journal article·2026-05-05Open access

Ecological Tensions in Soil: Healthier Biopolymeric Solutions in Urban and Agricultural Land

Ioana Negru, Laia Mogas-Soldevila, Cătălina Sănduleanu, Genoveva Cojocaru

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

Soil degradation in both agricultural and urban environments is accelerating due to intensive land use, plastic pollution, construction practices, and climate change, threatening ecosystem stability, food security, and carbon storage capacity. This review synthesizes current advances in biopolymeric materials as regenerative alternatives to conventional soil management approaches. Biopolymers derived from natural sources—including polysaccharides, proteins, and lignin-based compounds—are examined for their multifunctional roles in improving soil structure, enhancing water retention, optimizing nutrient delivery, stabilizing slopes, and supporting pollutant immobilization. Recent developments highlight the emergence of stimuli-responsive hydrogels, controlled-release fertilizer matrices, and composite soil conditioners capable of simultaneously addressing water stress, salinity, erosion, and contamination. In parallel, biodegradable agricultural films and in-soil degradable materials offer pathways to reduce microplastic accumulation while maintaining agronomic performance. Beyond agriculture, bio-based construction materials and bio-receptive design strategies extend biopolymeric interventions into the built environment, promoting soil permeability, microbial diversity, and circular material flows. The review emphasizes the need for context-specific formulation, long-term field validation, and life-cycle assessment to ensure environmental safety and scalability. By integrating soil science, polymer chemistry, and regenerative design, biopolymeric systems are described here as tools for restoring soil health and fostering resilient urban–rural ecosystems under conditions of environmental change.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials · Clay minerals and soil interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Plantesima SRL, 2 Aleea Poiana Cernei, 061552 Bucharest, Romania

Bionest Cluster, 14 Anastasia Doamna, 707035 Barnova, Romania

DumoLab Research (DLR), Department of Graduate Architecture, Stuart Weitzman School of Design, University of Pennsylvania, 210 South 34th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Department of Animal Resources and Technology, Faculty of Food and Animal Sciences, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iasi University of Life Sciences, 3 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490 Iasi, Romania

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Global soil carbon: Understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool
2. (2022). Global Soil Partnership 2012–2022—Sustainable Soil Management in Action, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
3. Handelsman, J. (2021). A World Without Soil: The Past, Present, and Precarious Future of the Earth Beneath Our Feet, Yale University Press.10.12987/9780300263107 ↗
4. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (2017). The Global Land Outlook, UNCCD.
5. Biodegradable polymers: A review about biodegradation and its implications and applications10.1002/pts.2699 ↗
6. Lewicka, K., Szymanek, I., Rogacz, D., Wrzalik, M., Łagiewka, J., Nowik-Zając, A., Zawierucha, I., Coseri, S., Puiu, I., and Falfushynska, H. (2024). Current Trends of Polymer Materials’ Application in Agriculture. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16198439 ↗
7. Ahmed, S. (2021). 8-Advanced applications of green materials in agriculture. Applications of Advanced Green Materials, Woodhead Publishing.
8. Plackett, D. (2011). Introductory Overview. Biopolymers—New Materials for Sustainable Films and Coatings, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119994312 ↗
9. Abbate, C., Scavo, A., Pesce, G.R., Fontanazza, S., Restuccia, A., and Mauromicale, G. (2023). Soil Bioplastic Mulches for Agroecosystem Sustainability: A Comprehensive Review. Agriculture, 13.10.3390/agriculture13010197 ↗
10. Saha, A., Sreedeep, S., and Manna, U. (2024). Role of Biopolymers and Their Composites in Sustainable Agriculture: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives. Applications of Biopolymers in Science, Biotechnology, and Engineering, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781119783473.ch3 ↗
11. Valle, C., Voss, M., Gaudino, E.C., Forte, C., Cravotto, G., and Tabasso, S. (2024). Harnessing Agri-Food Waste as a Source of Biopolymers for Agriculture. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14104089 ↗
12. Azeem, B. (2025). Stimuli-Responsive Starch-Based Biopolymer Coatings for Smart and Sustainable Fertilizers. Gels, 11.10.3390/gels11090681 ↗
13. Recent Advances of Biodegradable Agricultural Mulches from Renewable Resources10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c04873 ↗
14. Embracing nature’s clockwork: Crafting plastics for degradation in plant agricultural systems10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00031 ↗
15. Nano/Micro-Structural Supramolecular Biopolymers: Innovative Networks with the Boundless Potential in Sustainable Agriculture10.1007/s40820-024-01348-x ↗
16. Significance of biopolymer-based hydrogels and their applications in agriculture: A review in perspective of synthesis and their degree of swelling for water holding10.1039/D3RA03472K ↗
17. Water Absorption Capacity and Agricultural Utility of Biopolymer-Based Hydrogels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1021/acspolymersau.5c00019 ↗
18. Wang, A., and Zhu, Y. (2025). Superabsorbent Polymers: Synthesis, Properties and Applications, Royal Society of Chemistry.10.1039/9781837677672 ↗
19. Application of superabsorbent natural polymers in agriculture
20. Ahmed, S.S., Khan, T.K., El-Aziz, G.H.A., Shoala, T., El-Garhy, H.A.S., and Fahmy, A.H. (2023). Implementation of Biopolymeric Nanomaterials to Reduce the Negative Impacts of Salinity on Tomato Quantity and Quality. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28041594 ↗
21. Multifunctional biodegradable potato soluble starch-urea superabsorbent hydrogels for desert agriculture: Irradiation synthesis and their plant growth promotion and degradation properties10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2026.150787 ↗
22. Integrated Instillation Technology for the Synthesis of a pH-Responsive Sodium Alginate/Biomass Charcoal Soil Conditioner for Controlled Release of Humic Acid and Soil Remediation10.1021/acs.jafc.1c04121 ↗
23. Site application of biopolymer-based soil treatment (BPST) for slope surface protection: In-situ wet-spraying method and strengthening effect verification10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124983 ↗
24. Alkaline induced-cation crosslinking biopolymer soil treatment and field implementation for slope surface protection
25. Looper, T.L. (1998). Phytostabilization of Mine Tailings Piles Utilizing Biopolymer and Industrial Byproducts. [Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Montana].
26. Inulin biopolymer as a novel material for sustainable soil stabilization10.1038/s41598-024-82289-8 ↗
27. Water retention characteristics and mechanical properties of vegetated biopolymer and biochar-reinforced sandy loam10.1139/cgj-2024-0180 ↗
28. Sustainable soil treatment: Investigating the efficacy of carrageenan biopolymer on the geotechnical properties of soil10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134627 ↗
29. Zangeneh, S., Tabarsa, A., and Bagheri, Y. (2026, April 02). Investigation of Sandy Soil Stabilization Using Tragacanth Gum Biopolymer as Sustainable Materials. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4536022.
30. Stabilization of Soil Using Sodium Alginate Biopolymer10.22214/ijraset.2025.66257 ↗
31. Sustainable biopolymer soil stabilization in saline rich, arid conditions: A ‘micro to macro’ approach10.1038/s41598-022-06374-6 ↗
32. Bagheri, P., Gratchev, I., Zolghadr, M., Son, S., and Kim, J.M. (2024). Mitigation of Soil Erosion and Enhancement of Slope Stability through the Utilization of Lignin Biopolymer. Polymers, 16.10.3390/polym16091300 ↗
33. Anusha, S., and Harikrishna, P.R. (2024). Guar Gum, Gellan Gum Biopolymer Soil Stabilization, EDP Sciences.10.1051/e3sconf/202452901053 ↗
34. Correia, A.A.S., Caldeira, J.B., Branco, R., and Morais, P.V. (2023). Enhancing the Strength of Mine Residue Soil by Bioremediation Combined with Biopolymers. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app131810550 ↗
35. Biopolymer-enhanced delivery of reactive sulfide reagents for in-situ mercury remediation of heterogeneous contaminated soils10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174901 ↗
36. Sparks, D.L. (2024). Chapter Three—Biodegradable plastics as alternatives for polyethylene mulch films. Advances in Agronomy, Academic Press.
37. Polyethylene and biodegradable mulches for agricultural applications: A review10.1007/s13593-011-0068-3 ↗
38. English, M.E. (2019). The Role of Biodegradable Plastic Mulches in Soil Organic Carbon Cycling. [Master’s Thesis, University of Tennessee].
39. Biodegradability kraft paper coated with films emulsified chitosan and palmitic acid10.6000/1929-5995.2013.02.02.6 ↗
40. Haddad, S.A., Abdelmageed, H., Saleh, A., Ahmed, S., Abd El-Azeim, M.M., Lemanowicz, J., Eldesoky, G.E., and Saad, O. (2023). Response of Cellulose Decomposition and Nodulation in Soils Amended with Biochar for Peri-Urban Agriculture. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151310003 ↗
41. Specific biotests to assess eco-toxicity of biodegradable polymer materials in soil
42. Does poly-3-hydroxybutyrate biodegradation affect the quality of soil organic matter?10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141300 ↗
43. Effect of biodegradable poly-3-hydroxybutyrate amendment on the soil biochemical properties and fertility under varying sand loads10.1186/s40538-022-00345-9 ↗
44. Smagin, A.V., Sadovnikova, N.B., Belyaeva, E.A., and Korchagina, C.V. (2023). Biodegradability of Gel-Forming Superabsorbents for Soil Conditioning: Kinetic Assessment Based on CO2 Emissions. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15173582 ↗
45. Kanwal, A., Zhang, M., Sharaf, F., Rani, A., Khan, B., and Farooq, S. (2026, April 02). Poly (Butylene Adipate Terephthalate) Degradation Products and Their Influence on Plant Progression and Soil Microbial Diversity. Available online: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2930961/v1.
46. Sun, Y., Yang, W., Shi, H., Tanveer, S.K., and Hai, J. (2022). Past, present, and future perspectives of biodegradable films for soil: A 30-year systematic review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.1006388 ↗
47. Bagheri, P., Gratchev, I., Son, S., and Rybachuk, M. (2023). Durability, Strength, and Erosion Resistance Assessment of Lignin Biopolymer Treated Soil. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15061556 ↗
48. Impact of PBSA (Bionolle) biodegradation products on the soil microbiological structure
49. El-Nashar, M. (2010). Life span of biopolymer sequestering agents for contaminant removal and erosion resistance. Biopolymers, IntechOpen.10.5772/286 ↗
50. Soil Degradation of Polylactic Acid/Polyhydroxyalkanoate-Based Nonwoven Mulches10.1007/s10924-015-0716-9 ↗
51. Arn, S., Wille, F., Cerri, M., Kägi, R., Bucheli, T., Widmer, F., McNeill, K., and Sander, M. (2023, January 23–28). Biodegradation of commercial mulch films in Swiss agricultural soils: Results from combined laboratory, mesocosm and field incubations. Proceedings of the 25th EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria.10.5194/egusphere-egu23-13542 ↗
52. Biodegradable and Biobased Mulch Films: Highly Stretchable PLA Composites with Different Industrial Vegetable Waste10.1021/acsami.2c10965 ↗
53. Formulation, performance and environmental/agricultural benefit analysis of biomass-based biodegradable mulch films: A review10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112663 ↗
54. Ramadhani, A.M., Nassary, E.K., Rwehumbiza, F.B., Massawe, B.H.J., and Nchimbi-Msolla, S. (2024). Potentials of synthetic biodegradable mulch for improved livelihoods on smallholder farmers: A systematic review. Front. Agron., 6.10.3389/fagro.2024.1454060 ↗
55. Biodegradable and biobased mulch residues had limited impacts on soil properties but reduced yield of the following crop in a low fertility soil10.1017/S1742170522000217 ↗
56. Towards the microbial home: An overview of developments in next-generation sustainable architecture10.1111/1751-7915.14256 ↗
57. Heavy Metal Contamination in Urban Soils: Health Impacts on Humans and Plants: A Review10.59324/ejtas.2024.2(1).48 ↗
58. Impact of Urbanization on Soil Microbial Diversity and Composition in the Megacity of Shanghai10.1002/ldr.4145 ↗
59. Designing from place: A regenerative framework and methodology10.1080/09613218.2012.621341 ↗
60. Soil Sisters: Emerging Intersectoral Material Designs For Soil Health
61. Sesay, T., Xie, Y., Chen, Y., and Xue, J. (2025). Bio-Based Stabilization of Natural Soil for Rammed Earth Construction: A Review on Mechanical and Water Durability Performance. Polymers, 17.10.3390/polym17091170 ↗
62. Plank, J. (2005). Applications of Biopolymers in Construction Engineering. Biopolymers Online, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/3527600035.bpola002 ↗
63. Cradle to Site Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Natural vs. Conventional Building Materials: A Case Study on Cob Earthen Material10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.05.028 ↗
64. Rothschild, L.J., Lima, I.G.P., Senesky, D., Wipat, A., and Head, J. (2019). Myco-Architecture off Planet: Growing Surface Structures at Destination, NASA NTRS.
65. Brown, B. (2026, February 05). Fight Back with Fungi: How Mushrooms Can Help Solve the Global Housing Crisis. Healthy Materials Lab. Available online: https://architizer.com/blog/inspiration/stories/mycelium-fungi-architecture-mycohab/.
66. Bio-Habitat (2026, February 05). MYCOhab: Clearing the Namibian Encroacher Bush to Make Food and Materials. Namibia. Available online: https://www.bio-hab.org/materials.
67. Bioreceptive design: A novel approach to biodigital materiality
68. Jakubovskis, R. (2025). Biophilic Façades: The Potentiality of Bioreceptive Concrete. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15203646 ↗
69. Sommese, F., Diana, L., Colajanni, S., Bellomo, M., Sciuto, G., and Lombardo, G. (2025). Towards a Regenerative and Climate-Resilient Built Environment: Greening Lessons from European Cities. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15111878 ↗
70. Bae, J.Y., Aviv, D., and Mogas-Soldevila, L. (2024). SimbioBrick. Scalable Disruptors, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-68275-9_30 ↗
71. Ecological aspects of mycorrhizal symbiosis: With special emphasis on the functional diversity of interactions involving the extraradical mycelium10.1093/jxb/ern059 ↗
72. A simple and low-cost technique to initiate single-spore cultures of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi using a superabsorbent polymer10.1007/s13199-022-00878-5 ↗
73. Autonomous Self-Burying Seed Carriers for Aerial Seeding10.1038/s41586-022-05656-3 ↗
74. Lu, Q., Yi, S., Rae-Grant, T., Yu, T., Patel, D.K., and Yao, L. (2026). Morphing Matter to Support Ecological Restoration. Nat. Rev. Mater., 349–351.10.1038/s41578-026-00895-6 ↗
75. Nduka, I. (2026, March 28). Hyperlocal Construction in Rwanda: Low Carbon Architecture. Arch. J, Available online: https://architizer.com/blog/inspiration/collections/hyperlocal-construction-in-rwanda/.
76. (2026, February 05). General Architecture Collaborative. Learning & Sports Center. Masoro, Rulindo District, Rwanda. Available online: https://ga-c.squarespace.com/projects/icdc.
77. (2026, February 05). BE_Design. Komera Leadership Center. Rwanda. Available online: https://bruceengeldesign.com/new-p#/leadership-center/.
78. (2026, February 01). HuMUS, Healthy Municipal Soils. Available online: https://www.humus-project.eu/pilot-case-studies/.
79. Fathy, H. (1986). Natural Energy and Vernacular Architecture: Principles and Examples with Reference to Hot Arid Climates, University of Chicago Press. Available online: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/196097.
80. Oliver, P. (2007). Built to Meet Needs: Cultural Issues in Vernacular Architecture, Routledge.10.4324/9780080476308 ↗
81. Maguey leaf kitchens in the Mezquital Valley, Hidalgo
82. Espeland, M. (2024). A Proposed School for Traditional Building Arts & Crafts in Kalongo, Uganda. J. Tradit. Build. Archit. Urban., 258–269.10.51303/jtbau.vi5.759 ↗
83. A new hut in Medina Sidonia, Cádiz Una nueva choza en Medina Sidonia, Cádiz Uma nova choça em Medina Sidonia, Cádiz
84. ‘Ear-Roofed’ Houses in Mixteca Baja, Puebla State: The Ñuu’Davi Traditional Building System
85. Restoration of a barraca cottage in the Valencian Albufera
86. Healthy Materials Lab (2026, March 28). DON Enterprise, PSU Housing Research Center, Americhanvre, and Pennsylvania Dept of Agriculture. 2023. PA Hemp Home: Case Study and Lessons Learned. Available online: https://healthymaterialslab.org/tool-guides/the-pa-hemp-home-lessons-learned.
87. Upscaling bio-based construction: Challenges and opportunities10.1080/09613218.2023.2204414 ↗
88. Management of agricultural waste biomass as raw material for the construction sector: An analysis of sustainable and circular alternatives10.1186/s12302-022-00655-7 ↗
89. Exploring the climate impact effects of increased use of bio-based materials in buildings10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.041 ↗
90. Ramsgaard Thomsen, M., Rossi, G., Daugaard, A.E., Rech, A., and Nicholas, P. (2024). Extending the Circular Design Framework for Bio-Based Materials: Reconsidering Cascading and Agency Through the Case of Biopolymer Composites, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-031-36554-6_40 ↗
91. Amziane, S., Merta, I., and Page, J. (2023). Developing 3D-Printed Natural Fiber-Based Mixtures. Bio-Based Building Materials, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-33465-8 ↗
92. 3D-Printed Lightweight Earth Fiber: From Tiles to Tessellations10.1089/3dp.2023.0341 ↗
93. Maximizing Fiber Content in 3D-Printed Earth Materials: Printability, Mechanical, Thermal and Environmental Assessments10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135891 ↗
94. Rheology and 3D Printing of Alginate Bio-Stabilized Earth Concrete10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107380 ↗
95. Thin Earth: Bio-Stabilised Pressed Thin Earth Elements for Building Applications10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143160 ↗
96. Garcia-Holguera, M. (2026). From the Lab to the Land: Challenges of Upscaling Biobased Materials for Architecture. Appl. Sci., 16.10.3390/app16041990 ↗
97. Wang, J., Shi, D., and Song, Y. (2023). Low Energy Adaptive Biological Material Skins from Nature to Buildings. Advanced Materials in Smart Building Skins for Sustainability: From Nano to Macroscale, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-031-09695-2 ↗
98. Mogas-Soldevila, L., Zhang, J., and Yoon Bae, J. (2026). SimbioBrick II: Portable Bioremediation Technology for Urban Farming and Environmental Justice. Kleinman Policy Digest, Univeristy of Pennsylvania.
99. Mohseni, A., Çapunaman, Ö.B., Zamani, A., Walter, N., and Gürsoy, B. (2025). Advanced Sustainable Architectural Acoustics Through Robotic Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing (EAM) of Fungal Biomaterials. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15105587 ↗
100. Williams, F., and Wilson, R. (2026, February 01). It’s only Natural: Five Live Projects Made Using Natural Materials. Archit. J, Available online: https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/buildings/its-only-natural-five-live-projects-made-using-natural-materials.