Deep-MiSR: Multi-Scale Convolution and Attention-Enhanced DeepLabV3+ for Brain Tumor Segmentation in MRI
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate brain tumor segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosis, treatment planning, and therapy monitoring. Conventional deep learning models often struggle with large variations in tumor shape, size, and contrast, as well as severe foreground–background imbalance. To address these challenges, this study presents Deep-MiSR, an enhanced encoder–decoder framework built upon DeepLabV3+ with a MobileNetV2 backbone, tailored for single-modality contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1CE) MRI segmentation. Three complementary components are integrated into the architecture: mixed depthwise convolution (MixConv) with heterogeneous kernels within the atrous spatial pyramid pooling module for multi-scale feature aggregation, a squeeze-and-excitation block for adaptive channel recalibration, and R-Drop regularization that enforces prediction consistency via symmetric Kullback–Leibler divergence. The model was evaluated on 3064 T1CE slices from 233 patients drawn from the publicly available Nanfang Hospital brain MRI dataset. Deep-MiSR achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.9281, a mean intersection-over-union of 0.8738, a precision of 0.8839, and a 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance of 7.69 mm, demonstrating consistent improvements over both the DeepLabV3+ baseline and all prior methods evaluated on the same data. Ablation studies confirmed that each component contributes independently, with R-Drop providing the largest individual gain. These findings demonstrate that combining multi-scale convolution, channel attention, and consistency regularization constitutes an effective and computationally practical strategy for robust single-modality brain tumor segmentation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Neural Network Applications · Brain Tumor Detection and Classification · Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information Science and Engineering, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, China
School of Information Engineering, Yantai Institute of Science and Technology, Yantai 265660, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Global burden of brain and central nervous system cancer in 185 countries, and projections up to 2050: A population-based systematic analysis of GLOBOCAN 202210.1007/s11060-025-05164-0 ↗
2. Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma10.1056/NEJMoa043330 ↗
3. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2016–202010.1093/neuonc/noad149 ↗
4. Association of the Extent of Resection with Survival in Glioblastoma10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1373 ↗
5. Brain Tumor Segmentation in MRI with Multi-Modality Spatial Information Enhancement and Boundary Shape Correction10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110553 ↗
6. Martucci, M., Russo, R., Schimperna, F., D’Apolito, G., Panfili, M., Grimaldi, A., Perna, A., Ferranti, A.M., Varcasia, G., and Giordano, C. (2023). Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Primary Adult Brain Tumors: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Biomedicines, 11.10.3390/biomedicines11020364 ↗
7. The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)10.1109/TMI.2014.2377694 ↗
8. Transformers for Neuroimage Segmentation: Scoping Review10.2196/57723 ↗
9. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: Response assessment in neuro-oncology working group10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541 ↗
10. A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 ↗
11. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
12. nnU-Net: A self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z ↗
13. Hatamizadeh, A., Tang, Y., Nath, V., Yang, D., Myronenko, A., Landman, B., Roth, H., and Xu, D. (2022, January 3–8). UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/WACV51458.2022.00181 ↗
14. Tang, Y., Yang, D., Li, W., Roth, H., Landman, B., Xu, D., Nath, V., and Hatamizadeh, A. (2022, January 18–24). Self-Supervised Pre-Training of Swin Transformers for 3D Medical Image Analysis. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.02007 ↗
15. Bonato, B., Nanni, L., and Bertoldo, A. (2025). Advancing Precision: A Comprehensive Review of MRI Segmentation Datasets from BraTS Challenges (2012–2025). Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25061838 ↗
16. Ngo, D.K., Tran, M.T., Kim, S.H., Yang, H.J., and Lee, G.S. (2020). Multi-Task Learning for Small Brain Tumor Segmentation from MRI. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10217790 ↗
17. Chen, L.C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., and Adam, H. (2018). Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49 ↗
18. Medical image recognition and segmentation of pathological slices of gastric cancer based on Deeplab v3+ neural network10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106210 ↗
19. DeepLabv3 + method for detecting and segmenting apical lesions on panoramic radiography10.1007/s00784-025-06156-0 ↗
20. UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation
21. SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615 ↗
22. Pourmahboubi, A., Saeed, N.A., and Tabrizchi, H. (2025). A brain tumor segmentation enhancement in MRI images using U-Net and transfer learning. BMC Med. Imaging, 25.10.1186/s12880-025-01837-4 ↗
23. Abidin, Z.U., Naqvi, R.A., Haider, A., Kim, H.S., Jeong, D., and Lee, S.W. (2024). Recent deep learning-based brain tumor segmentation models using multi-modality magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective survey. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 12.10.3389/fbioe.2024.1392807 ↗
24. Brain tumor segmentation with deep learning: Current approaches and future perspectives10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110424 ↗
25. Brain tumor classification utilizing deep features derived from high-quality regions in MRI images10.1016/j.bspc.2023.104988 ↗
26. An enhanced deep learning method for multi-class brain tumor classification using deep transfer learning10.1007/s11042-023-14828-w ↗
27. A Novel and Effective Brain Tumor Classification Model Using Deep Feature Fusion and Famous Machine Learning Classifiers10.1155/2022/7897669 ↗
28. Raza, A., Ayub, H., Khan, J.A., Ahmad, I., Salama, A.S., Daradkeh, Y.I., Javeed, D., Rehman, A.U., and Hamam, H. (2022). A Hybrid Deep Learning-Based Approach for Brain Tumor Classification. Electronics, 11.10.3390/electronics11071146 ↗
29. Xiong, M., Wu, A., Yang, Y., and Fu, Q. (2025). Efficient Brain Tumor Segmentation for MRI Images Using YOLO-BT. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25123645 ↗
30. Deep Learning-Based MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation with EfficientNet-Enhanced UNet10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3554405 ↗
31. Brain Tumor Segmentation from MRI Images Using Deep Learning Techniques10.1007/978-3-031-35641-4_36 ↗
32. Badža, M., and Barjaktarović, M. (2021). Segmentation of Brain Tumors from MRI Images Using Convolutional Autoencoder. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11094317 ↗
33. Akagic, A., Kapo, M., Kandić, E., Bećirović, M., and Kadrić, N. (2024). Brain Tumor Segmentation of MRI Images with U-Net and DeepLabV3+. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Computing and Machine Intelligence (ICMI), Mt Pleasant, MI, USA, 13–14 April 2024, IEEE.10.1109/ICMI60790.2024.10585749 ↗
34. Ranjbarzadeh, R., Keles, A., Ozisik, P.A., Demirci, H., Kul, H., Crane, M., Anari, S., and Bendechache, M. (2024). Combining DeepLabV3 with Attention Mechanisms for Accurate Brain Tumor Segmentation: Insights from BraTS 2020 and a Private Clinical Dataset. Proceedings of the 2024 12th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP), Geneva, Switzerland, 8–11 September 2024, IEEE.10.1109/EUVIP61797.2024.10772776 ↗
35. Tan, M., and Le, Q.V. (2019). MixConv: Mixed Depthwise Convolutional Kernels. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC), Cardiff, UK, 9–12 September 2019, British Machine Vision Association.
36. Hu, J., Shen, L., and Sun, G. (2018). Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–23 June 2018, IEEE.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
37. R-Drop: Regularized Dropout for Neural Networks
38. BiTr-Unet: A CNN-Transformer Combined Network for MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation10.1007/978-3-031-09002-8_1 ↗
39. Slim UNETR: Scale Hybrid Transformers to Efficient 3D Medical Image Segmentation Under Limited Computational Resources10.1109/TMI.2023.3326188 ↗
40. Comparison of segmentation performance of CNNs, vision transformers, and hybrid networks for paranasal sinuses with sinusitis on CT images10.1038/s41598-025-17266-w ↗
41. A Hybrid UNet Model Incorporating Attention Mechanism for Adaptive Brain Tumor Magnetic Resonance Segmentation
42. CAGs-Net: A Novel Adjacent-Context Network with Channel Attention Gate for 3D Brain Tumor Image Segmentation10.1155/ijbi/6656059 ↗
43. Basak, H., Bhattacharya, R., Hussain, R., and Chatterjee, A. (2022). An Exceedingly Simple Consistency Regularization Method for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Kolkata, India, 28–31 March 2022, IEEE.10.1109/ISBI52829.2022.9761602 ↗
44. Cho, H., Han, Y., and Kim, W.H. (2023). Anti-Adversarial Consistency Regularization for Data Augmentation: Applications to Robust Medical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2023, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-43901-8_53 ↗
45. Cheng, J. (2026, April 10). Brain Tumor Dataset. Figshare. Available online: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/brain_tumor_dataset/1512427/5.
46. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J. (2015). Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, Chile, 7–13 December 2015, IEEE.10.1109/ICCV.2015.123 ↗
47. de Verdier, M.C., Saluja, R., Gagnon, L., LaBella, D., Baid, U., Tahon, N.H., Foltyn-Dumitru, M., Zhang, J., Alafif, M., and Baig, S. (2024). The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge: Glioma Segmentation on Post-treatment MRI. arXiv.
48. Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods10.2307/3001968 ↗
49. Reducing the Hausdorff Distance in Medical Image Segmentation with Convolutional Neural Networks10.1109/TMI.2019.2930068 ↗
50. Taha, A.A., and Hanbury, A. (2015). Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: Analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med. Imaging, 15.10.1186/s12880-015-0068-x ↗