journal article·2026-05-08Open access

Enhancing Cross-Dataset Mental Workload Detection Using Electrodermal Activity and Domain Adaptation

Luis Sigcha, Eduarda Pereira, Luigi Borzì, Diego Gachet, Paulo Cardoso, Nélson Costa

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 10

Abstract

Mental workload assessment using physiological signals has gained increasing attention for applications in human–computer interaction and occupational monitoring. Among these signals, electrodermal activity (EDA) is widely recognised as a reliable indicator of sympathetic activation associated with cognitive effort. However, most existing machine learning- based approaches are evaluated within a single dataset, limiting their generalisability across different populations and experimental conditions. This study investigates the cross-dataset performance of machine learning models for mental workload detection using EDA features. Two independent datasets were employed, and a cross-dataset evaluation framework was adopted to simulate realistic deployment scenarios under domain shift. Three classifiers (Random Forest, XGBoost, and Support Vector Classifier (SVC)) were evaluated, together with two domain adaptation techniques: Correlation Alignment (CORAL) and Subspace Alignment (SA). The results show that model performance is strongly dependent on the direction of transfer, with a notable performance drop when generalising across datasets. Domain adaptation improved performance in several configurations, particularly for SVC with CORAL, achieving the best overall F1-score (0.815). However, improvements were not consistent across all models and target domains. Overall, this study highlights the challenges of cross-dataset generalisation in EDA-based workload detection and demonstrates the potential, yet limited robustness, of domain adaptation techniques in mitigating distribution shifts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Emotion and Mood Recognition · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Digital Mental Health Interventions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centro ALGORITMI/LASI, School of Engineering, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal

Department of Control and Computer Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy

Advanced Artificial Intelligence Group (A2IG), Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Madrid, Spain

Funding

FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Declining rates of physical activity in the United States: What are the contributors?10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144437 ↗
2. Sedentary behavior: Emerging evidence for a new health risk10.4065/mcp.2010.0444 ↗
3. Total and domain-specific sitting time among employees in desk-based work settings in Australia10.1111/1753-6405.12293 ↗
4. Monitoring of mental workload levels during an everyday life office-work scenario10.1007/s00779-011-0466-1 ↗
5. Androutsou, T., Angelopoulos, S., Hristoforou, E., Matsopoulos, G.K., and Koutsouris, D.D. (2022). A Multisensor System Embedded in a Computer Mouse for Occupational Stress Detection. Biosensors, 13.10.3390/bios13010010 ↗
6. Longo, L., Wickens, C.D., Hancock, G., and Hancock, P.A. (2022). Human Mental Workload: A Survey and a Novel Inclusive Definition. Front. Psychol., 13.10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883321 ↗
7. Mental workload variations during different cognitive office tasks with social media interruptions10.1080/00140139.2022.2104381 ↗
8. Muñoz, J.E., Pereira, F., and Karapanos, E. (2016). Workload management through glanceable feedback: The role of heart rate variability. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), IEEE.10.1109/HealthCom.2016.7749477 ↗
9. Effects of physical and mental demands on shoulder muscle fatigue
10. Masi, G., Amprimo, G., Ferraris, C., and Priano, L. (2023). Stress and workload assessment in aviation—A narrative review. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23073556 ↗
11. Fatigue differences between Asian and Western populations in prolonged mentally demanding work-tasks10.1016/j.ergon.2016.05.005 ↗
12. Ramírez-Moreno, M.A., Carrillo-Tijerina, P., Candela-Leal, M.O., Alanis-Espinosa, M., Tudón-Martínez, J.C., Roman-Flores, A., Ramírez-Mendoza, R.A., and Lozoya-Santos, J.d.J. (2021). Evaluation of a fast test based on biometric signals to assess mental fatigue at the workplace—A pilot study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph182211891 ↗
13. Workload measures—Recent trends in the driving context10.1007/978-3-030-14730-3_45 ↗
14. Measurement and identification of mental workload during simulated computer tasks with multimodal methods and machine learning10.1080/00140139.2020.1759699 ↗
15. Impact of non-driving related task types, request modalities, and automation on driver takeover: A meta-analysis10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106704 ↗
16. Using smart offices to predict occupational stress10.1016/j.ergon.2018.04.005 ↗
17. Using IoT devices for sensor-based monitoring of employees’ mental workload: Investigating managers’ expectations and concerns10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103739 ↗
18. Giorgi, A., Ronca, V., Vozzi, A., Sciaraffa, N., Di Florio, A., Tamborra, L., Simonetti, I., Aricò, P., Di Flumeri, G., and Rossi, D. (2021). Wearable technologies for mental workload, stress, and emotional state assessment during working-like tasks: A comparison with laboratory technologies. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21072332 ↗
19. Detection of acute stress caused by cognitive tasks based on physiological signals10.11591/eei.v10i5.3130 ↗
20. ECG-based concentration recognition with multi-task regression10.1109/TBME.2018.2830366 ↗
21. Physiological signal based work stress detection using unobtrusive sensors10.1088/2057-1976/aadbd4 ↗
22. An efficient automatic workload estimation method based on electrodermal activity using pattern classifier combinations10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.10.013 ↗
23. Cross-contextual stress prediction: Simple methodology for comparing features and sample domain adaptation techniques in vital sign analysis10.1007/s10489-025-06277-9 ↗
24. Aricò, P., Reynal, M., Di Flumeri, G., Borghini, G., Sciaraffa, N., Imbert, J.P., Hurter, C., Terenzi, M., Ferreira, A., and Pozzi, S. (2019). How neurophysiological measures can be used to enhance the evaluation of remote tower solutions. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 13.10.3389/fnhum.2019.00303 ↗
25. Chirplet transform-based machine-learning approach towards classification of cognitive state change using galvanic skin response and photoplethysmography signals10.1111/exsy.12958 ↗
26. Posada-Quintero, H.F., and Chon, K.H. (2020). Innovations in electrodermal activity data collection and signal processing: A systematic review. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20020479 ↗
27. Sensitivity of physiological measures for detecting systematic variations in cognitive demand from a working memory task: An on-road study across three age groups10.1177/0018720812442086 ↗
28. Boucsein, W. (2012). Electrodermal Activity, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0 ↗
29. Pereira, E., Sigcha, L., Silva, E., Sampaio, A., Costa, N., and Costa, N. (2025). Capturing mental workload through physiological sensors in human–robot collaboration: A systematic literature review. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15063317 ↗
30. Discriminating stress from cognitive load using a wearable EDA device10.1109/TITB.2009.2036164 ↗
31. Zhou, J., Jung, J.Y., and Chen, F. (2015). Dynamic workload adjustments in human-machine systems based on GSR features. Proceedings of the Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2015: 15th IFIP TC 13 International Conference, Bamberg, Germany, 14–18 September 2015, Springer. Proceedings, Part I 15.
32. A survey on transfer learning10.1109/TKDE.2009.191 ↗
33. Deep visual domain adaptation: A survey10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.083 ↗
34. Sun, B., Feng, J., and Saenko, K. (2016). Return of frustratingly easy domain adaptation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10306 ↗
35. Fernando, B., Habrard, A., Sebban, M., and Tuytelaars, T. (2013). Unsupervised visual domain adaptation using subspace alignment. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, IEEE.10.1109/ICCV.2013.368 ↗
36. Transfer learning for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces: A review of progress made since 201610.1109/TCDS.2020.3007453 ↗
37. Transfer learning: A Riemannian geometry framework with applications to brain–computer interfaces10.1109/TBME.2017.2742541 ↗
38. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
39. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
40. Support-vector networks10.1023/A:1022627411411 ↗
41. Sigcha, L., Pereira, E., Lima, A., Cardoso, P., and Costa, N. (2024). Worker HP—Worker Health and Performance: Biosignals of Induced Mental Workload in Office Environment, Zenodo.
42. Unobtrusive measurement of cognitive load and physiological signals in uncontrolled environments10.1038/s41597-024-03738-7 ↗
43. Alchieri, L., Garzon, M., Alecci, L., De Bona, F.B., Gjoreski, M., De Felice, G., and Santini, S. (2026). A foundation model for electrodermal activity data. arXiv.
44. Automated complex for multiparameter analysis of the galvanic skin response signal10.1007/BF00562429 ↗
45. ComEDA: A new tool for stress assessment based on electrodermal activity10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106144 ↗
46. Horvers, A., Tombeng, N., Bosse, T., Lazonder, A.W., and Molenaar, I. (2021). Detecting emotions through electrodermal activity in learning contexts: A systematic review. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21237869 ↗
47. Campanella, S., Altaleb, A., Belli, A., Pierleoni, P., and Palma, L. (2023). A method for stress detection using empatica E4 bracelet and machine-learning techniques. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23073565 ↗
48. Recent trends in electrodermal activity signal processing and deep learning methods for emotion recognition10.1016/j.neuroscience.2026.03.009 ↗
49. FLIRT: A feature generation toolkit for wearable data10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106461 ↗
50. A review on mental stress detection using wearable sensors and machine learning techniques10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085502 ↗
51. Edge-based freezing of gait recognition in Parkinson’s disease10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110530 ↗
52. Deep learning algorithms for detecting freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease: A cross-dataset study10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124522 ↗
53. de Mathelin, A., Atiq, M., Richard, G., de la Concha, A., Yachouti, M., Deheeger, F., Mougeot, M., and Vayatis, N. (2021). Adapt: Awesome domain adaptation python toolbox. arXiv.
54. Japkowicz, N., and Shah, M. (2011). Evaluating Learning Algorithms: A Classification Perspective, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921803 ↗
55. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 ↗
56. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv.
57. A survey of unsupervised deep domain adaptation10.1145/3400066 ↗