Memory-Based Particle Swarm Optimization for Smart Grid Virtual Power Plant Scheduling Using Fractional Calculus
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an engineering framework for smart grid virtual power plant (VPP) day-ahead scheduling using fractional calculus-enhanced particle swarm optimization, targeting practical deployment in energy management systems. A fractional calculus-enhanced particle swarm optimization algorithm was developed and validated for day-ahead scheduling in virtual power plants using authentic market data and rigorous statistical analysis. The algorithm incorporates Grünwald–Letnikov fractional derivatives with adaptive memory into particle velocity updates, enabling trajectory-aware search that leverages historical exploration patterns. A factorial experiment across 500 independent test cases (50 dates × 10 trials) with controlled random seeds demonstrated that fractional particle swarm optimization increased mean daily profit by $205, representing a 4.1% improvement over standard particle swarm optimization. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirmed statistical significance (p < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 1.08), with superior performance observed in 89.4% of cases. The factorial design identified fractional calculus as the primary performance driver, while advanced scenario generation provided no significant additional benefit. Sensitivity analysis indicated that wind generation variability was the primary predictor of performance variance, with profit difference standard deviations ranging from $34 to $325 depending on meteorological conditions, supporting the use of adaptive computational strategies. Computation required approximately two minutes per optimization on standard hardware. These findings establish fractional calculus as a credible enhancement for operational energy systems and demonstrate that the quality of optimization algorithms outweighs the complexity of forecast uncertainty modeling. The results extend fractional calculus applications from benchmark functions to practical infrastructure scheduling, with projected annual value exceeding $74,000 for a 50-megawatt system. The three-stage optimization architecture is designed for integration with standard energy management systems and SCADA platforms, offering a deployable pathway for smart grid operators.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Grid Energy Management · Electric Power System Optimization · Microgrid Control and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Smart Grids and Renewable Energy Laboratory, Lithuanian Energy Institute, 44403 Kaunas, Lithuania
Funding
Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba
References (94)
Show source-provided references
1. Impact of Virtual Power Plants on grid stability and renewable energy integration in smart cities using IoT10.1016/j.egyr.2025.02.048 ↗
2. Saboori, H., Mohammadi, M., and Taghe, R. (2011, January 25–28). Virtual power plant (VPP), definition, concept, components and types. Proceedings of the 2011 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, Wuhan, China.10.1109/APPEEC.2011.5749026 ↗
3. Two-stage stochastic optimization for operating a renewable-based microgrid10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119848 ↗
4. Bidding strategy of virtual power plant for participating in energy and spinning reserve markets—Part I: Problem formulation10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2070884 ↗
5. Strategic bidding for a virtual power plant in the day-ahead and real-time markets: A price-taker robust optimization approach10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2483781 ↗
6. Optimal offering strategy of a virtual power plant: A stochastic bi-level approach
7. Novel fractional-order model predictive control: State-space approach10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3093364 ↗
8. A risk-constrained decision support tool for EV aggregators participating in energy and frequency regulation markets10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106367 ↗
9. Development of Approximate Scheduling-adaptive Controllers for Multi-products Continuous Chemical Processes Using Deep Learning Techniques and Model Predictive Control
10. Novel fractional order particle swarm optimization
11. Albalawi, H., Muhammad, Y., Wadood, A., Khan, B.S., Zainab, S.T., and Alatwi, A.M. (2024). Leveraging the Performance of Integrated Power Systems with Wind Uncertainty Using Fractional Computing-Based Hybrid Method. Fractal Fract., 8.10.3390/fractalfract8090532 ↗
12. Chaos suppression in a fractional order financial system using intelligent regrouping PSO based fractional fuzzy control policy in the presence of fractional Gaussian noise10.1007/s11071-012-0632-7 ↗
13. A comprehensive review on microgrid and virtual power plant concepts employed for distributed energy resources scheduling in power systems10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.025 ↗
14. Lombardi, P., Powalko, M., and Rudion, K. (2009, January 26–30). Optimal operation of a virtual power plant. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, Calgary, AB, Canada.10.1109/PES.2009.5275995 ↗
15. Economic valuation of reserves in power systems with high penetration of wind power10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2016598 ↗
16. Birge, J.R., and Louveaux, F. (1997). Introduction to Stochastic Programming, Springer.
17. Offering model for a virtual power plant based on stochastic programming10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.077 ↗
18. Scenario reduction in stochastic programming10.1007/s10107-002-0331-0 ↗
19. Rahimian, H., and Mehrotra, S. (2019). Distributionally robust optimization: A review. arXiv.
20. State-of-the-art short-term electricity market operation with solar generation: A review10.1016/j.rser.2020.110647 ↗
21. Bolfek, M. (2025). A Convex-Approximation Approach for Ancillary Services Provisioning Based on Optimal Power Flow Problem in Distribution Networks. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, Department of Energy and Power Systems].
22. Adaptive simulated annealing schedule to the unit commitment problem10.1016/j.epsr.2009.10.019 ↗
23. Unit commitment computation by fuzzy adaptive particle swarm optimisation10.1049/iet-gtd:20060252 ↗
24. A survey of contextual optimization methods for decision-making under uncertainty10.1016/j.ejor.2024.03.020 ↗
25. Dynamics and control of initialized fractional-order systems10.1023/A:1016534921583 ↗
26. Analogue realizations of fractional-order controllers10.1023/A:1016556604320 ↗
27. Introducing the fractional-order Darwinian PSO10.1007/s11760-012-0316-2 ↗
28. Particle swarm optimization with fractional-order velocity10.1007/s11071-009-9649-y ↗
29. Multilevel image segmentation based on fractional-order Darwinian particle swarm optimization10.1109/TGRS.2013.2260552 ↗
30. Fractional-order comprehensive learning marine predators algorithm for global optimization and feature selection10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107603 ↗
31. Borja-Jaimes, V., Valdez-Martínez, J.S., Beltrán-Escobar, M., Cruz-Rojas, A., Gil-Velasco, A., and Coronel-Escamilla, A. (2025). A Review of Fractional Order Calculus Applications in Electric Vehicle Energy Storage and Management Systems. Mathematics, 13.10.3390/math13182920 ↗
32. Nguyen Hong, N., and Nguyen Duc, H. (2024). Virtual Power Plant’s Optimal Scheduling Strategy in Day-Ahead and Balancing Markets Considering Reserve Provision Model of Energy Storage System. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14052175 ↗
33. Latimier, R.L.G., Le Bouëdec, E., and Monbet, V. (2019). Modeling of the wind power forecast errors and associated optimal storage strategy. HAL, Available online: https://hal.science/hal-02151567v1.
34. Conditional prediction intervals of wind power generation10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2045774 ↗
35. Ensemble-based probabilistic forecasting at Horns Rev10.1002/we.309 ↗
36. Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications10.1137/1010093 ↗
37. Fractional Brownian motion in option pricing and dynamic delta hedging: Experimental simulations10.1016/j.najef.2023.102017 ↗
38. Beran, J. (2017). Statistics for Long-Memory Processes, Routledge.10.1201/9780203738481 ↗
39. A hybrid approach to multi-step, short-term wind speed forecasting using correlated features10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.041 ↗
40. Modeling persistence in hydrological time series using fractional differencing10.1029/WR020i012p01898 ↗
41. Sykulski, A.M., and Percival, D.B. (2016, January 13–16). Exact simulation of noncircular or improper complex-valued stationary Gaussian processes using circulant embedding. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 26th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP), Salerno, Italy.10.1109/MLSP.2016.7738840 ↗
42. Dieker, T. (2004). Simulation of Fractional Brownian Motion. [Master’s Thesis, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Twente].
43. Dong, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., and Mei, S. (2025). A Data-driven Dynamic Temporal Correlation Modeling Framework for Renewable Energy Scenario Generation. arXiv.10.1109/TSTE.2025.3605937 ↗
44. Dynamic sampling algorithms for multi-stage stochastic programs with risk aversion10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.056 ↗
45. Coherent measures of risk10.1111/1467-9965.00068 ↗
46. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk10.21314/JOR.2000.038 ↗
47. Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00271-6 ↗
48. Khemlichi, F., Idrissi Khamlichi, Y., and Elhaj Ben Ali, S. (2025). Modular Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Market Portfolio Optimization. Information, 16.10.3390/info16110961 ↗
49. A CVaR-constrained optimal power flow model for wind integrated power systems considering Transmission-side flexibility10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109087 ↗
50. An Integrated CVaR and Real Options Approach to Investments in the Energy Sector10.21314/JEM.2008.007 ↗
51. Kuhn, D., Esfahani, P.M., Nguyen, V.A., and Shafieezadeh-Abadeh, S. (2019). Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization: Theory and applications in machine learning. Operations Research & Management Science in the Age of Analytics, INFORMS.10.1287/educ.2019.0198 ↗
52. A stochastic programming approach to electric energy procurement for large consumers10.1109/TPWRS.2007.895164 ↗
53. Stochastic optimization of renewable-based microgrid operation incorporating battery operating cost10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2455491 ↗
54. Arbitrage strategy of renewable-based microgrids via peer-to-peer energy-trading10.1109/TSTE.2020.3045216 ↗
55. Ishibashi, T., Furukakoi, M., Uehara, A., Takahashi, H., and Senjyu, T. (2024, January 6–8). MPC-based Optimal Operation of Smart City Considering Seasonally Adjusted Parameter. Proceedings of the 2024 11th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems Engineering (CPESE), Fukuoka, Japan.10.1109/CPESE62584.2024.10841239 ↗
56. All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.09.001 ↗
57. IEA (2023). World Energy Outlook 2023, IEA. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023.
58. Han, S., Sun, S., Wu, N., Lu, J., Meng, W., and Yang, Z. (2024). An Integrated Energy Dispatch Model for Virtual Power Plants Based on Optimal Economic Benefits. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Energy, Electrical and Power Engineering, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-981-96-4710-1_1 ↗
59. Zhang, Y., Pan, J., Jiang, S., Zhu, H., Chen, F., Shu, Q., and Zhao, J. (2025). Virtual power plant load aggregation optimization scheduling strategy for port adjustable resources. Front. Energy Res., 13.10.3389/fenrg.2025.1617362 ↗
60. Podlubny, I. (1998). Fractional Differential Equations: An Introduction to Fractional Derivatives, Fractional Differential Equations, to Methods of Their Solution and Some of Their Applications, Elsevier.
61. A predictor-corrector approach for the numerical solution of fractional differential equations10.1023/A:1016592219341 ↗
62. Tarasov, V.E. (2011). Fractional Dynamics: Applications of Fractional Calculus to Dynamics of Particles, Fields and Media, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-14003-7 ↗
63. Fractional differential equations in electrochemistry10.1016/j.advengsoft.2008.12.012 ↗
64. Sabatier, J.A.T.M.J., Agrawal, O.P., and Machado, J.T. (2007). Advances in Fractional Calculus, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6042-7 ↗
65. Monje, C.A., Chen, Y., Vinagre, B.M., Xue, D., and Feliu, V. (2010). Fractional-Order Systems and Controls: Fundamentals and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84996-335-0 ↗
66. Wind energy: Forecasting challenges for its operational management10.1214/13-STS445 ↗
67. Time-adaptive quantile-copula for wind power probabilistic forecasting10.1016/j.renene.2011.08.015 ↗
68. Tests for Hurst effect10.1093/biomet/74.1.95 ↗
69. Hodge, B.M., Lew, D., Milligan, M., Gómez-Lázaro, E., Larsén, X.G., Giebel, G., and Flynn, D. (2012, January 13–15). Wind power forecasting error distributions: An international comparison. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Large-Scale Integration of Wind Power into Power Systems as Well as on Transmission Networks for Offshore Wind Power Plants, Lisbon, Portugal.
70. Credit risk optimization with conditional value-at-risk criterion10.1007/PL00011399 ↗
71. Conejo, A.J., Carrión, M., and Morales, J.M. (2010). Decision Making Under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-7421-1 ↗
72. Pflug, G.C. (2000). Some remarks on the value-at-risk and the conditional value-at-risk. Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-3150-7_15 ↗
73. Morales, J.M., Conejo, A.J., Madsen, H., Pinson, P., and Zugno, M. (2013). Integrating Renewables in Electricity Markets: Operational Problems, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-9411-9 ↗
74. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the ICNN’95—International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, Australia.
75. Shi, Y., and Eberhart, R. (1998, January 4–9). A modified particle swarm optimizer. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC), Anchorage, AK, USA.
76. Eberhart, R.C., and Shi, Y. (2000, January 16–19). Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC00), La Jolla, CA, USA.
77. The particle swarm—Explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space10.1109/4235.985692 ↗
78. A cooperative approach to particle swarm optimization10.1109/TEVC.2004.826069 ↗
79. Recent history of fractional calculus10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.05.027 ↗
80. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
81. Coello, C.A.C., Lamont, G.B., and Veldhuizen, D.A.V. (2007). Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, Springer.
82. Evaluating the ε-domination based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for a quick computation of Pareto-optimal solutions10.1162/106365605774666895 ↗
83. MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition10.1109/TEVC.2007.892759 ↗
84. Wood, A.J., Wollenberg, B.F., and Sheblé, G.B. (2013). Power Generation, Operation, and Control, John Wiley & Sons.
85. Conejo, A.J., and Sioshansi, R. (2017). Optimization in Engineering: Models and Algorithms, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-56769-3 ↗
86. A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem10.1109/TPWRS.2006.876672 ↗
87. A microgrid energy management system based on the rolling horizon strategy10.1109/TSG.2012.2231440 ↗
88. Ela, E., Milligan, M., and Kirby, B. (2011). Operating Reserves and Variable Generation, Technical Report NREL/TP-5500-51978.10.2172/1023095 ↗
89. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets
90. Gibbons, J.D., and Chakraborti, S. (2011). Nonparametric Statistical Inference, CRC Press. [5th ed.].10.1201/9781439896129 ↗
91. Field, A. (2024). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, Sage Publications.
92. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Routledge.10.4324/9780203771587 ↗
93. Efron, B., and Hastie, T. (2021). Computer Age Statistical Inference, Student Edition: Algorithms, Evidence, and Data Science, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108914062 ↗
94. Hollander, M., Wolfe, D.A., and Chicken, E. (2013). Nonparametric Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons.