Pneumatically Actuated Soft Robotic Arm for Adaptable Grasping
Source abstract
Abstract
Developing robotic manipulators capable of performing effective physical interaction tasks is a challenging topic. In this study, we design a soft robotic arm (SRA) with multiple degrees of freedom inspired by the flexible structures and the unique motion mechanism of the octopus arm. The SRA is fabricated with elastomeric materials, which consists of four series of integrated pneumatic chambers that play similar roles as the muscles in the octopus arm can achieve large bending in various directions with variable stiffness. This SRA displays specified movements via controlling pressure and selecting channels. Moreover, utilizing parallel control, the SRA demonstrates complicated three-dimensional motions. The force response and motion of the SRA are determined both experimentally and computationally. The applications of the present SRA include tightly coiling around the objects because of its large bending deformation (nearly $$360^{{\circ }})$$ , grasping multiple objects, and adjusting the grabbing mode in accordance with the shape of objects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Robot Manipulation and Learning · Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Full RJ. Invertebrate locomotor systems. In The handbook of comparative physiology. vol 2. 1997;853–930.10.1002/cphy.cp130212 ↗
2. Dickinson MH, Farley CT, Full RJ. How animals move: an integrative view. Science. 2000;288(5463):100–6.10.1126/science.288.5463.100 ↗
3. Shepherd RF, Ilievski F, Choi W. Multigait soft robot. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(51):20400–3.10.1073/pnas.1116564108 ↗
4. Marchese AD, Onal CD, Rus D. Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Rob. 2014;1(1):75–87.10.1089/soro.2013.0009 ↗
5. Li T, Li G, Liang Y. Fast-moving soft electronic fish. Sci Adv. 2017;3(4):e1602045.10.1126/sciadv.1602045 ↗
6. Trivedi D, Rahn CD, Kier WM. Soft robotics: biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2008;5(3):99–117.10.1155/2008/520417 ↗
7. Suzumori K, Iikura S, Tanaka H. Applying a flexible microactuator to robotic mechanisms. IEEE Control Syst. 1992;12(1):21–7.10.1109/37.120448 ↗
8. McMahan W, Chitrakaran V, Csencsits M, et al. Field trials and testing of the octarm continuum manipulator. In IEEE/RSJ international conference on robotics and automation. 2006; p. 2336–2341.
9. Laschi C, Cianchetti M, Mazzolai B. Soft robot arm inspired by the octopus. Adv Robot. 2012;26(7):709–27.10.1163/156855312X626343 ↗
10. Marchese AD, Komorowski K, Onal CD, et al. Design and control of a soft and continuously deformable 2d robotic manipulation system. In IEEE/RSJ international conference on robotics and automation. 2014; p. 2189–2196.10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907161 ↗
11. Polygerinos P, Wang Z, Galloway KC, et al. Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Robot Auton Syst. 2015;73:135–43.10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.014 ↗
12. Hannan MW, Walker ID. Kinematics and the implementation of an elephant’s trunk manipulator and other continuum style robots. J Robot Syst. 2003;20(2):45–63.10.1002/rob.10070 ↗
13. Kang R, Branson DT, Zheng T. Design, modeling and control of a pneumatically actuated manipulator inspired by biological continuum structures. Bioinspir Biomim. 2013;8(3):036008.10.1088/1748-3182/8/3/036008 ↗
14. Cho KJ, Koh JS, Kim S. Review of manufacturing processes for soft biomimetic robots. Int J Precis Eng Manuf. 2009;10(3):171.10.1007/s12541-009-0064-6 ↗
15. Cham JG, Bailey SA, Clark JE. Fast and robust: Hexapedal robots via shape deposition manufacturing. Int J Rob Res. 2002;21(10–11):869–82.10.1177/0278364902021010837 ↗
16. Bartlett NW, Tolley MT, Overvelde JTB, et al. A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion. Science. 2015;349(6244):161–5.10.1126/science.aab0129 ↗
17. Suresh SA, Christensen DL, Hawkes EW. Surface and shape deposition manufacturing for the fabrication of a curved surface gripper. J Mech Robot. 2015;7(2):021005.10.1115/1.4029492 ↗
18. Morin SA, Shepherd RF, Kwok SW, et al. Camouflage and display for soft machines. Science. 2012;337(6096):828–32.10.1126/science.1222149 ↗
19. Shepherd RF, Stokes AA, Nunes RMD. Soft machines that are resistant to puncture and that self seal. Adv Mater. 2013;25(46):6709–13.10.1002/adma.201303175 ↗
20. Calisti M, Giorelli M, Levy G. An octopus-bioinspired solution to movement and manipulation for soft robots. Bioinspir Biomim. 2011;6(3):036002.10.1088/1748-3182/6/3/036002 ↗
21. Odhner LU, Jentoft LP, Claffee MR. A compliant, underactuated hand for robust manipulation. Int J Robot Res. 2014;33(5):736–52.10.1177/0278364913514466 ↗
22. Yeow CH, Baisch AT, Talbot SG. Cable-driven finger exercise device with extension return springs for recreating standard therapy exercises. J Med Device. 2014;8(1):014502.10.1115/1.4025449 ↗
23. Seok S, Onal CD, Cho KJ. Meshworm: a peristaltic soft robot with antagonistic nickel titanium coil actuators. IEEE-ASME Trans Mechatron. 2013;18(5):1485–97.10.1109/TMECH.2012.2204070 ↗
24. Chou CP, Hannaford B. Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Trans Rob Autom. 1996;12(1):90–102.10.1109/70.481753 ↗
25. Tolley MT, Shepherd RF, Mosadegh B. A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Rob. 2014;1(3):213–23.10.1089/soro.2014.0008 ↗
26. Katzschmann RK, Marchese AD, Rus D. Hydraulic autonomous soft robotic fish for 3D swimming. Experimental robotics. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 405–20.
27. Balasubraman R, Santos VJ. The human hand as an inspiration for robot hand development. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 7–12.10.1007/978-3-319-03017-3 ↗
28. Hao Y, Gong Z, Xie Z, et al. Universal soft pneumatic robotic gripper with variable effective length. In Proceedings of 35th Chinese control conference. 2016. pp. 6109–6114.10.1109/ChiCC.2016.7554316 ↗
29. Brown E, Rodenberg N, Amend J. Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(44):18809–14.10.1073/pnas.1003250107 ↗
30. Kier WM, Smith KK. Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular-hydrostats. Zool J Linn Soc. 1985;83(4):307–24.10.1111/j.1096-3642.1985.tb01178.x ↗
31. Kier WM, Stella MP. The arrangement and function of octopus arm musculature and connective tissue. J Morphol. 2007;268(10):831–43.10.1002/jmor.10548 ↗
32. Yeoh OH. Some forms of the strain energy function for rubber. Rubber Chem Technol. 1993;66(5):754–71.10.5254/1.3538343 ↗