journal article·2026-02-12Open access

Human-in-the-Loop Digital Twin Modeling for Smart Civil Infrastructure Operation and Maintenance

Zhe Sun, Yibing Wang, Weicheng Guo, Qinglei Meng

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 4

Abstract

Traditional inspection and diagnosis methods for civil infrastructure operation and maintenance (CI O&M) rely heavily on human efforts. Such efforts are always affected by subjective judgment and human errors due to engineering knowledge and prior experiences of field engineers. On the other hand, recent development of AI-driven tools could achieve effective information acquisition but lacks interpretability and engineering credibility. How to integrate human knowledge with AI capacity for safe and effective CI O&M is thus necessary in this new era. This paper presents a human-in-the-loop digital twin (HITL-DT) framework that enables safety risk sensing, prediction and control for smart CI O&M. The proposed framework fuses human cognition (i.e., individual perception and team situation awareness), AI and engineering knowledge for 1) risk sensing and diagnosis based on spatiotemporal changes and 2) risk prediction and control for smart CI O&M. Qualitative analysis indicates that the HITL-DT approach produces more explainable, trustworthy, and actionable diagnostic outputs, which enhance the reliability and proactivity of CI O&M.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Occupational Health and Safety Research · Digital Transformation in Industry · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Chongqing Research Institute, Beijing University of Technology, Chongqing 401121, China

School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Beijing Yuedu Construction Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 102699, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Infrastructure for sustainable development10.1038/s41893-019-0256-8 ↗
2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2021). 2021 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure: Bridges, ASCE. Available online: https://infrastructurereportcard.org.
3. OECD (2017). Bridging Divides: Transport Infrastructure for Connectivity and Growth, OECD Publishing. Available online: https://www.oecd.org.
4. Laña, I., Sanchez-Medina, J.J., Vlahogianni, E.I., and Del Ser, J. (2021). From data to actions in intelligent transportation systems: A prescription of functional requirements for model actionability. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21041121 ↗
5. Zeng, F., Pang, C., and Tang, H. (2024). Sensors on Internet of Things Systems for the Sustainable Development of Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24072074 ↗
6. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China (2025, December 01). Statistical Bulletin on the Development of the Transport Industry in 2023, (In Chinese).
7. Kim, J.-W., Choi, H.-W., Kim, S.-K., and Na, W.S. (2024). Review of Image-Processing-Based Technology for Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructures. J. Imaging, 10.10.3390/jimaging10040093 ↗
8. State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China (2025, December 01). China’s Rural Roads in the New Era, Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202411/content_6990096.htm.
9. Model-based systems engineering: Motivation, current status, and research opportunities10.1002/sys.21438 ↗
10. Omrany, H., Al-Obaidi, K.M., Husain, A., and Ghaffarianhoseini, A. (2023). Digital Twins in the Construction Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Current Implementations, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151410908 ↗
11. A meta-model approach for formal specification and consistent management of multi-LOD building models10.1016/j.aei.2019.04.003 ↗
12. Structural digital twin framework: Formulation and technology integration10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104333 ↗
13. Multi-domain ubiquitous digital twin model for information management of complex infrastructure systems10.1016/j.aei.2023.101951 ↗
14. Krupas, M., Kajati, E., Liu, C., and Zolotova, I. (2024). Towards a Human-Centric Digital Twin for Human–Machine Collaboration: A Review on Enabling Technologies and Methods. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24072232 ↗
15. Reason, J. (1990). Human Error, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139062367 ↗
16. Hollnagel, E. (2018). Safety-II in Practice: Developing the Resilience Potentials, Routledge.10.4324/9781315201023 ↗
17. Ahmed, H., La, H.M., and Gucunski, N. (2020). Review of Non-Destructive Civil Infrastructure Evaluation for Bridges: State-of-the-Art Robotic Platforms, Sensors and Algorithms. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20143954 ↗
18. Sun, Z., Chen, T., Meng, X., Bao, Y., Hu, L., and Zhao, R. (2023). A Critical Review for Trustworthy and Explainable Structural Health Monitoring and Risk Prognosis of Bridges with Human-In-The-Loop. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su15086389 ↗
19. Enabling human–machine collaboration in infrastructure inspections through mixed reality10.1016/j.aei.2022.101709 ↗
20. Asad, U., Khan, M., Khalid, A., and Lughmani, W.A. (2023). Human-Centric Digital Twins in Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Enabling Technologies and Implementation Strategies. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23083938 ↗
21. Wang, Q., Huang, B., Gao, Y., and Jiao, C. (2025). Current Status and Prospects of Digital Twin Approaches in Structural Health Monitoring. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15071021 ↗
22. Ji, Y., and Zheng, S. (2021). Distributed Mode-Dependent Event-Triggered Passive Filtering for Flexible Manipulator with Semi-Markov Parameters. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21062058 ↗
23. Wilson, S., Laing, R., Tan, E.W., and Wilson, C. (2020). Encapsulation of Electrically Conductive Apparel Fabrics: Effects on Performance. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20154243 ↗
24. Azimi, M., Eslamlou, A.D., and Pekcan, G. (2020). Data-Driven Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Detection through Deep Learning: State-of-the-Art Review. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20102778 ↗
25. Gharavi, H., Taban, F., Korivand, S., and Jalili, N. (2025). AI-Powered Structural Health Monitoring Using Multi-Type and Multi-Position PZT Networks. Sensors, 25.10.3390/s25165148 ↗
26. Gomez-Cabrera, A., and Escamilla-Ambrosio, P.J. (2022). Review of Machine-Learning Techniques Applied to Structural Health Monitoring Systems for Building and Bridge Structures. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122110754 ↗
27. Plevris, V., and Papazafeiropoulos, G. (2024). AI in Structural Health Monitoring for Infrastructure Maintenance and Safety. Infrastructures, 9.10.3390/infrastructures9120225 ↗
28. Wang, D., Luo, L., Luo, J., Lin, S., and Ren, G. (2022). Developing Computational Thinking: Design-Based Learning and Interdisciplinary Activity Design. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122111033 ↗
29. Abouelela, A. (2022). The Effectiveness of the Role of Interior Design in Creating Functional and Institutional Happiness for Work Environments: King Faisal University as a Model. Designs, 6.10.3390/designs6030045 ↗
30. Robitzsch, A. (2022). Regularized Mixture Rasch Model. Information, 13.10.3390/info13110534 ↗
31. Bombo, G., Cristofoli, N.L., Santos, T.F., Schüler, L., Maia, I.B., Pereira, H., Barreira, L., and Varela, J. (2023). Dunaliella viridis TAV01: A Halotolerant, Protein-Rich Microalga from the Algarve Coast. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042146 ↗
32. Jaryani, S., Yitmen, I., Sadri, H., and Alizadehsalehi, S. (2023). Exploring the Fusion of Knowledge Graphs into Cognitive Modular Production. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13092306 ↗
33. Firmino de Souza, D., Sousa, S., Kristjuhan-Ling, K., Dunajeva, O., Roosileht, M., Pentel, A., Mõttus, M., Can Özdemir, M., and Gratšjova, Ž. (2025). Trust and Trustworthiness from Human-Centered Perspective in Human–Robot Interaction (HRI)—A Systematic Literature Review. Electronics, 14.10.3390/electronics14081557 ↗