Generative AI Readiness in Public Higher Education: Assessing Digital Teaching Competence in Paraguay Through Machine Learning Models
Source abstract
Abstract
The rapid expansion of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) is transforming higher education systems, particularly public institutions seeking to advance toward smart governance models and digital transformation. In this context, digital teaching competence emerges as a strategic factor for the effective, ethical, and pedagogically sound adoption of these technologies. This study assesses the level of digital competence among public higher education faculty in Paraguay and examines its predictive capacity regarding the adoption of GAI tools using machine learning models. A nationwide quantitative study was conducted with a sample of 800 faculty members from public universities across Paraguay. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire based on international digital competence frameworks, incorporating additional variables such as attitudes toward GAI, technological experience, institutional infrastructure, and perceived organizational support. Data analysis involved the application of machine learning techniques, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting, to identify the variables with the strongest predictive power regarding faculty readiness and willingness to integrate GAI into teaching practices. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, F1-scores, and the AUC-ROC. The findings identify key predictors of technological readiness and structural gaps within Paraguay’s public higher education system. This research provides empirical evidence from Latin America on the factors influencing GAI adoption in public sector educational contexts and contributes to the design of educational policies aimed at fostering smart universities and digitally sustainable academic ecosystems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Digital literacy in education · Educational Leadership and Innovation · E-Learning and Knowledge Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Pedagogy, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Faculty of Education, University of Valladolid, 40005 Segovia, Spain
Funding
ConciencIA: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: Responsible Use for Pre-Service Teachers
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., and Syverson, C. (2026, April 20). Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics. NBER Working Paper No. 24001. Available online: https://www.nber.org/papers/w24001.
2. Towards a critical theory of communication as renewal and update of Marxist humanism in the age of digital capitalism10.1111/jtsb.12247 ↗
3. Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation10.1257/jep.29.3.3 ↗
4. Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Research on AI Applications in Higher Education—Where Are the Educators?10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 ↗
5. So What If ChatGPT Wrote It? Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative AI for Research, Practice and Policy
6. ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 ↗
7. State of the Art and Practice in AI in Education10.1111/ejed.12533 ↗
8. Mena-Guacas, A.F., Meza-Morales, J.A., Fernández, E., and López-Meneses, E. (2024). Digital Collaboration in Higher Education: A Study of Digital Skills and Collaborative Attitudes in Students from Diverse Universities. Educ. Sci., 14.10.3390/educsci14010036 ↗
9. Floridi, L. (2021). Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1 ↗
10. Teachers’ Digital Competencies in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8 ↗
11. From Digital Literacy to Digital Competence: The Teacher Digital Competency (TDC) Framework10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4 ↗
12. ICT teacher training: A view of the TPACK model10.1080/11356405.2016.1203526 ↗
13. Teacher Educators’ Digital Competence10.1080/00313831.2012.726273 ↗
14. The First-Level Digital Divide Shifts from Inequalities in Physical Access to Inequalities in Material Access10.1177/1461444818797082 ↗
15. Van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide, Polity Press.
16. Cáceres Troche, D., Boumadan Hamed, M., and Gómez García, M. (2025). Digital Competence as Psychological Defense: Impact of Digital Competence on Problematic Mobile Use among Paraguayan University Students. Behav. Sci., 15.10.3390/bs15121687 ↗
17. Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu, European Commission.
18. Principles Alone Cannot Guarantee Ethical AI10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4 ↗
19. Dimensions of Digital Literacy Based on Five Models of Development
20. The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–201410.1016/j.telpol.2016.01.006 ↗
21. Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Baneres, D., Guerrero-Roldán, A.E., and Rodríguez, M.E. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Reflections from Educational Landscape: A Review of AI Studies in Half a Century. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13020800 ↗
22. Governing Artificial Intelligence: Ethical, Legal and Technical Opportunities and Challenges
23. AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5 ↗
24. Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets10.1086/705716 ↗
25. Long, D., and Magerko, B. (2020). What Is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Proc. CHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst., 1–16.10.1145/3313831.3376727 ↗
26. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., and Forcier, L.B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education, Pearson.
27. The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) Model for Addictive Behaviors: Update, Generalization to Addictive Behaviors Beyond Internet-Use Disorders, and Specification of the Process Character of Addictive Behaviors10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032 ↗
28. Problematic smartphone use and mental health problems: Current state of research and future directions
29. Coeckelbergh, M. (2020). AI Ethics and the Future of Democracy. Philosophies, 5.10.7551/mitpress/12549.001.0001 ↗
30. Selwyn, N. (2019). Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education, Polity Press.
31. Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe, European Commission.
32. The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 ↗
33. Benkler, Y., Faris, R., and Hal, R. (2018). Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001 ↗
34. Vision, Challenges, Roles and Research Issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001 ↗
35. Coping, Emotion Regulation, and Psychopathology in Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analysis and Narrative Review10.1037/bul0000110 ↗
36. Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning10.61969/jai.1337500 ↗
37. Digital Technology Use and Adolescent Mental Health Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Roles of Internet Addiction and Digital Competence10.1089/cyber.2023.0048 ↗
38. Stahl, B.C. (2021). Artificial Intelligence for a Better Future: An Ecosystem Perspective on the Ethics of AI and Emerging Digital Technologies, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-69978-9 ↗
39. ChatGPT for Next Generation Science Learning