Deep Learning Based Correction Algorithms for 3D Medical Reconstruction in Computed Tomography and Macroscopic Imaging
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper introduces a hybrid two-stage registration framework for reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) kidney anatomy from macroscopic slices, using CT-derived models as the geometric reference standard. The approach addresses the data-scarcity and high-distortion challenges typical of macroscopic imaging, where fully learning-based registration (e.g., VoxelMorph) often fails to generalize due to limited training diversity and large nonrigid deformations that exceed the capture range of unconstrained convolutional filters. In the proposed pipeline, the Optimal Cross-section Matching (OCM) algorithm first performs constrained global alignment—translation, rotation, and uniform scaling—to establish anatomically consistent slice initialization. Next, a lightweight deep-learning refinement network, inspired by VoxelMorph, predicts residual local deformations between consecutive slices. The core novelty of this architecture lies in its hierarchical decomposition of the registration manifold: the OCM acts as a deterministic geometric anchor that neutralizes high-amplitude variance, thereby constraining the learning task to a low-dimensional residual manifold. This hybrid OCM + DL design integrates explicit geometric priors with the flexible learning capacity of neural networks, ensuring stable optimization and plausible deformation fields even with few training examples. Experiments on an original dataset of 40 kidneys demonstrated that the OCM + DL method achieved the highest registration accuracy across all evaluated metrics: NCC = 0.91, SSIM = 0.81, Dice = 0.90, IoU = 0.81, HD95 = 1.9 mm, and volumetric agreement DCVol = 0.89. Compared to single-stage baselines, this represents an average improvement of approximately 17% over DL-only and 14% over OCM-only, validating the synergistic contribution of the proposed hybrid strategy over standalone iterative or data-driven methods. The pipeline maintains physical calibration via Hough-based grid detection and employs Bézier-based contour smoothing for robust meshing and volume estimation. Although validated on kidney data, the proposed framework generalizes to other soft-tissue organs reconstructed from optical or photographic cross-sections. By decoupling interpretable global optimization from data-efficient deep refinement, the method advances the precision, reproducibility, and anatomical realism of multimodal 3D reconstructions for surgical planning, morphological assessment, and medical education.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Medical Image Segmentation Techniques · Advanced Neural Network Applications · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Plac Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute, Szaserów 128, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Pennarossa, G., Arcuri, S., De Iorio, T., and Gandolfi, F. (2021). Current advances in 3D tissue and organ reconstruction. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.10.3390/ijms22020830 ↗
2. A review on the 3D printing of functional structures for medical phantoms and regenerated tissue and organ applications10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.013 ↗
3. Real-time 3D image reconstruction guidance in liver resection surgery
4. Hu, M., Penney, G., Edwards, P., and Figl, M. (November, January 29). 3D reconstruction of internal organ surfaces for minimal invasive surgery. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Imaging, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
5. Geiger, B. (1993). Three-Dimensional Modeling of Human Organs and Its Application to Diagnosis and Surgical Planning, INRIA. Technical Report.
6. Development of an organ-specific insert phantom generated using a 3D printer for investigations of cardiac computed tomography protocols10.1002/jmrs.279 ↗
7. 3D reconstruction for super-resolution CT images in the Internet of health things using deep learning10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007024 ↗
8. Survey of methods and principles in three-dimensional reconstruction from two-dimensional medical images10.1186/s42492-023-00142-7 ↗
9. Virtual anthropology: A preliminary test of macroscopic observation versus 3D surface scans and computed tomography (CT) scans10.1080/20961790.2020.1817270 ↗
10. The potential of micro-CT for dating post-cranial bone fractures: A macroscopic, radiographic, and microtomography study of fractures of known post-traumatic ages10.1007/s00414-021-02582-3 ↗
11. Hagen, F., Mair, A., Bitzer, M., Bösmüller, H., and Horger, M. (2021). Fully automated whole-liver volume quantification on CT-image data: Comparison with manual volumetry using enhanced and unenhanced images as well as two different radiation dose levels and two reconstruction kernels. PLoS ONE, 16.10.1371/journal.pone.0255374 ↗
12. Chun, M., Choi, J., Kim, S., Ahn, C., and Kim, J. (2022). Fully automated image quality evaluation on patient CT: Multi-vendor and multi-reconstruction study. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0271724 ↗
13. Fully automatic segmentation and three-dimensional reconstruction of the liver in CT images10.1155/2018/6797102 ↗
14. CT-ORG, a new dataset for multiple organ segmentation in computed tomography10.1038/s41597-020-00715-8 ↗
15. Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: Effect of image reconstruction algorithm10.1118/1.1544679 ↗
16. Zhou, L., Wu, G., Zuo, Y., Chen, X., and Hu, H. (2024). A comprehensive review of vision-based 3d reconstruction methods. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24072314 ↗
17. Badea, C.T., Han, Z., Clark, D.P., and Badea, A. (2024, January 18–22). Whole heart CNN-based segmentation for phenotypical analysis of APOE mouse models using photon counting cine cardiac micro-CT data. Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2024: Clinical and Preclinical Optical Diagnostics, San Diego, CA, USA.
18. A hybrid scaffold induces chondrogenic differentiation and enhances in vivo cartilage regeneration
19. Wang, Z., Sun, Y., Li, S., Lin, L., Wang, S., and Cui, J. (2024). Geometric Artifact Correction for Symmetric Multi-Linear Trajectory CT: Theory, Method, and Generalization. arXiv.
20. A geometry-informed deep learning framework for ultra-sparse 3D tomographic image reconstruction10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105710 ↗
21. Feng, Z., Yang, L., Guo, P., and Li, B. (2023, January 1–6). Cvrecon: Rethinking 3d geometric feature learning for neural reconstruction. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Paris, France.10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.01627 ↗
22. A preclinical micro-computed tomography database including 3D whole body organ segmentations10.1038/sdata.2018.294 ↗
23. A novel multi-atlas strategy with dense deformation field reconstruction for abdominal and thoracic multi-organ segmentation from computed tomography10.1016/j.media.2018.02.001 ↗
24. González Izard, S., Sánchez Torres, R., Alonso Plaza, O., Juanes Mendez, J.A., and García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2020). Nextmed: Automatic imaging segmentation, 3D reconstruction, and 3D model visualization platform using augmented and virtual reality. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20102962 ↗
25. Low-dose CT with a residual encoder-decoder convolutional neural network10.1109/TMI.2017.2715284 ↗
26. A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction10.1002/mp.12344 ↗
27. A perspective on deep imaging10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2624938 ↗
28. Recent advances in CT image reconstruction10.1007/s40134-012-0003-7 ↗
29. Neural networks-based regularization for large-scale medical image reconstruction10.1088/1361-6560/ab990e ↗
30. Image reconstruction is a new frontier of machine learning10.1109/TMI.2018.2833635 ↗
31. Bouhacina, O., Khatir, A., Matoug, S.A., and Tamine, T. (2026). A Novel Hybrid TOARS-Optimized Ensemble of Tree-Based Models for Predicting Soil Temperature at Shallow Depths. Sustainability, 18.10.3390/su18010294 ↗
32. A survey of the Hough transform10.1016/S0734-189X(88)80033-1 ↗
33. A novel generalization of Bezier curve and surface10.1016/j.cam.2007.06.027 ↗
34. VoxelMorph: A Learning Framework for Deformable Medical Image Registration10.1109/TMI.2019.2897538 ↗