journal article·2026-06-17Open access

Intelligent Digital Rock Physics: Advances and Perspectives from Imaging Reconstruction to Pore-Scale Multiphase Flow Simulation

Xue Li, Lin Zhu, Feng Gao, Xin Liang, Zhengzheng Cao

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 12

Abstract

In characterizing unconventional reservoirs, conventional Digital Rock Physics (DRP) has long been constrained by three fundamental bottlenecks: the trade-off between imaging resolution and field of view, challenges in reconstructing multiscale pore topology, and the prohibitive computational cost of direct numerical simulation (DNS) at the pore scale. The deep integration of artificial intelligence and rock physics has given rise to a new paradigm—Intelligent Digital Rock Physics (IDRP). This paper provides a systematic review of the evolutionary trajectory of IDRP, with a focus on how machine learning is reshaping the end-to-end workflow from imaging and segmentation to reconstruction and simulation. First, we survey image super-resolution and 3D pore structure generation techniques based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), generative adversarial networks (GANs), and diffusion models, elucidating their mechanisms for surpassing optical diffraction limits and incorporating macroscopic petrophysical constraints. Second, we outline algorithmic strategies for fusing multi-source heterogeneous data (e.g., Micro-CT and SEM) and representing dual-porosity or multi-continuum systems. Third, we critically examine the application of machine learning surrogates in single- and multiphase flow prediction, highlighting how physics-informed machine learning (PIML) and reinforcement learning (RL)—by embedding governing equations such as Navier–Stokes or Muskat–Leverett into loss functions—achieve both computational acceleration and physical consistency. We further identify key limitations of current IDRP approaches, including insufficient validation of generated topological realism, narrow generalization across lithologies, inadequate representation of dynamic wettability, and limited model interpretability. Finally, we propose a forward-looking roadmap centered on multimodal foundation models for rocks, coupled with neural operators and uncertainty quantification frameworks, emphasizing the critical pathways for translating IDRP into engineering digital twins for unconventional hydrocarbon development, coalbed methane production enhancement, Enhanced Geothermal Systems, and geological CO2 storage. This review offers a comprehensive reference for researchers at the intersection of geophysics, rock mechanics, and artificial intelligence.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods · Model Reduction and Neural Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China

State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China

International Joint Research Laboratory of Henan Province for Underground Space Development and Disaster Prevention, School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China

Funding

Xi’an University of Technology

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. Digital transformation in rock physics: Deep learning and data fusion10.1190/tle41090591.1 ↗
2. Digital rock physics benchmarks—Part I: Imaging and segmentation10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.005 ↗
3. Liang, J., He, L., Chai, W., Jia, N., and Liu, R. (2026). A new paradigm for physics-informed AI-driven reservoir research: From multiscale characterization to intelligent seepage simulation. Energies, 19.10.3390/en19010270 ↗
4. The impact of sub-resolution porosity on numerical simulations of multiphase flow10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104094 ↗
5. Rock properties from micro-CT images: Digital rock transforms for resolution, pore volume, and field of view10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103419 ↗
6. Multiscale geometric analysis of dynamic wettability on complex, fractal-like, anisotropic surfaces10.1016/j.measurement.2026.120328 ↗
7. A comparative analysis of super-resolution techniques for enhancing micro-CT images of carbonate rocks10.1016/j.acags.2023.100143 ↗
8. On the representative elementary volumes of clay rocks at the mesoscale10.5897/JGMR2015.0224 ↗
9. Towards large-scale DRP simulations: Generation of large super-resolution images and extraction of large pore network models10.1007/s11242-023-01913-9 ↗
10. Lattice-Boltzmann method for complex flows10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145519 ↗
11. Multi-gpu solution to the lattice Boltzmann method: An application in multiscale digital rock simulation for shale formation10.1002/cpe.4530 ↗
12. Pore-network extraction using discrete Morse theory: Preserving the topology of the pore space10.1103/PhysRevE.106.055304 ↗
13. Reliability of algorithms interpreting topological and geometric properties of porous media for pore network modelling10.1007/s11242-019-01244-8 ↗
14. DGRN: Image super-resolution with dual gradient regression guidance10.1016/j.cag.2022.12.005 ↗
15. Balance equations for physics-informed machine learning10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38799 ↗
16. Single image super-resolution with non-local means and steering kernel regression10.1109/TIP.2012.2208977 ↗
17. Deep edge guided recurrent residual learning for image super-resolution10.1109/TIP.2017.2750403 ↗
18. Single image multi-scale enhancement for rock micro-CT super-resolution using residual U-Net10.1016/j.acags.2024.100165 ↗
19. Shan, L., Liu, C., Liu, Y., Kong, W., and Hei, X. (2022). Rock CT image super-resolution using residual dual-channel attention generative adversarial network. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15145115 ↗
20. Enhancing digital rock image resolution with a GAN constrained by prior and perceptual information10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104939 ↗
21. A multi-condition denoising diffusion probabilistic model controls the reconstruction of 3D digital rocks10.1016/j.cageo.2024.105541 ↗
22. Absolute permeability estimation from microtomography rock images through deep learning super-resolution and adversarial fine tuning10.1038/s41598-024-67367-1 ↗
23. A quantified study of segmentation techniques on synthetic geological XRM and FIB-SEM images10.1007/s10596-018-9768-y ↗
24. Bentonite mass loss in fractured crystalline rock quantified from CT scans using digital rock physics and machine learning: Case study from the Grimsel Test Site (Switzerland)10.1016/j.clay.2025.107915 ↗
25. Deep learning-based method for SEM image segmentation in mineral characterization, an example from Duvernay Shale samples in Western Canada Sedimentary Basin10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104450 ↗
26. Multi-task learning for digital rock segmentation and characteristic parameters computation10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109202 ↗
27. end-to-end approach to predict physical properties of heterogeneous porous media: Coupling deep learning and physics-based features10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128753 ↗
28. Construction of complex digital rock physics based on full convolution network10.1016/j.petsci.2021.11.018 ↗
29. A novel few-shot learning framework for rock images dually driven by data and knowledge10.1016/j.acags.2024.100155 ↗
30. Enhancing SAM-based digital rock image segmentation via edge-semantics fusion10.1016/j.acags.2025.100292 ↗
31. Generalizable Digital Rock Image Segmentation under Limited Data with the Segment Anything Model10.1016/j.ige.2025.12.001 ↗
32. Coercing machine learning to output physically accurate results10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109099 ↗
33. A physics-constrained two-stage GAN for reservoir data generation: Enhancing predictive accuracy10.1088/2631-8695/adf797 ↗
34. Integrating lattice Boltzmann and neural networks for modeling transport parameters in porous rocks: A systematic review10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108688 ↗
35. Reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media using generative adversarial neural networks10.1103/PhysRevE.96.043309 ↗
36. Wang, H., Yang, X., Zhou, C., Yan, J., Yu, J., and Xie, K. (2025). Constructions of multi-scale 3D digital rocks by associated image segmentation method. Front. Earth Sci., 12.10.3389/feart.2024.1518561 ↗
37. Fast multiple-point simulation using a data-driven path and an efficient gradient-based search10.1016/j.cageo.2015.10.010 ↗
38. A 3D reconstruction method of porous media based on improved WGAN-GP10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105151 ↗
39. Efficient generation of digital rock CT images using LoRA-enhanced stable diffusion models10.1016/j.ige.2025.06.002 ↗
40. Controlled latent diffusion models for 3D porous media reconstruction10.1016/j.cageo.2025.106038 ↗
41. Diffusion model-based generation of three-dimensional multiphase pore-scale images10.1007/s11242-025-02158-4 ↗
42. Micro-computed tomography pore-scale study of flow in porous media: Effect of voxel resolution10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.07.012 ↗
43. Xiong, T., Chen, M., Jin, Y., Zhang, W., Shao, H., Wang, G., Long, E., and Long, W. (2023). A new multi-scale method to evaluate the porosity and MICP curve for digital rock of complex reservoir. Energies, 16.10.2139/ssrn.4416302 ↗
44. Reimers, I., Safonov, I., Kornilov, A., and Yakimchuk, I. (2020). Two-stage alignment of FIB-SEM images of rock samples. J. Imaging, 6.10.3390/jimaging6100107 ↗
45. Analysis of reconstructed multisource and multiscale 3-D digital rocks based on the cycle-consistent generative adversarial network method10.1093/gji/ggad271 ↗
46. Machine-learning-assisted segmentation of focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy images with artifacts for improved void-space characterization of tight reservoir rocks10.2118/205347-PA ↗
47. Multiphase flow modeling in multiscale porous media: An open-source micro-continuum approach
48. Hybrid coupled discrete-fracture/matrix and multicontinuum models for unconventional-reservoir simulation10.2118/178430-PA ↗
49. A Darcy–Brinkman model of fractures in porous media10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.03.063 ↗
50. Chen, Y., and Dong, P. (2024). Modeling of characteristics of complex microstructure and heterogeneity at the core scale. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142311385 ↗
51. Fractal-based analysis of stress-induced dynamic evolution in geometry and permeability of porous media10.1063/5.0256639 ↗
52. PoreFlow-Net: A 3D convolutional neural network to predict fluid flow through porous media10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103539 ↗
53. A computationally efficient modeling of flow in complex porous media by coupling multiscale digital rock physics and deep learning: Improving the tradeoff between resolution and field-of-view10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104695 ↗
54. A computationally efficient hybrid neural network architecture for porous media: Integrating convolutional and graph neural networks for improved property predictions10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104881 ↗
55. Pore-GNN: A graph neural network-based framework for predicting flow properties of porous media from micro-CT images10.46690/ager.2023.10.05 ↗
56. Accelerating porous media flow simulations with Fourier neural operators: An application to geologic storage of CO210.1002/adts.202500747 ↗
57. Machine and deep learning performance in out-of-distribution regressions10.1088/2632-2153/ada221 ↗
58. Relative permeability curve prediction from digital rocks with variable sizes using deep learning10.1063/5.0167998 ↗
59. Pore-scale simulation of relative permeability hysteresis from a workflow of level-set and lattice-Boltzmann methods: The case of consolidated media with low pore-to-throat aspect ratio10.1007/s11242-026-02308-2 ↗
60. Pore-scale modeling of multiphase flow in porous media using a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN)10.1063/5.0133054 ↗
61. Imankulov, T., Kuljabekov, A., Bekele, S.D., Zhantayev, Z., Assilbekov, B., and Kenzhebek, Y. (2025). A systematic analysis of physics-informed neural networks for two-phase flow with capillarity: The Muskat–Leverett problem. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app152413011 ↗
62. Deep learning for pore-scale two-phase flow: Modelling drainage in realistic porous media10.1016/S1876-3804(25)60542-8 ↗
63. Efficient deep learning techniques for multiphase flow simulation in heterogeneous porousc media10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108968 ↗
64. Computing interface curvature from volume fractions: A machine learning approach10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104263 ↗
65. An approach for automatic parameters evaluation in unconventional oil reservoirs with deep reinforcement learning10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109917 ↗
66. Time-lapse earthquake difference prediction based on physics-informed long short-term memory coupled with interpretability boosting10.36922/JSE025310049 ↗
67. Plankovskyy, S., Tsegelnyk, Y., Shyshko, N., Litvinchev, I., Romanova, T., and Velarde Cantú, J.M. (2025). Review of physics-informed neural networks: Challenges in loss function design and geometric integration. Mathematics, 13.10.3390/math13203289 ↗
68. Probing out-of-distribution generalization in machine learning for materials10.1038/s43246-024-00731-w ↗
69. Optimization of neural networks for predicting oil recovery factor using quantization techniques
70. Fast evaluation of pressure and saturation predictions with a deep learning surrogate flow model10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110244 ↗
71. Real-time reservoir model updating using ensemble Kalman filter with confirming option10.2118/92991-PA ↗
72. Physics-informed machine learning with differentiable programming for heterogeneous underground reservoir pressure management10.1038/s41598-022-22832-7 ↗
73. A physics-informed deep learning framework for inversion and surrogate modeling in solid mechanics10.1016/j.cma.2021.113741 ↗