journal article·2026-04-27Open access

Calibrating the Performance Assessment Mechanism in Virtual Laboratories with a Reinforcement Learning-Inspired Technique

Vasilis Zafeiropoulos, Dimitris Kalles

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

Science universities strive to offer efficient lab training to their students and at the same time secure their safety and minimize the damages to the lab equipment. Thus, the development of distance learning tools for students to be trained virtually and safely in using the various lab instruments and performing experiments is necessary. Since the students are evaluated for their performance at the on-site labs, the assessment at the virtual labs is also needed and consequently, an embedded assessment mechanism for the evaluation of the user’s performance in the virtual lab is a necessary feature. For the assessment mechanism to be reliable and devoid of the designer’s bias, though, it may need calibration with Machine Learning. Hellenic Open University has developed its own virtual biology laboratory, Onlabs, which simulates its on-site one for its students to be trained and evaluated at. Considering the evaluation of the user’s performance in Onlabs, it is made with respect to particular experiments and is based on an embedded scoring algorithm. The latter is two-fold, measuring the extent to which the necessary steps have been made and the extent to which those steps were made in the correct order. Within the context of the experimental procedure of microscoping, the scoring algorithm has been recalibrated with the use of various Machine Learning techniques. In this paper, we propose the design of a Reinforcement Learning variant and recalibration of the scoring measure concerning the steps order. The results suggest that under specific parameters and Reinforcement Learning methods, a more efficient scoring mechanism may be achieved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Experimental Learning in Engineering · Online Learning and Analytics · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, 26335 Patras, Greece

Funding

European Union funds · Greek national funds

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Integration of Virtual Labs in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review
2. Virtual Laboratories in STEM Higher Education: A Scoping Review
3. Ali, N., Ullah, S., and Khan, D. (2022). Interactive Laboratories for Science Education: A Subjective Study and Systematic Literature Review. Multimodal Technol. Interact., 6.10.3390/mti6100085 ↗
4. Enhancing Experiential Science Learning with Virtual Labs: A Narrative Account of Merits, Challenges and Implementation Strategies10.1111/jcal.13061 ↗
5. Virtual Laboratories in Science Learning: Challenges and Opportunities
6. Li, J., and Liang, W. (2024). Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratory in Engineering Education: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0316269 ↗
7. Li, Y., Shen, Y., and Sukenik, C.I.I. (2024, January 23–26). Immersive Virtual Labs for Enhancing In-Person and Online Education. Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, USA.
8. Immersive Learning: A Systematic Literature Review on Transforming Engineering Education Through Virtual Reality10.3390/virtualworlds3040026 ↗
9. Gee, J.P. (2007). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy, St. Martin’s Griffin. [2nd ed.].
10. Malone, T.W., and Lepper, M.R. (1987). Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning. Aptitude, Learning and Instruction, Routledge.
11. Video Game-Based Learning: An Emerging Paradigm for Instruction10.1002/piq.20020 ↗
12. Digital Game-Based Learning: It’s Not Just the Digital Natives Who Are Restless
13. Tekinbaş, K.S., and Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals, MIT Press.
14. Shute, V. (2011). Stealth Assessment in Computer-Based Games to Support Learning. Computer Games and Instruction, Information Age Publishing.10.1108/978-1-61735-410-620251025 ↗
15. Shute, V., and Ventura, M. (2013). Stealth Assessment: Measuring and Supporting Learning in Video Games, The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9589.001.0001 ↗
16. Yannakakis, G.N., and Togelius, J. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and Games, Springer. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-3-319-63519-4 ↗
17. Drachen, A., Canossa, A., and Yannakakis, G.N. (2009, January 7–10). Player Modeling Using Self-Organization in Tomb Raider: Underworld. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games, Milan, Italy.10.1109/CIG.2009.5286500 ↗
18. Search-Based Procedural Content Generation: A Taxonomy and Survey10.1109/TCIAIG.2011.2148116 ↗
19. Millington, I., and Funge, J. (2009). Artificial Intelligence for Games, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-374731-0.00008-6 ↗
20. Willman, M. (2020). Machine Learning to Identify Cheaters in Online Games. [Master’s Thesis, Umeå University].
21. Sutton, R.S., and Barto, A.G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, The MIT Press. [2nd ed.].
22. Mastering the Game of Go with Deep Neural Networks and Tree Search10.1038/nature16961 ↗
23. Grandmaster Level in StarCraft II Using Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning10.1038/s41586-019-1724-z ↗
24. Brockman, G., Dennison, C., Zhang, S., Pachocki, J., Petrov, M., Pondé, H., Dębiak, P., Farhi, D., Wolski, F., and Raiman, J. (2026, February 20). OpenAI Five. Available online: https://openai.com/index/openai-five/.
25. Human-Level AI’s Killer Application: Interactive Computer Games
26. André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M.M.T., and du Boulay, B. (2017). Balancing Learning and Engagement in Game-Based Learning Environments with Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Education, Springer International Publishing.
27. Fuchs, R., Gieseke, R., and Dockhorn, A. (2024, January 28). Personalized Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment—Imitation Learning Meets Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), Milan, Italy.10.1109/CoG60054.2024.10645659 ↗
28. Kneebone, J. (2026, February 20). Reinforcement Learning for the Startups Card Game: The Reward Function. Available online: https://medium.com/@jeremykneebone/reinforcement-learning-for-the-startups-card-game-the-reward-function-034260d761b9.
29. Student Modeling: Supporting Personalized Instruction, from Problem Solving to Exploratory Open Ended Activities
30. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Learning Systems10.3102/10769986221129847 ↗
31. Larusson, J.A., and White, B. (2014). Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics. Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7 ↗
32. Koedinger, K., and Stamper, J. (2010, January 11–13). A Data Driven Approach to the Discovery of Better Cognitive Models. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
33. A Generic AI-Based Technique for Assessing Student Performance in Conducting Online Virtual and Remote Controlled Laboratories10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3227505 ↗
34. Automatic Evaluation of Student’s Performance in Online Laboratories10.3991/ijoe.v6i5.1362 ↗
35. Auer, M.E., Cukierman, U.R., Vendrell Vidal, E., and Tovar Caro, E. (2024). Implementation and Evaluation of an Automatic Scoring System for Experimental Reports Based on ChatGPT. Proceedings of the Towards a Hybrid, Flexible and Socially Engaged Higher Education, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-53382-2 ↗
36. Chen, Y., Liu, X., Huo, P., Li, L., and Li, F. (2017, January 22–25). The Design and Implementation for Automatic Evaluation System of Virtual Experiment Report. Proceedings of the 2017 12th International Conference on Computer Science and Education (ICCSE), Houston, TX, USA.10.1109/ICCSE.2017.8085587 ↗
37. Russell, S., and Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Pearson Education. [2nd ed.].
38. Yourdon, E. (1989). Modern Structured Analysis, Yourdon Press.
39. Zafeiropoulos, V., and Kalles, D. (2024). Using Machine Learning to Calibrate Automated Performance Assessment in a Virtual Laboratory: Exploring the Trade-Off between Accuracy and Explainability. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14177944 ↗
40. Sutton, R.S., and Barto, A.G. (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, The MIT Press. [1st ed.].10.1109/TNN.1998.712192 ↗
41. Christiano, P.F., Leike, J., Brown, T.B., Martic, M., Legg, S., and Amodei, D. (2017). Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates Inc.
42. Ng, A.Y., Harada, D., and Russell, S.J. (1999). Policy Invariance Under Reward Transformations: Theory and Application to Reward Shaping. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
43. Krakovna, V., Uesato, J., Mikulik, V., Rahtz, M., Everitt, T., Kumar, R., Kenton, Z., Leike, J., and Legg, S. (2026, March 30). Specification Gaming: The Flip Side of AI Ingenuity. Available online: https://deepmind.google/blog/specification-gaming-the-flip-side-of-ai-ingenuity/.
44. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., and Mané, D. (2016). Concrete Problems in AI Safety. arXiv.
45. Hadfield-Menell, D., Milli, S., Abbeel, P., Russell, S., and Dragan, A.D. (2017). Inverse Reward Design. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates Inc.