journal article·2026-02-11Open access

Multi-Point Stretch Forming Springback Prediction and Parameter Sensitivity Analysis Based on GWO-CatBoost

Xue Chen, Dongmei Wang, Chi Zhang, Renwei Wang, Changliang Zhang, Yueteng Zhou

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 4

Abstract

Springback control in Multi-Point Stretch Forming (MPSF) is significantly hindered by the computational intensity of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and the limited predictive robustness of traditional regression methods. This study develops a hybrid GWO-CatBoost model acting as a data-driven surrogate for MPSF simulations by integrating the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) with the CatBoost algorithm for high-precision springback forecasting. An FEA model of the MPSF process was initially validated through experimental comparison under a representative working condition to assess modeling accuracy. A comprehensive dataset comprising 1200 scenarios was generated via a full factorial design, incorporating key variables: curvature radius, sheet thickness, cushion thickness, and pre-stretching rate. In this study, the GWO was employed to perform automated hyperparameter tuning for CatBoost by optimizing the learning rate, tree depth, and number of iterations, thereby enabling accurate modeling of the complex nonlinear relationship between process inputs and numerical springback values. Numerical evaluations demonstrate that the GWO-CatBoost model outperforms GWO-XGBoost and GWO-Random Forest benchmarks, achieving a Coefficient of Determination (R2) of 0.9293, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0274 mm and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0189 mm. Sensitivity analysis identifies sheet thickness as the dominant factor (46% contribution), with cushion thickness as the secondary driver (23%). This predictive framework serves as a computationally efficient auxiliary surrogate, designed to assist iterative finite element analyses and support process optimization in the manufacture of complex-curved panels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China

Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center of Ocean Equipment and Manufacturing, Zhanjiang 524088, China

Funding

the program for scientific research start-up funds of Guangdong Ocean University

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Fu, W.Z., Chen, Z.H., and Li, M.J. (2009, January 9–12). Numerical Simulation Research on Multi-Point Stretch Forming Process of Sheet Metal Parts. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Changchun, China.
2. Numerical Study on the Effect of Mechanical Properties Variability in Sheet Metal Forming Processes10.1007/s00170-018-1604-y ↗
3. Insights into Spring-Back Prediction: A Comparative Analysis of Constitutive Models for Perforated U-Shaped Roll-Formed Steel Profiles10.1007/s00170-024-14211-5 ↗
4. Enhancing Experimental Prediction of Springback in Forming Processes Using Advanced Finite Element Modelling10.36897/jme/202916 ↗
5. Machine Learning and Finite Element Simulation and Experimentation for Springback Prediction of Al-Li Alloys
6. Springback Prediction in Sheet Metal Forming, Based on Finite Element Analysis and Artificial Neural Network Approach10.3390/applmech1020007 ↗
7. Springback Optimization of Deep Drawing Process Based on FEM-ANN-PSO Strategy10.1007/s00158-021-02861-y ↗
8. Springback Prediction of Incremental Sheet Forming Based on FEM-PSONN Technology10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62567-4 ↗
9. Springback Prediction Using Point Series and Deep Learning10.1007/s00170-024-13632-6 ↗
10. Prediction of Springback in Wipe-Bending Process of Sheet Metal Using Neural Network10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.033 ↗
11. Single and Ensemble Classifiers for Defect Prediction in Sheet Metal Forming under Variability10.1007/s00521-019-04651-6 ↗
12. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 August 2016, ACM.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
13. Prediction of Springback Using the Machine Learning Technique in High-Tensile Strength Sheet Metal during the V-Bending Process
14. CatBoost: Unbiased Boosting with Categorical Features
15. Dorogush, A.V., Ershov, V., and Gulin, A. (2018). CatBoost: Gradient Boosting with Categorical Features Support. arXiv.
16. Trzepieciński, T., and Lemu, H.G. (2020). Improving Prediction of Springback in Sheet Metal Forming Using Multilayer Perceptron-Based Genetic Algorithm. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13143129 ↗
17. Ruan, F., Feng, Y., and Liu, W.J. Springback Prediction of Complex Sheet Metal Forming Parts Based on Genetic Neural Network. Proceedings of the 2008 Second International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application, Shanghai, China, 21–22 December 2008.10.1109/IITA.2008.425 ↗
18. Prediction on V-shaped free bending angle and springback based on DPSO-BP neural network
19. High Precision and Rapid Springback Prediction for Creep Forming of Ribbed Panel Based on SPSO-BP Neural Network
20. High-Precision Roll Forming Springback Prediction Model Based on SA-PSO Optimized SVR10.1007/s10845-023-02222-0 ↗