journal article·2026-01-30Open access

A Multi-Branch CNN–Transformer Feature-Enhanced Method for 5G Network Fault Classification

Jiahao Chen, Yi Man, Yao Cheng

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 3

Abstract

The deployment of 5G (Fifth-Generation) networks in industrial Internet of Things (IoT), intelligent transportation, and emergency communications introduces heterogeneous and dynamic network states, leading to frequent and diverse faults. Traditional fault detection methods typically emphasize either local temporal anomalies or global distributional characteristics, but rarely achieve an effective balance between the two. In this paper, we propose a parallel multi-branch convolutional neural network (CNN)–Transformer framework (MBCT) to improve fault diagnosis accuracy in 5G networks. Specifically, MBCT takes time-series network key performance indicator (KPI) data as input for training and performs feature extraction through three parallel branches: a CNN branch for local patterns and short-term fluctuations, a Transformer encoder branch for cross-layer and long-term dependencies, and a statistical branch for global features describing quality-of-experience (QoE) metrics. A gating mechanism and feature-weighted fusion are applied outside the branches to adjust inter-branch weights and intra-branch feature sensitivity. The fused representation is then nonlinearly mapped and fed into a classifier to generate the fault category. This paper evaluates the performance of the proposed model on both the publicly available TelecomTS multi-modal 5G network observability dataset and a self-collected SDR5GFD dataset based on software-defined radio (SDR). Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves superior performance in fault classification, achieving 87.7% accuracy on the TelecomTS dataset and 86.3% on the SDR5GFD dataset, outperforming the baseline models CNN, Transformer, and Random Forest. Moreover, the model contains approximately 0.57M parameters and requires about 0.3 MFLOPs per sample for inference, making it suitable for large-scale online fault diagnosis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Software System Performance and Reliability · Wireless Signal Modulation Classification · Software-Defined Networks and 5G

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhao, L., He, C., and Zhu, X. (2024). A fault diagnosis method for 5G cellular networks based on knowledge and data fusion. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24020401 ↗
2. Zhu, T., Narusue, Y., and Morikawa, H. (2024, January 5–7). Fault diagnosis using hybrid transfer learning for vnf-based 5G core networks. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN), Natal, Brazil.10.1109/NFV-SDN61811.2024.10807503 ↗
3. Fault detection based on dynamic time warpping in NFV networks
4. Highly accurate and reliable wireless network slicing in 5th generation networks: A hybrid deep learning approach10.1007/s10922-021-09636-2 ↗
5. Dangi, R., Jadhav, A., Choudhary, G., Dragoni, N., Mishra, M.K., and Lalwani, P. (2022). Ml-based 5G network slicing security: A comprehensive survey. Future Internet, 14.10.3390/fi14040116 ↗
6. State-of-the-art deep learning: Evolving machine intelligence toward tomorrow’s intelligent network traffic control systems10.1109/COMST.2017.2707140 ↗
7. Nouioua, M., Fournier-Viger, P., He, G., Nouioua, F., and Min, Z. (2021). A survey of machine learning for network fault management. Machine Learning and Data Mining for Emerging Trend in Cyber Dynamics: Theories and Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-66288-2_1 ↗
8. Velasco, L., and Rafique, D. (2019, January 3–7). Fault management based on machine learning. Proceedings of the 2019 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), San Diego, CA, USA.10.1364/OFC.2019.W3G.3 ↗
9. DeepAnT: A deep learning approach for unsupervised anomaly detection in time series10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2886457 ↗
10. Zhang, C., Song, D., Chen, Y., Feng, X., Lumezanu, C., Cheng, W., Ni, J., Zong, B., Chen, H., and Chawla, N.V. (February, January 27). A deep neural network for unsupervised anomaly detection and diagnosis in multivariate time series data. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Honolulu, HI, USA.
11. Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., Shang, Z., and Cao, Z. (2022). DA-LSTM-VAE: Dual-stage attention-based LSTM-VAE for KPI anomaly detection. Entropy, 24.10.3390/e24111613 ↗
12. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
13. Electrical energy demand forecasting using time series in lstm and cnn-lstm models in deep learning applications
14. Dutta, Y., Chatterjee, S., Chakraborty, S., and Palit, B. (2025). Benchmarking Federated Learning for Throughput Prediction in 5G Live Streaming Applications. arXiv.
15. Attention is all you need
16. A systematic review for transformer-based long-term series forecasting10.1007/s10462-024-11044-2 ↗
17. A rollout heuristic algorithm for order sequencing in robotic compact storage and retrieval systems10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117396 ↗
18. Ke, Y., Liang, Y., Shi, Z., Song, Z., and Yang, C. (2024). Curse of attention: A kernel-based perspective for why transformers fail to generalize on time series forecasting and beyond. arXiv.
19. WCFormer: A wavelet-enhanced CNN-transformer hybrid network for bearing fault diagnosis using multi-sensor signal fusion
20. Malau, B.M., and Olusanya, M.O. (2025). Comparative Evaluation of Parallel and Sequential Hybrid CNN–ViT Models for Wrist X-Ray Anomaly Detection. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app152211865 ↗
21. Bearing fault diagnosis based on efficient cross space multiscale CNN transformer parallelism10.1038/s41598-025-95895-x ↗
22. Time-series analysis with smoothed convolutional neural network10.1186/s40537-022-00599-y ↗
23. Sundararajan, M., Taly, A., and Yan, Q. (2017, January 6–11). Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Sydney, Australia.
24. Feng, A., Varvarigos, A., Panitsas, I., Fernandez, D., Wei, J., Guo, Y., Chen, J., Maatouk, A., Tassiulas, L., and Ying, R. (2025). TelecomTS: A Multi-Modal Observability Dataset for Time Series and Language Analysis. arXiv.
25. Network slicing for 5G with SDN/NFV: Concepts, architectures, and challenges10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600935 ↗
26. Network slicing: A next generation 5G perspective10.1186/s13638-021-01983-7 ↗
27. Wernet, L., Siegmund, F., Kundel, R., Meuser, T., and Steinmetz, R. (2023, January 7–9). Fault-tolerance in future ran: Enabling redundancy for efficient recovery of ran network functions. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN), Dresden, Germany.10.1109/NFV-SDN59219.2023.10329718 ↗
28. Failure management in 5G RAN: Challenges and open research lines10.1109/MNET.131.2200528 ↗
29. Performance analysis of access and mobility management function on a 5G core based on CPU usage predictions
30. Azkaei, B., Joshi, K.C., and Exarchakos, G. (2025, January 19). Machine Learning-Driven Anomaly Detection for 5G O-RAN Performance Metrics. Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2025-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), London, UK.10.1109/INFOCOMWKSHPS65812.2025.11152997 ↗
31. Jia, H., Wang, M., Li, B., Liu, Y., Guo, J., and Zhang, P. (2024). 5GC2ache: Improving 5G UPF Performance via Cache Optimization. arXiv.
32. Isaac, J.H., Saradagam, H., and Pardhasaradhi, N. (2025). 5G Core Fault Detection and Root Cause Analysis using Machine Learning and Generative AI. arXiv.
33. 5G network slicing using SDN and NFV: A survey of taxonomy, architectures and future challenges10.1016/j.comnet.2019.106984 ↗
34. Liu, H., and Wang, H. (2023). Real-time anomaly detection of network traffic based on CNN. Symmetry, 15.10.3390/sym15061205 ↗
35. Time series classification based on statistical features10.1186/s13638-020-1661-4 ↗
36. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning, MIT Press.
37. FCCLab (2025, September 15). SUTD 5G Dataset (Singapore University of Technology and Design). Available online: https://github.com/FCCLab/sutd_5g_dataset_2023.
38. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 ↗
39. Manning, C.D. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval, Syngress Publishing.10.1017/CBO9780511809071 ↗