journal article·2026-02-02Open access

Uncertainty Quantification Analysis of Dynamic Responses in Plate Structures Based on a Physics-Informed CVAE Model

Shujing Tang, Xuewen Yin, Wenwei Wu

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

The propagation of uncertainties in structural dynamic responses, arising from variations in material properties, geometry, and boundary conditions, is of critical concern to researchers in a variety of engineering instances. Conventional methods like high-fidelity Monte Carlo simulation are computationally prohibitive, while existing surrogate models can improve efficiency at the expense of accuracy. To achieve a trade-off between accuracy and efficiency, a Physics-Informed Conditional Variational Autoencoder (PI-CVAE) model is proposed. It integrates a novel dual-branch encoder for time-frequency feature extraction, a learnable frequency-filtering decoder, and a holistic physics-informed loss function so as to enable efficient generation of dynamic responses with high accuracy and adequate physics consistency. Comprehensive numerical analysis of plate structures demonstrates that the proposed approach achieves remarkable accuracy (maximum FRF error < 0.2% and R2 > 0.99) and a computational speedup of 8–11 times in comparison with conventional simulation techniques. By maintaining high accuracy while efficiently propagating uncertainties, the PI-CVAE model provides a practical framework for probabilistic vibration analysis, especially during the acoustic design phase.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

China Ship Scientific Research Center, No. 222, Shanshui East Road, Binhu District, Wuxi 214082, China

Funding

National Fundamental Research Fund of China Ship Scientific Research Center

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Stochastic modeling of uncertainties in computational structural dynamics—Recent theoretical advances10.1016/j.jsv.2011.10.010 ↗
2. On the treatment of uncertainties in structural mechanics and analysis10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.10.009 ↗
3. Analytical approximation of dynamic responses of random parameter nonlinear systems based on stochastic perturbation-Galerkin method10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115724 ↗
4. An adaptive high-order stochastic perturbation collocation method for uncertainty quantification and propagation10.1016/j.apm.2025.116185 ↗
5. On a stochastic model of nonlocal elastic beams using the generalized perturbation method10.1016/j.probengmech.2025.103803 ↗
6. Spectral stochastic analysis of structures with uncertain parameters10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.10.006 ↗
7. Stochastic nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of a supersonic lifting surface using an adaptive spectral method10.1016/j.jsv.2011.08.027 ↗
8. Nonlinear free vibration analysis of composite plates with material uncertainties: A Monte Carlo simulation approach10.1016/j.jsv.2009.01.046 ↗
9. Uncertainty quantification and polynomial chaos techniques in computational fluid dynamics10.1146/annurev.fluid.010908.165248 ↗
10. An efficient polynomial chaos expansion method for uncertainty quantification in dynamic systems10.3390/applmech2030026 ↗
11. Characterization of dynamic response of structures with uncertainty by using Gaussian processes10.1115/1.4023998 ↗
12. A clustering adaptive Gaussian process regression method: Response patterns based real-time prediction for nonlinear solid mechanics problems10.1016/j.cma.2024.117669 ↗
13. Predicting non-linear stress–strain response of mesostructured cellular materials using supervised autoencoder10.1016/j.cma.2024.117372 ↗
14. Physics-informed deep autoencoder for fault detection in new-design systems10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111420 ↗
15. CVAE-based inverse design of two-dimensional honeycomb pentamode metastructure for acoustic cloaking10.1016/j.tws.2024.112623 ↗
16. Uncertainty in frequency response function estimates in experimental modal analysis10.1016/j.jsv.2025.119168 ↗
17. Arbitrary-order sensitivity analysis of frequency response functions using hypercomplex automatic differentiation and spectral finite elements
18. Analytical hierarchical bayesian modeling framework for model updating and uncertainty propagation utilizing frequency response function data10.1016/j.cma.2025.118341 ↗
19. Ullah, A., Yan, T., and Fuxin, L. (2024). CVAE-SM: A Conditional Variational Autoencoder with Style Modulation for Efficient Uncertainty Quantification. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE.10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10611160 ↗
20. A survey on machine learning approaches for uncertainty quantification of engineering systems10.1007/s44379-024-00011-x ↗
21. Novel neural network for predicting the vibration response of mistuned bladed disks10.2514/1.J062215 ↗
22. Uncertainty quantification of vibroacoustics with deep neural networks and Catmull–Clark subdivision surfaces10.1155/2024/7926619 ↗
23. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
24. Estimating transient vertical hyporheic exchange fluxes from streambed temperatures using LSTM-autoencoder-enhanced physics-informed neural networks10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133721 ↗
25. Multivariate physics-informed convolutional autoencoder for anomaly detection in power distribution systems with widespread deployment of distributed energy resources10.1016/j.segan.2025.102022 ↗
26. A generative design method of airfoil based on conditional variational autoencoder10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109461 ↗
27. A fast and accurate physics-informed neural network reduced order model with shallow masked autoencoder10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110841 ↗
28. Augmentation framework for HVAC fault diagnosis based on denoising diffusion models10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112646 ↗
29. Performance comparison on improved data-driven building energy prediction under data shortage scenarios in four perspectives: Data generation, incremental learning, transfer learning, and physics-informed10.1016/j.energy.2024.133640 ↗
30. An anomaly detection method for gas turbines in power plants using conditional variational autoencoder optimized with self-attention10.1016/j.ress.2025.111894 ↗
31. Φ-DVAE: Physics-informed dynamical variational autoencoders for unstructured data assimilation10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113293 ↗
32. Dual-Encoder Physics-Informed Variational Autoencoders for robust forward and inverse SDE solving under noisy measurements10.1016/j.physa.2025.131008 ↗
33. PET-AE: Physics-informed enhanced temporal autoencoder for incipient fault detection of shafting systems10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.113345 ↗
34. Physics-informed tensor autoencoder with memory for video anomaly detection10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129576 ↗
35. Inverse structural design with generative and probabilistic autoencoders and diffusion models10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112143 ↗
36. Rathnakumar, R., Huang, J., Yan, H., and Liu, Y. (2024). Bayesian Entropy Neural Networks for Physics-Aware Prediction. arXiv.
37. Robust measurement of surface tension and contact angle using physics-informed autoencoders10.1016/j.colsurfa.2025.138972 ↗
38. A hybrid deep learning approach for the design of 2D Auxetic Metamaterials10.1016/j.cma.2025.117972 ↗
39. Corrosion morphology prediction of civil infrastructure using a physics-constrained machine learning method10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110515 ↗
40. Study of current distribution generation in PEMFC based on Conditional Variational Auto-Encoder10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100568 ↗
41. A physics-informed autoencoder method with automatic weighted loss for chiller water system sensor fault detection10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116448 ↗
42. Physics-informed attention-aided multiple autoencoder for gear anomaly detection under zero-shot condition10.1016/j.measurement.2025.118725 ↗
43. Physics-informed neural networks for PDE problems: A comprehensive review10.1007/s10462-025-11322-7 ↗
44. Machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Progress and challenges10.54097/b1d21816 ↗
45. Booker, J.M., Ross, T.J., Reardon, B.J., Hemez, F.M., Anderson, M.C., Doebling, S.W., and Joslyn, C.A. (2004). An Engineering Perspective on uq for Validation, Reliability and Certification. Foundations, Available online: https://cliffjoslyn.github.io/Docs/BoJRoT04.pdf.