journal article·2026-03-04Open access

Predicting 30-Day Readmission Risks in Breast Cancer Patients: An Explainable Machine Learning Approach

Mlondolozi Mqadi, Elliot Mbunge, Tebogo Makaba

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 5

Abstract

Hospital readmission within 30 days remains a significant challenge in oncology practice, contributing to higher healthcare costs, treatment delays, and poorer patient outcomes. Existing predictive models for breast cancer readmission are often limited by inadequate interpretability and generalisability. This study develops and evaluates an explainable machine learning (ML) framework to predict 30-day hospital readmissions among breast cancer patients, with specific emphasis on methodological transparency and avoidance of information leakage. A retrospective dataset including demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables such as age, comorbidity burden, ECOG performance status, baseline neutrophil count, and dosage adjustments was analysed. Multiple ML classifiers were evaluated—including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbours, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and XGBoost—using repeated stratified cross-validation (5 × 10 folds). Class imbalance was addressed using SMOTE applied strictly within the training folds to prevent data leakage. Out-of-fold performance metrics included ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, calibration curves, and Brier scores. Random Forest demonstrated the strongest discrimination specificity of 0.57 ± 0.33, the highest among all models, and a superior ROC-AUC of 0.68 ± 0.17, which was appropriate for the small, imbalanced dataset. For interpretability, each model was refit on the full dataset and analysed using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP), Partial Dependence Plots (PDP), and LIME. Comorbidity burden and ECOG performance status consistently emerged as the most influential predictors across all explainability techniques, aligning with established clinical evidence. The findings highlight the feasibility of applying explainable ML methods to small, imbalanced oncology datasets and demonstrate their potential to support early clinical risk identification in breast cancer care.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis · Breast Cancer Treatment Studies · Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre of Applied Data Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa

Department of Applied Information Systems, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (2025, January 01). Breast Cancer. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer.
2. Thirty-Day Unplanned Hospital Readmissions in Patients With Cancer and the Impact of Social Determinants of Health: A Machine Learning Approach10.1200/CCI.22.00143 ↗
3. A perfect storm: How tumor biology, genomics, and health care delivery patterns collide to create a racial survival disparity in breast cancer and proposed interventions for change
4. Rahman, M.A., Khan, M.S.H., Watanobe, Y., Prioty, J.T., Annita, T.T., Rahman, S., Hossain, M.S., Aitijjo, S.A., Taskin, R.I., and Dhrubo, V. (2025). Advancements in Breast Cancer Detection: A Review of Global Trends, Risk Factors, Imaging Modalities, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning Approaches. BioMedInformatics, 5.10.3390/biomedinformatics5030046 ↗
5. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program10.1056/NEJMsa0803563 ↗
6. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2025, January 12). Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, Available online: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/acute-inpatient-pps/hospital-readmissions-reduction-program-hrrp.
7. Comparative validation of breast cancer risk prediction models and projections for future risk stratification10.1093/jnci/djz113 ↗
8. Surgical Risk Factors for the Delayed Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer10.1245/s10434-018-6351-7 ↗
9. Miret, C., Domingo, L., Louro, J., Barata, T., Baré, M., Ferrer, J., Carmona-García, M.C., Castells, X., and Sala, M. (2019). Factors associated with readmissions in women participating in screening programs and treated for breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv. Res., 19.10.1186/s12913-019-4789-3 ↗
10. Machine learning methods for hospital readmission prediction: Systematic analysis of literature10.1007/s40860-021-00165-y ↗
11. System delays in breast cancer10.7196/sajsnew.7741 ↗
12. Breast cancer risk assessment and management of the high-risk patient10.1016/j.ogc.2021.11.009 ↗
13. Identifying patients at risk of unplanned re-hospitalisation using statewide electronic health records10.1038/s41598-022-20907-z ↗
14. Risk factors for unplanned readmissions following excisional breast surgery10.1111/tbj.12253 ↗
15. Machine learning for predicting readmission risk among the frail: Explainable AI for healthcare10.1016/j.patter.2021.100395 ↗
16. Toward Predicting 30-Day Readmission Among Oncology Patients: Identifying Timely and Actionable Risk Factors10.1200/CCI.22.00097 ↗
17. Transparency of medical artificial intelligence systems10.1038/s44222-025-00363-w ↗
18. Rasool, A., Bunterngchit, C., Tiejian, L., Islam, M.R., Qu, Q., and Jiang, Q. (2022). Improved Machine Learning-Based Predictive Models for Breast Cancer Diagnosis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19063211 ↗
19. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 ↗
20. The Price of Explainability in Machine Learning Models for 100-Day Readmission Prediction in Heart Failure: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study
21. Developing AI Models for Predicting Hospital Readmission Rates
22. Alelyani, T., Alshammari, M.M., Almuhanna, A., and Asan, O. (2024). Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Quantifying Breast Cancer Factors: Saudi Arabia Context. Healthcare, 12.10.3390/healthcare12101025 ↗
23. A Critique Of Research Paradigms And Their Implications For Qualitative, Quantitative And Mixed Research Methods
24. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter?10.2307/2137284 ↗
25. Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome quality of care model: Validation in an integrated trauma system10.1097/TA.0000000000000663 ↗
26. Cosentino, V., Luis, J., and Cabot, J. (2016). Findings from GitHub: Methods, datasets and limitations. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/2901739.2901776 ↗
27. Learning from Imbalanced Data10.1109/TKDE.2008.239 ↗
28. Zhang, H. (2004). The Optimality of Naive Bayes. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2004), The AAAI Press.
29. Support-vector networks10.1023/A:1022627411411 ↗
30. Induction of decision trees10.1023/A:1022643204877 ↗
31. Interpretability of Clinical Decision Support Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence from Technological and Medical Perspective: A Systematic Review10.1155/2023/9919269 ↗
32. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
33. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/2939672.2939778 ↗
34. Hosmer, J., Lemeshow, S., and Sturdivant, R.X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression, Wiley.10.1002/9781118548387 ↗
35. Gonzalez-Castro, L., Chávez, M., Duflot, P., Bleret, V., Martin, A.G., Zobel, M., Nateqi, J., Lin, S., Pazos-Arias, J.J., and Del Fiol, G. (2023). Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Breast Cancer Recurrence Using Structured and Unstructured Sources from Electronic Health Records. Cancers, 15.10.3390/cancers15102741 ↗
36. Park, S.W., Park, Y.L., Lee, E.G., Chae, H., Park, P., Choi, D.W., Choi, Y.H., Hwang, J., Ahn, S., and Kim, K. (2024). Mortality Prediction Modeling for Patients with Breast Cancer Based on Explainable Machine Learning. Cancers, 16.10.3390/cancers16223799 ↗
37. Machine learning determined risk factors associated with non-adherence to timely surgery for breast cancer patients10.21037/abs-22-31 ↗
38. Lou, S.J., Hou, M.F., Chang, H.T., Chiu, C.C., Lee, H.H., Yeh, S.C.J., and Shi, H.Y. (2020). Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Recurrence within 10 Years after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study. Cancers, 12.10.3390/cancers12123817 ↗
39. Du, K.L., Jiang, B., Lu, J., Hua, J., and Swamy, M.N.S. (2024). Exploring Kernel Machines and Support Vector Machines: Principles, Techniques, and Future Directions. Mathematics, 12.10.3390/math12243935 ↗
40. Feature Importance Measures as an Explanation for Classification Applied to Hospital Readmission Prediction10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.195 ↗
41. Hospital readmission after a breast cancer-related admission among breast cancer patients with and without heart failure10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e18717 ↗
42. Tokac, U., Chipps, J., Brysiewicz, P., Bruce, J., and Clarke, D. (2025). Using Machine Learning to Improve Readmission Risk in Surgical Patients in South Africa. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 22.10.3390/ijerph22030345 ↗
43. A review on evaluation metrics for data classification evaluations
44. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 ↗
45. Classifiers and their metrics quantified10.1002/minf.201700127 ↗
46. Sensitivity and Specificity versus Precision and Recall, and Related Dilemmas10.1007/s00357-024-09478-y ↗
47. Pandey, S.R., Tile, J.D., and Oghaz, M.M.D. (2025). Predicting 30-day hospital readmissions using ClinicalT5 with structured and unstructured electronic health records. PLoS ONE, 20.10.1371/journal.pone.0328848 ↗
48. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique10.1613/jair.953 ↗
49. Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 ↗
50. Belle, V., and Papantonis, I. (2021). Principles and Practice of Explainable Machine Learning. Front. Big Data, 4.10.3389/fdata.2021.688969 ↗
51. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates Inc.