A CDE-Centered Quality Gate Framework to Operationalize ISO 19650 Governance in Hybrid Railway Depots
Source abstract
Abstract
Hybrid railway assets such as workshops and depots combine building, mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP)/industrial, and linear infrastructure domains, increasing coordination complexity and challenging continuity from the Project Information Model (PIM) to the Asset Information Model (AIM). Although Employer’s Information Requirements (EIR), Asset Information Requirements (AIR), and the BIM Execution Plan (BEP) prescribe deliverables and processes, a persistent gap remains between documentary prescriptions and the auditable evidence needed to support traceable decisions within the Common Data Environment (CDE). This paper proposes an ISO 19650-aligned governance framework that operationalizes the EIR/AIR → BEP → CDE transition by: (i) structuring the asset using Functional Units (FUs) as a stable anchor for PIM → AIM continuity; and (ii) implementing a pre-Published Quality Gate that separates control into three non-substitutable dimensions (spatial, semantic, and data). The approach is implemented as a tool-neutral, reproducible workflow (inputs → checks → outputs → publish) and produces a minimal, persistent evidence package in the CDE (file-level report, package summary, publish/hold decision record, and Nonconformity Report (NCR)/BIM Collaboration Format (BCF) traceability), with explicit roles governing the Shared → Published transition. Across 22 Industry Foundation Classes (IFC), deliverables from two depot cases and multiple delivery states, All Gates Pass ranged from 25.0% to 44.4% depending on Case × State; overall, 14/22 deliverables (63.6%) would be held pending correction under the gate. Although validated on Spanish railway depots, the framework is grounded in ISO/openBIM standards and is designed for transferability to other international contexts and complex asset types where multidisciplinary federation and PIM → AIM continuity pose similar challenges.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: BIM and Construction Integration · Construction Project Management and Performance · Information Technology Governance and Strategy
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Alicante, Carretera Sant Vicent del Raspeig s/n, 03690 Alicante, Spain
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Levels of BIM compliance for model handover
2. (2018). Organization and Digitization of Information About Buildings and Civil Engineering Works, Including Building Information Modelling (BIM)-Information Management Using Building Information Modelling-Part 1: Concepts and Principles (Standard No. ISO 19650-1:2018).
3. UK BIM Framework (2020). Information Management According to BS EN ISO 19650-Guidance Part 2: Processes for Project Delivery, UK BIM Framework. [4th ed.].
4. Towards an improved framework for enterprise BIM: The role of ISO 19650
5. UK BIM Framework (2020). Information Management According to BS EN ISO 19650-Guidance Part C: Facilitating the Common Data Environment (Workflow and Technical Solutions), UK BIM Framework. [1st ed.].
6. Abanda, F., Balu, B., Adukpo, S., and Akintola, A. (2025). Decoding ISO 19650 Through Process Modelling for Information Management and Stakeholder Communication in BIM. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15030431 ↗
7. (2018). Organization and Digitization of Information About Buildings and Civil Engineering Works, Including Building Information Modelling (BIM)-Information Management Using Building Information Modelling Part 2: Delivery Phase of the Assets (Standard No. ISO 19650-2:2018).
8. (2020). Organization and Digitization of Information About Buildings and Civil Engineering Works, Including Building Information Modelling (BIM)-Information Management Using Building Information Modeling-Part 3: Operational Phase of Assets (Standard No. ISO 19650-3:2020).
9. BIM guidance to optimize the operational phase: Defining information requirements based on ISO 1965010.1108/F-08-2021-0074 ↗
10. The building information modelling trajectory in facilities management: A review10.1016/j.autcon.2016.12.003 ↗
11. Engineers, A.S. (2014). Challenges in the implementation of BIM for FM-Case Manchester Town Hall Complex. Computing in Civil and Building Engineering (2014), ASCE Press.
12. Development of quality improvement procedures and tools for facility management BIM10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100075 ↗
13. Automatic rule-based checking of building designs10.1016/j.autcon.2009.07.002 ↗
14. Greenwood, D., Lockley, S., Malsane, S., and Matthew, J. (2010, January 2–3). Automated compliance checking using building information models. Proceedings of the Cobra 2010—Construction, Building and Real Estate Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, Paris, France.
15. Validation of technical requirements for a BIM model using semantic web technologies10.1016/j.aei.2024.102426 ↗
16. Jia, L., Chen, M., Chen, C., and Jin, Y. (2025). A semantic web and IFC-based framework for automated BIM compliance checking. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15152633 ↗
17. Automated code compliance checking research based on BIM and knowledge graph10.1038/s41598-023-34342-1 ↗
18. Automatic compliance checking of BIM models against quality standards based on ontology technology10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105656 ↗
19. Noardo, F., Arroyo Ohori, K., Krijnen, T., and Stoter, J. (2021). An inspection of IFC models from practice. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052232 ↗
20. Andrich, W., Daniotti, B., Pavan, A., and Mirarchi, C. (2022). Check and validation of building information models in detailed design phase: A check flow to pave the way for BIM based renovation and construction processes. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12020154 ↗
21. IFC models for semi-automating common planning checks for building permits10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104097 ↗
22. buildingSMART International (2022). What Do Facility Managers Need from BIM? (Industry Insight), buildingSMART International. Available online: https://www.buildingsmart.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Industry-Insight_What-do-Facility-Managers-Need-from-BIM.pdf.
23. buildingSMART International (2024). Information Delivery Specification (IDS) (Version 1.0), buildingSMART International. Available online: https://www.buildingsmart.org/standards/bsi-standards/information-delivery-specification-ids/.
24. (2014). Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) for Data Sharing in the Construction and Facility Management Industries (Standard No. ISO 16739-1:2024).
25. A holistic approach to information requirements: Integration of level of information need and information delivery specification
26. Fuentes Giner, B., and Oliver Faubel, I. (2025). IDS for the Verification of Project Information Requirements: A Case Study at Ferrocarrils de la Generalitat Valenciana. Proceedings of EUBIM 2025-BIM International Conference/14th BIM Users Meeting, Valencia, Spain, 21–24 May 2025, Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
27. Informative content validation is the key to success in a BIM-based project
28. Rules and validation processes for interoperable BIM data exchange standards
29. Gerbino, S., Cieri, L., Rainieri, C., and Fabbrocino, G. (2021). On BIM interoperability via the IFC standard: An assessment from the structural engineering and design viewpoint. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112311430 ↗
30. Noardo, F., Harrie, L., Arroyo Ohori, K., Biljecki, F., Ellul, C., Krijnen, T., Eriksson, H., Guler, D., Hintz, D., and Jadidi, M.A. (2020). Tools for BIM-GIS Integration (IFC Georeferencing and Conversions): Results from the GeoBIM Benchmark 2019. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.20944/preprints202007.0243.v1 ↗
31. Liu, X., Wang, X., Wright, G., Cheng, J., Li, X., and Liu, R. (2017). A state-of-the-art review on the integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Geographic Information System (GIS). ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 6.10.3390/ijgi6020053 ↗
32. Integration of BIM and GIS: IFC geometry transformation to shapefile using enhanced open-source approach10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102859 ↗
33. Tsay, G., Lin, Y., and Yuen, C. (2023). BIM for FM: Understanding information quality issues in terms of compliance with owner’s building information modeling requirements. Front. Built Environ., 9.10.3389/fbuil.2023.1117066 ↗
34. Kładź, M., and Borkowski, A.S. (2025). IDS Standard and bSDD Service as Tools for Automating Information Exchange and Verification in Projects Implemented in the BIM Methodology. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15030378 ↗
35. Zhu, J., Wu, P., Chen, M., Kim, M., Wang, X., and Fang, T. (2020). Automatically processing IFC clipping representation for BIM and GIS integration at the process level. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10062009 ↗
36. BIM-FM integration through openBIM: Solutions for interoperability towards efficient operations