journal article·2026-02-03Open access

Machine Learning-Guided Optimization of Electrospun Fiber Morphology for Enhanced Osteoblast Growth and Bone Regeneration

Julia Radwan-Pragłowska, Aleksander Radwan-Pragłowski, Aleksandra Kopacz, Łukasz Janus, Aleksandra Sierakowska-Byczek, Piotr Radomski

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

Optimizing nanofiber morphology is essential for promoting osteoblast elongation and supporting bone regeneration. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning framework capable of predicting optimal scaffold architectures directly from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and chemical composition. A four-module pipeline was implemented, combining tile-based SEM preprocessing, Cellpose-based cell morphology extraction with edge correction, ensemble machine-learning models, and an end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN). Cellular quality was quantified using an elongation-weighted metric to emphasize morphological maturity over cell number. The analysis revealed consistent structure–function relationships across samples, with Sample_5 achieving the highest quality score at the 72 h time point. Ensemble models reached an R2 of 0.400, while the end-to-end CNN achieved an R2 of 0.750, indicating that raw SEM texture provides additional predictive information beyond handcrafted features. Feature-importance analysis identified nonlinear MgO effects and synergistic interactions between MgO and gold nanoparticles as key determinants of cell morphology. These findings demonstrate that the integrated workflow can reliably identify morphology–chemistry combinations favorable for osteoblast performance and provide a foundation for data-driven scaffold optimization. The approach supports rational design of nanofibrous biomaterials and may facilitate future development of intelligent scaffolds for bone regeneration applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biotechnology and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Cracow, Poland

Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Cracow, Poland

CUT Doctoral School, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Cracow, Poland

Department of Chemical Technology and Environmental Analytics, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Cracow, Poland

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. The history of the science and technology of electrospinning from 1600 to 1995
2. Lewandowska, M., and Kurzydłowski, K. (2010). Nanomateriały Inżynierskie Konstrukcyjne i Funkcjonalne, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
3. Electrospinning of polymer nanofibres from multiple jets on a porous tubular surface10.1088/0957-4484/17/4/046 ↗
4. Molecular mechanics of mineralized collagen fibrils in bone10.1038/ncomms2720 ↗
5. Blood and interstitial flow in the hierarchical pore space architecture of bone tissue10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.013 ↗
6. Electrospinning of in situ synthesized silica-based and calcium phosphate bioceramics for applications in bone tissue engineering: A review10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.032 ↗
7. Alberts, B. (2017). Molecular Biology of the Cell, Garland Science.10.1201/9781315735368 ↗
8. Ducheyne, P. (2017). Comprehensive Biomaterials II, Elsevier.
9. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004 ↗
10. Currey, J.D. (2006). Bones: Structure and Mechanics, Princeton University Press.
11. Lee, C.A., and Einhorn, T.A. (2001). The bone organ system: Form and function. Osteoporosis, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012470862-4/50002-7 ↗
12. de Buffrénil, V., de Ricqlès, A.J., Zylberberg, L., and Padian, K. (2021). Vertebrate Skeletal Histology and Paleohistology, CRC Press.10.1201/9781351189590 ↗
14. Bone formation and resorption as the determinants of trabecular bone volume in postmenopausal osteoporosis10.1016/S0140-6736(81)90526-2 ↗
15. Wang, B., Zhang, Z., and Pan, H. (2023). Bone apatite nanocrystal: Crystalline structure, chemical composition, and architecture. Biomimetics, 8.10.3390/biomimetics8010090 ↗
16. Pountos, I., and Giannoudis, P.V. (2018). Fracture healing: Back to basics and latest advances. Fracture Reduction and Fixation Techniques: Upper Extremities, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-68628-8 ↗
17. Pharmaceutical electrospinning and 3D printing scaffold design for bone regeneration10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.007 ↗
18. Maruyama, M., Rhee, C., Utsunomiya, T., Zhang, N., Ueno, M., Yao, Z., and Goodman, S.B. (2020). Modulation of the inflammatory response and bone healing. Front. Endocrinol., 11.10.3389/fendo.2020.00386 ↗
19. Introduction of a novel guided bone regeneration memory shape based device10.1002/jbm.b.34402 ↗
20. Yu, L., and Wei, M. (2021). Biomineralization of collagen-based materials for hard tissue repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.10.3390/ijms22020944 ↗
21. Choi, I.-O., Oh, J.-S., Yu, S.-J., Kim, B.-O., and Lee, W.-P. (2021). Retrospective analysis of the effect of three-dimensional preformed titanium mesh on peri-implant non-contained horizontal defects in 100 consecutive cases. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11020872 ↗
22. Ca ions chelation, collagen I incorporation and 3D bionic PLGA/PCL electrospun architecture to enhance osteogenic differentiation10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109300 ↗
23. Influence of calcium phosphates incorporation into poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) electrospun membranes for guided bone regeneration10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109253 ↗
24. Osteogenic effect of a biodegradable BMP-2 hydrogel injected into a cannulated mg screw10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00709 ↗
25. Biomimetic bone regeneration using angle-ply collagen membrane-supported cell sheets subjected to mechanical conditioning10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.041 ↗
26. Lu, Q., Han, W.J., and Choi, H.J. (2018). Smart and functional conducting polymers: Application to electrorheological fluids. Molecules, 23.10.3390/molecules23112854 ↗
27. Biomimetic nanosilica–collagen scaffolds for in situ bone regeneration: Toward a cell-free, one-step surgery10.1002/adma.201904341 ↗
28. Microporous methacrylated glycol chitosan–montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering10.1038/s41467-019-11511-3 ↗
29. Potentiation of transforming growth factor (TGF-β1) by natural coral and fibrin in a rabbit cranioplasty model10.1007/BF00334331 ↗
30. Rapid mineralization of hierarchical poly(l-lactic acid)/poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibrous scaffolds by electrodeposition for bone regeneration10.2147/IJN.S205194 ↗
31. Rieger, B., Künkel, A., Coates, G.W., Reichardt, R., Dinjus, E., and Zevaco, T.A. (2012). Synthetic Biodegradable Polymers, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-27154-0 ↗
32. Third generation poly(hydroxyacid) composite scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1002/jbm.b.33674 ↗
33. Ana, I.D., Satria, G.A.P., Dewi, A.H., and Ardhani, R. (2018). Bioceramics for clinical application in regenerative dentistry. Novel Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-0947-2_16 ↗
34. Kaou, M.H., Furkó, M., Balázsi, K., and Balázsi, C. (2023). Advanced bioactive glasses: The newest achievements and breakthroughs in the area. Nanomaterials, 13.10.3390/nano13162287 ↗
35. Biodegradable magnesium alloys as temporary orthopaedic implants: A review10.1007/s10534-019-00170-y ↗
36. Data-Driven Prediction of Electrospun Nanofiber Diameter Using Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Study and Web-Based Tool Development10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102826 ↗
37. Machine Learning-Guided Morphological Property Prediction of 2D Electrospun Scaffolds: The Effect of Polymer Chemical Composition and Processing Parameters10.1039/D4RA01257G ↗
38. Data-Driven Machine Learning Approach for Modeling the Production and Predicting the Characteristics of Aligned Electrospun Nanofibers10.1021/acs.iecr.4c00075 ↗
39. Machine Learning to Predict Morphology, Topography and Mechanical Properties of Electrospun Gelatin-Based Scaffolds10.1038/s41598-024-71824-2 ↗
40. Machine learning to mechanically assess 2D and 3D biomimetic electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: Between the predictability and the interpretability10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106630 ↗
41. Cellpose: A generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x ↗
42. Electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach10.1038/s41598-023-36431-7 ↗
43. Ma, M., Zhou, H., Gao, S., Li, N., Guo, W., and Dai, Z. (2023). Analysis and prediction of electrospun nanofiber diameter using artificial neural networks. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15132813 ↗
44. Cuahuizo-Huitzil, G., Olivares-Xometl, O., Eugenia Castro, M., Arellanes-Lozada, P., Meléndez-Bustamante, F.J., Pineda Torres, I.H., Santacruz-Vázquez, C., and Santacruz-Vázquez, V. (2023). Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting the Diameter of Electrospun Nanofibers Synthesized from Solutions/Emulsions of Biopolymers and Oils. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16165720 ↗
45. A review on the applications of machine learning in biomaterials, biomechanics, and biomanufacturing for tissue engineering
46. Review on machine learning application in tissue engineering: What has been done so far? Application areas, challenges, and perspectives10.1007/s10853-024-10449-2 ↗
47. Machine Learning in Tissue Engineering10.1089/ten.tea.2022.0128 ↗
48. Consensus on the management of pediatric deep partial-thickness burn wounds (2023 edition)10.1093/burnst/tkad053 ↗
49. Martelli, A., Bellucci, D., and Cannillo, V. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Biomaterials Science: A Review. Polymers, 17.10.3390/polym17192668 ↗
50. Development of Machine Learning Regression Models for Predicting the Performance of Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Skin Tissue Engineering
51. Machine learning approaches for the design of biomechanically compatible bone tissue engineering scaffolds10.1016/j.cma.2024.116842 ↗
52. Machine learning-enabled constrained multi-objective design of architected materials10.1038/s41467-023-42415-y ↗
53. Progress and opportunities for machine learning in materials and processes of additive manufacturing10.1002/adma.202310006 ↗
54. An explainable machine learning-based probabilistic framework for the design of scaffolds in bone tissue engineering10.1007/s10237-024-01817-7 ↗
55. Rostami, M., Gharibshahian, M., Mostafavi, M., Sufali, A., Golmohammadi, M., Barati, M.R., Maleki, R., and Beheshtizadeh, N. (2025). A supervised machine-learning analysis of doxorubicin-loaded electrospun nanofibers and their anticancer activity capabilities. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 13.10.3389/fbioe.2025.1493194 ↗