Show source-provided references
1. Quantitative evaluation of geological uncertainty and its influence on tunnel structural performance using improved coupled Markov chain
10.1007/s11440-021-01287-6 ↗2. Optimization of site exploration program based on coupled characterization of stratigraphic and geo-properties uncertainties
10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107081 ↗3. Hybrid machine learning model with random field and limited CPT data to quantify horizontal scale of fluctuation of soil spatial variability
10.1007/s11440-021-01360-0 ↗5. Multi-scale generative adversarial networks (GAN) for generation of three-dimensional subsurface geological models from limited boreholes and prior geological knowledge
10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106336 ↗6. Probabilistic performance analysis of longitudinal tunnels based on coupled characterization of stratigraphic and geo-properties uncertainties
10.1016/j.tust.2025.106552 ↗9. Toscani, R., Rabelo Matos, D., and Guimaraes Campos, J. (2025). An Assessment of Landscape Evolution Through Pedo-Geomorphological Mapping and Predictive Classification Using Random Forest: A Case Study of the Statherian Natividade Basin, Central Brazil. Geosciences, 15.
10.20944/preprints202504.0666.v1 ↗10. Cone penetration test (CPT)-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system—An update
10.1139/cgj-2016-0044 ↗17. CPTU identification of regular, sensitive, and organic clays towards evaluating preconsolidation stress profiles
10.3934/geosci.2021032 ↗22. Deng, S., Zhang, Y., Han, J., Wang, K., Tian, Z., and Liu, T. (2023). An Analytical Study on Penetration and Pore Pressure Dissipation of Piezocone Test in Typical Normally and Over-Consolidated Silty Clays. Appl. Sci., 13.
10.3390/app13063797 ↗23. Zhang, Y., Gao, H., Fang, X., Xing, S., Xiao, L., and Duan, L. (2025). Research on the Compactness of Lunar Soil Simulant Based on Static Cone Penetration Test. Appl. Sci., 15.
10.3390/app15137553 ↗29. Mohajerani method: Tool for determining the liquid limit of soils using fall cone test results with strong correlation with the Casagrande test
10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105852 ↗30. Machine learning techniques for relating liquid limit obtained by Casagrande cup and fall cone test in low-medium plasticity fine grained soils
10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106381 ↗31. Nakayenga, J., Inui, M., and Hata, T. (2022). Study on the Effect of Amorphous Silica from Waste Granite Powder on the Strength Development of Cement-Treated Clay for Soft Ground Improvement. Sustainability, 14.
10.3390/su14074073 ↗34. Predicting the spatial distribution of soil profile in Adapazari/Turkey by artificial neural networks using CPT data
10.1016/j.cageo.2012.01.021 ↗35. Application of machine learning to the identification of quick and highly sensitive clays from cone penetration tests
10.1631/jzus.A1900556 ↗37. Rauter, S., and Tschuchnigg, F. (2021). CPT Data Interpretation Employing Different Machine Learning Techniques. Geosciences, 11.
10.3390/geosciences11070265 ↗40. Athar, M., Khoshnevisan, S., and Sadik, L. (2023, January 26–29). CPT-Based Soil Classification through Machine Learning Techniques. Proceedings of the GEO-CONGRESS 2023: Geotechnical Systems from Pore-Scale to City-Scale, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
42. Chala, A., and Ray, R. (2023). Assessing the Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Classification Using Cone Penetration Test Data. Appl. Sci., 13.
10.3390/app13095758 ↗43. Cho, S., Kim, H., and Kim, H. (2023). Locally Specified CPT Soil Classification Based on Machine Learning Techniques. Sustainability, 15.
10.3390/su15042914 ↗48. A semi-supervised clustering-based approach for stratification identification using borehole and cone penetration test data
10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.11.014 ↗50. Bernard, M. (2024). Integrating Machine Learning in Geotechnical Engineering: A Novel Approach for Railway Track Layer Design Based on Cone Penetration Test Data. Infrastructures, 9.
10.3390/infrastructures9080121 ↗52. Zhao, H., Wang, Y., Li, X., Guo, P., and Lin, H. (2023). Prediction of Maximum Tunnel Uplift Caused by Overlying Excavation Using XGBoost Algorithm with Bayesian Optimization. Appl. Sci., 13.
10.3390/app13179726 ↗53. Salehi Hikouei, I., Kim, S., and Mishra, D. (2021). Machine-Learning Classification of Soil Bulk Density in Salt Marsh Environments. Sensors, 21.
10.3390/s21134408 ↗54. Novel multi-spatial receptive field (MSRF) XGBoost method for predicting geological cross-section based on sparse borehole data
10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107604 ↗55. Prediction of fracture initiation in cohesive soils based on data mining modelling and large-scale laboratory verification
10.1016/j.undsp.2024.01.007 ↗56. A machine learning approach to sustainable land use: Integrating Markov chains and XGBoost for black galingale cultivation in Thailand
57. Analysis of CPT end resistance at variable penetration rates using the spherical cavity expansion method in normally consolidated soils
10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.04.019 ↗60. Cone penetration resistance of CUMT-1 lunar regolith simulant under magnetic-similitude lunar gravity condition
10.1007/s11440-023-01971-9 ↗61. Wu, C., Song, Y., Dai, J., Li, L., and Gu, X. (2025). Calibration of Cone Factor in Cone Penetration Test for Evaluating the Undrained Shear Strength of Silty Clay. Materials, 18.
10.3390/ma18061283 ↗62. Some relations among fall cone penetration, liquidity index and undrained shear strength of clays considering the sensitivity ratio
10.1007/s10064-019-01478-2 ↗63. Influence of geological uncertainty and soil spatial variability on tunnel deformation and their importance evaluation
10.1016/j.tust.2024.105930 ↗64. Experimental study of the coupling effect on segmental shield tunnel lining under surcharge loading and excavation unloading
10.1016/j.tust.2023.105199 ↗