journal article·2026-01-01Open access

A Modular Solution Concept for Self-Configurable Electronic Lab Notebooks: Systematic Theoretical Demonstration and Validation Across Diverse Digital Platforms

Kim Feldhoff, Martin Zinner, Hajo Wiemer, Steffen Ihlenfeldt

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

The increasing complexity and digitization of scientific research require Electronic Laboratory Notebooks (ELNs) that are adaptable, sustainable, and compliant across heterogeneous laboratory environments. In response to the limitations of proprietary, inflexible, and cost-intensive ELN solutions, this study systematically derives comprehensive requirements and proposes a modular solution concept for self-configurable ELNs that is explicitly platform-agnostic and broadly accessible. The methodological approach combines a structured requirements analysis with a modular architectural design, followed by theoretical validation through stepwise implementation walkthroughs on Microsoft SharePoint and Google Workspace. These walkthroughs demonstrate the feasibility of deploying self-configurable ELN modules using widely available low-code/no-code tools and native platform extensibility mechanisms. Based on a rigorous literature-driven analysis, key requirements, including modularity, usability, regulatory compliance, interoperability, scalability, auditability, and cost efficiency, are explicitly mapped to concrete architectural features within the proposed framework. The results show that essential ELN functionalities can, in principle, be realized across diverse digital platforms, enabling researchers and local administrators to independently assemble, configure, and adapt ELNs to their specific operational and regulatory contexts. Beyond technical feasibility, the proposed approach fundamentally democratizes ELN deployment and substantially mitigates vendor lock-in by leveraging existing digital infrastructures. Identified limitations, particularly with respect to advanced workflow orchestration and real-time data integration, delineate clear directions for future development. Overall, this work provides a systematic theoretical validation of a modular, self-configurable ELN concept, establishing it as a robust, scalable, and future-ready foundation for digital laboratory infrastructures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Scientific Computing and Data Management · Research Data Management Practices · Experimental Learning in Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Mechatronic Engineering (IMD), Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01062 Dresden, Germany

Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (IWU), 01187 Dresden, Germany

Funding

German Federal Ministry for Economics and Climate Action (BMWK) on the basis of decisions by the German Bundestag within the joint research projects “LaSt” · German Federal Ministry for Economics and Climate Action (BMWK) on the basis of decisions by the German Bundestag within the joint research projects “SWaT” · German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and financed by the EU within the joint research project “Come2Data”

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. A Review of Electronic Laboratory Notebooks Available in the Market Today10.1016/j.jala.2009.01.002 ↗
2. Laboratory notebooks in the digital era: The role of ELNs in record keeping for chemistry and other sciences10.1039/c3cs60122f ↗
3. How to pick an electronic laboratory notebook10.1038/d41586-018-05895-3 ↗
4. A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences10.12688/f1000research.7628.1 ↗
5. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship10.1038/sdata.2016.18 ↗
6. Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud
7. Electronic Laboratory Notebooks Progress and Challenges in Implementation10.1177/2211068213484471 ↗
8. Electronic lab notebooks: Can they replace paper?10.1186/s13321-017-0221-3 ↗
9. Leonelli, S. (2016). Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study, University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226416502.001.0001 ↗
10. Considerations for implementing electronic laboratory notebooks in an academic research environment10.1038/s41596-021-00645-8 ↗
11. Hey, T., Tansley, S., and Tolle, K. (2009). The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery, Microsoft Research.
12. Reproducibility in Science: Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.303819 ↗
13. Promoting an open research culture10.1126/science.aab2374 ↗
14. Feldhoff, K., Opatz, T., Wiemer, H., Zinner, M., and Ihlenfeldt, S. (2025). Benchmarking and Lessons Learned from Using SharePoint as an Electronic Lab Notebook in Engineering Joint Research Projects. Data, 10.10.3390/data10070092 ↗
15. Chemotion ELN: An Open Source electronic lab notebook for chemists in academia10.1186/s13321-017-0240-0 ↗
16. eLabFTW: An open source laboratory notebook for research labs10.21105/joss.00146 ↗
17. Milsted, A.J., Hale, J.R., Frey, J.G., and Neylon, C. (2013). LabTrove: A Lightweight, Web Based, Laboratory “Blog” as a Route towards a Marked Up Record of Work in a Bioscience Research Laboratory. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0067460 ↗
18. Goecks, J., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J., and The Galaxy Team (2011). Galaxy: A comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. BMC Bioinform., 12.10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86 ↗
19. On the Criteria To Be Used in Decomposing Systems into Modules10.1145/361598.361623 ↗
20. Fowler, M. (2002). Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture, Addison-Wesley.
21. Kulesza, T., Burnett, M.M., Wong, W.K., and Stumpf, S. (April, January 29). Principles of Explanatory Debugging to Personalize Interactive Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Atlanta, GA, USA.
22. Opatz, T., Feldhoff, K., Wiemer, H., and Ihlenfeldt, S. (2025). Sharing Research Data in Collaborative Material Science and Engineering Projects. Data, 10.10.3390/data10040053 ↗
23. Adoption of low-code and no-code development: A systematic literature review and future research agenda10.1016/j.jss.2024.112300 ↗
24. Streamlining multi-scale materials modeling: The MUSICODE low-code approach for simulation workflows and executable MODAs10.1007/s40192-025-00395-5 ↗
25. Ensuring Security and Compliance in Agile Cloud Infrastructure Projects10.47941/ijce.2222 ↗
26. Vandendorpe, J., Adam, B., Wilbrandt, J., Lindstädt, B., and Förstner, K.U. (2024). Ten simple rules for implementing electronic lab notebooks (ELNs). PLoS Comput. Biol., 20.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012170 ↗
27. GitHub as an open electronic laboratory notebook for real-time sharing of knowledge and collaboration10.1039/D3DD00032J ↗
28. Towards FAIR principles for research software10.3233/DS-190026 ↗
29. Large language models in electronic laboratory notebooks: Transforming materials science research workflows10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109801 ↗
30. A universal open-source Electronic Laboratory Notebook10.1093/bioinformatics/btt253 ↗
31. Guerrero, S., Dujardin, G., Cabrera-Andrade, A., y Miño, C.P., Indacochea, A., Inglés-Ferrándiz, M., Palomino-Navarrete, H., Colina, N., Díaz, Y., and Melo, I.D. (2016). Analysis and Implementation of an Electronic Laboratory Notebook in a Biomedical Research Institute. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0160428 ↗
32. Specifications for Electronic Laboratory Notebooks (ELN) in the Photon and Neutron Community10.1080/08940886.2024.2432265 ↗
33. A modern and pragmatic definition of Laboratory Medicine10.1515/cclm-2020-0114 ↗
34. (1998). OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD).
35. (2017). General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories (Standard No. ISO/IEC 17025:2017). Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/66912.html.
36. (1997). Electronic Records, Electronic Signatures (Standard No. FDA 21 CFR Part 11).
37. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufmann.10.1016/B978-0-08-052029-2.50009-7 ↗
38. Nemhauser, G.L., and Wolsey, L.A. (1988). Integer and Combinatorial Optimization, Wiley. Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization.10.1002/9781118627372 ↗
39. Bertsimas, D., and Tsitsiklis, J.N. (1997). Introduction to Linear Optimization, Athena Scientific.
40. Rudin, W. (1976). Principles of Mathematical Analysis, McGraw-Hill. [3rd ed.].