Multi-Level Evaluation of Earthquake Emergency Preparedness in Xiong’an New Area Using the Entropy Weight Method
Source abstract
Abstract
Earthquake emergency preparedness plays a vital role in strengthening disaster prevention and mitigation capacity, as well as societal resilience. This study focuses on the Xiong’an New Area, a rapidly developing national demonstration zone in China. An evaluation index system for earthquake emergency preparedness was established, and the entropy weight method was applied to objectively determine indicator weights. By integrating field questionnaire data with statistical analysis, preparedness was quantitatively assessed across three administrative levels: township, county, and city. The results reveal pronounced heterogeneity in earthquake emergency preparedness capacity, with township-level performance varying considerably, county-level performance being relatively higher yet still requiring improvement, and the New Area demonstrating strong overall capacity, particularly in emergency organization and coordination mechanisms. However, limited risk awareness and insufficient self-protection capability among grassroots residents remain key constraints on overall preparedness. This research enhances the understanding of earthquake preparedness and provides valuable insights for strengthening disaster prevention, emergency management, and public safety governance in rapidly urbanizing regions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Disaster Management and Resilience · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Facility Location and Emergency Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China Earthquake Network Center, Beijing 100045, China
Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100029, China
Twenty First Century Aerospace Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100096, China
Funding
National Nonprofit Fundamental Research Grant of China, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration · Spark Program for Earthquake Science and Technology · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Youth Science Foundation of the China Earthquake Networks Center · Key Earthquake Emergency Response Tasks of the China Earthquake Administration
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Earthquake Prediction and Disaster Preparedness: Interactive Analysis10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000020 ↗
2. Level of Earthquake Disaster Preparedness and Its Integrity in Natural Science Learning: A Literature Review10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012093 ↗
3. Community Resilience and Resident’s Disaster Preparedness: Evidence from China’s Earthquake-Stricken Areas10.1007/s11069-021-04695-9 ↗
4. Zucca, M., Franchi, A., Crespi, P., Longarini, N., and Ronca, P. (2018, January 9–11). The New Foundation System for the Transept Reconstruction of the Basilica Di Collemaggio. Proceedings of the 10th International Masonry Conference, Milan, Italy.
5. Semlali, B.-E.B., Molina, C., Librado, M.C., Park, H., Camps, A., Semlali, B.-E.B., Molina, C., Librado, M.C., Park, H., and Camps, A. (2024). Potential Earthquake Proxies from Remote Sensing Data. Climate Change and Risk Management—Strategies, Analysis, and Adaptation, IntechOpen.
6. Enhancing Societal Resilience through the Whole-of-Society Approach to Crisis Preparedness: Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective—The Case of Finland10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104944 ↗
7. The Federal Response Plan and Disaster Medical Assistance Teams in Domestic Disasters10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70256-X ↗
8. Examining the National Response Plan in Response to a Catastrophic Disaster: Hurricane Katrina in 200510.1177/028072700602400206 ↗
9. Preparedness for Emergency Response: Guidelines for the Emergency Planning Process10.1111/j.0361-3666.2003.00237.x ↗
10. Harris, J., and McCabe, S. (2023). ICSSC Biennial Progress Report for 2022: Report on Progress Towards Implementation of Executive Order 13717: Establishing a Federal Earthquake Risk Management Standard—Reporting Period: February 2, 2020 to February 1, 2022, NIST.
11. Evaluate the Capacity of Japanese Spatial Planning System for Hazards Integration Realities and (f)Acts: A Pre-Post the Great East Japan Earthquake in Fukushima, 201110.1007/s42797-024-00102-1 ↗
12. Navigating Theories of Actions on Disaster Prevention: A Systematic Review on Disaster Research in Japan10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1630 ↗
13. China’s Comprehensive Disaster Reduction
14. Establishment of an innovative system of natural disaster prevention and mitigation in China
15. Assessments of the Effectiveness of an Earthquake Emergency Plan Implementation with Hesitant Analytic Hierarchy Process10.1142/S0219622016500383 ↗
16. Chen, G., Li, T., and Fei, L. (2025). A Decision-Making Model for the Assessment of Emergency Response Capacity in China. Mathematics, 13.10.3390/math13111772 ↗
17. Multidimensional Evaluation of Seismic Emergency Capabilities in Chinese Cities: The Case of Changchun10.1038/s41598-024-81765-5 ↗
18. Zhai, L., and Lee, J.E. (2023). Analyzing the Disaster Preparedness Capability of Local Government Using AHP: Zhengzhou 7.20 Rainstorm Disaster. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20.10.3390/ijerph20020952 ↗
19. Evaluation of Disaster Preparedness in Educational Infrastructure of Remote Geographies Using Analytical Hierarchy Process10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104514 ↗
20. Wang, K., Feng, Y., Yang, H., Deng, J., and Li, Q. (2023). Evaluation of Community Emergency Management Capability Based on SWOT Analysis—A Case Study. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151712770 ↗
21. Assessment of Earthquake Prevention and Disaster Reduction Capability of County-Level Administrative Units in Gansu Province10.2991/jrarc.2017.7.4.3 ↗
22. Disaster Resilience Indicators for Benchmarking Baseline Conditions
23. Spatial Analysis of Earthquake-Prone Rural Areas and Residents’ Preparedness10.1007/s11069-023-06364-5 ↗
24. Liu, S., Li, Z., Wang, F., and Zhou, S. (2025). Research on Evaluation of Emergency Management Capability of Major Emergencies Based on Fuzzy Network Analysis. Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Big Data and Informatization Education, Suzhou, China, 21–23 February 2025, Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/3729605.3729664 ↗
25. The Importance of Indicator Weights for Vulnerability Indices and Implications for Decision Making in Disaster Management10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101103 ↗
26. Disaster Preparedness Using Risk-Assessment Methods from Earthquake Engineering10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.014 ↗
27. Study on Evaluation of Cities’ Ability Reducing Earthquake Disasters10.1007/s11589-004-0057-6 ↗
28. Kolathayar, S., Anupa, S.A., and Prakash, E.L. (2018). Development of Earthquake Readiness Index Tool to Assess Individual Earthquake Preparedness Level. Urbanization Challenges in Emerging Economies: Resilience and Sustainability of Infrastructure, ASCE.10.1061/9780784482032.016 ↗
29. Disaster Policy and Emergency Management Reforms in China: From Wenchuan Earthquake to Jiuzhaigou Earthquake10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101964 ↗
30. Response to a High-Altitude Earthquake: The Yushu Earthquake Example10.1007/s13753-011-0005-8 ↗
31. Shi, P., Jaeger, C., and Ye, Q. (2013). Experience, Lessons and Recommendation of China’s Response to the Wenchuan Earthquake Disaster. Integrated Risk Governance: Science Plan and Case Studies of Large-Scale Disasters, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-31641-8_6 ↗
32. Understanding Community-Level Disaster and Emergency Response Preparedness10.1017/dmp.2015.28 ↗
33. Mapping Individuals’ Earthquake Preparedness in China10.5194/nhess-18-1315-2018 ↗
34. (2014). Guideline of Earthquake Emergency for Community (Standard No. GB/T 31079-2014).
35. (2024). Technical Specification for Disaster Coping Capacity Assessment at Grassroots Level (Standard No. GB/T 43981-2024).
36. (2024). Technical Specification for Earthquake Disaster Risk Assessment and Zoning (Standard No. DB51/T 3223-2024).
37. Wu, R.M.X., Zhang, Z., Yan, W., Fan, J., Gou, J., Liu, B., Gide, E., Soar, J., Shen, B., and Fazal-e-Hasan, S. (2022). A Comparative Analysis of the Principal Component Analysis and Entropy Weight Methods to Establish the Indexing Measurement. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0262261 ↗
38. Implicit and Hybrid Methods for Attribute Weighting in Multi-Attribute Decision-Making: A Review Study10.1007/s10462-020-09941-3 ↗
39. Background Seismicity before and after the 1976 Ms 7.8 Tangshan Earthquake: Is Its Aftershock Sequence Still Continuing?10.1785/0220200179 ↗
40. Fault Plane Parameters of Sanhe-Pinggu M8 Earthquake in 1679 Determined Using Present-Day Small Earthquakes10.1007/s11589-014-0099-3 ↗
41. Seismic hazard assessment in the Xiongan New Area
42. Three-Dimensional Geological Structure of Xiong’an New Area: Constraints from Reflection Seismic Data
43. Geochemical Characterization and Implications of Soil Gas and Geothermal Fluids in the Fault Zone of Xiongan New Area10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105886 ↗
44. Construction of the Scale-Specific Resilience Index to Facilitate Multiscale Decision Making in Disaster Management: A Case Study of the 2015 Nepal Earthquake10.1007/s11205-019-02188-8 ↗
45. A Place-Based Model for Understanding Community Resilience to Natural Disasters10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013 ↗
46. Data-Driven Multi-Hazard Susceptibility and Community Perceptions Assessment Using a Mixed-Methods Approach10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126009 ↗
47. Disaster Preparedness: A Social-cognitive Perspective10.1108/09653560310480686 ↗
48. Constructing an Adaptability Evaluation Framework for Community-Based Disaster Management Using an Earthquake Event10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103774 ↗
49. Understanding the Culture of Natural Disaster Preparedness: Exploring the Effect of Experience and Sociodemographic Predictors10.1007/s11069-020-04060-2 ↗
50. Xu, J., and Takahashi, M. (2021). Urban Marginalization and the Declining Capacity for Disaster Risks in Contemporary China. Soc. Sci., 10.10.3390/socsci10110424 ↗
51. Time Windows of Opportunities to Fight Earthquake Under-Insurance: Evidence from Google Trends10.1057/s41599-020-0532-2 ↗
52. Bottom-up Citizen Initiatives in Natural Hazard Management: Why They Appear and What They Can Do?10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.012 ↗
53. Community Engagement for Disaster Preparedness: A Systematic Literature Review10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101655 ↗
54. Speaking of the Devil: A Systematic Literature Review on Community Preparedness for Earthquakes10.1007/s11069-021-04797-4 ↗
55. Disaster Management in Earthquake-Prone Countries: Lessons from the Public Administration Systems of Japan and the Philippines
56. Integrating Disaster Preparedness and Resilience: A Complex Approach Using System of Systems