journal article·2026-02-05Open access

Economic Evaluation of a Concrete-Based Tank for Molten Salts in Concentrating Solar Power Plants

Alessandro Ribezzo, Emiliano Borri, Cristina Prieto, David Vérez, Luisa F. Cabeza

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

Advancements in concentrating solar power (CSP) plants are essential for the wider adoption of these technologies. Increasing the operating temperature of the plants is one of the most promising ways to achieve further cost reductions and performance improvements. In this context, progress in supporting components—such as molten salt tanks—is critical to enable these advancements. This study compares a novel molten salt tank based on a refractory concrete formulation with a conventional design made from 347H stainless steel over the period 2015–2025. The prices of refractory concrete and stainless steel were analyzed across the decade to estimate the costs of the corresponding TES tanks in 2015 and 2025. The results showed that, while the concrete-based tank was more expensive than the conventional tank in 2015, the situation reversed by 2025, with the conventional stainless steel solution becoming 11% more expensive than the refractory concrete alternative. Additionally, an analysis of the producer price indexes for both materials highlighted that concrete exhibited a more stable price trend compared to stainless steel, which was subject to greater intra- and inter-year fluctuations. Finally, a brief examination of the 347H stainless steel production chain identified key causes of price volatility, such as the high geographic concentration of its main raw material extraction sites worldwide.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems · Phase Change Materials Research · Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

GREiA Research Group, University of Lleida, Pere de Cabrera 3, 25001 Lleida, Spain

Department of Energy Engineering, Universidad de Sevilla, Camino de los Descubrimientos s/n, 41092 Seville, Spain

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Cabeza, L.F. (2021). 24—Thermal storage for concentrating solar power plants. Advances in Thermal Energy Storage Systems, Woodhead Publishing. [2nd ed.].10.1016/B978-0-12-819885-8.00002-4 ↗
2. Techno-economic optimization of molten salt based CSP plants through integration of supercritical CO2 cycles and hybridization with PV and electric heaters10.1016/j.energy.2023.128528 ↗
3. Corrosion resistance of alumina-forming alloys against molten chlorides for energy production. I: Pre-oxidation treatment and isothermal corrosion tests10.1016/j.solmat.2017.02.019 ↗
4. Assessing the performance of novel molten salt mixtures on CSP applications10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122689 ↗
5. Thermal and mechanical degradation assessment in refractory concrete as thermal energy storage container material in concentrated solar plants10.1016/j.est.2021.102790 ↗
6. Progress in research and technological advancements of thermal energy storage systems for concentrated solar power10.1016/j.est.2022.105860 ↗
7. TES materials integrated in CSP plants: Research trends, challenges and 3E performance analysis10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113861 ↗
8. Advancing sensible heat storage: A novel transient heat transfer model for concrete-based TES modules for CSP applications10.1016/j.renene.2025.124558 ↗
9. Mehos, M., Turchi, C., Vidal, J., Wagner, M., Ma, Z., Ho, C., Kolb, W., Andraka, C., and Kruizenga, A. (2017). Concentrating Solar Power Gen3 Demonstration Roadmap, Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI).10.2172/1338899 ↗
10. Corrosion monitoring and mitigation techniques on advanced thermal energy storage materials for CSP plants10.1016/j.solmat.2018.12.028 ↗
11. Fernández, A.G., and Cabeza, L.F. (2020). Anodic protection assessment using alumina-forming alloys in chloride molten salt for CSP plants. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10020138 ↗
12. Jonemann, M. (2013). Advanced Thermal Storage System with Novel Molten Salt, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Subcontract Report—NREL/SR-5200-58595.
13. Calcium aluminate based cement for concrete to be used as thermal energy storage in solar thermal electricity plants10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.12.013 ↗
14. Enhancement of conventional concrete mix designs for sensible thermal energy storage applications10.1016/j.est.2023.106735 ↗
15. Concrete based molten salt storage tanks10.1016/j.est.2022.106151 ↗
16. Internal insulation and corrosion control of molten chloride thermal energy storage tanks10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111048 ↗
17. Gasa, G., Lopez-Roman, A., Prieto, C., and Cabeza, L.F. (2021). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) Plant in Tower Configuration with and without Thermal Energy Storage (TES). Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13073672 ↗
18. Osorio, J., Mehos, M., Imponenti, L., Kelly, B., Price, H., Torres-Madroñero, J.L., Rivera-Alvarez, A., Nieto-Londoño, C., Ni, C., and Yu, Z. (2024). Failure Analysis for Molten Salt Thermal Energy Storage Tanks for In-Service CSP Plants, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). National Renewable Energy Laboratoriy Report.10.2172/2331241 ↗
19. Prieto, C., Blindu, A., Cabeza, L.F., Valverde, J., and García, G. (2023). Molten Salts Tanks Thermal Energy Storage: Aspects to Consider during Design. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17010022 ↗
20. US Geological Survey (2020). Mineral Commodity Summaries 2020.
21. US Geological Survey (2025). Mineral Commodity Summaries 2025.
22. (2026, February 01). Steel Rebar Futures Streaming Chart. Available online: https://www.investing.com/commodities/steel-rebar-streaming-chart.
23. Eurostat (2025). Labour Cost Index—Recent Trends.
24. Performance study of slurry aluminide coated 347H immersed in Li-Na-K carbonate molten salt for 5000-h at 700 °C10.1016/j.surfcoat.2025.132762 ↗
25. Corrosion behaviour of the 347H stainless steel in molten NaCl-KCl-AlCl3 salts containing aluminum at 500 °C10.1016/j.solmat.2025.113715 ↗
26. Outokumpu Oyj (2025). Stainless Steel Alloy Surcharges Europe, Outokumpu Oyj.
27. Outokumpu Oyj (2024). Outokumpu Annual Report 2024, Outokumpu Oyj.
28. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2025). Producer Price Index by Industry: Cement and Concrete Product Manufacturing, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
29. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2025). Producer Price Index by Commodity: Metals and Metal Products Steel Pipe and Tube, Stainless Steel, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
30. Eurostat Data Browser, Eurostat (2026, February 01). Producer Price Index (PPI) 2021 = 100. Euro Area (EA-19): Manufacture of Cement, Lime & Plaster. Available online: https://Ec.Europa.Eu/Eurostat/Databrowser/View/Sts_inpp_m__custom_19575581/Default/Line?Lang=en.
31. Bubble behaviors in nickel price: What roles do geopolitical risk and speculation play?10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103707 ↗
32. Mapping chromium flows in China’s stainless-steel product chain: A product-level substance flow analysis10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107816 ↗
33. Embedded critical material flow: The case of niobium, the United States, and China10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106698 ↗
34. Global database of cement production assets and upstream suppliers10.1038/s41597-023-02599-w ↗