journal article·2026-04-21Open access

Tool Requirements for Life Cycle Assessment in the Innovation of Novel Carbon-Storing Construction Materials

Monica Huang, Ethan Ellingboe, Meng-Yen Lin, Tomás Méndez Echenagucia, Kathrina Simonen

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 8

Abstract

Novel carbon-storing construction materials have the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in long-lived building products. In order to understand the full benefits and shortcomings of carbon-storing materials, life cycle assessments (LCAs) must be performed. However, material innovators who are looking to perform LCAs of their products during early-stage research and development (R&D) face many challenges. While these challenges have been reported in the literature, this information has been fragmented and required a more comprehensive investigation. We explored these LCA challenges by holding an in-person workshop with sixteen R&D teams who were developing carbon-storing materials and building designs. From the data collected in this workshop, we found that the R&D teams struggled with data availability, biogenic carbon, and uncertainty, which confirmed our findings from the literature. They also struggled with various other LCA topics. Since current LCA tools lack functions that would be useful for this user group, we also proposed a list of tool ideas that could address their LCA needs, which can inform future LCA tool development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Chemistry and Chemical Engineering · Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Architecture, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

Funding

Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), United States Department of Energy

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. IPCC (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf.
2. IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Cambridge University Press. Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/#FullReport.
3. UNFCCC (2026, March 23). Paris Agreement on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Available online: https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/paris_nov_2015/application/pdf/paris_agreement_english_.pdf.
4. United Nations Environment Programme (2026, March 23). 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Available online: https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/2022-global-status-report-buildings-and-construction.
5. World Resources Institute (2026, March 23). World Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 2019. Available online: https://www.wri.org/data/world-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2019.
6. USGS (2026, March 23). Fact Sheet: Carbon Sequestration to Mitigate Climate Change, Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3097/pdf/CarbonFS.pdf.
7. USGS (2026, March 23). Biological Carbon Sequestration|U.S. Geological Survey, Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/biological-carbon-sequestration.
8. Utilization of mineral carbonation products: Current state and potential10.1002/ghg.1940 ↗
9. Global Warming Potential of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Biomass Stored in the Anthroposphere and Used for Bioenergy at End of Life10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00507.x ↗
10. Ganguly, I., Pierobon, F., and Hall, E.S. (2020). Global Warming Mitigating Role of Wood Products from Washington State’s Private Forests. Forests, 11.10.3390/f11020194 ↗
11. Buildings as a global carbon sink10.1038/s41893-019-0462-4 ↗
12. The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal10.1038/s41586-019-1681-6 ↗
13. World Green Building Council (WGBC) (2026, March 23). Bringing Embodied Carbon Upfront. Available online: https://worldgbc.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/22123951/WorldGBC_Bringing_Embodied_Carbon_Upfront.pdf.
14. Building materials could store more than 16 billion tonnes of CO2 annually10.1126/science.adq8594 ↗
15. Opportunities and challenges for engineering construction materials as carbon sinks10.21809/rilemtechlett.2021.146 ↗
16. Buildings as a Global Carbon Sink? A Reality Check on Feasibility Limits10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.018 ↗
17. Construction sector views on low carbon building materials10.1080/09613218.2016.1086872 ↗
18. Use of LCA as a development tool within early research: Challenges and issues across different sectors10.1007/s11367-013-0627-8 ↗
19. Woods-Robinson, R., Carbajales-Dale, M., Cheng, A., Cooney, G., Kirchofer, A., Liddell, H.P.H., Peterson, L., Posen, I.D., Moni, S., and Sleep, S. (2024). Controversy and consensus: Common ground and best practices for life cycle assessment of emerging technologies. arXiv.
20. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework (Standard No. ISO 14040:2006). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html.
21. Ex-ante LCA of Emerging Technologies10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.005 ↗
22. A critical view on the current application of LCA for new technologies and recommendations for improved practice10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120904 ↗
23. Using anticipatory life cycle assessment to enable future sustainable construction10.1111/jiec.12916 ↗
24. Carbon Sequestration and Storage in the Built Environment10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.028 ↗
25. Hart, J., and Pomponi, F. (2020). More Timber in Construction: Unanswered Questions and Future Challenges. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12083473 ↗
26. Biogenic carbon in buildings: A critical overview of LCA methods10.5334/bc.46 ↗
27. Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials—Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.02.006 ↗
28. (2017). Sustainability in Buildings and Civil Engineering Works—Core Rules for Environmental Product Declarations of Construction Products and Services (Standard No. ISO 21930:2017). Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:21930:ed-2:v1:en.
29. (2019). Sustainability of Construction Works—Environmental Product Declarations—Core Rules for the Product Category of Construction Products (Standard No. EN 15804:2012+A2:2019). Available online: https://www.en-standard.eu/bs-en-15804-2012-a2-2019-sustainability-of-construction-works-environmental-product-declarations-core-rules-for-the-product-category-of-construction-products/.
30. Biogenic Carbon and Temporary Storage Addressed with Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00503.x ↗
31. Estimating dynamic climate change effects of material use in buildings—Timing, uncertainty, and emission sources10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107399 ↗
32. Anatomy of methods for measuring life cycle carbon emission of built environment10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112506 ↗
33. Breton, C., Blanchet, P., Amor, B., Beauregard, R., and Chang, W.-S. (2018). Assessing the Climate Change Impacts of Biogenic Carbon in Buildings: A Critical Review of Two Main Dynamic Approaches. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10062020 ↗
34. Considering Time in LCA: Dynamic LCA and Its Application to Global Warming Impact Assessments10.1021/es9030003 ↗
35. (2022). Product Category Rules for Concrete and Concrete Elements (Standard No. EN 16757:2022). Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/50f0d48d-b47c-4efd-8e44-80b114f50c63/en-16757-2022.
36. Nielsen, P., and Quaghebeur, M. (2023). Determination of the CO2 Uptake of Construction Products Manufactured by Mineral Carbonation. Minerals, 13.10.3390/min13081079 ↗
37. Is crushed concrete carbonation significant enough to be considered as a carbon mitigation strategy?10.1088/1748-9326/ac9490 ↗
38. Life Cycle Assessment of construction materials: Methodologies, applications and future directions for sustainable decision-making
39. Office for National Statistics (2026, March 23). Uncertainty and How We Measure It for Our Surveys—Office for National Statistics, Available online: https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/methodologytopicsandstatisticalconcepts/uncertaintyandhowwemeasureit#:~:text=Uncertainty%20relates%20to%20how%20the,coefficient%20of%20variation.
40. Collingridge, D. (1982). The Social Control of Technology, St. Martin’s Press.
41. Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA10.1111/jiec.12690 ↗
42. PRé Sustainability (2026, March 23). SimaPro. Available online: https://simapro.com/.
43. Sphera (2026, March 23). LCA for Experts. Available online: https://sphera.com/solutions/product-stewardship/life-cycle-assessment-software-and-data/lca-for-experts/.
44. GreenDelta (2026, March 23). openLCA. Available online: https://www.openlca.org/.
45. LiSET: A Framework for Early-Stage Life Cycle Screening of Emerging Technologies10.1111/jiec.12807 ↗
46. Quantis (2026, March 23). Biogenic Carbon Footprint Calculator for Harvested Wood Products. World Wildlife Fund. Available online: https://www.worldwildlife.org/projects/biogenic-carbon-footprint-calculator-for-harvested-wood-products.
47. Computational screening-LCA tools for early design stages
48. ARPA-E (2024, September 01). HESTIA Program Kick-Off Meeting, Available online: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/hestia-program-kick-meeting.
49. Hollberg, A., Tjäder, M., Ingelhag, G., and Wallbaum, H. (2022). A Framework for User Centric LCA Tool Development for Early Planning Stages of Buildings. Front. Built Environ., 8.10.3389/fbuil.2022.744946 ↗
50. ARPA-E (2024, September 01). Press Release|ARPA-e.Energy.gov, Available online: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/news-and-media/press-releases/us-department-energy-announces-39-million-research-development.
51. ARPA-E (2024, September 01). Parametric Open Data for Life Cycle Assessment|ARPA-E, Available online: https://arpa-e.energy.gov/programs-and-initiatives/search-all-projects/parametric-open-data-life-cycle-assessment.
52. (2006). Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines (Standard No. ISO 14044:2006). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html.
53. Mass, enthalpy, and chemical-derived emission flows in mineral processing10.1111/jiec.13476 ↗
54. Towards the production of net-negative greenhouse gas emission bio-based plastics from 2nd and 3rd generation feedstocks10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141203 ↗
55. Assessing uncertainty in building material emissions using scenario-aware Monte Carlo simulation10.1088/2634-4505/ad40ce ↗
56. Temporalis, a generic method and tool for dynamic Life Cycle Assessment10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.044 ↗
57. CIRAIG (2026, March 23). DynCo2: Dynamic Carbon Footprinter. Available online: https://ciraig.org/index.php/project/dynco2-dynamic-carbon-footprinter/.
58. Cooper, S. (2020). Temporal Climate Impacts, University of Bath Research Data Archive.
59. Bare, J.C. (2026, March 23). Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI) TRACI Version 2.1: User’s Guide. US EPA, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/tool-reduction-and-assessment-chemicals-and-other-environmental-impacts-traci.