A Study on the Factors Influencing User Experience of AI Pose Recognition Feedback Systems in Ballet-Class Contexts
Source abstract
Abstract
With advances in artificial intelligence and computer vision, pose recognition-based feedback systems are increasingly being introduced into dance classes to support movement understanding and error correction. However, how learners interpret and adopt such feedback during actual classroom use, and how this process shapes their intention to continue using the system, remains insufficiently understood. This study develops and validates a three-layer “System–Psychological–Experience” model, with learning experience positioned as the key mechanism linking antecedent factors to usage intention. A sequential mixed-methods design was employed. In Phase 1, interviews were conducted with 20 dance majors to identify factors relevant to classroom integration. In Phase 2, structural equation modeling was performed using 398 valid survey responses. In Phase 3, explanatory interviews with five students and five teachers were conducted to further interpret the underlying mechanisms. The results showed that learning experience was the strongest direct predictor of usage intention (β = 0.409, p < 0.001). At the system layer, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use contributed to usage intention mainly by strengthening learning experience. At the psychological layer, system trust and perceived value showed the same indirect pattern through learning experience. Teaching context also played an important role. Teaching compatibility directly enhanced learning experience, while teacher influence both strengthened learning experience and indirectly contributed to usage intention by increasing system trust and perceived value. Overall, the findings suggest that learners’ intention to continue using pose recognition-based feedback systems is closely associated with their overall learning experience in teacher-mediated classroom practice, and the study offers implications for classroom-oriented design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Human Motion and Animation · Diversity and Impact of Dance · Educational Games and Gamification
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Smart Experience Design Department, Graduate School of Techno Design, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Republic of Korea
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. A Review of Computer Vision-Based Approaches for Physical Rehabilitation and Assessment10.1007/s00530-021-00815-4 ↗
2. Monocular Human Pose Estimation: A Survey of Deep Learning-Based Methods10.1016/j.cviu.2019.102897 ↗
3. Cao, Z., Simon, T., Wei, S.-E., and Sheikh, Y. (2017, January 21–26). Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2017), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.143 ↗
4. Deep Learning-Based Human Body Pose Estimation in Providing Feedback for Physical Movement: A Review10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36589 ↗
5. Robust Human Interaction Recognition Using Extended Kalman Filter
6. Sample-Cohesive Pose-Aware Contrastive Facial Representation Learning10.1007/s11263-025-02348-z ↗
7. A Weight-Aware-Based Multisource Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Method for Human Motion Intention Recognition10.1109/TCYB.2025.3565754 ↗
8. Dance Interactive Learning Systems: A Study on Interaction Workflow and Teaching Approaches
9. Soerel, B.F., Toering, T.T., Dicks, M., and Oudejans, R.R.D. (2023). An Analysis of Teachers’ Instructions and Feedback at a Contemporary Dance University. Front. Psychol., 14.10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1133737 ↗
10. “BOOM, So It Will Be like an Attack”: Demonstrating in a Dance Class through Verbal Sound and Body Imagery10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100488 ↗
11. Wilmerding, V., and Krasnow, D. (2009). Motor Learning and Teaching Dance, IADMS. IADMS Resource Paper for Dancers and Teachers.
12. The Neuroscience of Dance: A Conceptual Framework and Systematic Review10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105197 ↗
13. Augmented Visual, Auditory, Haptic, and Multimodal Feedback in Motor Learning: A Review10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8 ↗
14. Teaching with Analytics: Towards a Situated Model of Instructional Decision-Making
15. Effects of AI-Assisted Dance Skills Teaching, Evaluation and Visual Feedback on Dance Students’ Learning Performance, Motivation and Self-Efficacy10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103410 ↗
16. Dancing on the Inside: A Qualitative Study on Online Dance Learning with Teacher–AI Cooperation10.1007/s10639-023-11649-0 ↗
17. Application and Theory Gaps during the Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002 ↗
18. Stability through Human Perception: Technology Acceptance Models’ Robustness across Various Interaction Perspectives and Comparable Technologies10.1016/j.chbr.2026.100930 ↗
19. Investigating the Actual Usage Behavior of Thai Traditional Craftsmen in Adopting AI through a Hybrid SEM–ANN Approach10.1057/s41599-025-06163-2 ↗
20. Orchestrating Technology Enhanced Learning: A Literature Review and a Conceptual Framework10.1504/IJTEL.2011.045449 ↗
21. Technology Acceptance Model in Educational Context: A Systematic Literature Review10.1111/bjet.12864 ↗
22. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View10.2307/30036540 ↗
23. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology10.2307/249008 ↗
24. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education: A Systematic Review10.1177/21582440241229570 ↗
25. The Effect of Augmented Feedback on the Performance and Learning of Gross Motor and Sport-Specific Skills in Adults: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102277 ↗
26. PupilRec: Leveraging Pupil Morphology for Recommending on Smartphones10.1109/JIOT.2022.3181607 ↗
27. Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model10.2307/3250921 ↗
28. Explaining and Predicting Users’ Continuance Intention toward e-Learning: An Extension of the Expectation–Confirmation Model10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002 ↗
29. User Experience—A Research Agenda10.1080/01449290500330331 ↗
30. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology10.2307/41410412 ↗
31. Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance10.2307/249689 ↗
32. The Effects of Education Compatibility and Technological Expectancy on E-Learning Acceptance10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.009 ↗
33. Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologies
34. Wischnewski, M., Azad, M., He, J., Esterwood, C., Körber, M., and Takayama, L. (2023, January 23–28). Measuring and Understanding Trust Calibrations for Automated Systems: A Survey of Methods and Future Directions. Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hamburg, Germany.10.1145/3544548.3581197 ↗
35. Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Martens, J.B. (2009, January 4–9). User experience over time: An initial framework. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/1518701.1518814 ↗
36. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis10.1086/651257 ↗
37. Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x ↗
38. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422 ↗
39. Soper, D.S. (2026, March 26). A-priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models. Available online: https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc.
40. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [2nd ed.].
41. CB-SEM vs. PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092 ↗
42. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 ↗
43. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 ↗
44. Kock, N. (2021). WarpPLS User Manual, ScriptWarp Systems. [version 7.0]. Available online: https://www.scriptwarp.com/warppls/.
45. Radell, S.A. (2019). Mirrors in the Dance Class: Help or Hindrance, IADMS. IADMS Resource Paper.
46. Notarnicola, A., Maccagnano, G., Pesce, V., Di Pierro, S., Tafuri, S., and Moretti, B. (2014). Effect of Teaching with or without Mirror on Balance in Young Female Ballet Students. BMC Res. Notes, 7.10.1186/1756-0500-7-426 ↗
47. Marco-Ahulló, A., Villarrasa-Sapiña, I., Romero-Martínez, J., Monfort-Torres, G., Toca-Herrera, J.L., and García-Massó, X. (2024). Effect of Reduced Feedback Frequencies on Motor Learning in a Postural Control Task in Young Adults. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24051404 ↗