Prediction Factors for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in a PSA Gray Zone (4–10 ng/mL): A Systematic Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies among men worldwide. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has improved early detection; however, PSA levels within the so-called “gray zone” (4–10 ng/mL) remain a diagnostic challenge because of their limited specificity and the associated risk of unnecessary biopsies. In this clinical context, an important objective is the accurate identification of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), defined as disease with a higher likelihood of progression or clinical impact. In recent years, several diagnostic approaches and risk prediction models have been proposed to improve csPCa detection in patients within the PSA gray zone. These models combine clinical parameters, PSA-derived indices, and imaging findings—particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)—and, in some cases, incorporate advanced biomarkers or radiomic features. Nevertheless, considerable heterogeneity exists across studies with respect to predictor selection, model construction, and reported diagnostic performance. This systematic review aims to synthesize current evidence on the diagnostic characteristics and predictive models used to detect clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL. For consistency, heterogeneous outcome terms used in the included studies (e.g., “probable csPCa”, “significant cancer”, “clinically important PCa”) were harmonized and analyzed under the unified term csPCa. By identifying the most consistently reported predictors and comparing univariate with multivariate approaches, this review seeks to support clinical decision-making and to highlight areas for future research in prostate cancer diagnosis within the PSA gray zone.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Estavromenos, GR-71410 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
Computational Medicine Laboratory, FORTH-ICS, Nikolaou Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, GR-71110 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Cancer statistics, 2017
2. Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: Correlation with whole-mount histopathology10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.079 ↗
3. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up10.1056/NEJMoa1113135 ↗
4. Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70146-7 ↗
5. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: Results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60525-0 ↗
6. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.062 ↗
7. Whom to biopsy: Prediagnostic risk stratification with biomarkers, nomograms, and risk calculators10.1016/j.ucl.2017.07.001 ↗
8. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer management: Current status and future perspectives10.1097/RLI.0000000000000163 ↗
9. Re: Screening and prostate cancer mortality: Results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up
10. American Urological Association (2013). Medical Student Curriculum: Prostate Cancer Screening and Management, AUA.
11. Biparametric prostate MRI and clinical indicators predict clinically significant prostate cancer in men with “grey zone” PSA levels10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108977 ↗
12. Using clinical parameters to predict prostate cancer and reduce the unnecessary biopsy among patients with PSA in the gray zone10.1038/s41598-020-62015-w ↗
13. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.014 ↗
14. Niu, X.-K., Li, J., Das, S.K., Xiong, Y., Yang, C.-B., and Peng, T. (2017). Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting high-grade prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen gray zone. BMC Med. Imaging, 17.10.1186/s12880-017-0184-x ↗
15. A novel nomogram combined PI-RADS v2 and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to predict the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PSA 4–10 ng/mL at first biopsy10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.12.006 ↗
16. The Prostate Health Index in predicting initial prostate biopsy outcomes in Asian men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4–10 ng/mL10.1007/s11255-013-0582-0 ↗
17. Combining prostate-specific antigen parameters with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 to improve its diagnostic accuracy10.14740/wjon1230 ↗
18. Decision tree analysis for prostate cancer prediction10.2298/SARH181127039S ↗
19. Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI-based risk score for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men with prostate-specific antigen between 4–10 ng/mL10.1002/jmri.25850 ↗
20. Improving the detection rate of prostate cancer in the Gray zone of PI-RADS v2 and serum TPSA by using prostate-specific antigen-age volume10.1097/MD.0000000000016289 ↗
21. Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics for prostate cancer screening with PSA in 4–10 ng/mL to reduce unnecessary biopsies
22. Prevalence and risk factors of prostate cancer in Chinese men with PSA 4–10 ng/mL who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy10.1155/2015/596797 ↗
23. Using the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) to detect prostate cancer10.4103/aja.aja_19_18 ↗
24. Ji, W.-T., Wang, Y.-K., Han, Z.-Y., Wang, S.-Q., and Wang, Y. (2024). Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for clinically significant prostate cancer. Front. Oncol., 14.10.3389/fonc.2024.1474891 ↗
25. Chai, J.-G., Li, Y.-H., and Ke, C.-X. (2025). Development of novel nomograms for predicting prostate cancer in biopsy-naive patients with PSA < 10 ng/ml and PI-RADS ≤ 3 lesions. Front. Oncol., 14.10.3389/fonc.2024.1500010 ↗
26. The high prevalence of undiagnosed prostate cancer at autopsy: Implications for epidemiology and treatment of prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen-era10.1002/ijc.29408 ↗
27. Screening for prostate cancer
28. US Preventive Services Task Force, Grossman, D.C., Curry, S.J., Owens, D.K., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Caughey, A.B., Davidson, K.W., Doubeni, C.A., Ebell, M., and Epling, J.W. (2018). Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 319, 1901–1913.10.1001/jama.2018.3710 ↗
29. PI-RADS version 2: A pictorial update10.1148/rg.2016150234 ↗
30. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 201210.1007/s00330-011-2377-y ↗
31. Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: How we review and report10.1186/s40644-016-0068-2 ↗
32. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 210.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033 ↗
33. PI-RADS prostate imaging reporting and data system: 2015, version 210.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052 ↗
34. Efficiency of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging based on PI-RADS V2 in detection of prostate cancer10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.04.010 ↗
35. Prebiopsy mpMRI can help reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies and detect clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PSA 4–10 ng/mL10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2884 ↗
36. Predictive modeling for the presence of prostate carcinoma using clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound parameters in patients with prostate specific antigen levels <10 ng/mL10.1002/cncr.11668 ↗
37. Complexed prostate-specific antigen, total prostate-specific antigen and percent free prostate-specific antigen for early detection of prostate cancer: Results of an artificial neural network analysis10.1200/JCO.2002.20.4.921 ↗
38. Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator 2.0 for the prediction of low- vs high-grade prostate cancer10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.035 ↗
39. Importance of prostate volume in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators: Results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group10.1007/s00345-011-0804-y ↗
40. Park, J.Y., Yoon, S., Park, M.S., Choi, H., Bae, J.H., Moon, D.G., Hong, S.K., Lee, S.E., Park, C., and Byun, S.-S. (2017). Development and validation of a prostate cancer risk calculator in the Korean population. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0168917 ↗
41. Do prostate cancer risk models improve the predictive accuracy of prostate cancer detection? A meta-analysis10.1093/annonc/mdu525 ↗
42. imaging-guided prostate interventions10.1016/j.diii.2018.08.002 ↗
43. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion biopsy detect prostate cancer in patients with prior negative TRUS biopsies10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.025 ↗