journal article·2026-03-27Open access

Bioenergy Production and Consumption Prediction: The Best Predictors for the Best Machine Learning Models from Hundreds of Variables

Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 7

Abstract

The selection of variables that can be used to predict another variable is usually a challenge, considering that national and international databases contain a considerable amount of information and that the literature, in some circumstances, is unclear about the most adjusted predictors and the most accurate models. Without appropriate approaches to select the variables, there are actual risks of considering irrelevant information and ignoring important data in the prediction analysis. Artificial intelligence and, in particular, machine learning methodologies provide interesting support for identifying the most important predictors and the most accurate algorithms. In this way, this research intends to identify the most important variables to predict bioenergy production and consumption and select the most accurate models. For this, statistical information from the FAOSTAT database for the year 2023 was considered. This information was analysed considering machine learning approaches following IBM SPSS Modeler (Version 18.4) procedures. The results obtained indicate that 50% of bioenergy is produced and consumed worldwide by five countries (India, China, the United States of America, Brazil and Ethiopia) and most of this energy comes from firewood (60%). Out of a total of 456 inputs (consideration of this set of FAOSTAT variables is a novelty in the literature), bioenergy production and consumption are mainly explained by fuelwood production, with elasticities of 0.75% and 0.7%, respectively. The explanatory variable “fuelwood production” was identified from the most significant variables found by the machine learning approaches and was subsequently used as an independent variable in linear regressions. XGBoost Linear, XGBoost Tree, Linear, CHAID, Tree-AS, and C&R Tree are the most accurate models (lower relative error) for predicting bioenergy production and consumption worldwide.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Forest Biomass Utilization and Management · Energy Load and Power Forecasting · Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Agriculture (ESAV), Polytechnic Institute of Viseu (IPV), 3500-631 Viseu, Portugal

Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal

Funding

FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia I.P. https://ror.org/00snfqn58

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Trends and Advancements in Utilization of Biomass Waste for Gasification: A Bibliometric Review10.1111/gcbb.70095 ↗
2. Elkhwesky, Z., Gumbo, A.R., Abuelhassan, A.E., Hassan, H., Elkhwesky, F.F.Y., and El Manzani, Y. (2025). A Systematic Review with Bibliometric Analysis of Food Waste Research in Contemporary Hospitality. J. Culin. Sci. Technol., 1–33.10.1080/15428052.2025.2599860 ↗
3. Food waste in the context of Poland’s food security: Identifying research path dependency through bibliometric research
4. Evolving Paradigms in Sorghum Research: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Global Trends and Future Directions10.18280/ijdne.190318 ↗
5. A Bibliometric Description of Organosolv Pretreatment for Coconut Waste Valorization10.1007/s12155-022-10563-6 ↗
6. Aguilar-Rivera, N., and Enríquez-Poy, M. (2025). Strategies for the Development of Sugarcane Ecotourism in Veracruz, Mexico. Sugar Tech.10.1007/s12355-025-01689-w ↗
7. Dos Santos, E.R., Carvalho, W.D., and Mustin, K. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Sugarcane Production and Its Effects on Biodiversity: Trends, Critical Points, and Knowledge Gaps. Conservation, 5.10.3390/conservation5040067 ↗
8. Unlocking the Potential of Pongamia pinnata: A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis (ScoRBA) Guided by the PAGER Framework
9. A bibliometric landscape of polyhydroxyalkanoates production from low-cost substrates by Cupriavidus necator and its perspectives for the Latin American bioeconomy
10. A literature review on forest bioeconomy with a bibliometric network analysis10.17221/75/2020-JFS ↗
11. Analysis of research hotspots and development trends of iron-modified biochar based on bibliometrics
12. Global evolution of research on autohydrolysis (hydrothermal) pretreatment as a green technology for biorefineries: A bibliometric analysis
13. Enviro-economic and feasibility analysis of industrial hemp value chain: A systematic literature review10.1111/gcbb.13141 ↗
14. Trends and progress in sorghum research over two decades, and implications to global food security10.1016/j.sajb.2022.11.025 ↗
15. A systematic overview, trends and global perspectives on blue carbon: A bibliometric study (2003–2021)10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110063 ↗
16. Li, M., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Liu, B., Xue, H., Wu, L., and Li, Z. (2023). Knowledge Mapping of High-Rate Algal Ponds Research. Water, 15.10.3390/w15101916 ↗
17. How has scientific literature addressed crop planning at farm level: A bibliometric-qualitative review10.1016/j.farsys.2025.100139 ↗
18. Biohydrogen production for sustainable energy transition: A bibliometric and systematic review of the reaction mechanisms, challenges, knowledge gaps and emerging trends10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107345 ↗
19. Unraveling Factors Affecting Food Waste Globally: A PRISMA-Based Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis10.18280/ijdne.190638 ↗
20. Helal, M.A., Anderson, N., Wei, Y., and Thompson, M. (2023). A Review of Biomass-to-Bioenergy Supply Chain Research Using Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16031187 ↗
21. Cheng, Y., Zhao, C., Neupane, P., Benjamin, B., Wang, J., and Zhang, T. (2023). Applicability and Trend of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Bioenergy Research between 1991–2021: A Bibliometric Analysis. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16031235 ↗
22. Hybrid Simulation Optimization Method for Biomass Supply Chain Planning: A Systematic Review10.1007/s12155-025-10903-2 ↗
23. Advancements in artificial neural networks and fast pyrolysis of biomass processing: A comprehensive review and a bibliometric analysis10.1016/j.jaap.2025.107098 ↗
24. (2026, January 11). FAOSTAT Several Statistics. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.
25. (IBM SPSS, 2026). IBM SPSS, Version 18.4.
26. StataCorp (2025). Stata 19 Base Reference Manual 2025, StataCorp.
27. StataCorp (2025). Stata Statistical Software, Release 19, StataCorp.10.4324/9781032717425-3 ↗
28. Peguero, D.A., Gold, M., Vandeweyer, D., Zurbrügg, C., and Mathys, A. (2022). A Review of Pretreatment Methods to Improve Agri-Food Waste Bioconversion by Black Soldier Fly Larvae. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 5.10.3389/fsufs.2021.745894 ↗
29. Tobacco waste valorization through composting: A systematic review of biomass conversion efficiency and circular bioeconomy strategies10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108137 ↗
30. The battle for biomass: A systematic review of food-feed-fuel competition10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100330 ↗
31. Systematic review on effects of bioenergy from edible versus inedible feedstocks on food security10.1038/s41538-021-00091-6 ↗
32. Wood supply chain risks and risk mitigation strategies: A systematic review focusing on the Northern hemisphere10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106001 ↗
33. Barbosa Júnior, M.R., Moreira, B.R.A., de Brito Filho, A.L., Tedesco, D., Shiratsuchi, L.S., and Silva, R.P. (2022). UAVs to Monitor and Manage Sugarcane: Integrative Review. Agronomy, 12.10.3390/agronomy12030661 ↗
34. Cumplido-Marin, L., Graves, A.R., Burgess, P.J., Morhart, C., Paris, P., Jablonowski, N.D., Facciotto, G., Bury, M., Martens, R., and Nahm, M. (2020). Two novel energy crops: Sida hermaphrodita (L.) rusby and Silphium perfoliatum L.-state of knowledge. Agronomy, 10.10.3390/agronomy10070928 ↗
35. Microbial fuel cells as future of green technology: A systematic review10.1007/s13205-025-04388-1 ↗
36. A systematic review on potential microbial carbohydrases: Current and future perspectives10.1080/10408398.2022.2106545 ↗
37. Exploring the Diverse Benefits of Pine Needle Litter for Environmental Sustainability and Economic Development: A Systematic Literature Review
38. Importance of sample size, data type and prediction method for remote sensing-based estimations of aboveground forest biomass10.1016/j.rse.2014.07.028 ↗
39. The role of geospatial technologies for sustainable livestock manure management: A systematic review10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176687 ↗
40. Masood, A., Ahmed, U., Hassan, S.Z., Khan, A.R., and Mahmood, A. (2025). Economic Value Creation of Artificial Intelligence in Supporting Variable Renewable Energy Resource Integration to Power Systems: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 17.10.20944/preprints202501.0631.v1 ↗
41. Agri-Waste Valorization: Pathways to Sustainable Bioenergy and Biochemical Innovation10.1007/s43615-025-00688-z ↗
42. A systematic review of artificial intelligence and machine learning in energy sustainability: Research topics and trends10.1016/j.egyr.2025.05.021 ↗
43. Advancing the bioconversion process of food waste into methane: A systematic review10.1016/j.wasman.2022.11.030 ↗
44. Machine learning for renewable energy advancements: Prospects and emerging techniques10.1016/j.egyr.2025.109008 ↗
45. Enhanced artificial neural networks in predicting energy efficiency and minimize emissions from thermal treatment of lignocellulosic biowaste10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108638 ↗
46. Plant Power: Opportunities and challenges for meeting sustainable energy needs from the plant and fungal kingdoms10.1002/ppp3.10147 ↗
47. Efforts on Small- and Large-Scale Cultivation of Isochrysis galbana for Enhanced Growth and Lipid Production: A Systematic Review Towards Biorefinery Applications10.1007/s12155-025-10837-9 ↗
48. microRNAs and stress adaptation in grasses: A systematic review10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110783 ↗
49. Life Cycle Assessment of Forest-Derived Solid Biofuels: A Systematic Review of the Literature10.1007/s12155-021-10346-5 ↗
50. Exploring the potential of distillery vinasses through upcycling: Pathways to a circular economy10.1016/j.eti.2025.104072 ↗
51. Land use change to bioenergy: A meta-analysis of soil carbon and GHG emissions10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.05.008 ↗
52. Bioenergy production and sustainable development: Science base for policymaking remains limited10.1111/gcbb.12338 ↗
53. Sharma, S., and Chaubey, I. (2017). Surface and subsurface transport of nitrate loss from the selected bioenergy crop fields: Systematic review, analysis and future directions. Agriculture, 7.10.3390/agriculture7030027 ↗
54. Managing harvesting residues: A systematic review of management treatments around the world10.1093/forestry/cpae041 ↗
55. Are biomass feedstocks sustainable? A systematic review of three key sustainability metrics10.1111/gcbb.13187 ↗
56. The good, the bad, and the future: Systematic review identifies best use of biomass to meet air quality and climate policies in California10.1111/gcbb.13101 ↗
57. Lungaho, M., Ojuederie, O.B., Odozi, E.B., Mshelmbula, B.P., Onawo, L.O., Igiebor, F.A., Uselu, A., Adegboyega, T.T., and Ikhajiagbe, B. (2025). From discard to resource: Unlocking the environmental and nutritional value of Bambara groundnut waste. Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 9.10.3389/fsufs.2025.1684699 ↗
58. Feasibility of mitigation measures for agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the UK. A systematic review10.1007/s13593-023-00938-0 ↗
59. Anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes: A systematic review focused on feedstock physicochemical parameter optimization10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108671 ↗
60. A systematic review of the conceptual differences of environmental assessment and ecosystem service studies of biofuel and bioenergy production10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.05.003 ↗
61. Climate-smart agroforestry systems and practices: A systematic review of what works, what doesn’t work, and why10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102937 ↗
62. A systematic review of the sustainability assessment of bioenergy: The case of gaseous biofuels10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.03.014 ↗
63. Drivers and barriers of residual agroforestry biomass valorization: A systematic literature review10.1007/s10457-024-01131-2 ↗