Seismic Failure Mechanism Shift in RC Buildings Revealed by NDT-Supported, Field-Calibrated BIM-Based Models
Source abstract
Abstract
This study proposes a field-calibrated, NDT-integrated BIM modeling framework to improve the reliability of post-earthquake assessment for reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. The approach combines destructive and nondestructive testing (NDT) data—including core drilling, Schmidt hammer, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), and Windsor probe—through a site-specific WinSonReb regression model. The calibrated material properties (average compressive strength ≈ 18.6 MPa, CoV > 20%) were embedded into a Building Information Modeling (BIM) environment, producing an as-is, NDT-calibrated BIM model representing a Level-2 static digital twin of the structure. Nonlinear static pushover analyses performed in accordance with TBDY-2018 and ASCE 41-17 showed that the calibrated model exhibits a fundamental period of 0.85 s—approximately 18% longer than the uncalibrated BIM model. This elongation increased displacement demand and caused a shift in performance classification: while the uncalibrated model indicated Life Safety (LS), the calibrated model predicted behavior approaching Collapse Prevention (CP) in the Y direction. Furthermore, calibration reversed the predicted damage hierarchy, from ductile beam hinging to brittle column- and wall-controlled failure near elevator openings, consistent with post-event observations from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. These results demonstrate that integrating field-calibrated NDT data into BIM-based seismic models fundamentally alters both strength estimation and failure-mechanism prediction, reducing epistemic uncertainty and providing a more conservative basis for retrofit prioritization. Although demonstrated on a single case study, the proposed workflow offers a realistic and scalable pathway for NDT-supported seismic performance assessment of existing RC buildings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Malatya Turgut Özal University, 44210 Malatya, Türkiye
References (87)
Show source-provided references
1. Işık, E., Avcil, F., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., İzol, R., Büyüksaraç, A., Arkan, E., Radu, D., and Özcan, Z. (2024). Seismic Performance and Failure Mechanisms of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subject to the Earthquakes in Türkiye. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16156473 ↗
2. Suquillo, B., Rojas, F., and Massone, L.M. (2024). Seismic Performance Evaluation of a Chilean RC Building Damaged during the Mw8.8 Chile Earthquake. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14041028 ↗
3. Seismic Analysis of Damaged Buildings Based on Post-Earthquake Investigation of the 2018 Palu Earthquake
4. Seismic Response of Current RC Buildings in Kathmandu Valley10.12989/sem.2015.53.4.791 ↗
5. Performance-based probabilistic framework for seismic risk, resilience, and sustainability assessment of reinforced concrete structures10.1177/1369433219895363 ↗
6. FEMA (2012). Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings (FEMA P-58).
7. (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1998-1).
8. (2017). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (Standard No. ASCE/SEI 41-17).
9. PEER Tall Buildings Initiative (PEER-TBI) (2017). Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
10. Amini, M.I. (2022). Earthquake Performance and Cost Comparison of Core Wall and Tunnel Formwork RC High-Rise Buildings. [Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Kültür University]. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11413/8709.
11. Bagasi, O., Nawari, N.O., and Alsaffar, A. (2025). BIM and AI in Early Design Stage: Advancing Architect–Client Communication. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15121977 ↗
12. Lawal, O.O., Nawari, N.O., and Lawal, O. (2025). AI-Enabled Cognitive Predictive Maintenance of Urban Assets Using City Information Modeling—Systematic Review. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15050690 ↗
13. A strategic framework for digital maturity of design and construction through a systematic review and application
14. Maturity model for the implementation of digital twins in a Brazilian public health unit10.33448/rsd-v14i8.49393 ↗
15. Liao, J., Kim, H.Y., and Shin, M.H. (2025). Quantitative and Qualitative Benefits of Using BIM in Design and Construction Stages for Railway Development. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15020180 ↗
16. Dammag, B.Q.D., Jian, D., Dammag, A.Q., Alshawabkeh, Y., Almutery, S., Habibullah, A., and Baik, A. (2025). Modeling Ontology-Based Decay Analysis and HBIM for the Conservation of Architectural Heritage: The Big Gate and Adjacent Curtain Walls in Ibb, Yemen. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15152795 ↗
17. You, S., Ji, H.W., Kwak, H., Chung, T., and Bae, M. (2025). Schema-Agnostic Data Type Inference and Validation for Exchanging JSON-Encoded Construction Engineering Information. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15173159 ↗
18. Abu Moeilak, L.S.M., Abuhalimeh, D., Mattar, Y., and Beheiry, S. (2022, January 26–28). Barriers to Integrating BIM and Sustainable Practices in UAE Construction Projects: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach. Proceedings of the 5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), Rome, Italy. Available online: https://ieomsociety.org/.10.46254/EU05.20220390 ↗
19. Barriers to the Adoption of Building Information Modeling in the Jordanian Building Industry10.4236/ojce.2017.73022 ↗
20. Seismic assessment of irregular existing buildings: Appraisal of the influence of compressive strength variation by means of nonlinear conventional and multimodal static analysis
21. Reliability of Non-Destructive Testing Methods in the Assessment of the Strength of Concrete Columns Reinforced with Two Layers of Transverse Confining Stirrups: Empirical Evidence
22. Ekhteraey, N., Ekhteraei, M., and Sattari, M.A. (2025). Non-Destructive Concrete Strength Prediction Using AI: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models. Res. Sq.10.21203/rs.3.rs-6462021/v1 ↗
23. Bazı tahribatsız deney metotlarının vakum uygulanmış betonların basınç dayanımlarının belirlenmesindeki performanslarının incelenmesi
24. Estimation of Concrete Strength Properties through the Response Surface Methodology, Genetic Algorithm, and Artificial Neural Networks
25. Tawil, D., Martín-Pérez, B., Sanchez, L.F.M., and Noël, M. (Struct. Concr., 2024). Detection of corrosion effects on prestressed concrete bridge deck slabs from the Champlain Bridge through non-destructive testing techniques, Struct. Concr., in press.10.1002/suco.202400591 ↗
26. Non-Destructive and Semi-Destructive Diagnostics of Concrete Structures in Assessment of Their Durability
27. Remaining Service Life Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Considering Failure Probability of Members10.1186/s40069-024-00749-x ↗
28. Eren, M.E. (2025). Physics-guided self-supervised few-shot learning for ultrasonic defect detection in concrete structures. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15234227 ↗
29. Haselton, C.B., Goulet, C.A., Mitrani-Reiser, J., Beck, J.L., Deierlein, G.G., Porter, K.A., Stewart, J.P., and Taciroğlu, E. (2008). An assessment to benchmark the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete moment-frame building. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) Report 2008, Report No. PEER 2007/12, University of California.
30. (2020). Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete (Standard No. ASTM C42/C42M).
31. (2018). Standard Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete (Standard No. ASTM C805/C805M).
32. (2016). Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete (Standard No. ASTM C597).
33. (2018). Standard Test Method for Penetration Resistance of Hardened Concrete (Standard No. ASTM C803/C803M).
34. Non-destructive assessment of in-situ concrete strength: Comparison of approaches through an international benchmark10.1617/s11527-017-1009-7 ↗
35. Prediction of Concrete Strength Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Artificial Neural Networks10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.001 ↗
36. Demir, T., Ulucan, M., and Alyamaç, K.E. (2023). Development of Combined Methods Using Non-Destructive Test Methods to Determine the In-Place Strength of High-Strength Concretes. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11030673 ↗
37. (2019). Testing Concrete—Part 1: Cored Specimens—Taking, Examining and Testing in Compression (Standard No. EN 12504-1).
38. Miano, A., Ebrahimian, H., Jalayer, F., and Prota, A. (2023). Reliability Estimation of the Compressive Concrete Strength Based on Non-Destructive Tests. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151914644 ↗
39. Bolborea, B., Baera, C., Dan, S., Gruin, A., Burduhos-Nergis, D.-D., and Vasile, V. (2021). Concrete Compressive Strength by Means of Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Moduli of Elasticity. Materials, 14.10.37247/PAMS4ED.4.22.7 ↗
40. New predictive models to evaluate concrete compressive strength using the SonReb method
41. Eren, M.E., and Fenerli, C. (2025, January 24–26). Investigation of the Integrated Use of NDT Methods and BIM Technology in Performance Analysis Studies of Earthquake-Affected Reinforced Concrete Structures. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDT-CE 2025), Izmir, Turkey.
42. Combining Multiple NDT Methods to Improve Testing Effectiveness10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.01.011 ↗
43. Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Non-Destructive Defect Detection for Civil Infrastructure10.1016/j.autcon.2025.105996 ↗
44. Building Information Modeling and artificial intelligence: Advanced technologies for the digitalisation of seismic damage in existing buildings10.1002/suco.202000029 ↗
45. (2018). Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği (Turkish Seismic Code) (Standard No. TBDY-2018).
46. Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures10.1193/1.1586117 ↗
47. Comparison of Two Differently Designed Seismically Isolated Buildings
48. Xu, Y., Li, Y., Zheng, X., Zheng, X., and Zhang, Q. (2023). Computer-Vision and Machine-Learning-Based Seismic Damage Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13051258 ↗
49. Cloud-Based Digital Twinning for Structural Health Monitoring Using Deep Learning
50. Sivori, D., Ierimonti, L., Venanzi, I., Ubertini, F., and Cattari, S. (2023). An Equivalent Frame Digital Twin for the Seismic Monitoring of Historic Structures: A Case Study on the Consoli Palace in Gubbio, Italy. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13071840 ↗
51. Belsky, M.E. (2021). A Framework for Leveraging Semantic Interoperability between BIM Applications. ECPPM 2021—eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003191476-9 ↗
52. Sibenik, G., and Kovacic, I. (2018, January 20–25). Proposal for a Discipline-Specific Open Exchange Framework. Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2018), Berlin, Germany.10.22260/ISARC2018/0078 ↗
53. Rules and Validation Processes for Interoperable BIM Data Exchange
54. Interoperability Analysis of IFC-Based Data Exchange between Heterogeneous BIM Software10.3846/jcem.2018.6132 ↗
55. An Ontology-Based Analysis of the Industry Foundation Class Schema for Building Information Model Exchanges10.1016/j.aei.2015.09.006 ↗
56. Proverbio, E., and Venturi, V. (2005, January 17–20). Reliability of Nondestructive Tests for On-Site Concrete Strength Assessment. Proceedings of the 10DBMC International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components, Lyon, France.
57. Correlation between Destructive Compressive Testing (DT) and Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) for Concrete Strength10.25125/engineering-journal-IJOER-MAY-2017-12 ↗
58. Statistical equations to estimate the in-situ concrete compressive strength from non-destructive tests10.31026/j.eng.2018.11.05 ↗
59. Neville, A.M. (2011). Properties of Concrete, Pearson Education Limited. [5th ed.].
60. Ahmed, A.A.R., Lu, L., Li, B., Bi, W., and Al-Dhubai, F.M.A. (2025). Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Residential RC Buildings in Yemen Using Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA). Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15081336 ↗
61. SonReb Method for Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Concrete10.1088/1757-899X/810/1/012071 ↗
62. Predicting Concrete Compressive Strength Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Rebound Number
63. Maidi, M., Lifshitz Sherzer, G., Shufrin, I., and Gal, E. (2024). Seismic Resilience of CRC- vs. RC-Reinforced Buildings: A Long-Term Evaluation. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142311079 ↗
64. Building damages after Elazığ, Turkey earthquake on January 24, 202010.1007/s11069-021-04831-5 ↗
65. (2013). Concrete—Specification, Performance, Production and Conformity (Standard No. EN 206).
66. Vibration-Based Structural Health Monitoring of a Historic Bell Tower Using Output-Only Measurements and Multivariate Statistical Analysis10.1177/1475921716643948 ↗
67. Progressive Finite Element Model Calibration of a Long-Span Suspension Bridge Based on Ambient Vibration and Static Measurements10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.028 ↗
68. Response-Only Modal Identification of Structures Using Strong Motion Data10.1002/eqe.2268 ↗
69. A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design10.1193/1.1586128 ↗
70. Ibarra, K., and Krawinkler, H. (2005). Global Collapse of Frame Structures Under Seismic Excitations, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University. Report No. 152.
71. Seismic Demand Evaluation of Medium Ductility RC Moment Frames Using Nonlinear Procedures10.1007/s11803-013-0181-1 ↗
72. Inelastic Responses of Reinforced Concrete Structures to Earthquake Motions
73. AFAD (2023). 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremleri Raporu (Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes Report).
74. TMMOB İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası (2023). 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremleri Teknik Raporu, TMMOB İnşaat Mühendisleri Odası. Available online: https://www.imo.org.tr/Eklenti/8624,deprem-rapor-2-webpdf.pdf?0.
75. Seismic Risk Evaluation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings: A Case Study for Çanakkale-Türkiye
76. Paulay, T., and Priestley, M.J.N. (1992). Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, Wiley.10.1002/9780470172841 ↗
77. Simplified Pushover-Based Vulnerability Analysis for Large-Scale Assessment of RC Buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.05.021 ↗
78. McKenna, F., Fenves, G.L., and Scott, M.H. (2000). Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSees), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California. Available online: https://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
79. A Case Study on the Updates of Turkish Rapid Visual Screening Methods for Reinforced-Concrete Buildings10.17678/beuscitech.1024140 ↗
80. Variability in Corrosion Damage Models and Its Effect on Seismic Collapse Fragility of Aging Reinforced Concrete Frames10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123654 ↗
81. Seismic Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Structures10.1002/(SICI)1528-2716(200001/03)2:1<60::AID-PSE8>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
82. Seismic Performance and Damage Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures Based on Field Investigation Made after February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes10.1142/S179343112350032X ↗
83. Design Deficiencies, Failure Modes and Recommendations for Strengthening in Reinforced Concrete Structures Exposed to the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6)10.1007/s11069-024-06925-2 ↗
84. Maekawa, K., Ishida, T., and Kishi, T. (2009). Multi-Scale Modeling of Structural Concrete, Taylor & Francis. [1st ed.].10.1201/9781482288599 ↗
85. Dynamic Monitoring of Buildings as a Diagnostic Tool during Construction Phases10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103764 ↗
86. Lauria, M., and Azzalin, M. (2024). Digital Transformation in the Construction Sector: A Digital Twin for Seismic Safety in the Lifecycle of Buildings. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16188245 ↗
87. Thermal damage evaluation of full-scale concrete columns exposed to high temperatures using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction10.15446/dyna.v85n207.70593 ↗