journal article·2026-02-05Open access

Influence of Gravel Size and Geogrid Aperture on Performance of Geosynthetic-Encased Stone Column: DEM-FDM Coupled Numerical Investigation

Jia Lu, Jia-Quan Wang, Zhou-Jing-Qi Su, Min-Cai Jia, Chen-Hao Zou

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of gravel particle size and geogrid aperture on the bearing performance of geosynthetic-encased stone columns, a discrete–continuum coupled numerical model was established based on laboratory test results, and a series of numerical simulations were conducted. The results indicate that, under the same loading level, the maximum lateral bulging of geosynthetic-encased stone columns increases with increasing geogrid aperture and decreases with increasing gravel particle size. The distance between the location of maximum lateral bulging and the pile-top decreases as the aperture increases, whereas it increases with increasing particle size. The bearing performance of geosynthetic-encased stone columns shows a positive correlation with gravel particle size and a negative correlation with geogrid aperture. The influence of particle size on bearing performance becomes insignificant when d50 exceeds 40 mm. When the particle size is smaller than the geogrid aperture, contact between the gravel and the geogrid is established but remains insufficient, leading to separation as the load increases. In contrast, when the particle size is larger than the aperture, the effect of particle size on bearing performance is much more pronounced than that of aperture. Therefore, the use of gravel with a particle size slightly larger than the geogrid aperture is recommended in practical engineering applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Urban Construction Technology Group (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310009, China

Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Engineering Research Center of Geotechnical Disaster and Ecological Control, College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou 545006, China

Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key Project of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation · Bagui Scholar Program (Science and Technology Innovation Category) of China

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Investigation on geogrid reinforcement and pile efficacy in geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported track-bed10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103489 ↗
2. Reinforcement load in geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported model embankments10.1016/j.geotexmem.2022.07.005 ↗
3. Load transfer mechanism and deformation of reinforced piled embankments10.1016/j.geotexmem.2016.11.002 ↗
4. Micromechanical analysis of shear characteristics of core pile-cemented soil interface in stiffened deep cement mixing pile10.1016/j.powtec.2025.120961 ↗
5. Geosynthetic reinforced piled embankment modeling using discrete and continuum approaches10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.10.026 ↗
6. Scaled model tests on pile types influencing the stability of stiffened deep mixed pile-supported embankment over soft clay10.1007/s11440-024-02424-7 ↗
7. Probabilistic analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankments10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104595 ↗
8. Dong, Y., Yang, J., and Qin, Y. (2024). Prediction of Optimal Design Parameters for Reinforced Soil Embankments with Wrapped Faces Using a GA–BP Neural Network. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14166910 ↗
9. Geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments—3D discrete numerical analyses of the interaction and mobilization mechanisms10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112337 ↗
10. Application of the digital image correlation technique in wide width tensile test of geogrids10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.07.005 ↗
11. A DEM-FDM coupled numerical study on the deformation and failure process of the isolated stone column in soft soil10.1007/s10064-019-01671-3 ↗
12. Influence of encasement length and geosynthetic stiffness on the performance of stone column: 3D DEM-FDM coupled numerical investigation10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103993 ↗
13. Study on launch tunnelling parameters of a shield tunnel buried in pebble soil with existing pipelines base on discrete continuous coupling numerical method10.1016/j.tust.2022.104629 ↗
14. Discrete and continuum numerical modeling of soil arching between piles10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001341 ↗
15. Model tests on geosynthetic-encased stone columns10.1680/gein.2007.14.6.346 ↗
16. Behaviour of geosynthetic-encased granular columns in porous collapsible soil10.1680/gein.2009.16.6.433 ↗
17. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft clay: A numerical study10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.09.015 ↗
18. Experimental analysis of bearing behavior of geosynthetic encased stone columns
19. Bearing capacity of geosynthetic encased stone columns10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.04.003 ↗
20. Uniaxial Compression Tests of Biaxial Geogrid-Encased Stone Columns
21. Model tests on geotextile-encased granular columns under 1-g and undrained conditions10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.006 ↗
22. Experimental Study on Vertical Bearing Capacity of Single Geotextile-encased Granular Column in Marine Silty Clay
23. Model Tests on Bearing Behavior of Composite Foundation Reinforced with Geosynthetic-encased Stone Columns Based on Artificial Soft Clay Technique
24. Wei, J., Wang, W., and Wu, J. (2022). Hydro-mechanically coupled numerical modelling on vibratory open-ended pile driving in saturated sand. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12094527 ↗
25. Coupled numerical simulation of seabed response to focused wave loads around monopile foundation10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.122453 ↗
26. Numerical modeling of interaction between steady flow and pile-net structures using a one-way coupling model10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111362 ↗
27. Thermohydromechanical coupling analysis and engineering verification of gravel pile groups for strengthening permafrost marshland highway foundations10.1007/s10064-022-02796-8 ↗
28. Laboratory investigation of particle size effects on the shear behavior of aggregate-geogrid interface10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.045 ↗
29. Hussaini, S.K.K. (2013). An Experimental Study on the Deformation Behaviour of Geosynthetic Reinforced Ballast. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wollongong].
30. Effects of direct shear characteristics of sand-geogrid interface under different aperture ratios
31. Assessment of interface shear behaviour of sub-ballast with geosynthetics by large-scale direct shear test10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.094 ↗
32. Clayey soil reinforced with stone column group: Model tests and analyses10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000552 ↗
33. Han, J.W. (2015). Laboratory Test on Encapsulated Stone Columns Composite Foundation. [Ph.D. Thesis, Southwest Jiaotong University].
34. Micro-mechanical characterization of polymer-modified asphalt mixtures using discrete element modelling with soft-bond and linear contact bond models10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.144325 ↗
35. Characteristics and predictions of accumulative deformation of structured soft soil under long-term cyclic loading10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109088 ↗
36. Research on rock mass strength using optimized discrete fracture network and bonded block numerical model10.1007/s10064-025-04235-w ↗
37. DEM analysis of failure mechanisms in the intact Brazilian test10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.11.010 ↗
38. DEM simulation of the pullout behavior of geogrid-stabilized ballast with the optimization of the coordination between aperture size and particle diameter10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119359 ↗
39. Modelling geogrid-reinforced railway ballast using the discrete element method10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.04.005 ↗
40. Discussion: A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies10.1680/geot.1980.30.3.331 ↗
41. Three-dimensional discrete element simulations of inherently anisotropic granular materials subjected to circular rotational shear stress path10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.107040 ↗
42. Shear performance of geosynthetic-encased stone column based on 3D-DEM simulation10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104952 ↗
43. Multi-scale DEM Investigation of the Effects of Particle Shape and Size Characteristics on the Direct Shear Response of Granular Materials10.60093/jiciviltech.1814761 ↗
44. Systematic investigation into the role of particle multi-level morphology in determining the shear behavior of granular materials via DEM simulation10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106298 ↗
45. Effects of Particle Shape on the Shear Behavior and Breakage of Ballast: A DEM Approach10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-9617 ↗
46. Bouhacina, O., Khatir, A., Matoug, S.A., and Tamine, T. (2025). A Novel Hybrid TOARS-Optimized Ensemble of Tree-Based Models for Predicting Soil Temperature at Shallow Depths. Sustainability, 18.10.3390/su18010294 ↗
47. Rahmani, M.C., Khatir, A., Azad, M.M., Kim, H.S., Firouzi, N., Kumar, R., Khatir, S., and Cuong, L.-T. (Math. Mech. Solids, 2025). Mechanics-based deep learning framework for predicting deflection of functionally graded composite plates using an enhanced whale optimization algorithm, Math. Mech. Solids, in press.10.1177/10812865251398866 ↗
48. Development and performance evaluation of self-leveling sand concrete: Enhanced fluidity, mechanical strength, durability, and non-destructive analysis10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140463 ↗
49. Advancements and emerging trends in integrating machine learning and deep learning for SHM in mechanical and civil engineering: A comprehensive review10.1007/s40430-025-05697-5 ↗