PINN-Assisted Low-Carbon Operation Configuration for Catalytic Cracking Units: An Economic–Environmental–Energy Co-Optimization Framework Based on Life Cycle Assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
This study addresses challenges in fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units, including inaccurate quantification of carbon emissions, difficulties in implementing low-carbon operational optimization, and low computational efficiency in solving complex process kinetics. A low-carbon operation optimization method based on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) is proposed. First, a unit-level carbon footprint assessment model is established using process life cycle assessment (PLCA) to achieve high-resolution quantification of both direct and indirect carbon emissions. Second, a multi-objective low-carbon operation optimization model is developed considering carbon tax scenarios, incorporating carbon emissions and corresponding carbon tax costs into the optimization objectives to achieve economic and low-carbon synergistic optimization. Finally, a PINN-assisted surrogate model is designed by embedding material balance constraints into the neural network training process, enabling efficient approximation of complex product yield kinetics and improving optimization solution efficiency and predictive reliability. The proposed method is applied to optimize the operation of an FCC unit at a refinery site. The results indicate an increase of 12,048.851 CNY/h in profit, a reduction of 1088.921 kgCO2eq/h in CO2 emissions, and a decrease of 324.281 m3/h in steam consumption. Meanwhile, the PINN model exhibits excellent performance in product yield prediction, with an average R2 of 0.9968 and an average RMSE of 0.1482, outperforming conventional data-driven methods. The proposed approach balances carbon emission quantification accuracy, physical consistency in yield prediction, and optimization solution efficiency, providing a systematic and implementable technical framework for low-carbon operation optimization of FCC units.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Process Optimization and Integration · Catalysts for Methane Reforming · Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hbut Detroit Green Technology Institute, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
School of Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Catalytic cracking of biomass tar for hydrogen-rich gas production: Parameter optimization using response surface methodology combined with deterministic finite automaton10.1016/j.renene.2025.122368 ↗
2. Optimization algorithms for modeling conversion and naphtha yield in the catalytic co-cracking of plastic in HVGO10.1016/j.psep.2025.106958 ↗
3. Multi-objective optimization of FCC separation system based on NSGA-II10.1016/j.ces.2024.120829 ↗
4. Tian, W., Han, Z., Wang, S., and Cui, Z. (2025). Ann surrogate-driven multi-objective optimization for safety-energy synergy in fluid catalytic cracking separation systems. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot., 108103.10.1016/j.psep.2025.108103 ↗
5. A bilevel data-driven framework for robust optimization under uncertainty–applied to fluid catalytic cracking unit10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107989 ↗
6. Optimization of the catalytic cracking process and biodiesel coproduction supply chain considering seasonal factors10.1016/B978-0-443-28824-1.50207-6 ↗
7. Optimizing light and heavy aromatic ratios in fluid catalytic cracking slurry oil for mesophase pitch with wide-area optically anisotropic texture10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213073 ↗
8. Han, R., Guan, Q., Gu, L., Sun, X., Wongladprom, T., Meeyoo, V., Lim, J., Xia, L., and Xiang, S. (2026). Optimizing energy efficiency in fluid catalytic cracking units with GA and NSGA-II: A comprehensive simulation and multi-factor analysis. Chin. J. Chem. Eng.10.1016/j.cjche.2025.12.024 ↗
9. Data analysis and modelling of a fluid catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) for an implementation of real time optimization10.1016/B978-0-444-63578-5.50097-9 ↗
10. Crude oil hierarchical catalytic cracking for maximizing chemicals production: Pilot-scale test, process optimization strategy, techno-economic-society-environment assessment10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115149 ↗
11. Optimization and analysis of biomass carbon loaded metal catalyst for catalytic cracking of toluene10.1016/j.diamond.2023.109987 ↗
12. Multi-objective optimization strategy for industrial catalytic cracking units: Kinetic model and enhanced SPEA-2 algorithm with economic, CO2, and SO2 emission considerations10.1016/j.ces.2023.119331 ↗
13. A hybrid GA-SQP multi-objective optimization methodology for carbon monoxide pollution minimization in fluid catalytic cracking process10.1016/B978-0-444-63234-0.50128-7 ↗
14. Real-time refinery optimization with reduced-order fluidized catalytic cracker model and surrogate-based trust region filter method10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107455 ↗
15. Surrogate-assisted optimization of refinery hydrogen networks with hydrogen sulfide removal10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127477 ↗
16. Song, W., Yao, H., Gong, Y., and Zhang, N. (2026). Integrated Molecular Riser-Regenerator Modeling via Radau Collocation for FCC Operational Optimization. Chem. Eng. J. Adv., 101078.10.1016/j.ceja.2026.101078 ↗
17. Optimizing process parameters for catalytic steam gasification of Fe-K based biochar toward hydrogen-rich syngas production10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136465 ↗
18. Uncertainty-aware optimization of zeolite particle size: Utilizing quantile regression and SHAP analysis10.1016/j.cej.2025.162085 ↗
19. Large-scale stochastic production decision-making for coupled economy-environment-energy systems in sustainable industrial processes under uncertainty: A data-driven two-stage multi-objective optimization framework10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112976 ↗
20. Operation optimization of hydrocracking process based on Kriging surrogate model10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.01.001 ↗
21. Huamanga-Chumbes, L.E., Sacoto-Cabrera, E.J., Lloret, J., Silva-Alvarado, V.L., Huicho-Mendigure, A., and Moreno-Cardenas, E. (2026). Machine Learning-Driven Computer Vision System for Automated Fat and Energy Quantification in Human Milk Microcapillaries. Sensors, 26.10.3390/s26061756 ↗
22. Thepmangkorn, P., and Sitjongsataporn, S. (2026). Hyper-Thyro Vision: An Integrated Framework for Hyperthyroidism Diagnostic Facial Image Analysis Based on Deep Learning. Biomimetics, 11.10.3390/biomimetics11030210 ↗
23. Liu, S., Liu, X., and Jiang, Z. (2026). A Few-Shot Bearing Fault Diagnosis Method Integrating Improved Generative Adversarial Network and CNN-BiLSTM-Attention Hybrid Network. Appl. Sci., 16.10.3390/app16062660 ↗
24. Li, J., Pu, R., Jiang, J., and Zhu, M. (2026). A Swin-Transformer-Based Network for Adaptive Backlight Optimization. Symmetry, 18.10.20944/preprints202601.2127.v1 ↗
25. Nakajima, T., Kitanaka, Y., and Fukuda, M. (2026). Sustainability Benefit Ratio: Bridging Environmental Metrics and Economic Feasibility for Circular Remanufacturing of Perovskite Solar Cells. Sustainability, 18.10.3390/su18062796 ↗
26. Enhancing engineering strategies for direct catalytic cracking of crude oil via Molecular-Level kinetic reaction Networks: A Machine Learning-Enabled Multi-Objective optimization framework10.1016/j.fuel.2026.138273 ↗
27. A many-objective surrogate optimization model driven by hybrid pilot-test data, molecular reconstruction, and crude oil direct cracking reaction mechanism10.1016/j.cej.2025.160389 ↗
28. Bakhtyari, A., and Seo, J.G. (2026). AI-assisted modeling and optimization of large-scale ethylene production by catalytic oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane in a shell-and-tube multi-tubular reactor. Chem. Eng. J., 172969.10.1016/j.cej.2026.172969 ↗
29. Computer-aided many-objective optimization framework via deep learning surrogate models: Promoting carbon reduction in refining processes from a life cycle perspective10.1016/j.ces.2025.121350 ↗
30. Synergizing low-carbon planning and operation for sustainable integrated refinery-petrochemical processes under arrival time uncertainty: A large-scale hierarchical energy-efficiency optimization perspective10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124497 ↗
31. Top, N. (2026). Advanced Manufacturing Routes for VTOL UAV Component: A Life Cycle Comparison of CNC Milling, Selective Laser Melting, and Metal Extrusion. Sustainability, 18.10.3390/su18062707 ↗
32. Wang, H., Wei, C., and He, C. (2026). Mechanisms of Human Socioeconomic Activities’ Impacts on Giant Panda Habitat Fragmentation in the Xiangling Region, China. Sustainability, 18.10.3390/su18062861 ↗
33. Sobolewska, A., Bukowski, M., and Majewski, J. (2026). The Environmental Impact of Reducing Heat Energy Losses Through External Brick Walls in Single-Family Houses. Sustainability, 18.10.3390/su18052580 ↗
34. Hao, J., Zhu, W., Ma, Q., Niu, H., Wang, P., Zhao, F., and Li, Z. (2026). Analysis of Power System Power and Energy Balance Considering Demand-Side Carbon Emissions. Sustainability, 18.10.3390/su18031421 ↗
35. Cost-benefit analysis and technical efficiency evaluation of full-scale membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment using economic approaches10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126984 ↗
36. Lu, R., Jia, J., Lee, Y.J., Lu, Z., and Zhang, C.S. (2026). R-PINN: Recovery-type a-posteriori estimator enhanced adaptive PINN. J. Comput. Phys., 114684.10.1016/j.jcp.2026.114684 ↗
37. Ongaro, F., Fraldi, M., and Pugno, N. (2025). Closed-form dispersion relations for non-local rectangular mass–spring lattices satisfying mass conservation constraints. Eur. J. Mech.-A/Solids, 105841.10.1016/j.euromechsol.2025.105841 ↗
38. Choi, E.J., Lee, D., Lee, S.M., and Lim, S. (2026). Two-stage MLP-lookup table model for predicting heat pump power in greenhouses. Energy Build., 117027.10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117027 ↗
39. Carbon tax impacts on transport emissions in belt and road trade corridors: A scenario analysis
40. Ghadiri, A., Pazoki, M., and Erfani, S. (2026). Hybrid GA-PSO-Optimized Neural Network for Biogas Production: Comparative Evaluation of Metaheuristic Algorithms. Renew. Energy, 125432.10.1016/j.renene.2026.125432 ↗
41. Multi-objective optimization of residential building energy consumption, daylighting, and thermal comfort based on BO-XGBoost-NSGA-II10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111386 ↗
42. A new adaptive Kriging-based optimization (AKBO) framework for constrained optimization problems: A case study on shared autonomous electric vehicle system design10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124147 ↗
43. Stern pressure identification using CNN-BiLSTM model based on bayesian optimisation and attention mechanism10.1016/j.apor.2025.104897 ↗
44. Pack Transformer: Transformer-based hybrid model for lithium-ion battery packs10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.239238 ↗
45. Pan, M., Zhong, K., Pan, Y., Xie, Y., Fu, C., Gu, J., Chen, H., Ji, Z., Li, L., and Li, M. (2025). Mechanistic study of soot reduction in Fe-MOFs modified alcohol-based fuel based on optical experiments and BO-GPR predictive modeling. J. Hazard. Mater., 139686.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139686 ↗