for aircraft cabin environmental sensing. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Environmental Systems, Portland, OR, USA.10.2514/6.2011-5108 ↗
3. Pook, M., Loo, S.M., and Kiepert, J. (2012, January 15–19). Monitoring of the aircraft cabin environment via a wireless sensor network. Proceedings of the 42st International Conference on Environmental Systems, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2012-3462 ↗
4. Hall, J.A., Kiepert, J., Pook, M., and Loo, S.M. (2013, January 14–18). Monitoring of aircraft cabin particulate matter concentrations using a wireless sensor network. Proceedings of the 43st International Conference on Environmental Systems, Vail, CO, USA.10.2514/6.2013-3345 ↗
5. Kim, S., Kim, J., and Kim, D. (2019, January 2–5). Performance analysis of Cooperative Schemes for Wireless Sensor Network of Aircraft. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), Zagreb, Croatia.10.1109/ICUFN.2019.8806181 ↗
6. ITU (2014, April 04). Technical Characteristics and Spectrum Requirements of Wireless Avionics Intra-Communications Systems to Support Their Safe Operation. ITU-R M.2283. Available online: https://www.itu.int/pub/R-REP-M.2283-2013.
7. TDMA-based efficient cooperative relaying selection scheme in multi-hop wireless networks10.1016/j.csi.2017.02.004 ↗
8. Enhancing Real-Time Delivery of Gradient Routing for Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks10.1109/TII.2011.2174249 ↗
9. Airborne Wireless Sensor Networks for Airplane Monitoring System10.1155/2018/6025825 ↗
10. Wireless sensor networks applications in aircraft structural health monitoring10.5937/jaes13-7388 ↗
11. Sahmoudi, M., and Amin, M.G. (2007, January 15–20). Optimal Robust Beamforming for Interference and Multipath Mitigation in GNSS Arrays. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/ICASSP.2007.366774 ↗
12. Cooperative Relaying Under Spatially and Temporally Correlated Interference10.1109/TVT.2014.2372633 ↗
13. Wireless Network Design for Control Systems: A Survey10.1109/COMST.2017.2780114 ↗
14. ITU (2016, April 05). Final Acts WRC-15. World Radiocommunication Conference. Available online: http://www.itu.int/pub/R-ACT-WRC.12-2015.
15. IEEE 802.15 Working Group (2003, October 01). IEEE Std. 802.15.4-2003, IEEE Standard for Information Technology Telecommunications and Information Exchange between Systems Local and Metropolitan Area Networks Specific Requirements—Part 15.4: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs). IEEE. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=8762.
16. IEEE 802.11 Working Group (2016, December 14). IEEE Standard Part 11: Wireless Lan Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications. IEEE. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=7786993.
17. IEEE 802.15 Working Group (2018, February 07). IEEE Standard for Information Technology Telecommunications and Information Exchange between Systems Local and Metropolitan Area Networks Specific Requirements—Part 15.1: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs). IEEE. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=8287782.
18. Ultrawideband Network Channel Models for Next-Generation Wireless Avionic System10.1109/TAES.2019.2914538 ↗
19. Research on Path Loss for an Airplane Wing Wireless Monitoring System10.1109/LAWP.2018.2833470 ↗
20. An Event-Triggered Energy-Efficient Wireless Structural Health Monitoring System for Impact Detection in Composite Airframes10.1109/JIOT.2018.2867722 ↗
21. Design of Multichannel and Multihop Low-Power Wide-Area Network for Aircraft Vibration Monitoring10.1109/TIM.2019.2897037 ↗
22. Baltaci, A., Zoppi, S., Kellerer, W., and Schupke, D. (2019, January 20–24). Evaluation of Cellular Technologies for High Data Rate WAIC Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Shanghai, China.10.1109/ICC.2019.8761400 ↗
23. Bang, I., Nam, H., Chang, W., Kim, T., Woo, J., Kim, C., Ban, T., Park, P., and Jung, B. (2019). Channel Measurement and Feasibility Test for Wireless Avionics Intra-Communications. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19061294 ↗
24. On the design of an embedded wireless sensor network for aircraft vibration monitoring using efficient game theoretic based MAC protocol10.1016/j.adhoc.2017.03.004 ↗
25. Notay, J.K., and Safdar, G.A. (2011, January 10). A wireless sensor network based structural health monitoring system for an airplane. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Automation and Computing, Huddersfield, UK.
26. Design and evaluation of a wireless sensor network based aircraft strength testing system10.3390/s90604195 ↗
27. Balanis, C.A. (2016). Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, Wiley Press.
28. A simple and general parameterization quantifying performance in fading channels10.1109/TCOMM.2003.815053 ↗
29. Manhas, E.B., Pellenz, M.E., Brante, G., Souza, R.D., and Rosas, F. (2014, January 23–26). Energy Efficiency Analysis of HARQ with Chase Combining in Multi-Hop Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), Funchal, Portugal.10.1109/ISCC.2014.6912507 ↗
30. Energy efficiency of network coded cooperative communications in Nakagami-m fading10.1109/LSP.2013.2276438 ↗
31. Energy-Constrained Modulation Optimization
32. A low-power baseband receiver IC for frequency-hopped spread spectrum communications10.1109/4.494200 ↗
33. Brante, G., Souza, R.D., and Vandendorpe, L. (2012, January 1–4). Battery-Aware Energy Efficiency of Incremental Decode and Forward with Relay Selection. Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Shanghai, China.10.1109/WCNC.2012.6213941 ↗
34. Selective Decode-and-Forward Using Fixed Relays and Packet Accumulation10.1109/LCOMM.2011.050311.110416 ↗
35. The diversity gain of transmit diversity in wireless systems with Rayleigh fading10.1109/25.661038 ↗
36. SER analysis of QAM with space diversity in Rayleigh fading channels10.4218/etrij.96.0196.0043 ↗
37. Receiver diversity combining using evolutionary algorithms in rayleigh fading channel10.1155/2014/128195 ↗
38. Barry, J.R., Lee, E.A., and Messerschmitt, D.G. (2012). Digital Communication, Springer Science and Business Media Press.
39. Goldsmith, A. (2005). Wireless Communications, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511841224 ↗
40. Millimeter Wave Receiver Efficiency: A Comprehensive Comparison of Beamforming Schemes With Low Resolution ADCs10.1109/TWC.2017.2757919 ↗
41. Energy efficiency of some non-cooperative, cooperative and hybrid communication schemes in multi-relay WSNs10.1007/s11276-013-0569-x ↗
42. Energy Efficiency Analysis of Some Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Transmission Schemes in Wireless Sensor Networks10.1109/TCOMM.2011.063011.100744 ↗
43. Kakitani, M.T., Brante, G., Souza, R.D., and Imran, M.A. (2012, January 3–4). Energy efficiency of amplify-and-forward, repetition coding and parallel coding in short range communications. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP), Prague, Czech Republic.10.1109/TSP.2012.6256284 ↗