journal article·2026-01-13Open access

Multisource POI-Matching Method Based on Deep Learning and Feature Fusion

Yazhou Ding, Qi Tian, Yun Han, Cailin Li, Yue Wang, Baoyun Guo

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 2

Abstract

In the fields of geographic information science and location-based services, the fusion of multisource Point-of-Interest (POI) data is of remarkable importance but faces several challenges. Existing matching methods, including those based on single non-spatial attributes, single spatial geometric features, and traditional hybrid methods with fixed rules, suffer from limitations such as reliance on a single feature and inadequate consideration of spatial context. This study takes Dongcheng District, Beijing, as the research area and proposes a POI-matching method based on multi-feature value calculation and a deep neural network (DNN) model. The method comprehensively incorporates multidimensional features such as names, addresses, and spatial distances. Additionally, the approach also incorporates an improved multilevel name association strategy, an address similarity calculation using weighted edit distance, and a spatial distance model that accounts for spatial density and regional functional types. Furthermore, the method utilizes a deep learning model to automatically learn POI entity features and optimize the matching rules. Experimental results show that the precision, recall, and F1 value of the proposed method achieved 97.2%, 97.0%, and 0.971, respectively, notably outperforming traditional methods. Overall, this method provides an efficient and reliable solution for geospatial data integration and POI applications, and offers strong support for GIS optimization, smart city construction, and scientific urban/town planning. However, this method still has room for improvement in terms of data source quality and algorithm optimization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis · Data Management and Algorithms · Geographic Information Systems Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Powerchina Hubei Electric Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430040, China

School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China

Funding

Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. The application of Xiuchunliang POI data in urban research in China
2. Evaluation and enhancement methods of POI data quality in the context of geographic big data
3. Digital Map Conflation: A Review of the Process and a Proposal for Classification10.1080/13658816.2010.519707 ↗
4. Information Space Models for Data Integration, and Entity Resolution
5. Christen, P. (2012). Data Matching—Concepts and Techniques for Record Linkage, Entity Resolution, and Duplicate Detection, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-31164-2 ↗
6. Novack, T., Peters, R., and Zipf, A. (2018). Graph-Based Matching of Points-of-Interest from Collaborative Geo-Datasets. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 7.10.3390/ijgi7030117 ↗
7. Locating Place Names from Place Descriptions10.1080/13658816.2013.785550 ↗
8. Spatiotemporal and Semantic Information Extraction from Web News Reports about Natural Hazards10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.11.001 ↗
9. Multi source POI data fusion of Li Ruishan’s spatial location information
10. A standardized processing method for network POI address information considering location relationships in Luo An
11. Li, C., Liu, L., Dai, Z., and Liu, X. (2020). Different Sourcing Point of Interest Matching Method Considering Multiple Constraints. Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9040214 ↗
12. A Point-of-Interest Recommendation Method Using User Similarity10.3233/WEB-180376 ↗
13. Wu, Z., and Xia, L. (2018). Multi-source heterogeneous POI fusion method and application. Surv. Mapp. Bull., 143–146.
14. Luo, G., Ye, J., and Wang, J. (2022). Multi-source POI matching method based on multi feature similarity. Surv. Mapp. Bull., 96–100.
15. Multi-source point of interest fusion algorithm based on distance and category
16. Beeri, C., Doytsher, Y., Kanza, Y., Safra, E., and Sagiv, Y. (2005, January 4–5). Finding Corresponding Objects When Integrating Several Geo-Spatial Datasets. Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Geographic Information Systems, Bremen Germany.10.1145/1097064.1097078 ↗
17. Safra, E., Kanza, Y., Sagiv, Y., and Doytsher, Y. (2006). Integrating Data from Maps on the World-Wide Web, Springer.10.1007/11935148_17 ↗
18. Conflation Automated Map Compilation10.1080/02693798808927897 ↗
19. Poi Point Entity Matching and Fusion Based on Multi Similarity Calculation
20. Li, L., Xing, X., Xia, H., and Huang, X. (2016). Entropy-Weighted Instance Matching Between Different Sourcing Points of Interest. Entropy, 18.10.3390/e18020045 ↗
21. Visualizing the Relationship Between Human Mobility and Points of Interest10.1109/TITS.2016.2639320 ↗
22. Xing, X., Lin, H., Zhao, F., and Qiang, S. (2022, January 23–25). Local POI Matching Based on KNN and LightGBM Method. Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Computer Science, Electronic Information Engineering and Intelligent Control Technology (CEI), Nanjing, China.10.1109/CEI57409.2022.9950148 ↗
23. Linking Place Records Using Multi-View Encoders10.1007/s00521-021-05932-9 ↗
24. Piech, M., Smywinski-Pohl, A., Marcjan, R., and Siwik, L. (2020). Towards Automatic Points of Interest Matching. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 9.10.3390/ijgi9050291 ↗
25. Chen, R. (2014). Research on Matching and Fusion Method Based on Multi source POI Data. [Master’s Thesis, Lanzhou Jiaotong University].
26. Li, R. (2013). Research on Multi source POI Data Fusion Based on Natural Language Processing. [Master’s Thesis, Ocean University of China].
27. A Weighted Multi-Attribute Method for Matching User-Generated Points of Interest10.1080/15230406.2014.880327 ↗
28. Semantic Integration in Text: From Ambiguous Names to Identifiable Entities
29. Psaila, G., and Toccu, M. (2019). A Fuzzy Technique for On-Line Aggregation of POIs from Social Media: Definition and Comparison with Off-Line Random-Forest Classifiers. Information, 10.10.3390/info10120388 ↗
30. A Holistic Approach to Aligning Geospatial Data with Multidimensional Similarity Measuring10.1080/17538947.2017.1359688 ↗
31. Yeow, L.W., Low, R., Tan, Y.X., and Cheah, L. (2021). Point-of-Interest (POI) Data Validation Methods: An Urban Case Study. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10, Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/10/11/735.10.3390/ijgi10110735 ↗
32. A POI-constrained multi-source online geocoding optimization method10.1080/17538947.2025.2578735 ↗
33. Conflating point of interest (POI) data: A systematic review of matching methods10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.101977 ↗
34. A BERT-Based Sequential POI Recommender System in Social Media10.1016/j.csi.2023.103766 ↗
35. MCGT: Multi-Class Graph Model driven Transformer for next POI recommendation10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130773 ↗
36. Quality assessment for building footprints data on OpenStreetMap10.1080/13658816.2013.867495 ↗
37. Liu, Y., Bai, J., Wang, G., Wu, X., Sun, F., Guo, Z., and Geng, H. (2023). Uav localization in low-altitude gnss-denied environments based on poi and store signage text matching in uav images. Drones, 7.10.3390/drones7070451 ↗
38. A survey of location-based social networks: Problems, methods, and future research directions10.1007/s10707-021-00450-1 ↗
39. Research on Multi-source Place Name Data Integration and Update Methods10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-951-2025 ↗
40. Wang, J., and Dong, Y. (2020). Measurement of text similarity: A survey. Information, 11.10.3390/info11090421 ↗
41. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2019, January 2–7). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
42. Reimers, N., and Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. arXiv.10.18653/v1/D19-1410 ↗
43. Li, Z., Zhou, W., Chiang, Y.Y., and Chen, M. (2023). Geolm: Empowering language models for geospatially grounded language understanding. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.317 ↗
44. Deng, L., Adjouadi, M., and Rishe, N. (2020, January 17–18). Inverse distance weighted random forests: Modeling unevenly distributed non-stationary geographic data. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), Depok, Indonesia.10.1109/ICACSIS51025.2020.9263208 ↗
45. Wolfe, R., and Caliskan, A. (2021). Low frequency names exhibit bias and overfitting in contextualizing language models. arXiv.10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.41 ↗
46. Zhang, Z., Balsebre, P., and Luo, S. (2024, January 20–25). StructAM: Enhancing Address Matching through Semantic Understanding of Structure-aware Information. Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024), Torino, Italia.
47. A Chinese address parsing method using RoBERTa-BiLSTM-CRF
48. Ahlqvist, O. (2007, January 3–5). The geo-attribute space: A general space-time-property representation. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on GeoComputation, Maynooth, Ireland.
49. On geodetic distance computations in spatial modeling10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00320.x ↗
50. Identification of urban functional zones in Macau Peninsula based on POI data and remote information sensors technology for sustainable development10.1016/j.pce.2023.103447 ↗
51. Attention is all you need
52. Gao, E., and Widdows, D. (2024). Spatial Entity Resolution between Restaurant Locations and Transportation Destinations in Southeast Asia. arXiv.
53. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting