journal article·2026-03-23Open access

The Potential Use of a Land Trend Algorithm for Regional Landslide Mapping in Indonesia

Tubagus Nur Rahmat Putra, Muhammad Aufaristama, Khaled Ahmed, Mochamad Candra Wirawan Arief, Rahmihafiza Hanafi, Bambang Wijatmoko, Irwan Ary Dharmawan

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 6

Abstract

Indonesia is among the most landslide-prone countries in the world, with thousands of fatalities and widespread infrastructure damage recorded over recent decades. Despite this high hazard level, regional-scale landslide monitoring remains constrained by the limitations of conventional bitemporal satellite imagery, which is susceptible to cloud contamination, dependent on precise acquisition timing, and unable to capture the full temporal dynamics of landslide occurrence and recovery. While the LandTrendr (Landsat-based Detection of Trends in Disturbance and Recovery) algorithm has been widely applied for detecting vegetation disturbances such as forest loss and land-use change, its potential for landslide detection in tropical environments has not been sufficiently explored. This study aims to evaluate the applicability of LandTrendr applied to long-term Landsat time series imagery for automated regional-scale landslide detection and mapping in Indonesia. The method integrates temporal segmentation of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) derived from Landsat imagery spanning 2000–2022 with slope information from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) to identify the characteristic drop-recovery spectral signature associated with landslide events. The algorithm was applied and evaluated in two geologically distinct study areas: Lombok, West Nusa Tenggara, and Pasaman, West Sumatra. Detection accuracies of 25.9% by location and 20.3% by area were achieved in Lombok and 76.3% by location and 85.3% by area in Pasaman. The lower accuracy in Lombok is primarily attributed to the predominance of small landslides below the sensor’s spatial resolution and rapid vegetation recovery. The proposed approach demonstrates the unique capability of LandTrendr to model the entire life cycle of a mass movement event, from pre-event stability through abrupt disturbance to ecological recovery within a single unified framework, providing a scalable and cost-effective tool for long-term landslide monitoring applicable to other tropical, landslide-prone regions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Landslides and related hazards · Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques · Fire effects on ecosystems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Ir. Soekarno KM 21, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia

Department of Geosciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates

Center of Environment and Sustainability Science, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Ir. Soekarno KM 21, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia

Center for Sustainable Campus Development and Environmental Safety, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Ir. Soekarno KM 21, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia

Funding

Universitas Padjadjaran

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. A simple definition of a landslide10.1007/BF02590167 ↗
2. Turner, A.K., and Schuster, R.L. (1996). Landslide types and processes. Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation, National Research Council.
3. Highland, L.M., and Bobrowsky, P. (2008). The Landslide Handbook—A Guide to Understanding Landslides, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1325.10.3133/cir1325 ↗
4. Dandridge, C., Stanley, T.A., Kirschbaum, D.B., and Lakshmi, V. (2023). Spatial and temporal analysis of global landslide reporting using a decade of the Global Landslide Catalog. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15043323 ↗
5. Wang, F., Miyajima, M., Li, T., Shan, W., and Fathani, T.F. (2013). Progress of Geo-Disaster Mitigation Technology in Asia, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-29107-4 ↗
6. Malet, J.P., Glade, T., and Casagli, N. (2010). Landslide hazard and risk in Indonesia. Mountain Risks: Bringing Science to Society, CERG Editions.
7. A global landslide catalog for hazard applications: Method, results, and limitations10.1007/s11069-009-9401-4 ↗
8. Digital change detection methods in natural ecosystem monitoring: A review10.1142/9789812777249_0001 ↗
9. Change detection techniques10.1080/0143116031000139863 ↗
10. Landslide inventory mapping from Landsat-8 NDVI time series using adaptive landslide interval detection10.5194/isprs-annals-V-3-2022-557-2022 ↗
11. Remote sensing image thresholding methods for determining landslide activity10.1080/01431160512331330481 ↗
12. Continuous monitoring of land disturbance based on Landsat time series10.1016/j.rse.2020.111824 ↗
13. Application of High-Resolution Remote-Sensing Data for Land Use Land Cover Mapping of University Campus10.1155/2021/5519011 ↗
14. Semi-automated detection of landslide timing using harmonic modelling of satellite imagery, Buckinghorse River, Canada
15. Kennedy, R.E., Yang, Z., Gorelick, N., Braaten, J., Cavalcante, L., Cohen, W.B., and Healey, S. (2018). Implementation of the LandTrendr algorithm on Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10050691 ↗
16. Sijabat, K.R., Aufaristama, M., Wirawan Arief, M.C., and Dharmawan, I.A. (2025). Integrating Remote Sensing and Street View Imagery with Deep Learning for Urban Slum Mapping: A Case Study from Bandung City. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15148044 ↗
17. Global Landslide Finder: Detecting the Time and Place of Landslides with Dense Earth Observation Time Series10.3390/geohazards5030039 ↗
18. Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using Landsat time series10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.011 ↗
19. The SWADE model for landslide dating in time series of optical satellite imagery10.1007/s10346-022-02012-4 ↗
20. Fjeld, M.B. (2018). Detection of Landslides—Using Optical Satellite Remote Sensing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
21. Razak, K.A., Bucksch, A., Damen, M., van Westen, C., Straatsma, M., and de Jong, S. (2013). Characterizing tree growth anomaly induced by landslides using LiDAR. Landslide Science and Practice: Volume 1: Landslide Inventory and Susceptibility and Hazard Zoning, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-31325-7_31 ↗
22. A LandTrendr multispectral ensemble for forest disturbance detection10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.015 ↗
23. Demystifying LandTrendr and CCDC temporal segmentation
24. Detecting the dynamics of vegetation disturbance and recovery in surface mining area via Landsat imagery and LandTrendr algorithm10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.050 ↗
25. Landslides triggered by multiple earthquakes: Insights from the 2018 Lombok (Indonesia) events10.1007/s11069-019-03718-w ↗
26. Hypocenter and magnitude analysis of aftershocks of the 2018 Lombok, Indonesia, earthquakes using local seismographic networks10.1785/0220190348 ↗
27. Did the Flores backarc thrust rupture offshore during the 2018 Lombok earthquake sequence in Indonesia?10.1093/gji/ggaa018 ↗
28. Dewanto, B.G., Priadi, R., Heliani, L.S., Natul, A.S., Yanis, M., Suhendro, I., and Julius, A.M. (2022). The 2022 Mw 6.1 Pasaman Barat, Indonesia earthquake confirmed the existence of the Talamau segment fault based on teleseismic and satellite gravity data. Quaternary, 5.10.3390/quat5040045 ↗
29. Late Quaternary eruption of the Ranau caldera and new geological slip rates of the Sumatran fault zone in southern Sumatra, Indonesia10.1186/s40562-017-0087-2 ↗
30. Landslides triggered by the 2018 Lombok earthquake sequence, Indonesia10.1016/j.catena.2021.105676 ↗
31. Characteristics of the seismogenic faults in the 2018 Lombok, Indonesia, earthquake sequence as revealed by inversion of InSAR measurements10.1785/0220190002 ↗
32. Cascading partial rupture of the Flores thrust during the 2018 Lombok earthquake sequence, Indonesia10.1785/0220190378 ↗
33. Evaluation of the 2018 Lombok earthquake sequence damage: A case study of North Lombok Regency
34. An on-site post-event survey of the 2022 Mw 6.1 Western Pasaman Sumatera destructive earthquake10.56286/ntujre.v2i1.225 ↗
35. CitarumView: A Google Earth Engine–based application for Citarum River monitoring10.1088/1755-1315/1266/1/012011 ↗
36. Detection of Tree Cover Dynamic on Belitung Island using Random Forest Regression10.29244/medkon.30.2.250 ↗
37. Remote sensing and cloud computing applications for mapping cereal foodstuffs agricultural land in East Kalimantan, Indonesia10.1063/5.0162636 ↗
38. Object-oriented mapping of landslides using Random Forests10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.013 ↗
39. Mondini, A.C. (2017). Measures of bio-physical vegetation properties from optical remote sensing historical series to assess landslide resilience, vulnerability, and risk. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9060554 ↗
40. Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. Land-Trendr—Temporal segmentation algorithms10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.008 ↗
41. Rapid and robust monitoring of flood events using Sentinel-1 and Landsat data on the Google Earth Engine10.1016/j.rse.2020.111664 ↗
42. Using MODIS NDVI time series to identify geographic patterns of landslides in vegetated regions10.1109/LGRS.2012.2219576 ↗
43. Midad, B., Hanafi, R., Aufaristama, M., and Dharmawan, I.A. (2025). Object-Based Random Forest Approach for High-Resolution Mapping of Urban Green Space Dynamics in a University Campus. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app152413183 ↗
44. Hislop, S., Jones, S., Soto-Berelov, M., Skidmore, A., Haywood, A., and Nguyen, T.H. (2018). Using Landsat spectral indices in time-series to assess wildfire disturbance and recovery. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10030460 ↗
45. Near real-time vegetation anomaly detection with MODIS NDVI: Timeliness vs. accuracy and effect of anomaly computation options10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.041 ↗
46. Decadal vegetation succession from MODIS reveals the spatio-temporal evolution of post-seismic landsliding after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake10.1016/j.rse.2019.111476 ↗
47. Semi-automatic recognition and mapping of rainfall induced landslides using multi-temporal satellite images10.1016/j.rse.2011.03.006 ↗
48. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping and assessment using bivariate statistical methods in Simada area, northwestern Ethiopia10.1186/s40677-020-00155-x ↗
49. A satellite data-driven approach to monitoring and reporting fire disturbance and recovery across boreal and temperate forests
50. Dimiccoli, M., and Wendt, H. (2019, January 22–25). Enhancing temporal segmentation by nonlocal self-similarity. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/ICIP.2019.8803499 ↗
51. Multitemporal segmentation of Sentinel-2 images in an agricultural intensification region in Brazil
52. Glanz, H., Huang, X., Zheng, M., and Carvalho, L.E. (2015). A Bayesian Change Point Model for Detecting Land Cover Changes in MODIS Time Series. arXiv.
53. A review on time series data mining10.1016/j.engappai.2010.09.007 ↗
54. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.011 ↗
55. Using classification and NDVI differencing methods for monitoring sparse vegetation coverage: A case study of saltcedar in Nevada, USA10.1080/01431160801908095 ↗
56. Rizvi, R.H., Yadav, R.S., Singh, R., Datt, K., Khan, I.A., and Dhyani, S.K. (2009). Spectral analysis of remote sensing image for assessment of agroforestry areas in Yamunanagar district of Haryana, National Symposium on Advances in Geo-Spatial Technologies with Special Emphasis on Sustainable Rainfed Agriculture.
57. Determination of vegetation changes with NDVI method