journal article·2026-03-18Open access

A Novel Method to Investigate the Effect of Normalization Techniques on Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making in Web Service Quality Assessments

Diana Kalibatienė, Rūta Simanavičienė

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 6

Abstract

Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods remain popular for addressing decision-making problems involving uncertainty and explainability. However, decisions are usually made using data with different dimensions or even modalities. Therefore, existing MCDM methods incorporate various normalization techniques in order to transform attribute values into dimensionless quantities, ensuring the robustness and reliability of the decision-making results. Nevertheless, these normalization techniques may affect the ranking of alternatives. This study therefore proposes a novel method to investigate the effect of various normalization techniques on fuzzy MCDM methods. The study introduces a novel method for creating a fuzzy decision-making matrix using Tukey’s fences method, enabling the evaluation of alternatives using attributes under uncertain conditions. This method was evaluated in the context of web service quality assessments involving multi-dimensional and random variable attributes. The study demonstrated that Vector and Linear normalization techniques yield similar alternative rankings when using fuzzy MCDM methods, whereas rankings differ when Non-linear normalization techniques are applied. We believe that the current study will allow researchers and practitioners to address various practical uncertain decision-making problems with multi-dimensional attributes, thus promoting the digital transformation of complex, real-world decision-making issues.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Quality Function Deployment in Product Design · Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

Department of Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio av. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

References (96)

Show source-provided references
1. Malefaki, S., Markatos, D., Filippatos, A., and Pantelakis, S. (2025). A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods and Normalization Techniques in Holistic Sustainability Assessment for Engineering Applications. Aerospace, 12.10.3390/aerospace12020100 ↗
2. Normalization Techniques for Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Analytical Hierarchy Process Case Study
3. New Robust Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework for Thermal Insulation of Buildings under Conflicting Stakeholder Interests10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124262 ↗
4. A Decision Support System for Multiple Criteria Alternative Ranking Using TOPSIS and VIKOR in Fuzzy and Nonfuzzy Environments10.1016/j.fss.2019.01.012 ↗
5. Consensus Among Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: Using Methods as Voters
6. Influence of Normalization Techniques on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods10.1088/1742-6596/2224/1/012076 ↗
7. Techniques to Model Uncertain Input Data of Multi-criteria Decision-making Problems: A Literature Review10.1111/itor.12598 ↗
9. On Disaggregation Modeling of Uncertainty Group Preferences Considering Trust Networks10.1007/s10700-025-09438-0 ↗
10. Dymova, L., Kaczmarek, K., Sevastjanov, P., and Kulawik, J. (2021). A Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Approach with a Complete User Friendly Computer Implementation. Entropy, 23.10.3390/e23020203 ↗
11. Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques and Applications—Two Decades Review from 1994 to 201410.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003 ↗
12. Applications of fuzzy multiple criteria decision making methods in civil engineering: A state-of-the-art survey10.3846/jcem.2021.15252 ↗
13. Soft Cluster-Rectangle Method for Eliciting Criteria Weights in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making10.1038/s41598-024-81027-4 ↗
14. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Support Based on EDAS and Grey Relational Degree for Historic Bridges Reconstruction Priority10.1007/s00500-022-07259-6 ↗
15. A Novel Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Enhancing the Management of Medical Waste Generated during the Coronavirus Pandemic10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108465 ↗
16. Evaluation of Trustworthy Artificial Intelligent Healthcare Applications Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach10.1016/j.eswa.2023.123066 ↗
17. Ranking of Renewable Energy Sources for Regions in Turkey by Fuzzy Entropy Based Fuzzy COPRAS and Fuzzy MULTIMOORA10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.062 ↗
18. Kara, B., Ayyildiz, E., Kavus, B.Y., and Karaca, T.K. (2025). Evaluating Cybersecurity Measures for Smart Grids Under Uncertainty: A Picture Fuzzy SWARA–CODAS Approach. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app151910704 ↗
19. Janusonis, E., Kazakeviciute-Januskeviciene, G., and Bausys, R. (2024). Selection of Optimal Segmentation Algorithm for Satellite Images by Intuitionistic Fuzzy PROMETHEE Method. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020644 ↗
20. Chen, X., Sun, W., and Zhang, R. (2025). An Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Framework: Improved VIKOR with a Preference-Aware AHP–Entropy Weight Method for Evaluating Scalp-Detection Algorithms. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app152211937 ↗
21. Evaluation of Banks in Terms of Customer Preferences with Fuzzy SWARA and Fuzzy MOORA Integrated Approach10.31181/jdaic10007122024o ↗
22. Adaptive Utility Ranking Algorithm for Evaluating Blockchain-Enabled Microfinance in Emerging—A New MCDM Perspective10.31181/ijes1412025182 ↗
23. Enhancing Decision Quality in Smart Manufacturing: Uncertainty-Aware Evaluation of Edge–Cloud Architectures with T-Spherical Hesitant Fuzzy Rough Sets
24. Fuzzy AHP Analysis of Internet of Things (IoT) in Enterprises10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.016 ↗
25. Yilmaz, I. (2023). A Hybrid DEA–Fuzzy COPRAS Approach to the Evaluation of Renewable Energy: A Case of Wind Farms in Turkey. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151411267 ↗
26. A Dynamic Fuzzification Approach for Interval Type-2 Membership Function Development: Case Study for QoS Planning10.1007/s00500-021-05899-8 ↗
27. Effect of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Normalization in Microarray Gene Selection
28. Kim, S.Y., Lee, J.W., and Bae, J.S. (2006). Effect of Data Normalization on Fuzzy Clustering of DNA Microarray Data. BMC Bioinform., 7.10.1186/1471-2105-7-134 ↗
29. The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—III10.1016/0020-0255(75)90017-1 ↗
30. The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—II10.1016/0020-0255(75)90046-8 ↗
31. The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—I10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5 ↗
32. On General Framework of Type-1 Membership Function Construction: Case Study in QoS Planning10.1007/s40815-019-00753-4 ↗
33. Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Membership Function Generation Methods for Pattern Recognition10.1016/j.ins.2008.04.009 ↗
34. Zimmermann, H.J. (2001). Fuzzy Set Theory—And Its Applications, Springer. [4th ed.].10.1007/978-94-010-0646-0 ↗
35. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6 ↗
36. Fuzzy TOPSIS: A General View10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.088 ↗
37. Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods: A Comparative Analysis10.1002/int.21873 ↗
38. Chen, S.-J., and Hwang, C.-L. (1992). Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4 ↗
39. A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods10.1007/s13748-016-0093-1 ↗
40. Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with Maximizing Set and Minimizing Set10.1016/0165-0114(85)90050-8 ↗
41. Ouraki, K., Hadi-Vencheh, A., Jamshidi, A., and Karbassi Yazdi, A. (2025). An Enhanced Hierarchical Fuzzy TOPSIS-ANP Method for Supplier Selection in an Uncertain Environment. Mathematics, 13.10.3390/math13213417 ↗
42. Effect of Normalization Techniques in Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for the Design of Ship Internal Layout from a Pareto Optimal Set10.1007/s00158-020-02581-9 ↗
43. Data Normalisation Techniques in Decision Making: Case Study with TOPSIS Method
44. Selection of Normalization Technique for Weighted Average Multi-Criteria Decision Making10.1007/978-3-319-78574-5_4 ↗
45. Comparison of Normalization Techniques on Data Sets with Outliers10.4018/IJDSST.286184 ↗
46. Comparative Analysis of Normalization Procedures in TOPSIS Method: With an Application to Turkish Deposit Banking Market10.15388/Informatica.2014.10 ↗
47. Normalization Method for Quantitative and Qualitative Attributes in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Problems10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116821 ↗
48. Comparison of three fuzzy MCDM methods for solving THE supplier selection problem
49. Using Hybrid Normalization Technique and State Transition Algorithm to VIKOR Method for Influence Maximization Problem10.1016/j.neucom.2020.05.084 ↗
50. Selecting Normalization Techniques for the Analytical Hierarchy Process10.1007/978-3-030-45124-0_4 ↗
51. Investigating the Effect of Normalization Norms in Flexible Manufacturing Sytem Selection Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods10.25103/jestr.073.23 ↗
52. Aircraft Selection Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making Analysis Method with Different Data Normalization Techniques Image Denoising View Project
53. Selecting the Best Normalization Technique for Rov Method: Towards a Real Life Application10.35378/gujs.767525 ↗
54. Effect of Normalization Techniques in Robot Selection Using Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment
55. A Vikor and Topsis Focused Reanalysis of the Madm Methods Based on Logarithmic Normalization
56. Modification of TOPSIS Method for Solving of Multicriteria Tasks10.2298/YJOR1001117M ↗
57. Tzeng, G., and Huang, J. (2011). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, CRC Press.10.1201/b11032 ↗
58. Effect of Normalization Techniques and Criteria Weight Calculation Methodologies on Nontraditional Machining Process Rank for M-Polar Fuzzy Set ELECTRE-I Algorithm10.1080/23311916.2024.2367744 ↗
59. Yu, L., Pan, Y., and Wu, Y. (2009, January 11–13). Research on Data Normalization Methods in Multi-Attribute Evaluation. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, Wuhan, China.10.1109/CISE.2009.5362721 ↗
60. Vasilev, V., Leguay, J., Paris, S., Maggi, L., and Debbah, M. (2018, January 20–24). Predicting QoE Factors with Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Kansas City, MO, USA.10.1109/ICC.2018.8422609 ↗
61. Automatic Outlier Detection for Time Series: An Application to Sensor Data10.1007/s10115-006-0026-6 ↗
62. Noise Removal in the Presence of Significant Anomalies for Industrial IoT Sensor Data in Manufacturing10.1109/JIOT.2020.2981476 ↗
63. Self-Organising Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Neural Network with Asymmetric Membership Functions and Its Application10.1007/s00500-018-3367-7 ↗
64. Fuzzy Higher Type Information Granules from an Uncertainty Measurement10.1007/s41066-016-0030-5 ↗
65. Hwang, C.-L., and Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications—A State-of-the-Art Survey, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3 ↗
66. Warehouse Location Selection with TOPSIS Group Decision-Making under Different Expert Priority Allocations
67. Hung, C.C., and Chen, L.H. (2009, January 18–20). A Fuzzy TOPSIS Decision Making Model with Entropy Weight under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, China.10.1007/978-90-481-3517-2_2 ↗
68. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4757-3157-6 ↗
69. The Impact of Aggregating Benefit and Cost Criteria in Four MCDA Methods10.1109/TEM.2005.845221 ↗
70. Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1 ↗
71. A Hesitant Fuzzy Topsis Model to Supplier Performance Evaluation10.15446/dyna.v88n216.88320 ↗
72. A Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology to Support Outsourcing of Logistics Services10.1108/13598540610671743 ↗
73. Peleckis, K. (2022). Application of the Fuzzy VIKOR Method to Assess Concentration and Its Effects on Competition in the Energy Sector. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15041349 ↗
74. Service-Oriented Computing: Key Concepts and Principles10.1109/MIC.2005.21 ↗
75. Service Selection Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Comprehensive Review10.1007/s12652-020-02441-w ↗
76. Multi-Attribute Assessment of Road Design Solutions by Using the COPRAS Method
77. Nijkamp, P., and Delft, A.v. (1977). Multi-Criteria Analysis and Regional Decision-Making, Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division.
78. Weitendorf, D. (1976). Beitrag Zur Optimierung Der Räumlichen Struktur Eines Gebäudes. [Doctoral Dissertation, Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen].
79. A New Logarithmic Normalization Method in Games Theory10.15388/Informatica.2008.215 ↗
80. Zur Berücksichtigung Mehrer Zielfunktionen Bei Der Optimierung von Produktionsplanen
81. Jüttler, H. (1966). Untersuchungen Zur Fragen Der Operations Aforschung und Ihrer Anwendungsmöglichkeiten Aufökonomische Problemstellungen Unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung Der Spieltheorie. [Ph.D. Thesis, a Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin].
82. A New Fuzzy Approach Based on BWM and Fuzzy Preference Programming for Hospital Performance Evaluation: A Case Study10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106279 ↗
83. Integration of Correlations with Standard Deviations for Determining Attribute Weights in Multiple Attribute Decision Making10.1016/j.mcm.2009.07.016 ↗
84. Technologische Entscheidungen Bei Der Berücksich Tigung Mehrerer Ziehle
85. QOS-Aware Web-Services Ranking Normaliztion Techniques Comparative Analysis for LSP Method
86. Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis, Addison-Wesley.
87. Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2 ↗
88. A Performance Evaluation Model by Integrating Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066 ↗
89. Zhao, W.-J., and Liu, J.-C. (2018). Triangular Fuzzy Number-Typed Fuzzy Cooperative Games and Their Application to Rural E-Commerce Regional Cooperation and Profit Sharing. Symmetry, 10.10.3390/sym10120699 ↗
90. A COPRAS-F Base Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Approach for Site Selection of Wind Farm10.5267/j.dsl.2012.11.001 ↗
91. Fuzzy VIKOR with an Application to Water Resources Planning10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.097 ↗
92. Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Belgrade].
93. An Extension to Fuzzy MCDM10.1016/j.camwa.2008.10.076 ↗
94. An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS in Modeling Supply Chain Coordination
95. Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D.K., Subotić, M., and Pamučar, D. (2020). A New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis. Mathematics, 8.10.3390/math8030457 ↗
96. Cleff, T. (2014). Exploratory Data Analysis in Business and Economics, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-01517-0 ↗