Digital–Real Integration and Supply Chain Resilience: Insights from Stabilization, Complementarity, Extension, and Strengthening Pathways
Source abstract
Abstract
Digital–real economy integration constitutes a critical strategic pathway for enhancing supply chain resilience and safeguarding industrial security. This paper takes the listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets from 2010 to 2024 as samples to examine the effect and internal mechanism of the integration of digital–real economies on the supply chain resilience of enterprises. The results show that: (1) Digital–real integration significantly enhances corporate supply chain resilience; (2) mechanism test results indicate that information transparency, supply chain diversification, talent capital and enterprise credit respectively perform the functions of chain stabilization, complementarity, extension and strengthening, which act as critical pathways for improving supply chain resilience; (3) complementary analyses reveal a robust three-way synergy among market efficiency, governmental capacity, and digital–real integration—jointly enhancing corporate supply chain resilience; (4) the promoting effect of digital–real integration on supply chain resilience shows heterogeneity and is more significant in samples of private enterprises, small-scale enterprises, regions with higher external risks, and regions with better institutional environments. From a micro-level enterprise perspective, this study reveals the transmission channels and moderating effects of digital–real integration on supply chain resilience, to some extent addressing the limitations of existing research and enriching the theory of digital–real integration and supply chain resilience. Practically, it offers guidance for firms to enhance supply chain resilience through digital upgrading and multidimensional pathways, and to formulate differentiated strategies aligned with external market and government conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Economics & Management, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China
School of Economics & Management, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
School of Humanities & Social Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China
Funding
Key Talents of Hebei Yanzhao Golden Platform Gathering Program
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Sun, J., and Zhou, T. (2026). Digital Transformation’s Impact on Enterprise Supply Chain Resilience Toward Sustainability: An Investigation Testing for Threshold and Mediation Effects. Sustainability, 18.10.3390/su18020911 ↗
2. (2025, October 28). Recommendations of the CPC Central Committee on Formulating the 15th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development, Xinhuanet. Available online: https://www.news.cn/politics/20251028/08920d9f557c432e99459f8f468504db/c.html.
3. Yin, J., Chen, H., and Zhou, Y. (2025). The Impact of the Digital Economy on the Resilience of China’s Foreign Trade. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su172411008 ↗
4. Connotation and approach of deep integration of the digital economy and the real economy
5. Digital technologies and supply chain resilience: A resource-action-performance perspective10.1007/s10796-025-10595-1 ↗
6. Research on the integrated development of the digital economy and the real economy10.54254/2977-5701/2025.26941 ↗
7. Xu, Z., and Zhang, J. (2026). Digital–Real Economy Integration and Urban Ecological Resilience: Evidence from the Yellow River Basin of China. Land, 15.10.3390/land15040528 ↗
8. Liu, Z., Zhao, Y., Guo, C., and Xin, Z. (2024). Research on the impact of digital-real integration on logistics industrial transformation and upgrading under green economy. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16146173 ↗
9. Research on the employment effects of the integration of digital economy and real economy
10. Xie, Y., Feng, Z., Yan, S., Liu, J., Li, M., and Li, X. (2026). The impact mechanism of digital-real integration on organizational resilience in manufacturing companies. Oper. Manag. Res., 19.10.1007/s12063-025-00566-9 ↗
11. Fan, Z., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Kang, M., and Cui, Q. (2025). The impact of digital–real economy integration on ESG performance: The moderating role of organizational inertia. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su172310670 ↗
12. Wang, L., and Luo, J. (2025). Does digital-real integration contribute to corporate ESG practices? The mediating role of dynamic capabilities. Appl. Econ., 1–18.10.1080/00036846.2025.2539534 ↗
13. Digital-physical integration and foreign direct investment: Also on the moderating effect of “active government” and “efficient market”
14. The Digital-Real Economy Integration in Enterprises and Industrial Chain Resilience Enhancement: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
15. How does new industrialization improve manufacturing industry chain resilience?10.1080/09537325.2024.2425736 ↗
16. Does the integration of digital and real economies enhance corporate supply chain resilience? Evidence from China’s listed firms10.1016/j.frl.2025.107953 ↗
17. Role of information processing and digital supply chain in supply chain resilience through supply chain risk management
18. Supply chain risk management strategies in the era of digital intelligence integration: Strategies and in-sights
19. Exploring the impact of business intelligence on real-time supply chain decision-making
20. Hlal, M., Baraka Munyaka, J.C., Chenal, J., Azmi, R., Diop, E.B., Bounabi, M., Abdem, S.A.E., Almouctar, M.A.S., and Adraoui, M. (2025). Digital twin technology for urban flood risk management: A systematic review of remote sensing applications and early warning systems. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17173104 ↗
21. Huang, T., and Xia, H. (2024). How Can Digital–Real Economy Integration Affect Urban Green Innovation? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su162411072 ↗
22. Wang, Z., Lin, S., Chen, Y., Lyulyov, O., and Pimonenko, T. (2024). The digital economy and real economy: The dynamic interaction effect and the coupling coordination degree. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16135769 ↗
23. AI-enabled smart manufacturing boosts ecosystem value capture: The importance of servitization pathways within digital-intensive industries10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109411 ↗
24. Zhao, X., and Xia, Y. (2025). How Can Digital–Real Integration Affect High-Quality Development of the Regional Economy? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 18.10.3390/su18010340 ↗
25. Coupling relationship among technological innovation, industrial transformation and environmental efficiency: A case study of the Huaihai Economic Zone, China10.1007/s11769-022-1294-0 ↗
26. Digital transformation drives product quality improvement: An organizational transparency perspective10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122888 ↗
27. How does digital transformation promote supply chain diversification? From the perspective of supply chain transaction costs10.1016/j.frl.2024.105399 ↗
28. The impact of digital-real integration on corporate default risk: Evidence from China
29. Incentives for Information Revelation in a Supply Chain and the Bullwhip Effect10.1177/10591478251378832 ↗
30. The impact of information sharing factors on the bullwhip effect mitigation: A systematic literature review
31. Wang, H., Chen, Y., Xie, J., and Liu, C. (2025). Research on digital empowerment, innovation vitality and manufacturing supply chain resilience mechanism. PLoS ONE, 20.10.1371/journal.pone.0316183 ↗
32. Zheng, M., Yan, S., and Xu, S. (2025). Digital economy, industry–academia–research collaborative innovation, and the development of new-quality productive forces. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17010318 ↗
33. Chen, S., and Ren, G. (2025). The Impact of Exogenous Shocks on the Sustainability of Supply Chain Relationships: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17072828 ↗
34. Research on adaptive intelligent decision algorithm in industry 4.0 Digital economy and management transformation based on clustering algorithm
35. Coupling simulation and machine learning for predictive analytics in supply chain management10.1080/00207543.2024.2342019 ↗
36. Li, X., Li, S., Zhang, W., and Qiao, J. (2024). How to obtain a sustainably preferential supplier resource allocation? A model based on the SOR framework from a supplier’s perspective. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16146095 ↗
37. Fan, B., Shao, Y., Dong, Z., and Zhou, X. (2025). Ambidextrous Alliances, Complementary Assets, and Firms’ Breakthrough Innovations: Evidence from High-Tech Firms in China. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17072812 ↗
38. Research on supply chain resilience mechanism of AI-Enabled manufacturing enterprises-based on organizational change perspective10.1038/s41598-025-17138-3 ↗
39. Tubis, A.A., and Rohman, J. (2023). Intelligent warehouse in industry 4.0—Systematic literature review. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23084105 ↗
40. Digital transformation, human capital upgrading, and enterprise ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises10.24136/oc.3058 ↗
41. Wu, F., and Duan, K. (2025). Building Sustainable Financial Capacity: How Supply Chain Digitalization Facilitates Credit Access by Adjustment Capability. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17209265 ↗
42. Su, M., Duan, Y., and Cui, Y. (2023). The digital economy and corporate credit risk: An empirical study based on Chinese new energy enterprises. Front. Energy Res., 11.10.3389/fenrg.2023.1141793 ↗
43. A novel deep learning approach to enhance creditworthiness evaluation and ethical lending practices in the economy10.1007/s10479-024-05849-1 ↗
44. Yu, L., Ji, M., Haleem, F., Gong, Y., Shen, Y., and Zeng, S. (2024). A case study on the innovative development of digital supply chain finance based on MYbank in China. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16177408 ↗
45. Does digital-real integration drive enterprise ambidextrous innovation balance?10.1016/j.jik.2025.100870 ↗
46. Can the integration of digital and real economies stimulate residents’ consumption?10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104260 ↗
47. The mechanism and impact of digital transformation on supply chain resilience in the manufacturing industry10.1038/s41598-026-38930-9 ↗
48. Liu, J., Zhou, K., Zhang, Y., and Tang, F. (2023). The effect of financial digital transformation on financial performance: The intermediary effect of information symmetry and operating costs. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15065059 ↗
49. Wu, S., Wang, H., Guo, Y., and Fan, Y. (2024). Supply chain concentration, financing constraints, and carbon performance. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16041354 ↗
50. Liu, Y., Zhao, F., Jia, S., and Qiu, L.-R. (2025). The relationship between enterprise human capital structure and international M&A performance based on cultural differences in China. PLoS ONE, 20.10.1371/journal.pone.0289270 ↗
51. Machine learning in corporate credit rating assessment using the expanded audit report10.1007/s10994-022-06226-4 ↗
52. The influence of tax incentives on market segmentation in the context of a unified national market10.1016/j.frl.2024.105591 ↗
53. Analysis of the Economic Effects of China’s Construction of A Unified National Market10.1016/j.frl.2026.109620 ↗
54. Zhang, M., Zhang, H., and Cudjoe, D. (2026). Does Market Unification Promote Employment Growth? Evidence from China’s Unified National Market Initiative. Sustainability, 18.10.3390/su18031684 ↗
55. Ramandi, M.D., Jabbarzadeh, A., Chaabane, A., and Amodeo, L. (2025). Green supply chain coordination with profit-sharing and government intervention: A game-theoretic approach applied to the pharmaceutical industry. J. Oper. Res. Soc., 1–35.10.1080/01605682.2025.2544865 ↗
56. Zhou, M., and Zhao, M. (2023). Research on the performance transmission of green technology innovation in the coal industry under the goal of carbon peaking and the moderating role of government macro-regulation. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15021544 ↗
57. Mei, Z., Zhang, J., and Zhou, Q.M. (2024). The role of government in helping SMEs to access finance: An evolutionary game modeling and simulation approach. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0315941 ↗
58. Tao, M., Lv, S., and Feng, S. (2023). Study on the Evaluation of the Development Efficiency of Smart Mine Construction and the Influencing Factors Based on the US-SBM Model. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15065183 ↗
59. The digital empowerment promotes synergistic efficiency in regional pollution reduction and carbon emission reduction—Analysis of the moderating effects of market structure and government behavior10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144867 ↗
60. Bai, J., Wang, J., and Li, X. (2025). Interruption Risk Propagation and Resilience Evaluation of Supply Chain of Emergency Medical Supplies Under Information Sharing Mechanism. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17125303 ↗
61. Chen, D., Zhu, Y., Zhou, N., and Xing, M. (2023). Impacts of environmental uncertainty on degree of enterprise financialization and the moderating role of executive incentives. Front. Environ. Sci., 11.10.3389/fenvs.2023.1170596 ↗
62. Mu, R., Ma, D., Zhang, J., Liu, S., and Zhang, L. (2026). Impact of Enterprise Digital Transformation on Green Innovation Dynamics—Empirical Evidence from Growth Enterprise Market-Listed Companies. Sustainability, 18.10.3390/su18052539 ↗
63. Xie, F., and Yang, P. (2023). The impact of marketization on enterprise performance from the perspective of enterprise debt. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151310436 ↗
64. Coşkun, A.E., and Erturgut, R. (2024). How do uncertainties affect supply-chain resilience? The moderating role of information sharing for sustainable supply-chain management. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16010131 ↗