Liquefaction Hazard Assessment and Mapping Across the Korean Peninsula Using Amplified Liquefaction Potential Index
Source abstract
Abstract
Liquefaction is a critical mechanism amplifying earthquake-induced damage, necessitating systematic hazard assessment through spatially distributed mapping. This study presents a nationwide liquefaction hazard assessment framework for South Korea, integrating site classification, liquefaction potential index (LPI) computation, and probabilistic damage evaluation. Sites across the Korean Peninsula were stratified into five geotechnical categories (S1–S5) based on soil characteristics. LPI values were computed incorporating site-specific amplification coefficients for nine bedrock acceleration levels corresponding to seismic recurrence intervals of 500, 1000, 2400, and 4800 years per Korean seismic design specifications. Subsurface characterization utilized standard penetration test (SPT) data from 121,821 boreholes, with an R-based analytical program enabling statistical processing and spatial visualization. Damage probability assessment employed Iwasaki’s LPI severity classification across site categories. Results indicate that at 0.10 g peak ground acceleration (500-year event), four regions exhibit severe liquefaction susceptibility. This geographic footprint expands to seven regions at 0.14 g (1000-year event) and eight regions at 0.18 g. For the 2400-year design basis earthquake (0.22 g), all eight identified high-risk zones reach critical thresholds simultaneously. Site-specific analysis reveals stark contrasts in vulnerability: S2 sites demonstrate 99% very low to low damage probability, whereas S3, S4, and S5 sites face 33%, 51%, and 99% severe damage risk, respectively. This study establishes a scalable, evidence-based framework enabling efficient large-scale liquefaction hazard assessment for governmental risk management applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Coastal and Marine Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea
Connectix Ltd., Seoul 06167, Republic of Korea
Department of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Seokyeong University, Seoul 02713, Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Interior and Safety
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Time-advanced occurrence of moderate-size earthquakes in a stable intraplate region after a megathrust earthquake and their seismic properties10.1038/s41598-018-31600-5 ↗
2. The 2016 Gyeongju earthquake sequence revisited: Aftershock interactions within a complex fault system10.1093/gji/ggz009 ↗
3. Investigation of Pohang Earthquake Liquefaction Using 1D Effective-Stress Site Response Analysis
4. Paleoseismological implications of liquefaction-induced structures caused by the 2017 Pohang Earthquake10.1007/s12303-018-0051-y ↗
5. State of Practice of Performance-Based Seismic Design in Korea
6. Ministry of Construction and Transportation (MOCT) (1997). Research of Seismic Design Criteria (II), Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. (In Korean).
7. (2018). Seismic Design–General (Standard No. KDS 17 10 00: 2018).
8. Site Classification and Design Response Spectra for Seismic Code Provisions—(I) Database and Site Response Analyses10.5000/EESK.2016.20.4.235 ↗
9. Naik, S.P., Kim, Y.S., Kim, T., and Kinoshita, A. (2020). Land damage mapping and liquefaction potential analysis of soils from the epicentral region of 2017 Pohang Mw 5.4 earthquake, South Korea. Sustainability, 12.10.37247/PAS.1.2020.13 ↗
10. Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Potential10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662 ↗
11. Iwasaki, T., Tatsuoka, F., Tokida, K., and Yasuda, S. (December, January 26). A Practical Method for Assessing Soil Liquefaction Potential Based on Case Studies at Various Sites in Japan. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Microzonation, San Francisco, CA, USA.
12. Liquefaction Hazard Mapping with LPI in the Greater Oakland, California, Area10.1193/1.2218591 ↗
13. Cramer, C.H., Gomberg, J.S., Schweig, E.S., Waldron, B.A., and Tucker, K. (2004). The Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee, Seismic Hazard Maps, USGS.10.3133/ofr20041294 ↗
14. Ku, T.J. (2010). Development of Mapping of Liquefaction Hazard Considering Various Ground Condition in Korea. [Master’s Thesis, Seokyeong University]. (In Korean).
15. Liquefaction Hazard Map of Pohang Area considering Site Amplification
16. Select Liquefaction Case Histories from the 2010–2011 Canterbury Earthquake Sequence10.1193/030713EQS066M ↗
17. Assessment of Liquefaction-Induced Land Damage for Residential Christchurch10.1193/031813EQS070M ↗
18. CPT-based liquefaction case histories compiled from three earthquakes in Canterbury, New Zealand10.1177/8755293021996367 ↗
19. Assessment of liquefaction evaluation procedures and severity index frameworks at Christchurch strong motion stations
20. A GLPI framework for gravelly soil liquefaction hazard assessment based on fuzzy mathematics10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108134 ↗
21. Bayesian network models for probabilistic evaluation of earthquake-induced liquefaction based on CPT and Vs databases10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.04.003 ↗
22. Influence of data quality on the performance of supervised classification models for predicting gravelly soil liquefaction10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107254 ↗
23. Performance-based probabilistic liquefaction-induced ground settlement procedure10.1177/87552930241234289 ↗
24. Development of mapping method liquefaction hazard in moderate seismic region considering the uncertainty of big site investigation data
25. Influence of Assumed Groundwater Depth on Mapping Liquefaction Potential10.2113/gseegeosci.19.4.377 ↗
26. Ministry of Interior and Safety (MOIS) (2017). Seismic Design General Application, Ministry of Interior and Safety. (In Korean).
27. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT) (2012). National Ground Water Monitoring Network in Korea Annual Report 2012, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. (In Korean).
28. Luna, R., and Frost, J.D. (1998). Spatial Liquefaction Assessment Using Geographic Information System. Geo-Environment 97 Geotechnical Special Publication No. 46, ASCE.
29. Microzonation for Earthquake Risk Mitigation (MERM) (2003). Microzonation Manual, World Institute for Disaster Risk Management.
30. Assessment of liquefaction potential index for Mumbai city10.5194/nhess-12-2759-2012 ↗
31. Evaluation of the Liquefaction Potential Index for Assessing Liquefaction Hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001117 ↗