journal article·2024-06

Influence of self-weight on size effect of quasi-brittle materials: generalized analytical formulation and application to the failure of irregular masonry arches

Micaela Mercuri, Madura Pathirage, Amedeo Gregori, Gianluca Cusatis

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 246· Issue 2-3
Publisher page

Abstract

Up to the beginning of the twenty-first century, most of quasi-brittle structures, in particular the ones composed by concrete or masonry frames and walls, were designed and built according to codes that totally ignored fracture mechanics theory. The structural load capacity predicted by strength-based theories, such as plastic analysis and limit analysis, do not exhibit size-effect. Within the framework of fracture mechanics theory, this paper deals with the analysis of the effect of non proportional loadings on the strength reduction with the structural scaling. In particular, this study investigates the size-effect of quasi-brittle materials subjected to self-weight. Although omnipresent, gravity-load is often considered negligible in most studies in the field of fracture mechanics. This assumption is obviously not valid for large structures and in particular for geometries in which the dead load is a major driving force leading to fracture and structural failure. In this study, an analytical formulation expressing the relation between the strength-reduction and the structural scaling and accounting for self-weight, was derived for both notched and unnotched bodies. More specifically, a closed form expression for size and self-weight effects was first derived for notched specimens from equivalent linear elastic fracture mechanics. Next, equivalent linear elastic fracture mechanics theory being not applicable to unnotched bodies, a cohesive model formulation was considered. Particularly, the cohesive size effect curve and the generalized cohesive size effect curves, originally obtained via cohesive crack analysis for weightless bodies with sharp and blunt/unnotched notches, respectively, were equipped of an additional term to account for the effect of gravity. All the resulting formulas were compared with the predictions of numerical simulation resulting from the adoption of the Lattice Discrete Particle Model. The results point out that the analytical formulas match very well the results of the numerical model for both notched and unnotched samples. Furthermore, the analytical formulas predict a vertical asymptote for increasing size, in the typical double-logarithm strength versus structural size representation. The asymptote corresponds to a characteristic size at which the structure fails under its own weight. For large structural sizes approaching this characteristic size, the newly developed formulas deviate significantly from previously proposed size-effect formulas. The practical relevance of this finding was demonstrated by analyzing size and self-weight effect for several quasi-brittle materials such as concrete, wood, limestone and carbon composites. Most importantly, the proposed formulas were applied to the failure of semi-circular masonry arches under spreading supports with different slenderness ratios. Results show that analytical formulas well predict numerical simulations and, above all, that for vaulted structures it is mandatory accounting for the effect of self-weight.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (85)

Show source-provided references
1. Aicher S (2010) Process zone length and fracture energy of spruce wood in mode-I from size effect. Wood Fiber Sci 42(2):237–247
2. Alexakis H, Makris N (2014) Limit equilibrium analysis and the minimum thickness of circular masonry arches to withstand lateral inertial loading. Arch Appl Mech 84:757–77210.1007/s00419-014-0831-4 ↗
3. Alnaggar M, Cusatis G, Di Luzio G (2013) Lattice discrete particle modeling (LDPM) of alkali silica reaction (ASR) deterioration of concrete structures. Cem Concr Compos 41:45–5910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.04.015 ↗
4. Al-Shayea N, Khan K, Abduljauwad S (2000) Effects of confining pressure and temperature on mixed-mode (I-II) fracture toughness of a limestone rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37(4):629–64310.1016/S1365-1609(00)00003-4 ↗
5. Angiolilli M, Gregori A, Pathirage M, Cusatis G (2020) Fiber reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) for strengthening historical stone masonry structures: experiments and computations. Eng Struct 224:11110210.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111102 ↗
6. Bažant ZP (1996) Is no-tension design of concrete or rock structures always safe?–fracture analysis. J Struct Eng 122(1):2–1010.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:1(2) ↗
7. Bazant ZP (2002a) Reminiscences on four decades of struggle and progress in softening damage and size effect. Concr J (Jpn Concr Inst) 40:16–2810.3151/coj1975.40.2_16 ↗
8. Bažant ZP (2002b) Concrete fracture models: testing and practice. Eng Fract Mech 69(2):165–20510.1016/S0013-7944(01)00084-4 ↗
9. Bažant ZP (2002c) Scaling of structural strength. CRC Press, Boca Raton
10. Bažant ZP (2019) Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials. Routledge, London10.1201/9780203756799 ↗
11. Bažant ZP, Frangopol DM (2002) Size effect hidden in excessive dead load factor. J Struct Eng 128(1):80–8610.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:1(80) ↗
12. Bažant ZP, Kazemi M (1990a) Determination of fracture energy, process zone length and brittleness number from size effect, with application to rock and concrete. Int J Fract 44(2):111–13110.1007/BF00047063 ↗
13. Bažant ZP, Kazemi MT (1990b) Size effect in fracture of ceramics and its use to determine fracture energy and effective process zone length. J Am Ceram Soc 73(7):1841–185310.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb05233.x ↗
14. Bazant ZP, Le J-L (2017) Probabilistic mechanics of quasibrittle structures: strength, lifetime, and size effect. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/9781316585146 ↗
15. Bazant ZP, Lewis G (2003) Scaling of structural strength. Appl Mech Rev 56(5):70–7210.1115/1.1584419 ↗
16. Bažant ZP, Pfeiffer PA (1987) Determination of fracture energy from size effect and brittleness number. ACI Mater J 84(6):463–480
17. Bazant ZP, Planas J (1997) Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials, vol 16. CRC Press, Boca Raton
18. Bažant ZP, Yu Q (2006) Size effect on strength of quasibrittle structures with reentrant corners symmetrically loaded in tension. J Eng Mech 132(11):1168–117610.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2006)132:11(1168) ↗
19. Bažant Z, Gettu R, Kazemi M (1991) Identification of nonlinear fracture properties from size effect tests and structural analysis based on geometry-dependent R-curves. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 28:43–5110.1016/0148-9062(91)93232-U ↗
20. Bazant ZP, Daniel IM, Li Z (1996) Size effect and fracture characteristics of composite laminates10.1115/1.2806812 ↗
21. Block P, DeJong M, Ochsendorf J (2006) As hangs the flexible line: equilibrium of masonry arches. Nexus Netw J 8(2):13–2410.1007/s00004-006-0015-9 ↗
22. Brandi C (1963) Il restauro. Teoria e pratica 1988
23. Carloni C, Cusatis G, Salviato M, Le J-L, Hoover CG, Bažant ZP (2019) Critical comparison of the boundary effect model with cohesive crack model and size effect law. Eng Fract Mech 215:193–21010.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.04.036 ↗
24. Carolan D, Kinloch A, Ivankovic A, Sprenger S, Taylor A (2016) Mechanical and fracture performance of carbon fibre reinforced composites with nanoparticle modified matrices. Procedia Struct Integr 2:96–10310.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.013 ↗
25. Cedolin L, Cusatis G (2008) Identification of concrete fracture parameters through size effect experiments. Cem Concr Compos 30(9):788–79710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.05.007 ↗
26. Chang T-P, Shieh M-M (1996) Fracture properties of lightweight concrete. Cem Concr Res 26(2):181–18810.1016/0008-8846(95)00198-0 ↗
27. Cibelli A, Pathirage M, Cusatis G, Ferrara L, Di Luzio G (2022) A discrete numerical model for the effects of crack healing on the behaviour of ordinary plain concrete: implementation, calibration, and validation. Eng Fract Mech 263:10826610.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108266 ↗
28. Committee A, for Standardization IO (2019) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–19) and commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills
29. Cusatis G, Schauffert EA (2009) Cohesive crack analysis of size effect. Eng Fract Mech 76(14):2163–217310.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.06.008 ↗
30. Cusatis G, Schauffert E (2010) Discontinuous cell method (DCM) for cohesive fracture propagation. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on fracture mechanics of concrete and concrete structures (FraMCos 7), vol 845. pp 23–28
31. Cusatis G, Zhou X (2013) High-order microplane theory for quasi-brittle materials with multiple characteristic lengths. J Eng Mech 140(7):0401404610.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000747 ↗
32. Cusatis G, Pelessone D, Mencarelli A (2011a) Lattice discrete particle model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. I: theory. Cem Concr Compos 33(9):881–89010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.011 ↗
33. Cusatis G, Mencarelli A, Pelessone D, Baylot J (2011b) Lattice discrete particle model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. II: calibration and validation. Cem Concr Compos 33(9):891–90510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.010 ↗
34. Cusatis G, Mencarelli A, Pelessone D, Baylot J (2011c) Lattice discrete particle model (LDPM) for failure behavior of concrete. Cem Concr Compos 33(9):891–90510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.010 ↗
35. Di Luzio G, Cusatis G (2018) Cohesive crack analysis of size effect for samples with blunt notches and generalized size effect curve for quasi-brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech 204:15–2810.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.003 ↗
36. Elices M, Planas G (2002) Prediction of size-effect based on cohesive crack models. Size-scale effects in the failure mechanisms of materials and structures. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 309–310
37. Feng J, Sun W, Chen L, Chen B, Arkin E, Du L, Pathirage M (2022) Engineered cementitious composites using Chinese local ingredients: material preparation and numerical investigation. Case Stud Constr Mater 16:00852
38. Ferreira TM, Costa AA, Costa A (2015) Analysis of the out-of-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry: a literature review. Int J Archit Herit 9(8):949–97210.1080/15583058.2014.885996 ↗
39. Forsman K, Fredriksson M, Serrano E, Danielsson H (2021) Moisture-dependency of the fracture energy of wood: a comparison of unmodified and acetylated scots pine and birch. Holzforschung. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2020-017410.1515/hf-2020-0174 ↗
40. Galassi S (2023) An alternative approach for limit analysis of masonry arches on moving supports in finite small displacements. Eng Fail Anal 145:10700410.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.107004 ↗
41. Galassi S, Misseri G, Rovero L, Tempesta G (2018) Failure modes prediction of masonry voussoir arches on moving supports. Eng Struct 173:706–71710.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.015 ↗
42. Gregori A, Mercuri M, Angiolilli M, Pathirage M (2022) Simulating defects in brick masonry panels subjected to compressive loads. Eng Struct 263:11433310.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114333 ↗
43. Gregori A, Castoro C, Natale AD, Mercuri M, Giampaolo ED (2023) Using commercial UHF-RFID wireless tags to detect structural damage. Procedia Struct Integr 44:1586–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.20310.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.203 ↗
44. Han L, Pathirage M, Akono A-T, Cusatis G (2020) Lattice discrete particle modeling of size effect in slab scratch tests. J Appl Mech. doi 10(1115/1):4048989
45. Heyman J (1966) The stone skeleton. Int J Solids Struct 2(2):249–27910.1016/0020-7683(66)90018-7 ↗
46. Heyman J (1982) The masonry arch. Ellis Horwood series in engineering science. E. Horwood. https://books.google.com/books?id=1eceAQAAIAAJ
47. Hoover CG, Bažant ZP (2014) Universal size-shape effect law based on comprehensive concrete fracture tests. J Eng Mech 140(3):473–47910.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000627 ↗
48. Kim S-H, Park S-J (2021) Effect of graphene oxide/graphitic nanofiber nanohybrids on interfacial properties and fracture toughness of carbon fibers-reinforced epoxy matrix composites. Composites B 227:10938710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109387 ↗
49. Kostopoulos V, Markopoulos Y, Pappas Y, Peteves S (1998) Fracture energy measurements of 2-D carbon/carbon composites. J Eur Ceram Soc 18(1):69–7910.1016/S0955-2219(97)00100-3 ↗
50. Lyu Y, Pathirage M, Ramyar E, Liu WK, Cusatis G (2023) Machine learning meta-models for fast parameter identification of the lattice discrete particle model. Comput Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-023-02320-z10.1007/s00466-023-02320-z ↗
51. McKinney K, Rice R (1981) Specimen size effects in fracture toughness testing of heterogeneous ceramics by the notch beam method. In: Fracture mechanics for ceramics, rocks, and concrete. ASTM International10.1520/STP28301S ↗
52. Mercuri M, Pathirage M, Gregori A, Cusatis G (2020) Computational modeling of the out-of-plane behavior of unreinforced irregular masonry. Eng Struct 223:11118110.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111181 ↗
53. Mercuri M, Pathirage M, Gregori A, Cusatis G (2021a) On the collapse of the masonry Medici tower: an integrated discrete-analytical approach. Eng Struct 246:11304610.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113046 ↗
54. Mercuri M, Pathirage M, Gregori A, Cusatis G (2021b) Lattice discrete modeling of out-of-plane behavior of irregular masonry. In: Proceedings of the 8th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering. pp 546–56210.7712/120121.8508.19419 ↗
55. Mercuri M, Pathirage M, Gregori A, Cusatis G (2022) Masonry vaulted structures under spreading supports: analyses of fracturing behavior and size effect. J Build Eng 45:10339610.1016/j.jobe.2021.103396 ↗
56. Mercuri M, Vailati M, Gregori A (2023a) Lime-based mortar reinforced with randomly oriented polyvinyl-alcohol (PVA) fibers for strengthening historical masonry structures. Dev Built Environ 14:10015210.1016/j.dibe.2023.100152 ↗
57. Mercuri M, Pathirage M, Gregori A, Cusatis G (2023b) Analysis of the behavior of the masonry Medici tower resorting on a hybrid discrete-kinematic methodology. Procedia Struct Integr 44:1640–1647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.21010.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.210 ↗
58. Mercuri M, Pathirage M, Gregori A, Cusatis G (2023c) Fracturing and collapse behavior of masonry vaulted structures: a lattice-discrete approach. Procedia Struct Integr 44:1276–128310.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.164 ↗
59. Milani E, Milani G, Tralli A (2008) Limit analysis of masonry vaults by means of curved shell finite elements and homogenization. Int J Solids Struct 45(20):5258–528810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.05.019 ↗
60. Nguyen H, Pathirage M, Rezaei M, Issa M, Cusatis G, Bažant ZP (2020a) New perspective of fracture mechanics inspired by gap test with crack-parallel compression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200564611710.1073/pnas.2005646117 ↗
61. Nguyen HT, Pathirage M, Cusatis G, Bažant ZP (2020b) Gap test of crack-parallel stress effect on quasibrittle fracture and its consequences. J Appl Mech 87(7):07101210.1115/1.4047215 ↗
62. Ochsendorf JA (2002) Collapse of masonry structures. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge
63. Olurin OB, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (2001) Tensile and compressive failure of notched cellular foams. Adv Eng Mater 3(1–2):55–5810.1002/1527-2648(200101)3:1/2<55::AID-ADEM55>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
64. Pastor J, Guinea G, Planas J, Elices M (1995) Nueva expresión del factor de intensidad de tensiones para la probeta de flexión en tres puntos. Anales de Mecánica de la Fractura 12:85–90
65. Pathirage M, Bousikhane F, D’Ambrosia M, Alnaggar M, Cusatis G (2019a) Effect of alkali silica reaction on the mechanical properties of aging mortar bars: experiments and numerical modeling. Int J Damage Mech 28(2):291–32210.1177/1056789517750213 ↗
66. Pathirage M, Bentz D, Di Luzio G, Masoero E, Cusatis G (2019b) The ONIX model: a parameter-free multiscale framework for the prediction of self-desiccation in concrete. Cem Concr Compos 103:36–4810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.04.011 ↗
67. Pathirage M, Tong D, Thierry F, Cusatis G, Grégoire D, Pijaudier-Cabot G (2023a) Discrete modeling of concrete failure and size-effect. Theor Appl Fract Mech 124:10373810.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103738 ↗
68. Pathirage M, Zhang B, Alnaggar M, Cusatis G (2023b) Confinement and alkali-silica reaction in concrete: review and numerical investigation. Int J Solids Struct 277–278:11234110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112341 ↗
69. Planas J, Guinea G, Elices M (1997) Generalized size effect equation for quasibrittle materials. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 20(5):671–68710.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb00300.x ↗
70. Rezakhani R, Scott DA, Bousikhane F, Pathirage M, Moser RD, Green BH, Cusatis G (2021) Influence of steel fiber size, shape, and strength on the quasi-static properties of ultra-high performance concrete: experimental investigation and numerical modeling. Constr Build Mater 296:12353210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123532 ↗
71. RILEM Draft Recommendation (1985) Determination of the fracture energy of mortar and concrete by means of three-point bend tests on notched beams. Mater Struct 18(106):285–290
72. RILEM Draft Recommendation (1990) Size-effect method for determining fracture energy and process zone size of concrete. Mater Struct 23:461–46510.1007/BF02472030 ↗
73. Roca P, López-Almansa F, Miquel J, Hanganu A (2007) Limit analysis of reinforced masonry vaults. Eng Struct 29(3):431–43910.1016/j.engstruct.2006.05.009 ↗
74. Schauffert EA, Cusatis G (2011) Lattice discrete particle model for fiber-reinforced concrete. I: theory. J Eng Mech 138(7):826–83310.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000387 ↗
75. Tada H (1985) The stress analysis of cracks handbook. Paris Productions Inc, St. Louis
76. Timoshenko S, Goodier J (1970) Theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York
77. Topcu İB (2003) Properties of heavyweight concrete produced with barite. Cem Concr Res 33(6):815–82210.1016/S0008-8846(02)01063-3 ↗
78. Triquet J, Blanchet P, Landry V (2021) Hardness of chemically densified yellow birch in relation to wood density, polymer content and polymer properties. Holzforschung 75(2):114–12510.1515/hf-2020-0076 ↗
79. Vailati M, Mercuri M, Angiolilli M, Gregori A (2021) Natural-fibrous lime-based mortar for the rapid retrofitting of heritage masonry buildings. Fibers 9(11):6810.3390/fib9110068 ↗
80. Vailati M, Gregori A, Mercuri M, Monti G (2023) A non-intrusive seismic retrofitting technique for masonry infills based on bed-joint sliding. J Build Eng 69:10620810.1016/j.jobe.2023.106208 ↗
81. Viollet-le-Duc E-E (1875a) On restoration. Sampson Low, Marston Low, and Searle, London
82. Viollet-le-Duc E-E (1875b) Discourses on architecture, vol 1. Ticknor, Boston
83. Yang L, Pathirage M, Su H, Alnaggar M, Di Luzio G, Cusatis G (2021) Computational modeling of temperature and relative humidity effects on concrete expansion due to alkali-silica reaction. Cem Concr Compos 124:10423710.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104237 ↗
84. Yang L, Pathirage M, Su H, Alnaggar M, Di Luzio G, Cusatis G (2022) Computational modeling of expansion and deterioration due to alkali-silica reaction: effects of size range, size distribution, and content of reactive aggregate. Int J Solids Struct 234:11122010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111220 ↗
85. Zhu Z, Pathirage M, Wang W, Troemner M, Cusatis G (2022) Lattice discrete particle modeling of concrete under cyclic tension-compression with multi-axial confinement. Constr Build Mater 352:12898510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128985 ↗