journal article·2019-05-27Open access

Multiscale Superpixelwise Locality Preserving Projection for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Lin He, Xianjun Chen, Jun Li, Xiaofeng Xie

Applied Sciences· Volume 9· Issue 10

Abstract

Manifold learning is a powerful dimensionality reduction tool for a hyperspectral image (HSI) classification to relieve the curse of dimensionality and to reveal the intrinsic low-dimensional manifold. However, a specific characteristic of HSIs, i.e., irregular spatial dependency, is not taken into consideration in the method design, which can yield many spatially homogenous subregions in an HSI scence. Conventional manifold learning methods, such as a locality preserving projection (LPP), pursue a unified projection on the entire HSI, while neglecting the local homogeneities on the HSI manifold caused by those spatially homogenous subregions. In this work, we propose a novel multiscale superpixelwise LPP (MSuperLPP) for HSI classification to overcome the challenge. First, we partition an HSI into homogeneous subregions with a multiscale superpixel segmentation. Then, on each scale, subregion specific LPPs and the associated preliminary classifications are performed. Finally, we aggregate the classification results from all scales using a decision fusion strategy to achieve the final result. Experimental results on three real hyperspectral data sets validate the effectiveness of our method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Remote Sensing and Land Use · Face and Expression Recognition

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Automation Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China

Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Urbanization and Geo-Simulation, Center of Integrated Geographic Information Analysis, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Mechanical and Electrical Engineering College, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Recent advances on spectral—Spatial hyperspectral image classification: An overview and new guidelines10.1109/TGRS.2017.2765364 ↗
2. Chang, C.I. (2007). Hyperspectral Data Exploitation: Theory And Applications, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0470124628 ↗
3. Qiu, Z., Chen, J., Zhao, Y., Zhu, S., He, Y., and Zhang, C. (2018). Variety identification of single rice seed using hyperspectral imaging combined with convolutional neural network. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8020212 ↗
4. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers10.1109/TIT.1968.1054102 ↗
5. Hyperspectral remote sensing of vegetation and agricultural crops
6. Integration of spatial and spectral information by means of unsupervised extraction and classification for homogenous objects applied to multispectral and hyperspectral data10.1109/TGRS.2004.843193 ↗
7. Classification of hyperspectral image based on sparse representation in tangent space10.1109/LGRS.2014.2362512 ↗
8. Sparse dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral image based on semi-supervised local Fisher discriminant analysis
9. Dimensionality reduction based on clonal selection for hyperspectral imagery10.1109/TGRS.2007.905311 ↗
10. Dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral data via spectral feature extraction10.1109/TGRS.2008.2010346 ↗
11. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., and Stork, D.G. (2001). Pattern Classification, John Wiley & Sons.
12. Fukunaga, K. (1990). Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-047865-4.50007-7 ↗
13. Principal component analysis10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 ↗
14. Classification of hyperspectral images with regularized linear discriminant analysis10.1109/TGRS.2008.2005729 ↗
15. He, X.F., and Niyogi, P. (2003, January 8–13). Locality preserving projections. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
16. Wang, Z.Y., and He, B.B. (2011, January 24–26). Locality perserving projections algorithm for hyperspectral image dimensionality reduction. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geoinformatics, Shanghai, China.10.1109/GeoInformatics.2011.5980790 ↗
17. Deng, Y.J., Li, H.C., Pan, L., and Emery, W.J. (2017, January 23–28). Tensor locality preserving projection for hyperspectral image classification. Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Fort Worth, TX, USA.10.1109/IGARSS.2017.8127066 ↗
18. A modified locality-preserving projection approach for hyperspectral image classification10.1109/LGRS.2016.2564993 ↗
19. Fast and orthogonal locality preserving projections for dimensionality reduction10.1109/TIP.2017.2726188 ↗
20. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding10.1126/science.290.5500.2323 ↗
21. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 ↗
22. Zhang, Z.Y., and Zha, H.Y. (2003, January 21–23). Nonlinear dimension reduction via local tangent space alignment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, Hong Kong, China.10.1007/978-3-540-45080-1_66 ↗
23. Sun, H., Ren, J., Zhao, H., Yan, Y., Zabalza, J., and Marshall, S. (2019). Superpixel based feature specific sparse representation for spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11050536 ↗
24. Duan, W., Li, S., and Fang, L. (2014, January 17–19). Spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification using superpixel and extreme learning machines. Proceedings of the Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition, Changsha, China.10.1007/978-3-662-45646-0_17 ↗
25. Zhan, T., Sun, L., Xu, Y., Yang, G., Zhang, Y., and Wu, Z. (2018). Hyperspectral classification via superpixel kernel learning-based low rank representation. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10101639 ↗
26. Modified tensor locality preserving projection for dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral images10.1109/LGRS.2017.2786223 ↗
27. A new spatial-spectral feature extraction method for hyperspectral images using local covariance matrix representation10.1109/TGRS.2018.2801387 ↗
28. Feature extraction with multiscale covariance maps for hyperspectral image classification
29. Sparsity preserving projections with applications to face recognition10.1016/j.patcog.2009.05.005 ↗
30. Pedestrian detection via classification on riemannian manifolds10.1109/TPAMI.2008.75 ↗
31. Bilinear regularized locality preserving learning on Riemannian graph for motor imagery BCI10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2794415 ↗
32. Wang, R.P., Guo, H.M., Davis, L.S., and Dai, Q.H. (2012, January 16–21). Covariance discriminative learning: A natural and efficient approach to image set classification. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Providence, RI, USA.
33. Customizing kernel functions for SVM-based hyperspectral image classification10.1109/TIP.2008.918955 ↗
34. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines10.1109/TGRS.2004.831865 ↗
35. Local Manifold Learning-Based k-Nearest-Neighbor for Hyperspectral Image Classification
36. Liu, M.Y., Tuzel, O., Ramalingam, S., and Chellappa, R. (2011, January 20–25). Entropy rate superpixel segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995323 ↗
37. SuperPCA: A superpixelwise PCA approach for unsupervised feature extraction of hyperspectral imagery10.1109/TGRS.2018.2828029 ↗
38. Bishop, C.M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer.