Trends in Flight-Operated Small-Satellite Propulsion Technologies
Source abstract
Abstract
The development and execution of prospective inner and outer space missions require focusing on the use of many small space vehicles operating in swarms with multiple informational, navigational, and mission-oriented interactions among themselves. Such missions involve providing communication and surveillance services, facilitating distributed material production in space, and conducting research expeditions to explore the resources and environments of new worlds. The cornerstone technology for operating distributed space systems is propulsion. Among a range of propulsion technologies—from using pressurized cold gases to implementing laser beams to generate thrust—certain methods stand out for application in small spacecraft. This paper provides a summary of space-operated propulsion, emphasizing the reasons for the more frequent adoption of one technology over another. The discussion on propulsion trends is complemented by examining the physical, engineering, production, operational, and societal rationale behind these choices. The findings reinforce the trend toward transitioning to fully electric satellites. This review serves as a means for reevaluating global propulsion trends and guiding the future development of inner and outer space propulsion-assisted economies effectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Space Satellite Systems and Control · Spacecraft Dynamics and Control · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Plasma Power Plants, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 2-ya Baumanskaya Street 5/1, 105005 Moscow, Russia
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Opportunities and challenges of on-board AI-based image recognition for small satellite Earth observation missions10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.053 ↗
2. Weston, S.V., Burkhard, C.D., Stupl, J.M., Ticknor, R.L., Yost, B.D., Austin, R.A., Galchenko, P., Newman, L.K., and Soto, L.S.S. (2026, January 21). State-of-the-Art Small Spacecraft Technology, Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/soa-2023.pdf.
3. Autonomous navigation for deep space small satellites: Scientific and technological advances10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.12.030 ↗
4. Architectures and synchronization techniques for distributed satellite systems: A survey10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3169499 ↗
5. Modern small satellites—Changing the economics of space10.1109/JPROC.2018.2806218 ↗
6. A system engineering analysis of highly adaptive small satellites10.1109/JSYST.2012.2198138 ↗
7. Enhancing the resilience of low earth orbit remote sensing satellite networks10.1109/MNET.001.1900550 ↗
8. Space mission resilience with inter-satellite networking10.1016/j.ress.2019.106608 ↗
9. Launch and deployment of distributed small satellite systems10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.04.015 ↗
10. A framework for small satellite deployable structures and how to deploy them reliably10.1038/s44172-024-00210-7 ↗
11. A comprehensive review on small satellite microgrids10.1109/TPEL.2022.3175093 ↗
12. Thrust-vectoring schemes for electric propulsion systems: A review10.1016/j.cja.2025.103401 ↗
13. Levchenko, I., Baranov, O., Pedrini, D., Riccardi, C., Roman, H.E., Xu, S., Lev, D., and Bazaka, K. (2022). Diversity of physical processes: Challenges and opportunities for space electric propulsion. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122111143 ↗
14. Review of micro propulsion technology for space gravitational waves detection10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.01.043 ↗
15. Development of a novel wave plasma propulsion module with six-directional thrust vectoring capability10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.11.028 ↗
16. Optimal multitarget rendezvous using hybrid propulsion system10.2514/1.A35540 ↗
17. Pulsed feedback control for directional rendezvous on eccentric orbits under propulsion constraints10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.09.057 ↗
18. A holistic approach for efficient greener in-space propulsion10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.07.023 ↗
19. Selection of propulsion characteristics for systematic assessment of future European RLV-options10.1007/s12567-024-00564-w ↗
20. Starting modes of multidirectional electrodeless plasma thruster with closed ring-shaped gas discharge chamber10.1038/s41598-025-24995-5 ↗
21. Savelev, P., Shumeiko, A., and Telekh, V. (2025). Wire-based solid-state propellant management system for small form-factor space propulsion. Inventions, 10.10.3390/inventions10050075 ↗
22. Andronov, A., Shumeiko, A., Pashaev, A., Tsygankov, P., Kovalev, S., and Telekh, V. (2025). Plume characterization of electrodeless plasma thruster with configurable exhaust. Symmetry, 17.10.3390/sym17050661 ↗
23. Direct thrust measurements of 2U-sized bi-directional wave plasma thruster10.1063/5.0160582 ↗
24. RBF neural network-based cooperative electromagnetic takeover control for large-scale failed spacecraft10.1109/TAES.2025.3624706 ↗
25. Shi, K., Liu, X., Zhi, Y., and Liu, C. (2025). Integrated hippopotamus and whale optimizations-based impedance control for spacecraft electromagnetic separation. Adv. Space Res.10.1016/j.asr.2025.08.020 ↗
26. Dual hybrid non-fragile control for integrated electromagnetic docking and separation of spacecraft10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.11.075 ↗
27. Active disturbance rejection control for delayed electromagnetic docking of spacecraft in elliptical orbits10.1109/TAES.2021.3130830 ↗
28. Coupled orbit-attitude dynamics and trajectory tracking control for spacecraft electromagnetic docking10.1016/j.apm.2021.08.030 ↗
29. Shumeiko, A., Telekh, V., and Ryzhkov, S. (2023). Starting modes of bidirectional plasma thruster utilizing krypton. Symmetry, 15.10.3390/sym15091705 ↗
30. Shumeiko, A.I., Jarrar, F.S., and Swei, S.S. (2022). Advanced wave plasma thruster with multiple thrust vectoring capability. Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA, 3–7 January 2022, AIAA.10.2514/6.2022-2190 ↗
31. (2025). 3U CubeSat Solar Panel, Satsearch. Available online: https://satsearch.co/products/endurosat-3u-cubesat-solar-panel.
32. Optimization Technique for Energy-Mass Characteristics of the EPS of a Geostationary Spacecraft10.21293/1818-0442-2021-24-1-83-90 ↗
33. Early commercial demonstration of space solar power using ultra-lightweight arrays10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.055 ↗
34. Yendler, B. (2021). Lunar IceCube: Development of Thermal Management System. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Small Satellite Conference, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC21-P2-20.
35. Alves, B., Sousa, R., Coelho, R., Oliveira, G., Cacho, L., Gatões, D., Teixeira, R., Almeida, J.R., Ferreira, P., and Faria, R. (2025). Integration of Shape Memory Alloy Actuators into Sintered Aluminum Structures via Material Extrusion for Aerospace Applications. Actuators, 14.10.3390/act14070305 ↗
36. Alves, B., Sousa, R., Coelho, R., Oliveira, G., Cacho, L., Gatões, D., Teixeira, R., Almeida, J.R., Ferreira, P., and Faria, R. (2026). Enabling Sensor-Integrated and Sustainable Aerospace Structures Through Additively Manufactured Aluminium Mechanisms for CubeSats. Sensors, 26.10.3390/s26010281 ↗
37. Shumeiko, A. (2026). Multiple Spark Plugs Approach for Pulsed Plasma Thrusters Assisting Resilient Proliferated Space Systems. Aerospace, 13.10.20944/preprints202601.1247.v1 ↗
38. Micro-propulsion for space applications: A review of traditional and innovative systems
39. Belyaev, N.M., and Uvarov, E.I. (1974). Calculation and design of reactive control systems for spacecraft. Sov. Rocket., 247. Available online: https://raketoff.wrk.ru/raketoff/Proektirovanie_reaktivnyh_sistem.pdf.
40. DeGroot, W., and Steve, O. (1996). Chemical Microthruster Options. Proceedings of the Joint Propulsion Conference, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 1–3 July 1996, AIAA.10.2514/6.1996-2868 ↗
41. Janson, S., Welle, R., Rose, T., Rowen, D., Hardy, B., Dolphus, R., Doyle, P., Faler, A., Chien, D., and Chin, A. (2016). The NASA Optical Communications and Sensor Demonstration Program: Initial Flight Results. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA, 6–11 August 2016, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC16-III-03.
42. Gangestad, J.W., Venturini, C.C., Hinkley, D.A., and Kinum, G. (2021). A Sat-to-Sat Inspection Demonstration with the AeroCube-10 1.5U CubeSats. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA, 7–12 August 2021, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC21-I-1.
43. Porter, A., Freedman, M., Grist, R., Wesson, C., and Hanson, M. (2021). Flight Qualification of a Water Electrolysis Propulsion System. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA, 7–12 August 2021, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC21-XI-06.
44. Kilcoin, M., Cavender, D., Hasanof, T., Zaluki, M., McKechnie, T., Sedano, C., and Williams, H. (2022). Development of ASCENT Propellant Thrusters and Propulsion Systems. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA, 6–11 August 2022, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC22-X-08.
45. Smith, S., Cheek, N., Burnside, C., Baker, J., Adell, P., Picha, F., Kowalkowski, M., and Lightsey, G. (2023). The Journey of the Lunar Flashlight Propulsion System from Launch through End of Mission. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA, 5–10 August 2023, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC23-VI-03.
46. Galvin, M., Rhodes, B.L., Smolke, J., Burrell, D., Harpenau, A., and Hinkley, D. (2024). HyPer—The On-Orbit Campaign of a Green Monopropellant for Small Satellite Propulsion. Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, Orlando, FL, USA, 8–12 January 2024, AIAA. AIAA 2024-1835.10.2514/6.2024-1835 ↗
47. Rhodes, B.L., Piechowski, M., Hinkley, D., and Ulrich, E.R. (2021). HyPer—A Green Monopropellant for Small Satellite Propulsion. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA, 7–12 August 2021, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC21-XI-02.
48. Nishikizawa, S., Sahara, H., Miyashita, N., and Kuramoto, Y. (2012). Development of Mono-Propellant Propulsion System for a Japanese Microsatellite “Hodoyoshi-1”. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30 July–1 August 2012, AIAA. AIAA 2012-3757.10.2514/6.2012-3757 ↗
49. Walter, C. (2021). Development and Definition of a CubeSat Demonstrator for a Water Propulsion System. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stuttgart].
50. Hsu, A., Dragnea, H., Schilling, J., and Doumitt, A. (2025). 2023 Small Satellite Propulsion Technologies Compendium, The Aerospace Corp.. Available online: https://aerospace.org/sites/default/files/2024-02/20231218%20Small%20Satellite%20Propulsion%20Survey_DISTRO_A.pdf.
51. Weston, S.V., Burkhard, C.D., Stupl, J.M., Ticknor, R.L., Yost, B.D., Austin, R.A., Galchenko, P., Newman, L.K., and Soto, L.S.S. (2026, January 21). State-of-the-Art Small Spacecraft Technology, Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/soa-2024.pdf.
52. Gardner, T. (2022). CAPSTONE: A CubeSat Pathfinder for the Lunar Gateway Ecosystem. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA, 6–11 August 2022, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC21-II-06.
53. ArgoMoon: There is a Nano-Eyewitness on the SLS10.1109/MAES.2019.2911138 ↗
54. (2025, February 21). JinTa Nanosatellite Information. Available online: https://www.nanosats.eu/sat/jinta.
55. (2025, February 21). Dawn Aerospace Green Propulsion Information. Available online: https://www.dawnaerospace.com/green-propulsion.
56. Cheah, K.H., Ganani, C., Lemmer, K., and Cervone, A. (2022). Cold gas microthruster. Space Micropropulsion for Nanosatellites: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 19–25 March 2022, Elsevier.
57. Hart, S.T., and Lightsey, E.G. (2023). Improvements on Two-Phase Cold Gas Propulsion Systems for Small Spacecraft. Proceedings of the American Astronomical Society Guidance Navigation and Control Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 2–8 February 2023, American Astronomical Society. AAS 23-174.
58. Hinkley, D. (2008). A Novel Cold Gas Propulsion System for Nanosatellites and Picosatellites. Proceedings of the 22nd AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA, 11–14 August 2008, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC08–VII–7.
59. In-orbit results of Delfi-n3Xt: Lessons learned and moving forward10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.12.003 ↗
60. Bonin, G., Roth, N., Armitage, S., Newman, J., Risi, B., and Zee, R.E. (2015). CanX–4 and CanX–5 Precision Formation Flight: Mission Accomplished!. Proceedings of the 29th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC15-I-4.
61. Manzoni, G., and Brama, Y.L. (2015). Cubesat Micropropulsion Characterization in Low Earth Orbit. Proceedings of the 29th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA, 8–13 August 2015, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC15-IV-5.
62. Skidmore, L., and Lightsey, E.G. (2021). Design of a Cold Gas Propulsion System for the SunRISE Mission. [Master’s Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology].
63. Spiegel, I.A., Zhou, B., Fox, B., DiMatteo, J., and Goodloe, R. (2023). CubeSat Proximity Operations Demonstration (CPOD) Mission Results. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA, 5–10 August 2023, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC23-XI-01.
64. A high resolution and wide range valve for micronewton cold gas thrusters10.1063/5.0175676 ↗
65. Gibbon, D.M. (2001). Low Cost Butane Propulsion Systems for Small Spacecraft. Proceedings of the 15th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA, 7–12 August 2001, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC01-XI-1.
66. Propulsion for CubeSats10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.01.048 ↗
67. Dalbins, J., Allaje, K., Ehrpais, H., Iakubivskyi, I., Ilbis, E., Janhunen, P., Kivastik, J., Merisalu, M., Noorma, M., and Pajusalu, M. (2023). Interplanetary Student Nanospacecraft: Development of the LEO Demonstrator ESTCube-2. Aerospace, 10.10.3390/aerospace10060503 ↗
68. Cubsat-Propulsion.com (2026, January 21). X13003000-01 RCM Technical Documentation. Available online: https://cubesat-propulsion.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/X13003000-01_RCM_2016update.pdf.
69. Piergentili, F., Balucani, M., Crescenzi, R., and Piattoni, J. (2013). MEMS cold gas microthruster on Ursa Maior Cubesat. Proceedings of the 64th International Astronautical Congress, IAF. IAC-13,C4,5,1,x17444.
70. Gomspace.com (2026, January 21). Gomspace Nanoprop Product Description. Available online: https://gomspace.com/products/.
71. EO Portal (2026, January 21). Armadillo Spacecraft Details. Available online: https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/armadillo#spacecraft.
72. Radke, C.D., Atwell, M., and Studak, B. (2019). Design, Development, and Certification of the Seeker Robotic Free Flier Propulsion System. Proceedings of the AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2019 Forum, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 19–22 August 2019, AIAA. AIAA 2019-3956.10.2514/6.2019-3956 ↗
73. NanoSats Database (2026, January 21). Tianyuan-1 Satellite Information. Available online: https://www.nanosats.eu/sat/tianyuan-1.
74. Rocket Engines of JSC “OKB ‘Fakel’” for Spacecraft Experience of Flight Application and New Developments
75. EO Portal (2026, January 21). Argomoon Sensor Complement. Available online: https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/argomoon#sensor-complement.
76. Development and Testing of a 3-D Printed Cold Gas Thruster for an Interplanetary CubeSat10.1109/JPROC.2018.2799898 ↗
77. Cubsat-Propulsion.com (2026, January 21). VACCO Micro-Propulsion Systems Summary. Available online: https://www.cubesat-propulsion.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/VACCO-Micro-Propulsion-Systems-Summary-web2-Sept2018.pdf.
78. Stevenson, T. (2024). Flight Results and Lessons Learned from the Starling Propulsion System. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA, 3–8 August 2024, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC24-VII-01.
79. SpacePi.Space (2026, January 21). Politeh-Yunivers-3 Satellite Information. Available online: https://en.spacepi.space/satellites/politeh-yunivers-3.
80. (2026, January 21). NanoSats Database. Juventas Satellite Information. Available online: https://www.nanosats.eu/sat/juventas.
81. Klesh, A.T., Baker, J., and Krajevski, J. (2019). MarCO: Flight Review and Lessons Learned. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA, 3–9 August 2019, DigitalCommons@USU.
82. Author Correction: Impact Observations of Asteroid Dimorphos via Light Italian CubeSat for Imaging of Asteroids (LICIACube)10.1038/s41467-023-38705-0 ↗
83. Napoli, M., Kong, C., Homan, J., Fusco, J., Nakamura, R., Padgen, M., Wu, S., Shih, P., Hejase, M., and Benton, J. (2023). Biosentinel: Mission Summary and Lessons Learned From the First Deep Space Biology CubeSat Mission. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Small Satellite Conference, Logan, UT, USA, 5–10 August 2023, DigitalCommons@USU. SSC23-I-02.
84. Hashimoto, T., Kikuchi, J., Hirasawa, R., Miyoshi, K., Torii, W., Morishita, N., Bando, N., Tomiki, A., Nakajima, S., and Otsuki, M. (2023). Lessons Learned from CubeSat Moon Lander OMOTENASHI. Proceedings of the 30th IAA Symposium on Small Satellite Missions, Baku, Azerbaijan, 2–6 October 2023, IAF. IAC-23,B4,8,2,x76126.
85. Electric Propulsion for Satellites and Spacecraft: Established Technologies and Novel10.1088/0963-0252/25/3/033002 ↗
86. ThrustMe (2026, January 21). NPT30 Ion Thruster Product Information. Available online: https://www.thrustme.fr/products/npt30.
87. Martinez, D.R., and Aanesland, A. (2019, January 15–20). Development and testing of the NPT30-I2 iodine ion thruster. Proceedings of the 36th International Electric Propulsion Conference (IEPC), Vienna, Austria.
88. (2026, January 21). Busek Company Website. Available online: https://www.busek.com/.
89. (2026, January 21). Aurora PT Website. Available online: https://aurorapt.fi.
90. Tsay, M., Frongillo, J., and Hohman, K. (2015, January 8–13). LunarCube. Proceedings of the 29th AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA.
91. (2026, January 21). ExoTerra Corp Website. Available online: https://exoterracorp.com.
92. (2026, January 21). Exotrail Products Page. Available online: https://www.exotrail.com/.
93. (2026, January 21). Enpulsion Website. Available online: https://www.enpulsion.com.
94. Krejci, D., Reissner, A., and Seifert, B. (June, January 28). Demonstration of the IFM nano feeP thruster in low earth orbit. Proceedings of the 4S Symposium, Sorrento, Italy.
95. (2026, January 21). White Paper on Indium-Based FEED Propulsion Systems. Available online: https://www.enpulsion.com/white-paper/flight-heritage-of-indium-based-feep-propulsion-systems-across-different-applications-and-orbits-in-space-cleaning-of-extractor-electrode.
96. (2026, January 21). Morpheus Space Website. Available online: https://www.morpheus-space.com.
97. Bock, D., Spethmann, A., and Trottenberg, T. (2017, January 8–12). In-plume thrust measurement of nanofeep thruster with a force-measuring probe using laser interferometry. Proceedings of the 35th International Electric Propulsion Conference (IEPC), Atlanta, GA, USA.
98. Kramer, A., Bangert, P., and Schilling, K. (2019, January 3–8). Hybrid attitude control on board UWE-4 using magnetorquers and the electric propulsion system NanoFEEP. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, UT, USA.
99. EO Portal Directory (2026, January 21). Hodoyoshi-3-4 Satellite Mission Overview. Available online: https://directory.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/hodoyoshi-3-4#hodoyoshi-4.
100. Takegahara, H., Kuninaka, H., and Funaki, I. (2015, January 4–10). Overview of electric propulsion research activities in Japan. Proceedings of the Joint Conference of 30th International Symposium on Space Technology and Science and 34th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Kobe, Japan.