journal article·2026-02-13Open access

A Child–Robot Interaction Framework for Designing Inclusive Educational Robotics in Resourced Classrooms: (Robo-ICARE)

Sandra Cano, Rocio Hidalgo, Carlos Alberto Peláez, Andrés Solano, Francisca Guzmán, Ignacio Reyes, Klinge Orlando Villalba-Condori

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 4

Abstract

This study presents Robo-ICARE (Robotics-Inclusive Child-Centered Approach for Robotics in Education), a Child–Robot Interaction (cHRI) framework for designing inclusive educational robotics in under-resourced and multigrade classroom contexts. The framework addresses gaps in existing educational robotics approaches by integrating user-centered design, affective expressiveness, pedagogical alignment and inclusivity, with particular attention to learner variability and contextual constraints. Robo-ICARE comprises six interrelated design dimensions—embodiment, interactivity, intelligence, pedagogical alignment, inclusivity, and user-centered process—intended to guide the design implementation, and evaluation of educational robots in authentic classroom environments. The framework is operationalized and empirically examined through a case study involving COODI, a low-cost and emotionally expressive educational robot co-designed with students and teachers in rural Chile. The study follows a primarily qualitative, exploratory design-based research approach, supported by descriptive quantitative measures. Empirical evaluation with 49 participants focuses on usability, user experience, engagement, and emotional acceptance, rather than on causal measurement of learning gains. The findings indicate that the proposed framework supports the design of emotionally engaging and context-sensitive educational robotics experiences that are feasible in low-resource settings. Overall, this work contributes a design-guiding, empirically grounded framework that bridges child–robot interaction theory and educational practice, offering a replicable approach for inclusive educational robotics in under-resourced classroom contexts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Teaching and Learning Programming · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Autism Spectrum Disorder Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Informatics Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile

School of Education, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile

Faculty of Engineering and Basic Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Cali 760030, Colombia

Vice-Rectorate for Research, Universidad Nacional Pedro Henríquez Ureña, Santo Domingo 1423, Dominican Republic

Funding

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. A Systematic Review of Studies on Educational Robotics
2. Sorayyaei Azar, A., Elyas, T., Muthmainnah, M., and Curle, S. (2025). Integrating Educational Robotics and Artificial Intelligence With African Educational Perspectives in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Challenges and Opportunities. Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics, IGI Global.
3. Ryalat, M., Almtireen, N., Al-refai, G., Elmoaqet, H., and Rawashdeh, N. (2025). Research and Education in Robotics: A Comprehensive Review, Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions. J. Sens. Actuator Netw., 14.10.3390/jsan14040076 ↗
4. Integrated constructive robotics in education (ICRE) model: A paradigmatic framework for transformative learning in educational ecosystem10.1080/2331186X.2024.2324487 ↗
5. Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning10.1002/tea.3660020306 ↗
6. Papert, S. (1982). Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, Harvester Press.10.1007/978-3-0348-5357-6 ↗
7. Papert, S. (1987). Microworlds: Transforming education. Artificial Intelligence and Education, Ablex Publishing Corp.. Learning Environments and Tutoring Systems.
8. Educational Robotics for Developing Computational Thinking in Young Learners: A Systematic Review10.1007/s11528-023-00841-1 ↗
9. The value of digital technologies in inclusion10.1051/shsconf/202214103015 ↗
10. Castro, A., Medina, J., Aguilera, C.A., Ramirez, M., and Aguilera, C. (2022). Robotics Education in STEM Units: Breaking Down Barriers in Rural Multigrade Schools. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23010387 ↗
11. Funk, M.G., Cascalho, J.M., Santos, A.I., and Mendes, A.B. (2021). Educational Robotics and Tangible Devices for Promoting Computational Thinking. Front. Robot. AI, 8.10.3389/frobt.2021.713416 ↗
12. Social robots for education: A review10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954 ↗
13. Dong, J., Yu, S., Choi, K., and Jeon, M. (2025). A child-robot theater afterschool program can promote children’s conceptualization of social robots’ mental capacities and engagement in learning. Front. Robot. AI, 12.10.3389/frobt.2025.1529421 ↗
14. Guidelines for Designing Social Robots as Second Language Tutors10.1007/s12369-018-0467-6 ↗
15. Catlin, D., Kandlhofer, M., Cabibihan, J.-J., Angel-Fernandez, J., Holmquist, S., and Csizmadia, A.P. (2019). EduRobot Taxonomy. Smart Learning with Educational Robotics, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-19913-5_15 ↗
16. Effectiveness of social robots as a tutoring and learning companion: A bibliometric analysis10.1080/23311975.2023.2299075 ↗
17. Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges10.1007/978-3-319-02675-6_45 ↗
18. A Review of the Applicability of Robots in Education10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015 ↗
19. Löffler, D., Schmidt, N., and Tscharn, R. (2018). Multimodal Expression of Artificial Emotion in Social Robots Using Color, Motion and Sound. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, ACM.10.1145/3171221.3171261 ↗
20. Multigrade teaching: Towards an international research and policy agenda10.1016/S0738-0593(01)00011-6 ↗
21. Social Educational Robotics and Learning Analytics: A Scoping Review of an Emerging Field10.1007/s12369-025-01235-4 ↗
22. Cano, S., Díaz-Arancibia, J., Arango-López, J., Libreros, J.E., and García, M. (2023). Design Path for a Social Robot for Emotional Communication for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Sensors, 23.10.20944/preprints202305.0535.v1 ↗
23. Tengler, K., Kastner-Hauler, O., and Sabitzer, B. (2021). Identifying Preliminary Design Principles for a Robotics-based Learning Environment. Proceedings of the 2021 16th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), IEEE.10.1109/ICCSE51940.2021.9569250 ↗
24. Beyond User-Centered Design: Applicable Concepts from Complementary Approaches10.1177/154193120905302406 ↗
25. Educational Robots for Social and Emotional Learning
26. Guide to build YOLO, a creativity-stimulating robot for children10.1016/j.ohx.2019.e00074 ↗
27. Designing a robot teaching assistant for enhancing and sustaining learning motivation10.1080/10494820.2012.705855 ↗
28. Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center10.1073/pnas.0707769104 ↗
29. Leite, I., Martinho, C., Pereira, A., and Paiva, A. As Time goes by: Long-term evaluation of social presence in robotic companions. Proceedings of the RO-MAN 2009—The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326256 ↗
30. Souza, A., Sousa, C.E., Torres, D., and Paradeda, R. Roboldo: An Affective Robot for Empathetic Social Interactions in Education. Proceedings of the 2024 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR), and 2024 Workshop on Robotics in Education (WRE).10.1109/SBR/WRE63066.2024.10837785 ↗
31. Ali, M., Cheema, S.M., Ayub, N., Naz, A., and Aslam, Z. Impact of Adopting Robots as Teachers: A Review Study. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Electronics, Computing and Communication (ICETECC).10.1109/ICETECC56662.2022.10069714 ↗
32. Bredder, E., Lilly, S., Wilkens, K., and Vieira, C. Low-cost Educational Robotics (LCER) Design Framework. Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings.
33. Chiou, A., Lye, N.C., Lai, R., and Wong, K.W. Framework for robotics in education: Some experiences and case studies in test arena based projects. Proceedings of the 2011 5th IEEE International Conference on E-Learning in Industrial Electronics (ICELIE).10.1109/ICELIE.2011.6130020 ↗
34. Demetroulis, E.A., Papadogiannis, I., Wallace, M., Poulopoulos, V., and Antoniou, A. (2025). CORE: Cultivation of Collaboration Skills via Educational Robotics. Knowledge, 5.10.3390/knowledge5020009 ↗
35. Social attributes of robotic products: Observation of child-robot interaction in school environment
36. (2026, January 23). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 2.2. Available online: https://udlguidelines.cast.org/.
37. Charisi, V., Davison, D., Reidsma, D., and Evers, V. Evaluation methods for user-centered child-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745171 ↗
38. Empathy in Virtual Agents and Robots: A Survey10.1145/2912150 ↗
39. The Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educ. Res., 32, 5–8.10.3102/0013189X032001005 ↗
40. The System Usability Scale: Beyond Standard Usability Testing10.1177/1541931213571042 ↗
41. Applying the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) in Different Evaluation Scenarios10.1007/978-3-319-07668-3_37 ↗
42. The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307 ↗
43. Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6 ↗