journal article·2026-04-08Open access

Model for Structural and Parametric Optimization of the Mechanical Processing Technology for a Product

Gulnara Zhetessova, Irina Khrustaleva, Viacheslav Shkodyrev, Larisa Chernykh, Olga Zharkevich, Murat Kozhanov, Toty Buzauova

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 8

Abstract

Optimizing the parameters of the manufacturing process for products in terms of metalworking equipment is one of the key tasks in technological preparation for production. This process is structurally complex, characterized by an ordered set of actions of various types. The basis for improving the efficiency of the technological process is the comprehensive optimization of the parameters of individual elements that form its structure. To solve this problem, an integrated model for comprehensive multi-criteria optimization of a structurally complex process has been developed, establishing a clear hierarchical relationship between its elements. The model is based on the structural decomposition of two processes: the process of forming individual design elements and the technological process of manufacturing a product. Structural hierarchical models have been developed for each process. The structure of the integrated model contains six levels of control. For each level of control, a set of target indicators and control parameters has been formed. The article presents the results of testing the proposed model using the example of optimizing the technological process of mechanical processing for the “Housing” product. As part of the study, structural and parametric optimization of the manufacturing process for this part was carried out. During the study, the structure of the technological processing route was optimized, as well as individual technological operations and technological transitions. Over the course of the work, the technological equipment and processing methods used for shaping a number of surfaces were replaced. As a result of the optimization, the overall labor intensity of the technological process for manufacturing the “Housing” product was reduced by 19.8%, and the manufacturing accuracy of the most critical surfaces was increased by 16.4%. The results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed model for comprehensive optimization of the mechanical processing technological process.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Engineering Technology and Methodologies · Advanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry · Mechanical Systems and Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Technological Equipment, Mechanical Engineering and Standardization, Faculty of Metallurgy and Mechanical Engineering, Abylkas Saginov Karaganda Technical University, Karaganda 100012, Kazakhstan

Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Transportation, Graduate School of Mechanical Engineering, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia

Institute of Computer Science and Cyber Security, Graduate School of Cyber-Physical Systems Management, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia

Department of Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Information Technology, Abylkas Saginov Karaganda Technical University, Karaganda 100012, Kazakhstan

Institute of Digitalization and Innovation, Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

Funding

Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Kempf, K., Keskinocak, P., and Uzsoy, R. (2011). Optimization Models of Production Planning Problems. Planning Production and Inventories in the Extended Enterprise, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-8191-2 ↗
2. Dynamic personnel rescheduling: Insights and recovery strategies10.1007/s10951-023-00785-7 ↗
3. A fast elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
4. Zeng, Z., Zhang, W., and Jin, H.A. (2025). “C3-TOPSIS-Pareto” Based Model for Identifying Critical Nodes in Complex Networks. Systems, 13.10.3390/systems13020138 ↗
5. Joint optimization of production scheduling and worker allocation under a resource dedication policy in aircraft assembly lines10.1016/j.rcim.2025.103047 ↗
6. Integrated network-computing resource allocation and optimized scheduling for cyber physical production system10.1016/j.adhoc.2025.103831 ↗
7. Integrated optimization of production and maintenance scheduling with third-party worker resource constraints in distributed parallel machines environment10.1016/j.cie.2024.110647 ↗
8. Optimization of production, distribution, natural resources and capacity planning throughout process sector worldwide supply chains with various goals10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105187 ↗
9. Integrated optimization of stochastic resource scheduling and machine maintenance in prefabricated component production processes10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105030 ↗
10. Multi-objective teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm for carbon-efficient integrated scheduling of distributed production and distribution considering shared transportation resource10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137061 ↗
11. Production Line Energy Cost Optimization with Renewable Energy Resource Usage in a Flexible Job Shop Configuration10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.918 ↗
12. How to improve sustainability for industrial sectors: Optimizing production scales based on performance-oriented resource reallocation10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106525 ↗
13. Optimizing sensitivity parameters of automated driving vehicles in an open heterogeneous traffic flow system
14. Fleet management enterprise systems and traffic control synergies: A literature review and research agenda10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.321 ↗
15. Fast scheduling of human-robot teams collaboration on synchronised production-logistics tasks in aircraft assembly10.1016/j.rcim.2023.102620 ↗
16. Task scheduling method for HRC workplaces based on capabilities and execution time assumptions for robots10.1016/j.cirp.2020.04.030 ↗
17. A comprehensive framework for computationally efficient system-level design optimization of machine tools10.1016/j.jmsy.2026.02.005 ↗
18. Improvement of Base Sets for Complex Configuration Parts when Assessing their Manufacturability within Industry 4.0
19. Zhetessova, G., Khrustaleva, I., Shkodyrev, V., Zharkevich, O., Kanatova, A., Kozhanov, M., Tattimbetova, G., and Abdugaliyeva, G. (2025). Model of Optimization of Process Parameters for Machining of Separate Design Elements of the Product. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15105395 ↗
20. Digital twin-enabled Graduation Intelligent Manufacturing System for fixed-position assembly islands10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101917 ↗
21. Dataset preprocessing and optimization for machine learning-based building load prediction: A review10.1016/j.energy.2026.139992 ↗
22. Increasing the efficiency of technological preparation for the production of the manufacture components equipment for the mineral resource complex10.31897/PMI.2021.3.11 ↗
23. Mechanostructures: Rational mechanical design, fabrication, performance evaluation, and industrial application of advanced structures10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101021 ↗
24. Artificial Intelligence in manufacturing: State of the art, perspectives, and future directions10.1016/j.cirp.2024.04.101 ↗
25. Digital twins for cutting processes10.1016/j.cirp.2023.05.006 ↗
26. Wu, Z., and Liang, C. (2024). A Review and Prospects of Manufacturing Process Knowledge Acquisition, Representation, and Application. Machines, 12.10.3390/machines12060416 ↗
27. Goodarzimehr, V., Pereira, J.L.J., and Khodadadi, N. (2025). MOSRS: An engineering multi-objective optimization through Einsteinian concept. PLoS ONE, 20.10.1371/journal.pone.0328005 ↗
28. Additive Optimization Method for Choosing CNC Machines for Technological Preparation of Machine-Building Production
29. Yang, X., Deng, Z., Zhu, D., Zhuo, R., Xu, X., and Liu, W. (2026). A Review of Research on Multi-Objective Process Parameter Optimization Technology for Grinding Machining. Technologies, 14.10.3390/technologies14010064 ↗
30. Improved multi-objective decision-making in manufacturing processes through uncertainty quantification and robust pareto front modelling10.1038/s41598-025-97508-z ↗
31. A review of Pareto pruning methods for multi-objective optimization10.1016/j.cie.2022.108022 ↗
32. The development of the computer-aided design system for production processes of component part machining for single-piece production and repair conditions10.5937/jaes17-21470 ↗
33. Uncovering hidden capacity in overall equipment effectiveness management International10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108494 ↗