Enhancing Food Safety, Quality and Sustainability Through Biopesticide Production Under the Concept of Process Intensification
Source abstract
Abstract
The worldwide population is anticipated to reach 10.12 billion by the year 2100, thereby amplifying the necessity for sustainable agricultural methodologies to secure food availability while reducing ecological consequences. Conventional synthetic pesticides, while capable of increasing crop yields by as much as 50%, present considerable hazards such as toxicity, the emergence of resistance, and environmental pollution. This review examines biopesticides, originating from microbial (e.g., Bacillus thuringiensis, Trichoderma spp.), plant, or animal sources, as environmentally sustainable alternatives which address pest control through mechanisms including antibiosis, hyperparasitism, and competition. Biopesticides provide advantages such as biodegradability, minimal toxicity to non-target organisms, and a lower likelihood of resistance development. The global market for biopesticides is projected to be valued between USD 8 and 10 billion by 2025, accounting for 3–4% of the overall pesticide sector, and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12–16%. To mitigate production costs, agro-industrial byproducts such as rice husk and starch wastewater can be utilized as economical substrates in both solid-state and submerged fermentation processes, which may lead to a reduction in expenses ranging from 35% to 59%. Strategies for process intensification, such as the implementation of intensified bioreactors, continuous cultivation methods, and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven monitoring systems, significantly improve the upstream stages (including strain development and fermentation), downstream processes (such as purification and drying), and formulation phases. These advancements result in enhanced productivity, reduced energy consumption, and greater product stability. Patent activity, exemplified by 2371 documents from 1982 to 2021, highlights advancements in formulations and microbial strains. The integration of circular economy principles in biopesticide production through process intensification enhances the safety, quality, and sustainability of food systems. Projections suggest that by the 2040s to 2050s, biopesticides may achieve market parity with synthetic alternatives. Obstacles encompass the alignment of regulations and the ability to scale in order to completely achieve these benefits.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control · Insect Resistance and Genetics · Insect Pest Control Strategies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Biological Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Torreón 25280, Coahuila, Mexico
Bioprocesses and Bioproducts Research Group (BBG-DIA), Food Research Department, School of Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Saltillo 25280, Coahuila, Mexico
Agricultural and Food Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur 721302, West Bengal, India
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Bhat, R.A., Beigh, B.A., Mir, S.A., Dar, S.A., Dervash, M.A., Rashid, A., and Lone, R. (2022). Biopesticide techniques to remediate pesticides in polluted ecosystems. Research Anthology on Emerging Techniques in Environmental Remediation, IGI Global Scientific Publishing.10.4018/978-1-6684-3714-8.ch017 ↗
2. Production of Bacillus thuringiensis based biopesticide formulation using starch industry wastewater (SIW) as substrate: A techno-economic evaluation10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122144 ↗
3. Agriculture waste valorisation as a source of antioxidant phenolic compounds within a circular and sustainable bioeconomy10.1039/D0FO00937G ↗
4. Biopesticides and their role in sustainable agricultural production
5. Microbial disease management in agriculture: Current status and future prospects10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101468 ↗
6. Current developments in the production of fungal biological control agents by solid-state fermentation using organic solid waste10.1080/10643389.2018.1557497 ↗
7. Potential of microalgae as biopesticides to contribute to sustainable agriculture and environmental development10.1080/03601234.2019.1571366 ↗
8. Prasad, R., Kumar, V., Singh, J., and Upadhyaya, C.P. (2021). Recent Trends in Plant-and Microbe-Based Biopesticide for Sustainable Crop Production and Environmental Security. Recent Developments in Microbial Technologies; Environmental and Microbial Biotechnology, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-4439-2 ↗
9. Abbey, L., Abbey, J., Leke-Aladekoba, A., Iheshiulo, E.M.A., and Ijenyo, M. (2019). Biopesticides and biofertilizers: Types, production, benefits, and utilization. Byproducts from Agriculture and Fisheries: Adding Value for Food, Feed, Pharma, and Fuels, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9781119383956.ch20 ↗
10. Review on biopesticide production by Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki since 1990: Focus on bioprocess parameters10.1016/j.procbio.2020.07.023 ↗
11. Thakur, N., Kaur, S., Tomar, P., Thakur, S., and Yadav, A.N. (2020). Microbial biopesticides: Current status and advancement for sustainable agriculture and environment. New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-820526-6.00016-6 ↗
12. Pesticide and Biopesticide Use Trends in Morocco10.1564/v36_aug_04 ↗
13. Narandžić, T., Šarac, V., Rodić, V., Vukelić, N., Lukač-Bulatović, M., Bijelić, S., and Ljubojević, M. (2025). Exploring the Known and Mapping Future Directions in Biopesticides Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Horticulturae, 11.10.3390/horticulturae11010097 ↗
14. Trends in the implementation of biopesticides in the Euro-Mediterranean region: A narrative literary review10.1186/s42055-024-00085-8 ↗
15. Status of the biopesticide market and prospects for new bioherbicides10.1002/ps.7403 ↗
16. Balasubramanian, S., and Tyagi, R.D. (2017). Biopesticide production from solid wastes. Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-444-63664-5.00003-4 ↗
17. Rice husk as a source for fungal biopesticide production by solid-state fermentation using B. bassiana and T. harzianum10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122322 ↗
18. Biopesticide and formulation processes based on starch industrial wastewater fortified with soybean medium10.1080/03601234.2019.1668225 ↗
19. History, current situation and challenges for conservation biological control10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.12.010 ↗
20. Ramírez-Guzmán, N., Chávez-González, M., Sepúlveda-Torre, L., Torres-León, C., Cintra, A., Angulo-López, J., Martínez-Hernández, J.L., and Aguilar, C.N. (2020). Significant advances in biopesticide production: Strategies for high-density bio-inoculant cultivation. Microbial Services in Restoration Ecology, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-819978-7.00001-4 ↗
21. Agroindustrial residues exploration to maximize metabolites production in fungal biocontrol co-culture10.29267/mxjb.2025.10.2.64-88 ↗
22. Pimentel, D., and Peshin, R. (2014). Integrated Pest Management: Pesticide Problems Vol. 3, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-94-007-7796-5 ↗
23. Shifting paradigms in the history of classical biological control10.1007/s10526-017-9841-9 ↗
24. Pesticides classification and its impact on environment10.20546/ijcmas.2019.803.224 ↗
25. Pesticides and agriculture: Profit, politics and policy (Burleigh Dodds series in agricultural science)
26. Pesticides pollution: Classifications, human health impact, extraction and treatment techniques10.1016/j.ejar.2020.08.007 ↗
27. Towards sustainable management of insect pests: Protecting food security through ecological intensification
28. Global agricultural losses and their causes10.54112/bbasr.v2024i1.66 ↗
29. Verma, P., Singh, D., Pathania, I.P., and Aggarwal, K. (2019). Strategies to improve agriculture sustainability, soil fertility and enhancement of farmers income for the economic development. Soil Fertility Management for Sustainable Development, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-5904-0_4 ↗
30. Khan, B.A., Nadeem, M.A., Nawaz, H., Amin, M.M., Abbasi, G.H., Nadeem, M., Ali, M., Ameen, M., Javaid, M.M., and Maqbool, R. (2023). Pesticides: Impacts on agriculture productivity, environment, and management strategies. Emerging Contaminants and Plants: Interactions, Adaptations and Remediation Technologies, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-031-22269-6_5 ↗
31. Review on bioremediation of pesticides
32. Modification of the functional and bioactive properties of camel milk casein and whey proteins by ultrasonication and fermentation with Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109501 ↗
33. Current status and potential of conservation biological control for agriculture in the developing world10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.11.010 ↗
34. Selection of fungi with biocontrol potential against the black spot disease of papaya110.1590/1983-40632017v4749178 ↗
35. Pesticides, depression and suicide: A systematic review of the epidemiological evidence10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.12.003 ↗
36. Ramírez-Guzmán, K.N., Torres-León, C., Martínez-Terrazas, E., De la Cruz-Quiroz, R., Flores-Gallegos, A.C., Rodríguez-Herrera, R., and Aguilar, C.N. (2018). Biocontrol as an efficient tool for food control and biosecurity. Food Safety and Preservation, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-814956-0.00007-X ↗
37. Das, S., Ray, M.K., Panday, D., and Mishra, P.K. (2023). Role of biotechnology in creating sustainable agriculture. PLoS Sustain. Transform., 2.10.1371/journal.pstr.0000069 ↗
38. Unleashing the potential of biotechnology for sustainable development
39. Singh, S.P., Jadaun, J.S., and Rai, A.K. (2025). Management of Agri-Food Wastes via Novel Biotechnological Methods: Emerging Trends and Technological Advances. Biotechnological Approaches for Sustainable Environment Management, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003328926 ↗
40. Marrone, P.G. (2023). Biopesticide commercialization in North America: State of the art and future opportunities. Development and Commercialization of Biopesticides, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-323-95290-3.00017-0 ↗
41. Entomopathogenic microorganisms: Their role in insect pest management10.1186/s41938-021-00466-7 ↗
42. Microorganisms in biological control strategies to manage microbial plant pathogens: A review10.1007/s00203-022-03279-w ↗
43. Biopesticides from natural products Current development, legislative framework, and future trends10.15376/biores.11.2.Villaverde ↗
44. Yadav, A.N., Rastegari, A.A., Yadav, N., and Kour, D. (2020). Advances in Plant Microbiome and Sustainable Agriculture, Springer.10.1007/978-981-15-3208-5 ↗
45. Damalas, C.A., and Koutroubas, S.D. (2018). Current status and recent developments in biopesticide use. Agriculture, 8.10.3390/agriculture8010013 ↗
46. A Comprehensive Review of Pesticide Elimination Methods from Fruits and Vegetables Over the Past Two Decades: Optimizing Produce Safety for Sustainable Food Systems
47. Pesticidal natural products–status and future potential10.1002/ps.5433 ↗
48. Chakraborty, N., Mitra, R., Pal, S., Ganguly, R., Acharya, K., Minkina, T., Sarkar, A., and Keswani, C. (2023). Biopesticide consumption in India: Insights into the current trends. Agriculture, 13.10.3390/agriculture13030557 ↗
49. Rosskopf, E.N., and Charudattan, R. (2018). Bioherbicides: An overview USDA-ARS, Foreign Disease-Weed Science Research Unit, USA. Integrated Weed Management for Sustainable Agriculture, CRC Press.
50. Barwant, M.M., Singh, B., Sobin, F., Sharma, S., and Kumari, R. (2026). Global Regulations and Standards for Fungal-Derived Products. Fungal Biotechnology, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003594840-15 ↗
51. Report on regulations governing AD and NRR in EU member states
52. Cultivating sustainability: Navigating the EU legal landscape in organic farming amidst climate change challenges
53. Saritha, M., and Tollamadugu, N.P. (2019). The status of research and application of biofertilizers and biopesticides: Global scenario. Recent Developments in Applied Microbiology and Biochemistry, Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-816328-3.00015-5 ↗
54. Sansinenea, E. (2021). Application of biofertilizers: Current worldwide status. Biofertilizers, Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-12-821667-5.00004-X ↗
55. Growth inhibition of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Phytophthora capsici by native Mexican Trichoderma strains10.1016/j.kijoms.2018.03.002 ↗
56. Fungal Spores Production by solid-state fermentation under hydric stress condition
57. Balance between resilient fruit surface microbial community and population of Monilinia spp. after biopesticide field applications of Penicillium frequentans10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108788 ↗
58. Challenges and opportunities of the bio-pesticides production by solid-state fermentation: Filamentous fungi as a model10.3109/07388551.2013.857292 ↗
59. Ayaz, M., Li, C.H., Ali, Q., Zhao, W., Chi, Y.K., Shafiq, M., Ali, F., Yu, X.Y., Yu, Q., and Zhao, J.T. (2023). Bacterial and fungal biocontrol agents for plant disease protection: Journey from lab to field, current status, challenges, and global perspectives. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28186735 ↗
60. Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm?10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009 ↗
61. Challenges and safety regulations for employing fungi in environmental applications10.1007/978-981-97-4113-7_14 ↗
62. Biswas, S.K., and Pal, S. (2014). Organic Agriculture: An Approach for Sustainable Food Production and Environmental Security. Organic Farming and Management of Biotic Stresses, Biotech Books. Chapter 2.
63. Thatoi, H., Mohapatra, S., and Das, S.K. (2022). Agro-industrial wastes for production of single-cell protein (SCP). Innovations in Fermentation and Phytopharmaceutical Technologies, Elsevier Inc.. Chapter 17.
64. Thatoi, H., Mohapatra, S., and Das, S.K. (2022). Wine waste as a potential source of bioactive compounds. Innovations in Fermentation and Phytopharmaceutical Technologies, Elsevier Inc.. Chapter 16.
65. Aguilar, C.N., Gómez-García, G.R., and Kuddus, M. (2023). Solid-State Fermentation as Strategy for Food Waste Transformation. Food Waste Conversion, Springer.10.1007/978-1-0716-3303-8 ↗
66. Electro-stimulation of tofu wastewater for the production of single cell protein from various microorganisms10.1016/j.sjbs.2023.103679 ↗
67. Almond processing residues as a source of organic acid biopesticides during biosolarization10.1016/j.wasman.2019.09.028 ↗
68. Reutilisation of food wastes for generating fuels and value added products: A global review10.1016/j.eti.2020.101040 ↗
69. Microbial products from wastes and residues10.1093/femsle/fnaa156 ↗
70. Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis biopesticide produced in shrimp pond sludge as alternative culture medium against Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)
71. Efficient and cost-effective production of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. aizawai spores and delta-endotoxins using agricultural raw materials and agro-industrial wastes under submerged fermentation10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101001 ↗
72. Use of agro-industrial bio-waste for the growth and production of a previously isolated Bacillus thuringiensis strain10.1186/s43088-023-00461-x ↗
73. Gangwar, P., Trivedi, M., and Tiwari, R.K. (2022). Entomopathogenic bacteria. Microbial Approaches for Insect Pest Management, Springer.10.1007/978-981-16-3595-3_2 ↗
74. Synergistic activity of a Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin and a bacterial endochitinase against Spodoptera littoralis larvae10.1128/aem.62.10.3581-3586.1996 ↗
75. Valtierra-de-Luis, D., Villanueva, M., Berry, C., and Caballero, P. (2020). Potential for Bacillus thuringiensis and other bacterial toxins as biological control agents to combat dipteran pests of medical and agronomic importance. Toxins, 12.10.3390/toxins12120773 ↗
76. Sporulation, structure assembly, and germination in the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis: Survival and success in the environment and the insect host10.3390/microbiolres14020035 ↗
77. Bacterial insecticides beyond Bacillus thuringiensis10.1186/s42483-024-00306-0 ↗
78. Economic production and biocontrol efficiency of lipopeptide biosurfactants from Bacillus mojavenis A2110.1007/s10532-018-9864-7 ↗
79. A novel two-stage aeration strategy for Bacillus thuringiensis biopesticide production from biowaste digestate through solid-state fermentation10.1016/j.bej.2020.107644 ↗
80. Valorisation of digestate from biowaste through solid-state fermentation to obtain value added bioproducts: A first approach10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.131 ↗
81. The effect of aeration for 6-pentyl-alpha-pyrone, conidia and lytic enzymes production by Trichoderma asperellum strains grown in solid-state fermentation10.1007/s12649-019-00809-4 ↗
82. Thambugala, K.M., Daranagama, D.A., Phillips, A.J., Kannangara, S.D., and Promputtha, I. (2020). Fungi vs. fungi in biocontrol: An overview of fungal antagonists applied against fungal plant pathogens. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 10.10.3389/fcimb.2020.604923 ↗
83. Guzmán-Guzmán, P., Kumar, A., de Los Santos-Villalobos, S., Parra-Cota, F.I., Orozco-Mosqueda, M.D.C., Fadiji, A.E., Hyder, S., Babalola, O.O., and Santoyo, G. (2023). Trichoderma species: Our best fungal allies in the biocontrol of plant diseases—A review. Plants, 12.10.3390/plants12030432 ↗
84. Rodrigo, S., García-Latorre, C., and Santamaria, O. (2021). Metabolites produced by fungi against fungal phytopathogens: Review, implementation and perspectives. Plants, 11.10.3390/plants11010081 ↗
85. Alves, V., Zamith-Miranda, D., Frases, S., and Nosanchuk, J.D. (2025). Fungal metabolomics: A comprehensive approach to understanding pathogenesis in humans and identifying potential therapeutics. J. Fungi, 11.10.3390/jof11020093 ↗
86. Ramírez-Guzmán, K.N., Torres-León, C., Martinez-Medina, G.A., de la Rosa, O., Hernández-Almanza, A., Alvarez-Perez, O.B., Araujo, R., González, L.R., Londoño, L., and Ventura, J. (2019). Traditional fermented beverages in Mexico. Fermented Beverages, Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-12-815271-3.00015-4 ↗
87. Rapid and mass production of biopesticide Trichoderma Brev T069 from cassava peels using newly established solid-state fermentation bioreactor system10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114981 ↗
88. Bioprocess intensification: A route to efficient and sustainable biocatalytic transformations for the future10.1016/j.cep.2022.108793 ↗
89. Bioprocess strategies for intensification of microbial validamycin A production10.1016/j.cep.2025.110582 ↗
90. Ayilara, M.S., Adeleke, B.S., Akinola, S.A., Fayose, C.A., Adeyemi, U.T., Gbadegesin, L.A., Omole, R.K., Johnson, R.M., Uthman, Q.O., and Babalola, O.O. (2023). Biopesticides as a promising alternative to synthetic pesticides: A case for microbial pesticides, phytopesticides, and nanobiopesticides. Front. Microbiol., 14.10.3389/fmicb.2023.1040901 ↗
91. Daraban, G.M., Hlihor, R.M., and Suteu, D. (2023). Pesticides vs. biopesticides: From pest management to toxicity and impacts on the environment and human health. Toxics, 11.10.3390/toxics11120983 ↗
92. Recent advances in biopesticide research and development with a focus on microbials10.12688/f1000research.154392.4 ↗
93. Development of a novel pilot-scale tray bioreactor for solid-state fermentation aiming at process intensification10.1016/j.cep.2023.109526 ↗
94. Optimization of Metarhizium koreanum MN031-Mt 46: Nutritional Supplementation to Improve Conidia and Cuticle-Degrading Enzyme Production by Solid-State Fermentation10.4014/jmb.2412.12079 ↗
95. Luna-Finkler, C.L., and Finkler, L. (2012). Bacillus sphaericus and Bacillus thuringiensis to Insect Control: Process Development of Small Scale Production to Pilot-Plant-Fermenters, INTECH Open Access Publisher.
96. Bioprocess intensification: Cases that (don’t) work10.1016/j.nbt.2020.11.007 ↗
97. Ultrasonically intensified extraction and emulsification of Azadirachtin and its bioactivity analysis for fenugreek crop growth10.1016/j.cep.2024.109748 ↗
98. Processes intensification for sustainability: Prospects and opportunities10.1021/acs.iecr.2c04305 ↗
99. Intensification of bioprocesses–definition, examples, challenges and future directions
100. Adewole, J.K., Yeneneh, A.M., Khan, M.Y., and Uddin, M.J. (2024). Membrane engineering and process intensification. Front. Chem. Eng., 5.10.3389/fceng.2023.1360708 ↗