journal article·2026-03-16Open access

Extracting and Predicting Earthquake Frequency Regularities in the Longmen Shan Fault Zone via the LSTM-GARCH Model

Zhenyu Fang, Yuan Xue, Run Liu

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 6

Abstract

The Longmen Shan Fault Zone is marked by intricate geological structures and frequent seismic activity, which gives rise to persistent seismic hazards. To tackle the challenge of capturing the multi-temporal characteristics of earthquake frequency, this study combines machine learning with time series analysis to conduct earthquake frequency prediction research. Based on the 1970–2023 seismic dataset from the China Earthquake Networks Center, the seismic records were structured into four temporal scales: daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly. The minimum completeness magnitude (Mc) was determined as M3.0 by applying the G–R relationship. After conducting white noise tests and data normalization, ACF and PACF were utilized to select the optimal time-step parameters for the LSTM model. Considering the inherent characteristics of the seismic data, the 99th percentile of the frequency series was set as the threshold, and an auxiliary parameter was introduced to label high-frequency earthquake days for the construction of the LSTM model. Upon the completion of LSTM model fitting, heteroscedasticity tests were performed on the residuals between the predicted and observed values. Confirming the presence of significant heteroscedasticity, the GARCH model was incorporated to process these residuals, thus establishing a complete LSTM-GARCH coupled model. The results reveal that seismic activity in this region is normally low-frequency with occasional high-frequency occurrences. The proposed model achieves R2 above 0.80 across all four temporal scales, accompanied by superior performance in all error metrics. This study validates that the LSTM-GARCH model can effectively extract the multi-scale patterns of earthquake frequency, with the best performance observed at the daily scale. Ablation experiments further demonstrate that this coupled model outperforms both the ARIMA and single LSTM models, providing reliable technical support for short-to-long-term earthquake prediction and regional disaster risk assessment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: earthquake and tectonic studies · Earthquake Detection and Analysis · Seismology and Earthquake Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mathematical Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China

Geomathematics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Mathematical Sciences, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Regional Indirect Economic Impact Evaluation of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake10.1007/s12665-011-1078-9 ↗
2. An adaptive regional input-output model and its application to the assessment of the economic cost of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake
3. Earthquakes Cannot Be Predicted10.1126/science.275.5306.1616 ↗
4. An Updated Digital Model of Plate Boundaries10.1029/2001GC000252 ↗
5. Seismic Risk Zonation of China Based on Plate Tectonic Interactions
6. Earthquake Prediction Research: Challenges and Opportunities
7. A New Method for Calculating B-Value of Time Sequence Based on Data-Driven (tbdd): A Case Study of the 2021 Yangbi Ms6.4 Earthquake Sequence in Yunnan
8. Zhang, P., Wen, X., and Ma, J. (2021). Seismic Hazard and Long-Term Potential of Large Earthquakes along the Longmen Shan Fault Zone, China. Remote Sens., 13.
9. Li, Y., Zhang, G., Shan, X., Liu, Y., Wu, Y., Liang, H., Qu, C., and Song, X. (2018). GPS-Derived Fault Coupling of the Longmen Shan Fault Associated with the 2008 Mw Wenchuan 7.9 Earthquake and Its Tectonic Implications. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10050753 ↗
10. Prediction of the Earthquake Magnitude by Time Series Methods along the East Anatolian Fault, Turkey10.1007/s12145-021-00636-z ↗
11. Analysis and Prediction of the SARIMA Model for a Time Interval of Earthquakes in the Longmen Shan Fault Zone
12. Modeling overdispersed or underdispersed count data with generalized Poisson integer-valued GARCH models10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.11.042 ↗
13. Predicting the Earthquake Magnitude along Zagros Fault Using Time Series and Ensemble Model
14. Regional Seismic-Event Characterization Using a Bayesian Formulation of Simple Kriging10.1785/0120010141 ↗
15. Calibration of Ground Motion Models to Icelandic Peak Ground Acceleration Data Using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation10.1007/s10518-019-00569-5 ↗
16. Seismic Tomography Using Variational Inference Methods10.1029/2019JB018589 ↗
17. Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Improve Ground Motion Predictions10.1093/gji/ggz486 ↗
18. Paleoearthquakes and long-term seismic regime in the Longmen Shan fault zone, Southwest China10.1134/S1069351317060039 ↗
19. Hui, C., Cheng, C., Shen, S., Gao, P., Chen, J., Yang, J., and Zhao, M. (2021). The Effect of the Wenchuan and Lushan Earthquakes on the Size Distribution of Earthquakes along the Longmen Shan Fault. Appl. Sci., 11.10.5194/nhess-2021-21 ↗
20. Earthquake Prediction Based on Spatio-Temporal Data Mining: An LSTM Network Approach10.1109/TETC.2017.2699169 ↗
21. On the Use of VMD-LSTM Neural Network for Approximate Earthquake Prediction10.1007/s11069-024-06724-9 ↗
22. Frequency of earthquakes in California10.1785/BSSA0340040185 ↗
23. MacKinnon, J.G. (2010). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests, Queens University. Queens Economics Department Working Paper, No. 1227.
24. Long Short-Term Memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
25. The Vanishing Gradient Problem During Learning Recurrent Neural Nets and Problem Solutions10.1142/S0218488598000094 ↗
26. Box, G.E.P., Jenkins, G.M., and Reinsel, G.C. (2015). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, John Wiley & Sons. [4th ed.].
27. Box, G.E.P., and Jenkins, G.M. (1976). Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, Holden-Day.
28. Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting
29. LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2582924 ↗
30. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2015, January 7–9). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), San Diego, CA, USA.
31. Baker, F. (2020). The Importance of Being Random: Stochastic Optimization and Reproducible Results in Deep Learning. arXiv.
32. Montavon, G., Orr, G.B., and Müller, K.R. (2012). Early Stopping—But When?. Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8 ↗
33. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
34. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1 ↗
35. Guyon, I., von Luxburg, U., Bengio, S., Wallach, H.M., Fergus, D., Vishwanathan, S.V.N., and Garnett, R. (2017). A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, Curran Associates, Inc.
36. Fisher, R.A. (1935). The Design of Experiments, Oliver & Boyd.
37. Wilcox, R.R. (2017). Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing, Academic Press. [4th ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-804733-0.00001-9 ↗
38. Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation10.2307/1912773 ↗
39. Montgomery, D.C. (2021). Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons. [9th ed.].
40. Hyndman, R.J., and Athanasopoulos, G. (2018). Forecasting: Principles and Practice, OTexts. [2nd ed.].
41. A note on the validity of cross-validation for time series
42. A new look at the statistical model identification10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 ↗