Pattern Discovery in White Etching Crack Experimental Data Using Machine Learning Techniques
Source abstract
Abstract
White etching crack (WEC) failure is a failure mode that affects bearings in many applications, including wind turbine gearboxes, where it results in high, unplanned maintenance costs. WEC failure is unpredictable as of now, and its root causes are not yet fully understood. While WECs were produced under controlled conditions in several investigations in the past, converging the findings from the different combinations of factors that led to WECs in different experiments remains a challenge. This challenge is tackled in this paper using machine learning (ML) models that are capable of capturing patterns in high-dimensional data belonging to several experiments in order to identify influential variables to the risk of WECs. Three different ML models were designed and applied to a dataset containing roughly 700 high- and low-risk oil compositions to identify the constituting chemical compounds that make a given oil composition high-risk with respect to WECs. This includes the first application of a purpose-built neural network-based feature selection method. Out of 21 compounds, eight were identified as influential by models based on random forest and artificial neural networks. Association rules were also mined from the data to investigate the relationship between compound combinations and WEC risk, leading to results supporting those of previous analyses. In addition, the identified compound with the highest influence was proved in a separate investigation involving physical tests to be of high WEC risk. The presented methods can be applied to other experimental data where a high number of measured variables potentially influence a certain outcome and where there is a need to identify variables with the highest influence.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fault Detection and Control Systems · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Wind Power Drives, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG, 52134 Herzogenaurach, Germany
Funding
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Investigating the Process of White Etching Crack Initiation in Bearing Steel10.1007/s11249-016-0673-z ↗
2. White structure flaking (WSF) in wind turbine gearbox bearings: Effects of ‘butterflies’ and white etching cracks (WECs)10.1179/026708311X13135950699254 ↗
3. Reliability of wind turbine subassemblies10.1049/iet-rpg.2008.0060 ↗
4. Sheng, S. (2016, January 16–17). Wind Turbine Gearbox Reliability Database, Condition Monitoring, and Operation and Maintenance Research Update. Proceedings of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Drivetrain Reliability Collaborative Workshop, Golden, CO, USA.
5. Lubricant Effects on White Etching Cracking Failures in Thrust Bearing Rig Tests10.1080/10402004.2018.1453571 ↗
6. EBSD investigation of the crack initiation and TEM/FIB analyses of the microstructural changes around the cracks formed under Rolling Contact Fatigue (RCF)10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.07.002 ↗
7. Microstructural Changes and Crack Initiation with White Etching Area Formation under Rolling/Sliding Contact in Bearing Steel10.2355/isijinternational.45.1897 ↗
8. Material wear and fatigue in wind turbine Systems10.1016/j.wear.2013.01.060 ↗
9. An updated review: White etching cracks (WECs) and axial cracks in wind turbine gearbox bearings10.1080/02670836.2015.1133022 ↗
10. White Etching Cracking—Simulation in Bearing Rig and Bench Tests10.1080/10402004.2017.1339839 ↗
11. Iso, K., Yokouchi, A., and Takemura, H. (2005, January 11–14). Research Work for Clarifying the Mechanism of White Structure Flaking and Extending the Life of Bearings, SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1868. Proceedings of the SAE 2005 World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, MI, USA.10.4271/2005-01-1868 ↗
12. Influence of Currents from Electrostatic Charges on WEC Formation in Rolling Bearings10.1080/10402004.2015.1118582 ↗
13. The Cause of Premature Wind Turbine Bearing Failures: Overloading or Underloading?10.1080/10402004.2018.1433345 ↗
14. Investigations of Bearing Failures Associated with White Etching Areas (WEAs) in Wind Turbine Gearboxes10.1080/10402004.2013.823531 ↗
15. Serial sectioning investigation of butterfly and white etching crack (WEC) formation in wind turbine gearbox bearings10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.031 ↗
16. Arnaud, R.D.C. (2014). Tribological Analysis of White Etching Crack (WEC) Failures in Rolling Element Bearings. [Ph.D. Thesis, INSA de Lyon].
17. A FIB/TEM study of butterfly crack formation and white etching area (WEA) microstructural changes under rolling contact fatigue in 100Cr6 bearing steel10.1016/j.msea.2013.02.004 ↗
18. Gegner, J., and Nierlich, W. (2011, January 15–17). The Bearing Axial Cracks Root Cause Hypothesis of Frictional Surface Crack Initiation and Corrosion Fatigue Driven Crack Growth. Proceedings of the NREL 2011 Wind Turbine Tribology Seminar, Broomfield, CO, USA.
19. TEM/SEM investigation of microstructural changes within the white etching area under rolling contact fatigue and 3-D crack reconstruction by focused ion beam10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.024 ↗
20. The Effects of Hydrogen on Microstructural Change and Surface Originated Flaking in Rolling Contact Fatigue10.2474/trol.6.123 ↗
21. The Evolution of White Etching Cracks (WECs) in Rolling Contact Fatigue-Tested 100Cr6 Steel10.1007/s11249-017-0946-1 ↗
22. White Etching Crack Root Cause Investigations10.1080/10402004.2014.942938 ↗
23. The Influence of Sliding and Contact Severity on the Generation of White Etching Cracks10.1007/s11249-015-0602-6 ↗
24. The Effect of Lubricant Composition on White Etching Crack Failures10.1007/s11249-018-1106-y ↗
25. Wang, L., and Holweger, W. (2017, January 17–22). White Etching Cracks (WECs) in Wind Turbine Bearings. Proceedings of the World Tribology Congress 2017, Beijing, China.
26. Effect of lubricants on bearing damage in rolling-sliding conditions: Evolution of white etching cracks10.1016/j.wear.2017.12.001 ↗
27. WEC Formation in Rolling Bearings under Mixed Friction: Influences and “Friction Energy Accumulation as Indicator10.1080/10402004.2016.1183250 ↗
28. Azzam, B., Harzendorf, F., Schelenz, R., Holweger, W., and Jacobs, G. (2019, January 18–19). White Etching Crack Bearing Failure: Identification of High Risk Lubricant Compounds using Artificial Neural Networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Gears 2019, Garching bei München, Germany.10.51202/9783181023556-569 ↗
29. Brandt, J.M., Benedek, M., Guerin, J.S., and Fliege, J. Industrial Analytics-based Bearing Risk Classification Systems investigated with Advanced Mathematical Models. IoT - Eng. Cyber Phys. Hum. Syst., (under review).
30. Japkowicz, N. (2000, January 15). The class imbalance problem: Significance and strategies. Proceedings of the Int’l Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
31. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
32. Probst, P., Wright, M., and Boulesteix, A.-L. (2018). Hyperparameters and Tuning Strategies for Random Forest. arXiv.10.1002/widm.1301 ↗
33. Probst, P., and Boulesteix, A.-L. (2017). To tune or not to tune the number of trees in random forest?. arXiv.
34. Meyer, D., Dimitriadou, E., Hornik, K., Weingessel, A., and Leisch, F. (2018, November 22). e1071: Misc Functions of the Department of Statistics, Probability Theory Group (Formerly: E1071), TU Wienl; R Package Version 1.7-0. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=e1071.
35. Feature Selection with the Boruta Package
36. Ng, A. (2004, January 4–8). Feature Selection, L1 vs. L2 Regularization, and Rotational Invariance. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, Banff, AB, Canada.
37. Glorot, X., and Bengio, A.B.U.Y. (2011, January 11–13). Deep Sparse Rectifier Neural Networks. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
38. Kingma, D., and Ba, J.L. (2015, January 7–9). ADAM: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, San Diego, CA, USA.
39. Bridle, J.S. (1990). Probabilistic Interpretation of Feedforward Classification Network Outputs, with Relationships to Statistical Pattern Recognition. Neurocomputing, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-76153-9_28 ↗
40. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
41. Agrawal, R., Mannila, H., Srikant, R., Toivonen, H., and Verkamo, A. (1996). Fast discovery of association rules. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI Press.
42. arules—A Computational Environment for Mining Association Rules and Frequent Item Sets
43. Allaire, J., and Chollet, F. (2018, November 22). keras: R Interface to ‘Keras’; R Package Version 2.2.0. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=keras.10.32614/CRAN.package.keras ↗
44. Hahsler, M., Buchta, C., Grün, B., and Hornik, K. (2019, January 09). arules: Mining Association Rules and Frequent Itemsets; R Package Version 1.6-2. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=arules.
45. Occurence of brittle flaking on bearings used for automotive electrical instruments and auxiliary devices10.1016/0043-1648(96)06990-6 ↗