Variability of Schmidt Rebound Values in Volcanic Rocks (Basalt and Lapilli Tuff): Comparative Effect of Surface Roughness, Alteration, and Testing Methods
Source abstract
Abstract
Enhancing the sustainability and safety of rock engineering requires understanding how micro-structural and alteration conditions influence the geomechanical properties of rocks in geotechnical projects. The determination of surface hardness using the Schmidt Hammer is an interdisciplinary experimental method employed in mining, geology, and civil engineering. This study quantitatively evaluates the effects of surface roughness, weathering degree, and evaluation procedures on Schmidt rebound values obtained from basalt and lapilli tuff. Field measurements on eight surfaces produced rebound values between 10 and 60, with standard deviations ranging from 2.4 to 11, reflecting substantial variability related to roughness and alteration. Laboratory results showed that cut surfaces yielded the highest hardness values (Mean ≈ 57–58) with very low variability (SD ≈ 1.1–1.6), whereas natural surfaces exhibited markedly lower rebound values (Mean ≈ 19–22) and greater scatter (SD ≈ 4–4.5). A strong correlation (R2 > 0.97) was observed between JRC roughness and rebound values in laboratory-prepared samples. The percentage difference among the USBR, ASTM, and Sumner & Nel methods remained below 5% when the standard deviation of measurements was under 2, indicating that method selection becomes critical only for heterogeneous surfaces. Mineralogical heterogeneity further increased variability in lapilli tuff, whereas basalt provided highly consistent responses. Overall, this study introduces quantitative thresholds linking roughness, weathering, and statistical variability, offering a more rigorous and reproducible framework for interpreting Schmidt hardness measurements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mining Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Türkiye
Department of Mining Engineering, Gümüşhane University, 29000 Gümüşhane, Türkiye
Department of Planning and Coordination Directorate, Governorship of Trabzon, 61040 Trabzon, Türkiye
Department of Geology Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080 Trabzon, Türkiye
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Karaman, K., and Kolaylı, H. (2024). Effects of Olivine Alteration on Micro-Internal Structure and Geomechanical Properties of Basalts and Strength Prediction in These Rocks. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16135490 ↗
2. Investigation of gamma ray absorption levels of composites produced from copper mine tailings, fly ash, and brickdust10.1007/s10163-022-01450-5 ↗
3. A non-destructive concrete tester
4. A method for normalization of Schmidt hammer rebound values10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.05.001 ↗
5. Wang, M., Xu, W., Chen, D., Li, J., Mu, H., Mi, J., and Wu, Y. (2022). Summary of the Transformational Relationship between Point Load Strength Index and Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rocks. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141912456 ↗
6. A comparative study of Schmidt hammer test methods for estimating uniaxial compressive strength of rocks10.1007/s10064-014-0617-5 ↗
7. A classification system for excavation of surface coal measures10.1016/0167-9031(90)90303-A ↗
8. Field characterization of weathered Ankara andesites10.1016/S0013-7952(96)00002-6 ↗
9. New approaches to the characterization of clay-bearing, densely jointed and weak rock masses10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00032-6 ↗
10. Geotechnical factors affecting tunnelling machine performance in coal measures rock
11. Roadheaders glean valuable tips for Istanbul metro tunnels
12. The Schmidt hammer in geomorphological research10.1177/0309133306071954 ↗
13. ISRM suggested method for determination of the Schmidt hammer rebound hardness: Revised version10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.01.020 ↗
14. Correlation of Schmidt rebound hardness with uniaxial compressive strength and P-wave velocity of rock materials10.1007/s13369-014-1510-z ↗
15. Predicting the Schmidt hammer values of in-situ intact rock from core sample values10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00028-X ↗
16. The effect of Schmidt hammer type on uniaxial compressive strength prediction of rock10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.07.008 ↗
17. The effect of sample size on Schmidt rebound hardness value of rocks10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.09.004 ↗
18. The effect of rock moisture on Schmidt hammer rebound10.1002/esp.402 ↗
19. A rapid method for determining the strength of rocks in situ10.1016/0148-9062(65)90009-4 ↗
20. Deere, D.U., and Miller, R.P. (1966). Engineering Classifications and Index Properties of Intact Rock, University of Illinois. Technical Report AFWL-TR 65-116.10.21236/AD0646610 ↗
21. ISRM (1981). Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring, Pergamon Press.
22. USBR (1998). Engineering Geology Field Manual: Field Index Tests.
23. (2001). Standard Test Method for Determination of Rock Hardness by Rebound Hammer Method (Standard No. ASTM D5873-14).
24. Potential and limitations of the Schmidt hammer for relative-age dating10.1080/00040851.1989.12002738 ↗
25. The Schmidt hammer in rock material characterization10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.006 ↗
26. Rock surface micro-roughness, Schmidt hammer rebound and weathering rind thickness within LIA Skálafellsjökull foreland, SE Iceland10.2478/popore-2014-0008 ↗
27. Evaluation of mechanical rock properties using a Schmidt hammer10.1016/S1365-1609(00)00004-6 ↗
28. Surface and sub-surface Schmidt hammer rebound value variation for a granite outcrop10.1002/esp.2029 ↗
29. The effect of surface texture on Schmidt hammer hardness10.1002/esp.3290080311 ↗
30. Evaluation of different surface characteristics and mineral grain size in the estimation of rock strength using the Schmidt hammer10.17159/2411-9717/2325/2024 ↗
31. Analysis of Schmidt hammer rebound test results with repetitive impacts10.1007/s10064-018-1334-2 ↗
32. Numerical surface exposure-age dating of a Holocene rock avalanche10.1080/04353676.2019.1644815 ↗
33. Comparison and combination of two NDT methods with implications for compressive strength evaluation of selected masonry and building stones10.1007/s10064-018-1382-7 ↗
34. Han, S., Li, H., Li, M., and Rose, T. (2019). A deep learning based method for non-destructive measuring of rock strength through hammering sound. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9173484 ↗
35. A comparative study of Schmidt hammer testing procedures with reference to rock cutting machine performance prediction10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.12.002 ↗
36. A new approach for applying in-situ Schmidt hammer test on a coal face10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.09.012 ↗
37. Multiphysics modeling of thermal–fluid–solid interactions in coalbed methane reservoirs: Simulations and optimization strategies10.1063/5.0278665 ↗
38. Okay, A.I., and Sahinturk, O. (1997). Geology of the Eastern Pontides. Regional and Petroleum Geology of the Black Sea and Surrounding Region, AAPG.
39. The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice10.1007/BF01261801 ↗
40. Hsiung, S.M., Ghosh, A., and Chowdhury, A.H. (1995, January 5–7). On natural rock joint profile characterization using self-affine fractal approach. Proceedings of the 35th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Reno, NV, USA.
41. Gökçeoğlu, C. (1997). Killi, Yoğun Süreksizlik Içeren ve Zayıf Kaya Kütlelerinin Mühendislik Sınıflamalarında Karşılaşılan Güçlüklerin Giderilmesine Yönelik Yaklaşımlar. [Ph.D. Thesis, Hacettepe University]. (In Turkish).
42. Fisher, R.V., and Schmincke, H.-U. (1984). Pyroclastic Rocks, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-74864-6 ↗
43. Guney, A., Altındağ, R., Yavuz, H., and Saraç, S. (2005, January 9–12). Evaluation of the relationships between Schmidt hardness rebound number and other properties of rocks. Proceedings of the 19th International Mining Congress of Turkey, İzmir, Türkiye.
44. The effect of grain size and cement content on index properties of weakly solidified artificial sandstones10.1088/1742-2140/aaa14a ↗