Numerical Assessment of Dynamic Responses Induced by Underground Explosions in Tunnel Soil Free Field Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Underground structures are essential components of modern transportation and infrastructure systems, and evaluating their behavior under extreme dynamic loads such as explosions is critical for urban safety. This study examines the dynamic effects of underground explosions on tunnel–soil–free-field interaction using numerical methods. Finite element-based dynamic analyses are carried out using PLAXIS-2D, in which a single-layer NATM (New Austrian Tunneling Method) tunnel section representing the Eurasia Tunnel is modeled. Blast loads are defined based on closed-space explosion conditions specified in UFC 3-340-02, and force–time histories are generated for different explosion intensities. A parametric study is performed by varying soil type (soft and stiff soil) and tunnel cover depth to investigate wave propagation mechanisms. Response spectra derived from free-field surface acceleration records are compared with the design spectra of the Turkish Building Earthquake Code (TBEC-2018). The results show that increasing explosion intensity significantly amplifies spectral accelerations. Soft soils exhibit longer acceleration wavelengths, whereas stiffer soils result in higher acceleration amplitudes. Shallow explosion depths are found to reduce soil stability and considerably increase surface accelerations. Under unfavorable soil and cover conditions, explosion-induced demands may approach or exceed design-level earthquake spectra.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Combustion and Detonation Processes · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Technology, Civil Engineering Department, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, 54050 Sakarya, Türkiye
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Şehir İçi Tünel İnşaatlarındaki Kazılarda Patlatma Tasarımı ve Titreşim Modellemesi
2. Resilience Models for Tunnel Recovery After Earthquakes10.1016/j.eng.2025.06.028 ↗
3. Vulnerability of Buildings to Blast Loads and Progressive Collapse
4. UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) (2026, January 30). UFC 3-340-02. Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental. Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. Available online: https://www.wbdg.org/FFC/DOD/UFC/ARCHIVES/ufc_3_340_02_2008.pdf.
5. A Case Study on Rock Damage Prediction and Control Method for Underground Tunnels Subjected to Adjacent Excavation Blasting10.1016/j.tust.2012.11.010 ↗
6. Seyedan, S., and Hosseininia, E.S. (2026, January 18). Significance of Soil Compaction on Blast Resistant Behavior of Underground Structures: A Parametric Study. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285228270_Significance_of_Soil_Compaction_on_Blast_Resistant_Behavior_of_Underground_Structures_A_Parametric_Study.
7. AFAD (2026, January 30). Türkiye Building Seismic Code, Available online: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/03/20180318M1-2-1.pdf.
8. (2026, January 18). PLAXIS 2D: Geotechnical Engineering Software|Bentley Systems. Available online: https://www.bentley.com/software/plaxis-2d/.
9. Blast Effects on Buildings. Design of Buildings to Optimize Resistance to Blast Loading10.1016/0148-9062(95)92584-5 ↗
10. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2026, January 30). Primer for Design of Commercial Buildings to Mitigate Terrorist Attacks, Available online: https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-08/fema427.pdf.
11. Analysis of the Blast Wave Decay Coefficient Using the Kingery–Bulmash Data10.1177/2041419616659572 ↗
12. Explosion Performance of a Ball Powder Production Facility10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000108 ↗
13. (2026, January 18). Avrasya Tüneli|İki Kıtanın Kısa Yolu. Available online: https://www.avrasyatuneli.com/.
14. (2026, January 30). Delivering Sustainable Solutions in a More Competitive World Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for the Eurasia Tunnel Project Istanbul. Available online: https://www.eib.org/files/pipeline/20090678_nts_en.pdf.
15. Bowles, J.E. (1997). Foundation Analysis and Design, McGraw-Hill. Available online: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3540501.
16. (2026, January 18). Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Dynamic Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/34223690_Nonlinear_finite_element_analysis_of_dynamic_soil-foundation-structure_interaction.
17. Viscous Damping Formulation and High Frequency Motion Propagation in Non-Linear Site Response Analysis10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00042-8 ↗
18. (2026, January 18). Zemin Neden Bu Kadar Önemli?. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305656493_Zemin_Neden_Bu_Kadar_Onemli.
19. Lysmer, J., and Kuhlemeyer, L. (2026, January 18). Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media|PDF|Waves|Infinity. Available online: https://www.scribd.com/document/513429930/Kupdf-net-Lysmer-j-Kuhlemeyer-l-1969-Finite-Dynamic-Model-for-Infinite-Media.
20. Bathe, K.J., and Wilson, E.L. (1976). Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis, Prentice Hall.
21. Kirtel, O. (2013). Dynamıc Impedance Functıons for Rıgıd Strıp Foundatıon on Nonlınear Soıl Medıum. [Ph.D. Thesis, Sakarya Univercity].
22. (2026, January 18). SeismoSignal Strong-Motion Data Processing Seismosoft. Available online: https://seismosoft.com/products/seismosignal/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=9255402191&gbraid=0AAAAADyU81uui6aYIFOeMejkB73jEjzKZ&gclid=Cj0KCQiAprLLBhCMARIsAEDhdPeHXufivVLA5-R_k-JVMYadspY_osXj00FQVPUOe6GfTxrKzW1mB9caAtDsEALw_wcB.