Parametric and Nonparametric PI Controller Tuning Method for Integrating Processes Based on Magnitude Optimum
Source abstract
Abstract
Integrating systems are frequently encountered in the oil industry (oil–water–gas separators, distillation columns), power plants, paper-production plants, polymerisation processes, and in storage tanks. Due to the non-self-regulating character of the processes, any disturbance can cause a drift of the process output signal. Therefore, efficient closed-loop control of such processes is required. There are many PI and PID controller tuning methods for integrating processes. However, it is hard to find one requiring only a simple tuning procedure on the process, while the tuning method is based either on time-domain measurements or on a process transfer function of arbitrary order, which are the advantages of the magnitude optimum multiple integration (MOMI) tuning method. In this paper, we propose the extension of the MOMI tuning method to integrating processes. Besides the mentioned advantages, the extension provides efficient closed-loop control, while PI controller parameters calculation is still based on simple algebraic expressions, making it suitable for less-demanding hardware, like simpler programmable logic controllers (PLC). Additionally, the proposed method incorporates reference weighting factor b that allows users to emphasize either the disturbance-rejection or reference-following response. The proposed extension of the MOMI method (time-domain approach) was also tested on a charge-amplifier drift-compensation system, a laboratory hydraulic plant, on an industrial autoclave, and on a solid-oxide fuel-cell temperature control. All closed-loop responses were relatively stable and fast, all in accordance with the magnitude optimum criteria.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Control Systems Optimization · Advanced Control Systems Design · Fault Detection and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Systems and Control, Jožef Stefan Institute (JSI), Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Department of E-Mobility, Automation and Drives, Institute of Automotive Mechatronics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Slovak University of Technology (STU), Ilkovičova 3, 812 19 Bratislava, Slovakia
Funding
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Design of PI Controllers based on Non-Convex Optimization10.1016/S0005-1098(98)00011-9 ↗
2. A survey of PID auto-tuning methods
3. Menini, L., Zaccarian, L., and Abdallah, C.T. (2006). Constrained Pole Assignment Control. Current Trends in Nonlinear Systems and Control, Birkhäuser Boston.10.1007/0-8176-4470-9 ↗
4. Huba, M. (2006). Theory of Automatic Control 3: Constrained PID Control, STU.
5. Sato, T., Hayashi, I., Horibe, Y., Vilanova, R., and Konishi, Y. (2019). Optimal Robust PID Control for First- and Second-Order Plus Dead-Time Processes. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9091934 ↗
6. PI/PID Control Design Based on a Fractional-Order Model for the Process10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.06.189 ↗
7. Visioli, A., and Zhong, Q. (2011). Control of Integral Processes with Dead Time, Springer. [1st ed.]. Advances in Industrial Control.10.1007/978-0-85729-070-0 ↗
8. Consider IMC tuning to improve performance
9. Control of high-purity distillation columns10.1021/i200022a004 ↗
10. Single-loop controller design via IMC principles10.1016/S0005-1098(01)00170-4 ↗
11. On-line controllers tuning for integrator plus delay systems
12. Ogunnaike, B.A., and Ray, W.H. (1994). Process Dynamics, Modeling and Control, Oxford University Press Inc.. [1st ed.].
13. Internal model-based control for integrating processes10.1016/j.isatra.2010.03.012 ↗
14. Bequette, B.W. (2003). Process Control: Modeling, Design and Simulation, Prentice Hall Professional. [1st ed.].
15. Pairing Criteria for Decentralized Control of Unstable Plants10.1021/ie00033a016 ↗
16. Tuning PID controllers for integrating processes10.1049/ip-cta:19971435 ↗
17. O’Dwyer, A. (2009). Handbook of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules, Imperial College Press. [3rd ed.].10.1142/9781848162433 ↗
18. Tuning of IMC based PID controllers for integrating systems with time delay10.1016/j.isatra.2016.03.020 ↗
19. A PI tuning rule for integrating plus dead time processes with parametric uncertainty10.1016/j.isatra.2017.01.025 ↗
20. Time-optimal plug and control for integrating and FOPDT processes10.1016/S0959-1524(02)00059-8 ↗
21. All-PD control of pure Integrating Plus Time-Delay processes with gain and phase-margin specifications10.1016/j.isatra.2017.01.031 ↗
22. Optimal PI and PID control of first-order plus delay processes and evaluation of the original and improved SIMC rules10.1016/j.jprocont.2018.06.011 ↗
23. I–PD controller for integrating plus time-delay processes10.1049/iet-cta.2017.0112 ↗
24. Dalen, C., and Di Ruscio, D. (2018). Performance Optimal PI controller Tuning Based on Integrating Plus Time Delay Models. Algorithms, 11.10.3390/a11060086 ↗
25. Process-Identification and Design of Robust PI Controller for a Self-Oscillating Integral Process with Dead Time10.1252/jcej.18we261 ↗
26. Raza, A., Pathak, N., and Anwar, M.N. (2017, January 17–19). A PID Controller Tuning Rule for FOPDT Process to Achieve Better Load Disturbance Rejection Based on Maximum Sensitivity. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Smart grids, Power and Advanced Control Engineering (ICSPACE), Bangalore, India.10.1109/ICSPACE.2017.8343421 ↗
27. Rene Pereira, D.O., Correia, W.B., Nogueira, F.G., and Torrico, B.C. (2018, January 12–14). Automatic Tuning Method for PID Controllers Applied to Integrating and Unstable Processes. Proceedings of the 2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON), Sao Paulo, Brazil.10.1109/INDUSCON.2018.8627347 ↗
28. Yin, H., Zhang, W., Yao, R., and Lin, S. (2018, January 25–27). IMC-PID Load Disturbance Rejection Controller with Set-point Filter for The Integrating and Unstable Processes with Time Delay. Proceedings of the 2018 37th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Wuhan, China.10.23919/ChiCC.2018.8483151 ↗
29. Raja, G.L., and Ali, A. (2018, January 4–6). Modified Series Cascade Control Strategy for Integrating Processes. Proceedings of the 2018 Indian Control Conference (ICC), Kanpur, India.10.1109/INDIANCC.2018.8307987 ↗
30. PID Tuning Method for Integrating Processes Having Time Delay and Inverse Response10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.077 ↗
31. A 2-Dof LQR based PID controller for integrating processes considering robustness/performance tradeoff10.1016/j.isatra.2017.09.010 ↗
32. Medarametla, P.K., and Komanapalli, V.L.N. (2017). Maximum Sensitivity Based New PID Controller Tuning for Integrating Systems Using Polynomial Method. Chem. Prod. Process Model., 12.10.1515/cppm-2016-0070 ↗
33. Kaya, I., and Cengiz, H. (2017, January 19–21). Optimal tuning of PI/PID controllers for integrating processes with inverse response. Proceedings of the 2017 21st International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), Sinaia, Romania.10.1109/ICSTCC.2017.8107121 ↗
34. IMC-PID controller design based on loop shaping via LMI approach10.1016/j.cherd.2017.06.007 ↗
35. Enhanced IMC based PID controller design for non-minimum phase (NMP) integrating processes with time delays10.1016/j.isatra.2017.03.005 ↗
36. Wang, Z., Tian, H., Geng, X., Cui, J., and Liu, T. (2018, January 18–20). Predictor based 2DOF control design for inverse response processes with time delay. Proceedings of the 2018 33rd Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC), Nanjing, China.10.1109/YAC.2018.8406348 ↗
37. PID controller tuning for integrating processes10.1016/j.isatra.2009.09.001 ↗
38. PID controller tuning rules for integrating processes with varying time-delays10.1016/j.jfranklin.2009.01.003 ↗
39. Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning10.1016/S0959-1524(02)00062-8 ↗
40. Optimal tuning rules for PI/PID controllers for inverse response processes10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.05.063 ↗
41. Synthesis of PID controller for unstable and integrating processes10.1016/j.ces.2009.02.051 ↗
42. Discrete-time domain two-degree-of-freedom control design for integrating and unstable processes with time delay10.1016/j.isatra.2016.03.017 ↗
43. Analytical IMC-PID design in terms of performance/robustness tradeoff for integrating processes: From 2-Dof to 1-Dof10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.12.011 ↗
44. Tuning of PID controllers for integrating systems using direct synthesis method10.1016/j.isatra.2015.03.002 ↗
45. Atic, S., and Kaya, I. (December, January 30). Generalized Stability Boundary Locus for PI Controller Design for Controlling Integrating Processes with Dead Time. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ELECO), Bursa, Turkey.
46. Kuzishchin, V.F., Merzlikina, E.I., and Van Va, H. (2017, January 16–19). PD and PDD algorithms with integrating object: Tuning on the basis of approach to suboptimal algorithm. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM), St. Petersburg, Russia.10.1109/ICIEAM.2017.8076155 ↗
47. Novel proportional-integral-derivative controller with second order filter for integrating processes10.1002/apj.2195 ↗
48. Kumar, M.P., and Manimozhi, M. (2018). A New Control Scheme for Integrating Processes with Inverse Response and Time Delay. Chem. Prod. Process Model., 13.10.1515/cppm-2017-0071 ↗
49. Comparison of PID and FOPID controllers tuned by PSO and ABC algorithms for unstable and integrating systems with time delay10.1002/oca.2419 ↗
50. I-PD Controller Design for Integrating Time Delay Processes Based on Optimum Analytical Formulas10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.157 ↗
51. PID Controller Design for Controlling Integrating Processes with Dead Time using Generalized Stability Boundary Locus10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.06.104 ↗
52. Papadopoulos, K.G. (2015). PID Controller Tuning Using the Magnitude Optimum Criterion, Springer International Publishing. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-3-319-07263-0 ↗
53. A model-free direct synthesis method for PI/PID controller design based on disturbance rejection10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.08.004 ↗
54. A simple nonlinear PD controller for integrating processes10.1016/j.isatra.2013.09.011 ↗
55. Classification of dynamic processes and PID controller tuning in a parameter plane10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.12.004 ↗
56. PID controller frequency-domain tuning for stable, integrating and unstable processes, including dead-time10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.09.007 ↗
57. A Uniform Approach to the Optimum Adjustment of Control Loops
58. A magnitude optimum multiple integration tuning method for filtered PID controller10.1016/S0005-1098(01)00088-7 ↗
59. Theory of servo systems, with particular reference to stabilization
60. Magnitude Optimum Techniques for PID Controllers
61. Vrančić, D., Peng, Y., and Danz, C. (2020, February 18). A Comparison between Different PI Controller Tuning Methods—Report DP-7286. Available online: http://www-e2.ijs.si/Damir.Vrancic/Files/dp7286.pdf.
62. Cunha, J.B. Momi tuning method for integral processes. Proceedings of the 8th Portuguese Conference on Automatic Control.
63. Vrančić, D. (2019, July 17). Matlab and Simulink Files for MOMI Methods for Integral Processes. Available online: http://dsc.ijs.si/damir.vrancic/tools.html.
64. Improving disturbance rejection of PID controllers by means of the magnitude optimum method10.1016/j.isatra.2009.08.002 ↗
65. Two-Degree-of-Freedom PID Controllers—Their Functions and Optimal Tuning10.1016/S1474-6670(17)38226-5 ↗
66. Control system for automated drift compensation of the stand-alone charge amplifier used for low-frequency measurement10.1063/1.5064631 ↗
67. Charge migration in Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 ceramics and its relation to ageing, hardening, and softening10.1063/1.3284954 ↗
68. Hardening-softening transition in Fe-doped Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 ceramics and evolution of the third harmonic of the polarization response10.1063/1.2963704 ↗
69. Huba, M. (2020, February 04). Školská hydraulická Sústava uDAQ28/3H. Available online: https://www.eas.sk/mod/product/show.php?ID=52.
70. State of health estimation and remaining useful life prediction of solid oxide fuel cell stack10.1016/j.enconman.2017.06.041 ↗