journal article·2026-02-02Open access

Analytical Seismic Vulnerability and Performance Assessment of a Special-Importance Steel Building: Application Under the NCSE-02 Code

Rocio Romero-Jaren, Laura Navas-Sanchez, Carlos Gamboa-Canté, Maria Belen Benito, Carmen Jaren

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

This study develops a comprehensive workflow for the analytical seismic vulnerability and structural performance assessment of a special-importance steel building located in a region of elevated seismic hazard in southern Spain. The work addresses the need for reliable analytical methodologies for facilities that must remain operational during earthquakes. The proposed framework integrates a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, including uniform hazard spectra and hazard disaggregation to identify control earthquakes. Additionally, an analytical vulnerability assessment under the Spanish seismic design code, NCSE-02, is performed. Operational modal analysis and nonlinear analysis are combined to retrofit the numerical model of the building and capture the building’s realistic seismic response. The resulting demand spectra are derived from site-specific ground-motion scenarios for Los Barrios (Cádiz, Spain). Retrofitting strategies are designed and assessed to ensure compliance with the code-defined performance requirements. Results indicate that the retrofitted model reproduces the building’s dynamic behaviour with improved reliability, and that the strengthening interventions enhance seismic performance while still allowing moderate damage in specific components. These findings highlight the importance of analytical vulnerability approaches and code-oriented retrofitting when evaluating the seismic performance and vulnerability of essential facilities. The study demonstrates that rigorous analytical methods provide a robust basis for defining seismic vulnerability in special-importance buildings and support improved decision-making for structural safety and resilience.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Departamento de Ingeniería Topográfica y Cartografía, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros en Topografía, Geodesia y Cartografía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Campus Sur-UPM, Calle Mercator 2, 28031 Madrid, Spain

Geolyder S.L., Calle Poeta Juan Maragall 15, 28020 Madrid, Spain

Departamento de Estructuras y Física de Edificación, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. de Juan de Herrera 4, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Departamento de Ingeniería y Morfología del Terreno, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Calle del Profesor Aranguren 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Departamento de Ingeniería, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y Biociencias, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Campus de Arrosadia, Arrosadia s/n, 31006 Pamplona, Spain

Funding

Community of Madrid · Geolyder S.L. · Open Access co-funding provided by the Universidad Pública de Navarra

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. Cvetković, V.M., Renner, R., Aleksova, B., and Lukić, T. (2024). Geospatial and Temporal Patterns of Natural and Man-Made (Technological) Disasters (1900–2024): Insights from Different Socio-Economic and Demographic Perspectives. Appl. Sci., 14.10.20944/preprints202408.0175.v1 ↗
2. The economic impact of earthquakes: A global assessment of direct and indirect losses
3. How resilient is the labour market against natural disaster? Evaluating the effects from the 2010 earthquake in Chile10.1007/s11069-020-04229-9 ↗
4. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (2025, December 14). 2022 Disasters in Numbers. Available online: https://cred.be/sites/default/files/2022_EMDAT_report.pdf.
5. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (2025, December 14). Economic Losses, Poverty & Disasters (1998–2017). Available online: https://www.cred.be/unisdr-and-cred-report-economic-losses-poverty-disasters-1998-2017.
6. Silva, V., Aljawhari, K., Baiguera, M., Calderón, A., Caruso, M., Costa, C., González, D., Nafeh, A.M.B., Rao, A., and Yepes-Estrada, C. (May, January 27). Drivers of Earthquake Damage and Losses: A Global Perspective on Where and Why Seismic Risk Is High. Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Austria.10.5194/egusphere-egu25-21102 ↗
7. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (2025, December 14). Poverty and Death: Disaster Mortality 1996–2015. Available online: https://www.undrr.org/publication/poverty-death-disaster-mortality-1996-2015.
8. Hu, J., Wen, W., Zhai, C., Pei, S., and Ji, D. (2023). Seismic Resilience Assessment of Buildings Considering the Effects of Mainshock and Multiple Aftershocks. J. Build. Eng., 68.10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106110 ↗
9. Mahin, S. (2012, January 1–4). Lessons from Recent Earthquakes: The Need for More Resilient Cities. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Tokyo, Japan.
10. Gupta, H.K. (2019). Seismic Hazard. Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics, Springer. [2nd ed.]. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338281955_Seismic_Hazard_Encyclopedia_of_Solid_Earth_Geophysics_2nd_Edition_Harsh_Gupta.
11. United Nations Disaster Relief Organization (UNDRO) (1979). Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Analysis, United Nations.
12. Probabilistic Assessment of Civil Infrastructure Resilience to Earthquakes10.1111/mice.12092 ↗
13. Scenario-Based Earthquake Hazard and Risk Assessment for Baku (Azerbaijan)10.5194/nhess-10-2697-2010 ↗
14. Spence, R., So, E., and Scawthorn, C. (2011). Human Casualties in Earthquakes: Progress in Modelling and Mitigation, Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9455-1 ↗
15. Li, L. (2023). The hazard of earthquake and solution directions. Advances in Civil Engineering and Environmental Engineering, Volume 1, CRC Press eBooks.10.1201/9781003349563-48 ↗
16. Existing Building Retrofits: Methodology and State-of-the-Art10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.018 ↗
17. Tartaglia, R., Milone, A., Prota, A., and Landolfo, R. (2022). Seismic Retrofitting of Existing Industrial Steel Buildings: A Case Study. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15093276 ↗
18. Bracing Systems for Seismic Retrofitting of Steel Frames10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.02.013 ↗
19. Lu, B., Zhao, B., Wang, C., Zhang, P., and Gu, Q. (2025). Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of Replaceable Energy Dissipation Braces with Square Steel Tubes and Rectangular Steel Plates. Structures, 73.10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108409 ↗
20. Ullah, R., Vafaei, M., Alih, S.C., and Waheed, A. (2024). A Replaceable sandwiched metallic fuse damper for seismic performance enhancement of braced frames. Eng. Struct., 298.10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117072 ↗
21. Andreotti, R., Giuliani, G., and Tondini, N. (2023). Experimental analysis of a full-scale steel frame with replaceable dissipative connections. J. Constr. Steel Res., 208.10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108036 ↗
22. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-1:2004).
23. (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-3:2005).
24. Ministerio de Fomento (2026, January 26). Norma de Construcción Sismorresistente: Parte General y Edificación (NCSE-02), Available online: https://www.transportes.gob.es/recursos_mfom/0820200.pdf.
25. Risk-UE Project: An Advanced Approach to Earthquake Risk Scenarios with Application to Different European Towns
26. Engineering seismic risk analysis10.1785/BSSA0580051583 ↗
27. Kramer, S.L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall.
28. Baker, J.W. (2025, December 14). An Introduction to Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA). Available online: http://www.stanford.edu/~bakerjw/Publications/Baker_(2008)_Intro_to_PSHA_v1_3.pdf.
29. Bernreuter, D.L., and Lawrence Livermore National Lab (1992). Determining the Controlling Earthquake from Probabilistic Hazards for the Proposed Appendix B. Proceedings of the Twentieth Water Reactor Safety Information Meeting, Bethesda, MD, USA, 1992, IAEA.
30. Disaggregation of seismic hazard10.1785/BSSA0890020501 ↗
31. NSE Seismic Demand Characterization: The Case of a Spanish RC Residential Building10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.055 ↗
32. Dynamic Properties of Steel Structures under Different Construction Stages, Ambient Temperature and Live Load
33. Evaluating the Effect of Masonry Infills on Natural Period of Buildings with Moment-Resisting Frame10.1002/tal.540 ↗
34. Bertero, S., Tarazaga, P.A., and Sarlo, R. (2022). In Situ Seismic Testing for Experimental Modal Analysis of Civil Structures. Eng. Struct., 270.10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114773 ↗
35. Integration of LiDAR and multispectral images for rapid exposure and earthquake vulnerability estimation: Application in Lorca, Spain
36. Applied Technology Council (2018). Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings. Volume 1: Methodology, Applied Technology Council.
37. Instituto Geográfico Nacional, and Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2013). Actualización de Mapas de Peligrosidad Sísmica de España 2012, Centro Nacional de Información Geográfica.
38. A Unified Catalog of Main Earthquakes for Northern Algeria from A.D. 856 to 200810.1785/gssrl.81.5.732 ↗
39. Martínez Solares, J.M., and Mezcua Rodríguez, J. (2002). Catálogo Sísmico de la Península Ibérica (880 a.C.–1990), Instituto Geográfico Nacional.
40. Linear Regression in Astronomy10.1086/169390 ↗
41. Relationships between Mw and Other Earthquake Size Parameters in the Spanish IGN Seismic Catalog10.1007/s00024-014-1025-2 ↗
42. Is the Sequence of Earthquakes in Southern California, with Aftershocks Removed, Poissonian?10.1785/BSSA0640051363 ↗
43. Analysis of Completeness of the Earthquake Sample in the Puget Sound Area and Its Effect on Statistical Estimates of Earthquake Hazard
44. García-Mayordomo, J. (2015). Creación de un Modelo de Zonas Sismogénicas para el Cálculo del Mapa de Peligrosidad Sísmica de España, Instituto Geológico y Minero de España. Available online: https://web.igme.es/publicaciones/publiFree/Creaci%C3%B3n%20de%20un%20modelo%20de%20zonas%20sismog%C3%A9nicas...%20-%20P.pdf.
45. Frequency of Earthquakes in California10.1785/BSSA0340040185 ↗
46. Abrahamson, N.A., Silva, W.J., and Kamai, R. (2013). Update of the AS08 Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Based on the NGA-West2 Data Set, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
47. NGA-West2 Ground Motion Model for the Average Horizontal Components of PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped Linear Acceleration Response Spectra10.1193/062913EQS175M ↗
48. Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra10.1193/072813EQS219M ↗
49. Ruíz, S., Cantero, A., Rivas-Medina, A., Gaspar-Escribano, J.M., and Oterino, B. (2012). Desarrollo de un Modelo de Movimiento Fuerte Utilizando Datos Acelerométricos Españoles y Contraste de Otros Modelos Mediante Análisis Estadístico de Residuos con Datos Locales. Proceedings of the 7a Asamblea Hispano-Portuguesa de Geodesia y Geofísica, Donostia/San Sebastián, Spain, 25–29 June 2012, Spanish National Committee of Geodesy and Geophysics.
50. Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East10.1785/gssrl.81.2.195 ↗
51. (2017). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (Standard No. ASCE/SEI 41-17). Available online: https://amplify.asce.org/content/standard/9780784440032.
52. Soil and Structure Damping from Single-Station Measurements10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.005 ↗
53. Effects of Local Geology on Ground Motion near San Francisco Bay
54. Dynamic Characterization of the Eiffel Tower10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.461 ↗
55. Passive Single-Station Techniques Applied for Dynamic Characterization of Reinforced Concrete Buildings
56. Ministerio de Planificación del Desarrollo (1974). Norma Sismorresistente P.D.S.-1; Decreto 3209/1974.
57. Ministerio de la Vivienda (1963). Norma MV 101-1962 de Acciones en la Edificación, Decreto 195/1963.
58. Ministerio de la Vivienda (1973). Norma Básica MV 103-1972: Cálculo de las Estructuras de Acero Laminado en Edificación.
59. Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda Urbana (2021). Código Estructural.
60. Ministerio de Fomento (2009). Documento Básico SE-AE: Seguridad Estructural. Acciones en la Edificación.
61. Ministerio de Fomento (2026, January 21). Instrucción de Acero Estructural, Available online: https://www.transportes.gob.es/recursos_mfom/1903100.pdf.
62. Gamboa-Canté, C., Benito, M.B., Flores, O., and Pérez-Arias, C. (2025). Comprehensive Methodology for Assessing Structural Response to Probable Seismic Motions: Application to Guatemala City. Geosciences, 15.10.3390/geosciences15110427 ↗
63. Frequency Variation in Construction Stages and Model Validation for Steel Buildings10.12989/scs.2016.22.3.647 ↗
64. Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics10.1002/eqe.4290050306 ↗