journal article·2026-01-30Open access

Effects of Momentum-FluxRatio on POD and SPOD Modes in High-Speed Crossflow Jets

Subhajit Roy, Guillermo Araya

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

High-speed jet-in-crossflow (JICF) configurations are central to several aerospace applications, including turbine-blade film cooling, thrust vectoring, and fuel or hydrogen injection in combusting or reacting flows. This study employs high-fidelity direct numerical simulations (DNS) to investigate the dynamics of a supersonic jet (Mach 3.73) interacting with a subsonic crossflow (Mach 0.8) at low Reynolds numbers. Three momentum-flux ratios (J = 2.8, 5.6, and 10.2) are considered, capturing a broad range of jet–crossflow interaction regimes. Turbulent inflow conditions are generated using the Dynamic Multiscale Approach (DMA), ensuring physically consistent boundary-layer turbulence and accurate representation of jet–crossflow interactions. Modal decomposition via proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and spectral POD (SPOD) is used to identify the dominant spatial and spectral features of the flow. Across the three configurations, near-wall mean shear enhances small-scale turbulence, while increasing J intensifies jet penetration and vortex dynamics, producing broadband spectral gains. Downstream of the jet injection, the spectra broadly preserve the expected standard pressure and velocity scaling across the frequency range, except at high frequencies. POD reveals coherent vortical structures associated with shear-layer roll-up, jet flapping, and counter-rotating vortex pair (CVP) formation, with increasing spatial organization at higher momentum ratios. Further, POD reveals a shift in dominant structures: shear-layer roll-up governs the leading mode at high J, whereas CVP and jet–wall interactions dominate at lower J. Spectral POD identifies global plume oscillations whose Strouhal number rises with J, reflecting a transition from slow, wall-controlled flapping to faster, jet-dominated dynamics. Overall, the results demonstrate that the momentum-flux ratio (J) regulates not only jet penetration and mixing but also the hierarchy and characteristic frequencies of coherent vortical, thermal, and pressure and acoustic structures. The predominance of shear-layer roll-up over counter-rotating vortex pair (CVP) dynamics at high J, the systematic upward shift of plume-oscillation frequencies, and the strong analogy with low-frequency shock–boundary-layer interaction (SBLI) dynamics collectively provide new mechanistic insight into the unsteady behavior of supersonic jet-in-crossflow flows.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Combustion and flame dynamics · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Computational Turbulence and Visualization Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation · Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Experimental Investigation of Transverse Jet Interaction in Low-Density Hypersonic Crossflows10.2514/1.J065989 ↗
2. Flow physics of supersonic crossflow with transversely injected jets in streamwise tandem configuration10.1063/5.0251204 ↗
3. Combustion characteristics of a transverse jet in supersonic crossflow with varying inflow conditions10.1063/5.0264126 ↗
4. Boersma, B., and Lele, S. (1999). Large eddy simulation of compressible turbulent jets. Cent. Turbul. Res. Annu. Res. Briefs, 365–377.10.2514/6.1999-1874 ↗
5. Experimental investigation on transverse jet penetration into a supersonic turbulent crossflow10.1007/s11431-013-5265-7 ↗
6. The interaction of jets with crossflow10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101115 ↗
7. Jet arrays in supersonic crossflow—An experimental study10.1063/1.4937349 ↗
8. Effect of boundary layer thickness on transverse sonic jet mixing in a supersonic turbulent crossflow10.1063/1.5056540 ↗
9. Turbulent characteristics of a transverse supersonic jet in a subsonic compressible crossflow10.2514/1.14575 ↗
10. Numerical study of high speed jets in crossflow10.1017/jfm.2015.612 ↗
11. Dual injection in supersonic crossflow: Analysis jet shear layer from schlieren images10.2514/1.J061843 ↗
12. Effects of compressibility and shock-wave interactions on turbulent shear flows10.1007/s10494-016-9733-6 ↗
13. Computational investigation of multi-cavity fuel injection on hydrogen mixing at supersonic combustion chamber10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.096 ↗
14. Turbulent jet in crossflow analysis with LES approach10.1108/AEAT-10-2014-0167 ↗
15. Fiorina, B., and Lele, S. (2006, January 5–8). Numerical investigation of a transverse jet in a supersonic crossflow using large eddy simulation. Proceedings of the 36th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2006-3712 ↗
16. Three-dimensional numerical study of jet-in-crossflow characteristics at low Reynolds number10.1007/s00231-011-0895-4 ↗
17. Direct numerical simulation of canonical shock/turbulence interaction10.1063/1.3275856 ↗
18. Instability waves in high-speed jets: Near-and far-field DNS/LES data analysis10.1260/1475-472X.14.3-4.643 ↗
19. Porter, D., Woodward, P., Anderson, S., Winkler, K., and Hodson, S. (2026, January 02). Numerical Simulation of Compressible Turbulence. Available online: http://www.lcse.umn.edu/research/lanlrun.
20. A dynamic multi-scale approach for turbulent inflow boundary conditions in spatially evolving flows10.1017/S0022112010005616 ↗
21. Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. I. Coherent structures10.1090/qam/910462 ↗
22. Numerical study and POD snapshot analysis of flow characteristics for pulsating turbulent opposing jets10.1108/HFF-07-2018-0382 ↗
23. POD analysis of flow over a backward-facing step forced by right-angle-shaped plasma actuator10.1186/s40064-016-2361-8 ↗
24. LES of turbulent jet in cross flow: Part 2–POD analysis and identification of coherent structures10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.03.010 ↗
25. Spectral proper orthogonal decomposition and its relationship to dynamic mode decomposition and resolvent analysis10.1017/jfm.2018.283 ↗
26. DNS of turbulent thermal boundary layers subjected to adverse pressure gradients10.1063/1.4820816 ↗
27. DNS of a turbulent boundary layer with surface roughness10.1017/jfm.2013.326 ↗
28. Effect of small roughness elements on thermal statistics of a turbulent boundary layer at moderate Reynolds number10.1017/jfm.2015.676 ↗
29. Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations10.1006/jcph.1998.5882 ↗
30. Araya, G., Lagares, C., and Jansen, K. (2019, January 17–21). Direct simulation of a Mach-5 turbulent spatially-developing boundary layer. Proceedings of the 49th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA-2019-3340), Dallas, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2019-3340 ↗
31. Araya, G., Lagares, C., and Jansen, K. (2020, January 6–10). Reynolds number dependency in supersonic spatially-developing turbulent boundary layers. Proceedings of the 2020 AIAA SciTech Forum (AIAA-2020-0574), Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2020-0574 ↗
32. Araya, G., Lagares, C., Santiago, J., and Jansen, K. (19–21, January 11–15). Wall temperature effect on hypersonic turbulent boundary layers via DNS. Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum (AIAA-2021-1745), Virtual.10.2514/6.2021-1745 ↗
33. Araya, G., Lagares, C.J., and Jansen, K. (2025, January 6–10). Reynolds Number Dependency in Compressible Crossflow-Jet Problems. Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2025 Forum, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.2025-1953 ↗
34. Penetration of a Transverse Supersonic Jet into a Subsonic Compressible Crossflow10.2514/1.9919 ↗
35. A direct numerical simulation study on the mean velocity characteristics in turbulent pipe flow10.1017/S0022112008002085 ↗
36. Hierarchical basis in stabilized finite element methods for compressible flows10.1016/j.cma.2003.07.011 ↗
37. A stabilized finite element method for computing turbulence10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00301-6 ↗
38. A generalized-α method for integrating the filtered Navier-Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00203-6 ↗
39. Curved boundary layer meshing for adaptive viscous flow simulation10.1016/j.finel.2009.06.016 ↗
40. On the interaction between dynamic model dissipation and numerical dissipation due to streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin stabilization10.1016/j.cma.2004.06.037 ↗
41. Three-dimensional Interactions between a Finite-Span Synthetic Jet and a Cross Flow10.1017/S0022112010005604 ↗
42. Scalable fully implicit flow solver for realistic wings with flow control
43. Experimental and Numerical Investigation on Steady Blowing Flow Control within a Compact Inlet Duct10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2015.05.011 ↗
44. Sahni, O., Zhou, M., Shephard, M.S., and Jansen, K.E. (2009, January 14–20). Scalable implicit finite element solver for massively parallel processing with demonstration to 160K cores. Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis, Portland, OR, USA. SC ’09.10.1145/1654059.1654129 ↗
45. DNS of compressible turbulent boundary layers and assessment of data/scaling-law quality10.1017/jfm.2018.179 ↗
46. Skote, M. (2001). Studies of Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow Through Direct Numerical Simulation. [Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology].
47. Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers10.1017/S0022112010003113 ↗
48. White, F.M. (2006). Viscous Fluid Flow, McGraw-Hill Mechanical Engineering.
49. Low-Reynolds-number effects in a turbulent boundary layer10.1007/BF00192235 ↗
50. Hunt, J.C.R., Wray, A.A., and Moin, P. (1988, January 2). Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Proceedings of the Studying Turbulence Using Numerical Simulation Databases, Stanford, CA, USA.