Assessing VOC Dispersion from Hydrocarbon Storage Tanks: A Case Study on Emission Temporal Resolution
Source abstract
Abstract
Volatile Organic Compound emissions from hydrocarbon storage tanks are a key source of industrial air pollution and odour nuisance. This study evaluates odour impact predictions using annual average emissions versus time-resolved emissions from fixed roof tanks and external floating roof tanks that store different hydrocarbon products, including crude oil and refined products such as gasoline, diesel, kerosene, fuel oil, and bitumen. Odour emission rates are derived from field measurements and laboratory data and implemented in CALPUFF dispersion modelling. The results show that for fixed roof tanks, time-resolved emissions predict odour separation distances up to four times greater than annual averages, with central domain differences reaching 300% and boundary variations between 50–100%. In contrast, floating roof tanks show minimal variation (<10%) between the two methods. These findings highlight that odour perception is driven by short-term peaks rather than long-term averages and that using annualized emissions may significantly underpredict odour impacts, especially for fixed roof tanks. Accurate temporal characterization is thus essential for realistic odour assessments and effective regulatory compliance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Odor and Emission Control Technologies · Vehicle emissions and performance · Insect Pheromone Research and Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Department of Chemistry, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Hazardous substances as the dominant non-methane volatile organic compounds with potential emissions from liquid storage tanks during well fracturing: A modeling approach10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110715 ↗
2. Assessment of atmospheric volatile organic compounds at two crude oil production plants in Southeastern Türkiye
3. Process-based volatile organic compound emission inventory establishment method for the petroleum refining industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121609 ↗
4. Historical volatile organic compounds emission performance and reduction potentials in China’s petroleum refining industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125810 ↗
5. Emissions of volatile organic compounds from crude oil processing—Global emission inventory and environmental release10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138654 ↗
6. Kim, J.H., Lee, H.E., and Yoon, S.J. (2023). Study on the speciation of VOCs at oil refining plant fenceline through active sampling. Atmosphere, 14.10.3390/atmos14030485 ↗
7. Production of hydrogen and carbon in the petrochemical industry by cracking of hydrocarbons in the process of heat utilization in steel production10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.341 ↗
8. Ragothaman, A., and Anderson, W.A. (2017). Air quality impacts of petroleum refining and petrochemical industries. Environments, 4.10.3390/environments4030066 ↗
9. Emission characteristics, OFPs, and mitigation perspectives of VOCs from refining industry in China’s petrochemical bases10.4209/aaqr.220347 ↗
10. Volatile organic compounds and ozone air pollution in an oil production region in northern China10.5194/acp-20-7069-2020 ↗
11. Environmental impacts and emission profiles of volatile organic compounds from petroleum refineries10.1038/s41598-025-99932-7 ↗
12. Research on accounting and detection of volatile organic compounds from a typical petroleum refinery in Hebei, North China10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130653 ↗
13. Odour emission rate estimation methods for hydrocarbon storage tanks
14. Proposal of a method for evaluating odour emissions from refinery storage tanks
15. Experimental study of the VOC emitted from crude oil tankers10.1016/j.psep.2013.10.005 ↗
16. Characterization and assessment of volatile organic compounds emissions from typical industries10.1007/s11434-012-5345-2 ↗
17. Japan’s policy to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds: Factors that facilitate industry participation in voluntary actions10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.145 ↗
18. Emission losses and dispersion of volatile organic compounds from tank farm of petroleum refinery complex10.1007/s40201-019-00370-1 ↗
19. Characteristics of volatile organic compounds emitted from a petroleum refinery in Beijing, China10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.01.038 ↗
20. The effect of crude oil type on evaporation loss from Khark Island storage tanks10.1080/10916466.2010.521785 ↗
21. Emissions from fixed-roof storage tanks: Modeling and experiments10.1021/ie010111m ↗
22. Maxwell, A., and Lawal, A. (2016, January 4–6). Petroleum product storage tank, design and loss control management. Proceedings of the SPE African Health, Safety, Security, Environment, and Social Responsibility Conference and Exhibition, Accra, Ghana.10.2118/183615-MS ↗
23. Long-term emission measurements at a floating roof tank for gasoline storage10.1016/j.jlp.2018.05.004 ↗
24. Flashing losses emission evaluation from crude oil storage tank
25. Research on the effect of wall corrosion and rim seal on the withdrawal loss for a floating roof tank10.1007/s11356-018-1978-2 ↗
26. Evaporation losses and dispersion of volatile organic compounds from tank farms10.1007/s10661-015-4456-z ↗
27. Introduction of cleaner production in the tank farm of the Pancevo Oil Refinery, Serbia10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.002 ↗
28. Emission characteristics of VOCs from three fixed-roof p-xylene liquid storage tanks10.1007/s10661-013-3067-9 ↗
29. Characteristics and dispersion modeling of VOCs emission released from the tank farm of petroleum refinery complex
30. Volatile organic compounds emissions from internal floating-roof tank in oil depots in Beijing: Influencing factors and emission reduction strategies analysis10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170222 ↗
31. Volatile organic compounds losses simulation during storage of gasoline
32. Odour dispersion modelling, impact criteria, and setback distances for an oil refinery plant10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118879 ↗
33. Developing an odour emission factor for an oil refinery plant using reverse dispersion modeling10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117167 ↗
34. Evaluation of odour properties, their relationships, and impact of an oil refinery plant on the surrounding environment using field measurements10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117480 ↗
35. A field experiment on turbulent concentration fluctuations of an atmospheric tracer gas in the vicinity of a complex-shaped building10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.05.005 ↗
36. Bokowa, A., Diaz, C., Koziel, J.A., McGinley, M., Barclay, J., Schauberger, G., Guillot, J.M., Sneath, R., Capelli, L., and Zorich, V. (2021). Summary and overview of the odour regulations worldwide. Atmosphere, 12.10.3390/atmos12020206 ↗
37. Do odour impact criteria of different jurisdictions ensure analogous separation distances for an equivalent level of protection?10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.102 ↗
38. Temporal variability in odour emissions: To what extent this matters for the assessment of annoyance using dispersion modelling
39. Zhang, Q., and Zhou, X. (2020). Assessing peak-to-mean ratios of odour intensity in the atmosphere near swine operations. Atmosphere, 11.10.3390/atmos11030224 ↗
40. Emissions characterization and regulatory compliance at an industrial complex: An integrated MM5/CALPUFF approach10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.12.022 ↗
41. Assessment of odour emissions by the use of a dispersion model in the context of the proposed new law in Chile10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113208 ↗
42. USEPA CALPUFF validation and dispersion modeling of beef cattle feedlot PM10 and PM2.5 emissions factors10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120189 ↗
43. Performance evaluation of AERMOD and CALPUFF air dispersion models in industrial complex area10.4137/ASWR.S32781 ↗
44. Variability in odour impact assessment due to different cloud cover estimation approaches: A northern Italy case study10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100492 ↗
45. Tagliaferri, F., Facagni, L., Invernizzi, M., Ferrer Hernández, A.L., Hernández-Garces, A., and Sironi, S. (2024). Odor impact assessment via dispersion model: Comparison of different input meteorological datasets. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14062457 ↗
46. Strategies for the reduction of odour impact via dispersion modelling: A case study of a rendering plant
47. Szalata, L., Zwózdziak, J., Majerník, M., Cierniak-Emerych, A., Jarossová, M.A., Dziuba, S., Knošková, L., and Drábik, P. (2021). Assessment of the odour quality of the air surrounding a landfill site: A case study. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13041713 ↗
48. Establishment of suitable separation distance by using different methods for malodor mitigation from palm oil mill10.1007/s11356-019-05517-z ↗
49. Dispersion modelling of environmental odours using hourly-resolved emission scenarios: Implications for impact assessments
50. Influence of the variability of the odour emission rate on the separation distance shown for the Irish odour impact criterion
51. Scire, J.S., Strimaitis, D.G., and Yamartino, R.J. (2000). A User’s Guide for the CALPUFF Dispersion Model, Earth Tech. Inc.
52. Scire, J., Robe, F., Fernau, M., and Yamartino, R. (2000). A User’s Guide for the CALMET Meteorological Model, Earth Tech. Inc.
53. Update on the new EN 13725:2021
54. U.S. EPA (1997). Emission Factor Documentation for AP-42 Organic Liquid Storage Tanks.
55. U.S. EPA (2018). User’s Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model (AERMOD), EPA-454/B-18-001.
56. Hartley, S., Rosenbaum, A., Holder, C., Cohen, J., Graham, S., Brode, R., Thurman, J., Langstaff, J., and Fox, T. (2009, January 26–30). Application of AERMOD to Region-wide Emissions in an Urban Setting in Support of the NO2 NAAQS Review. Proceedings of the AWMA Guideline on Air Quality Models: Next Generation of Models, Raleigh, NC, USA.
57. Evaluation of a revised AERMOD treatment of plume dispersion in the daytime elevated stable layer10.1080/10962247.2022.2094031 ↗
58. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Sicurezza Energetica (2023). Decreto Direttoriale 28 Giugno 2023, n. 309.
59. Diurnal and annual variation of the sensation distance of odour emitted by livestock buildings calculated by the Austrian odour dispersion model10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00240-5 ↗