A Combined Wavelet–SVD Denoising and Wavelet Packet Decomposition Method for Quantitative GPR-Based Assessment of Compaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Ballast compaction is a critical factor influencing ballast bed condition and the operational safety of heavy-haul railways. However, existing quantitative evaluation methods often suffer from overly idealized simulation models and limitations in signal processing and assessment frameworks. To address these issues, this study proposes a quantitative analysis approach for ballast compaction by integrating non-uniform medium simulation modeling, wavelet–Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) joint denoising, frequency–wavenumber (F-K) migration imaging, and wavelet packet decomposition (WPD)-based feature extraction. Forward simulations were conducted based on the constructed model, and the proposed methodology was validated using 1.5 GHz (gigahertz, 1 GHz = 109 Hz) ground penetrating radar (GPR) data acquired from compaction experiments. The results demonstrate that wavelet–SVD joint denoising effectively suppresses deep coherent noise caused by strong reflections from sleepers, significantly enhancing the identification of deep effective signals and ensuring accurate localization and feature extraction of compaction zones. The Geometric Mean of WPD High/Low-Frequency Energy Ratio (GMHLFER) exhibits a strong positive correlation with the degree of compaction. In simulations, as the proportion of compacted material increased from 9% to 21%, the GMHLFER rose from 21.555 to 26.581. In field tests, the value increased from 22.012 to 26.012 as compaction severity progressed from slight to severe, demonstrating stable responses across full-gradient compaction conditions and indicating high robustness and sensitivity. The proposed method provides an effective approach for quantitative characterization of ballast compaction in heavy-haul railways, and offers a promising technical pathway for intelligent inspection and condition assessment of railway ballast beds.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China Energy Shuohuang Railway Development Co., Ltd., Cangzhou 062350, China
Hangzhou Institute of Technology, Xidian University, Hangzhou 311231, China
School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. The determination of the repairs of railway track considering the reliability and risk level10.1051/e3sconf/202015706031 ↗
2. Improvement recommendations for railway infrastructure maintenance10.1051/e3sconf/202015701001 ↗
3. Li, C., Wang, Y., Ma, Q., and Wan, X. (2025). Multi-Domain Feature Analysis and Application Research of GPR Aliased Signals. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25092741 ↗
4. Study on automated detection methods of shallow surface soil water content based on GPR signal level10.1016/j.rse.2025.115003 ↗
5. Improving the accuracy of pavement structural quality assessment by correcting numerical hypothetical model of modulus Back-Calculation through GPR10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127422 ↗
6. Void detection behind tunnel concrete lining by an SH-Ultrasonic-assisted GPR method10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.106034 ↗
7. Bayesian optimization based extreme gradient boosting and GPR time-frequency features for the recognition of moisture damage in asphalt pavement10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136675 ↗
8. Advancing railway track health monitoring: Integrating GPR, InSAR and machine learning for enhanced asset management10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105378 ↗
9. Zhang, H., Ma, Z., Fan, X., and Hou, F. (2025). Synergistic Multi-Model Approach for GPR Data Interpretation: Forward Modeling and Robust Object Detection. Remote Sens., 17.10.3390/rs17142521 ↗
10. Rapid subsurface sensing via Bayesian-optimized FDTD modeling of ground penetrating radar10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112243 ↗
11. A discrete element study on the deformation and degradation of coal-fouled ballast10.1007/s11440-022-01453-4 ↗
12. Discrete element modelling of railway ballast performance considering particle shape and rolling resistance10.1007/s40534-020-00216-9 ↗
13. Performance of ballast influenced by deformation and degradation10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001515 ↗
14. Efficient DEM simulations of railway ballast using simple particle shapes10.1007/s10035-022-01274-y ↗
15. Paredes-Palacios, D., Mota-Toledo, F., Biosca, B., Arévalo-Lomas, L., and Díaz-Curiel, J. (2022). Optimization of Dominant Frequency and Bandwidth Analysis. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22249851 ↗
16. The effect of fracture aperture and filling material on GPR signal10.1007/s10064-013-0566-4 ↗
17. A rapid detection method for coal dust thickness in heavy-haul railway ballast10.1038/s41598-025-31834-0 ↗
18. Ballast fouling inspection and quantification with GPR10.1080/23248378.2022.2064346 ↗
19. Railway ballast layer inspection with different GPR antennas and frequencies10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100823 ↗
20. Overview and outlook on railway track stiffness measurement10.1007/s40534-016-0104-8 ↗
21. On the determination of the rail support modulus k10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00151-1 ↗
22. Kaewunruen, S., and Remennikov, A. (2005, January 11–14). Application of experimental modal testing for estimating dynamic properties of structural components. Proceedings of the Australian Structural Engineering Conference 2005 (ASEC 2005), Newcastle, Australia.
23. Deflectometer-based analysis of ballasted railway tracks10.1680/geng.2007.160.3.169 ↗
24. On the vertical modulus in the standard railway track analysis
25. Automated concrete damage detection using GPR10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106453 ↗
26. Intelligent recognition of subgrade damages combining GPR signals and CNN models
27. Yan, Y., Jiao, G., Cui, M., and Ni, L. (2025). The Lightweight Method of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Hidden Defect Detection Based on SESM-YOLO. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15132345 ↗
28. Research on lightweight GPR road surface disease image recognition and data expansion algorithm based on YOLO and GAN
29. Liu, Z., Wu, W., Gu, X., Li, S., Wang, L., and Zhang, T. (2021). Application of Combining YOLO Models and 3D GPR Images in Road Detection and Maintenance. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13061081 ↗
30. Li, Y., Zhao, Z., Luo, Y., and Qiu, Z. (2020). Real-Time Pattern-Recognition of GPR Images with YOLO v3 Implemented by Tensorflow. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20226476 ↗
31. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank10.1007/BF02288367 ↗
32. Jamming recognition method based on wavelet packet decomposition10.1016/j.dcan.2025.05.004 ↗
33. Enhanced obesity classification with wavelet packet decomposition10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01603-1 ↗
34. A fusion wavelet-based binary pattern approach10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.110019 ↗