journal article·2025-12-20Open access

Integrating Remote Sensing Indices and Ensemble Machine Learning Model with Independent HEC-RAS 2D Model for Enhanced Flood Prediction and Risk Assessment in the Ottawa River Watershed

Temitope Seun Oluwadare, Dongmei Chen, Heather McGrath

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

Floods rank among the most destructive natural hazards worldwide. In Canada’s capital region—Ottawa and its surrounding areas—flood prediction is crucial, especially in flood-prone zones, to improve flood mitigation strategies, given its historical record-breaking events in 2017 and 2019, which resulted in substantial damage to homes and infrastructure in the region. Previous studies in these regions typically did not use remote sensing techniques or advanced methods to enhance flood susceptibility prediction and extent mapping. This study addressed the gap by incorporating 18 flood conditioning factors and integrating high-performance machine learning algorithms such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machines and XGBoost to develop ensemble flood susceptibility models. The HEC-RAS 2D model was used to simulate hydrodynamic variables based on a 100-year flood scenario. The developed ensemble model for flood susceptibility prediction achieved strong performance (Kappa, F1-score, and AUC all above 0.979) and demonstrated model transferability, maintaining high accuracy (Kappa > 0.850, F1-score > 0.920, AUC > 0.990) when applied to other sub-regions. The hydraulic model reveals that flood velocity and depth differ across sub-regions, reaching maximums of 15 m/s and 15 m, respectively. SHAP analysis indicates Elevation, Handmodel, MNDWI, NDWI, and Aspect are key factors influencing floods. These findings and methods help Natural Resources Canada develop tools and policies for effective flood risk reduction in the Ottawa River watershed and similar regions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrological Forecasting Using AI · Hydrology and Drought Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Geographic Information and Spatial Analysis Laboratory (GisaLab), Department of Geography and Planning, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada

Canada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observation, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0Y7, Canada

Funding

Office of the Vice-Principal Research (VPR) Fund of Queen’s University, ON, Canada · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant

References (79)

Show source-provided references
1. Flood risk and climate change: Global and regional perspectives10.1080/02626667.2013.857411 ↗
2. Insurance Bureau of Canada (2025, August 25). Severe Weather in 2023 Caused Over $3.1 Billion in Insured Damage, Available online: https://www.ibc.ca/news-insights/news/severe-weather-in-2023-caused-over-3-1-billion-in-insured-damage.
3. Government of Ontario (2025, August 25). Independent Review of the 2019 Flood Events in Ontario: Region Specific Situations, Available online: https://www.ontario.ca/document/independent-review-2019-flood-events-ontario/region-specific-situations.
4. Ottawa River Regulation Planning Board (2025, August 25). Spring 2019 Freshet and Flood Summary Report, Available online: https://ottawariver.ca/.
5. (2025, May 29). Douglas McNeil: An Independent Review of the 2019 Flood Events in Ontario Available. Available online: https://files.ontario.ca/mnrf-english-ontario-special-advisor-on-flooding-report-2019-11-25.pdf.
6. (2025, September 29). Ontario Independent Review Report of Flood Events. “Region-Specific Situations-Including in 2017 and 2019”. Available online: https://www.ontario.ca/document/independent-review-2019-flood-events-ontario/region-specific-situations?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
7. Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., and Chau, K.-W. (2018). Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Literature Review. Water, 10.10.20944/preprints201810.0098.v2 ↗
8. On the Contribution of Remote Sensing-Based Calibration to Model Hydrological and Hydraulic Processes in Tropical Regions10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126184 ↗
9. Flood hazard zoning in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)10.1080/19475705.2015.1045043 ↗
10. A Comparative Assessment of Flood Susceptibility Modeling Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073 ↗
11. Modelling the Impact of Land Subsidence on Urban Pluvial Flooding: A Case Study of Downtown Shanghai, China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.159 ↗
12. Advances in Hydrological Modeling with GIS and RS Integration for Flood Assessment and Management
13. Bhuiyan, S.A., Bataille, C.P., and McGrath, H. (2022). Harmonizing and Extending Fragmented 100 Year Flood Hazard Maps in Canada’s Capital Region Using Random Forest Classification. Water, 14.10.3390/w14233801 ↗
14. Farhadi, H., and Najafzadeh, M. (2021). Flood Risk Mapping by Remote Sensing Data and Random Forest Technique. Water, 13.10.3390/w13213115 ↗
15. Cardi, J., Dussel, A., Letessier, C., Ebtehaj, I., Gumiere, S.J., and Bonakdari, H. (2023). Modeling Hydrodynamic Behavior of the Ottawa River: Harnessing the Power of Numerical Simulation and Machine Learning for Enhanced Predictability. Hydrology, 10.10.3390/hydrology10090177 ↗
16. Oluwadare, T.S., Ribeiro, M.P., Chen, D., Babadi Ataabadi, M., Tabesh, S.H., and Daomi, A.E. (2025). Applying Machine Learning Algorithms for Spatial Modeling of Flood Susceptibility Prediction over São Paulo Sub-Region. Land, 14.10.3390/land14050985 ↗
17. An algorithm for rapid flood inundation mapping from optical data using a reflectance differencing technique10.1111/jfr3.12045 ↗
18. Rapid assessment of riverine flood inundation in Chenab floodplain using remote sensing techniques10.1186/s40677-023-00236-7 ↗
19. Flood risk prediction and modeling in Bauchi: Leveraging machine learning models and explainable AI for urban resilience10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100490 ↗
20. Flood-prone area mapping using a synergistic approach with swarm intelligence and gradient boosting algorithms10.1038/s41598-025-12022-6 ↗
21. Boosting vs. traditional machine learning models for flood susceptibility mapping: Insights from a case study in central Vietnam10.1016/j.asr.2025.07.105 ↗
22. Advancing flood susceptibility prediction: A comparative assessment and scalability analysis of machine learning algorithms via artificial intelligence in high-risk regions of Pakistan10.1111/jfr3.13047 ↗
23. Flood risk mapping and performance efficiency evaluation of machine learning algorithms: Best practice in northern Iran10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-G-2025-1347-2025 ↗
24. HEC-RAS 2D modeling for flood inundation mapping: A case study of the Krishna River Basin10.2166/wpt.2023.048 ↗
25. Flood modeling using HEC-RAS 2D and IBER 2D: A comparative study10.2166/ws.2024.184 ↗
26. Distributed whole city water level measurements from the Carlisle 2005 urban flood event and comparison with hydraulic model simulations10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.026 ↗
27. A novel statistical model for flood prediction in the Eel River watershed, New Brunswick, Canada10.1080/23570008.2023.2243693 ↗
28. Identification of a preferred statistical distribution for at-site flood frequency analysis in Canada10.1080/07011784.2019.1691942 ↗
29. Statistically-based projected changes in the frequency of flood events across the U.S. Midwest10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124314 ↗
30. Environment and Climate Change Canada (2019). An Examination of Governance, Existing Data, Potential Indicators and Values in the Ottawa River Watershed.
31. Water Science School (2022, July 22). Impervious Surfaces and Flooding, Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/special-topics/water-science-school/science/impervious-surfaces-and-flooding.
32. Ottawa River Regulation Planning Board (2025, August 25). Summary of the 2017 Spring Flood. Available online: https://ottawariver.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2017-Spring-Flood-Summary.pdf.
33. Ottawa Citizen (2025, August 25). One Flood, Five Stories: Heartbreak, Battle and Hope on the Ottawa River. Available online: https://ottawacitizen.com/feature/one-flood-five-stories-heartbreak-battle-and-hope-on-the-ottawa-river.
34. (2025, April 13). City of Gatineau. Road Network. Available online: https://www.gatineau.ca/portail/default.aspx?p=publications_cartes_statistiques_donnees_ouvertes/donnees_ouvertes/jeux_donnees/details&id=872107914&ref=fil-d-Ariane.
35. City of Ottawa (2025, April 13). Road Centrelines. Available online: https://open.ottawa.ca/datasets/road-centrelines/explore.
36. Identifying the essential flood conditioning factors for flood prone area mapping using machine learning techniques10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.011 ↗
37. Effects of High-Quality Elevation Data and Explanatory Variables on the Accuracy of Flood Inundation Mapping via Height Above Nearest Drainage10.5194/hess-28-1287-2024 ↗
38. The Interaction of Topographic Slope with Various Geo-Environmental Flood-Causing Factors on Flood Prediction and Susceptibility Mapping10.1007/s11356-023-26616-y ↗
39. Spatial Modeling of Flood Hazard Using Machine Learning and GIS in Ha Tinh Province, Vietnam10.2166/wcc.2022.257 ↗
40. Analysis of Flood Susceptibility and Zonation for Risk Management Using Frequency Ratio Model in District Charsadda, Pakistan10.30897/ijegeo.407260 ↗
41. The Effect of DEM Resolution on Topographic Wetness Index Calculation and Visualization: An Insight to the Hidden Danger Unraveled in Bozkurt in August, 2021
42. Stream Power Framework for Predicting Geomorphic Change: The 2013 Colorado Front Range Flood10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.03.004 ↗
43. Hu, A., and Demir, I. (2021). Real-Time Flood Mapping on Client-SideWeb Systems Using HAND Model. Hydrology, 8.10.31223/X5M02R ↗
44. Investigating the Role of Model Structure and Surface Roughness in Generating Flood Inundation Extents Using One-and Two-Dimensional Hydraulic Models10.1111/jfr3.12347 ↗
45. Enhancing Flood Risk Assessment in Urban Areas by Integrating Hydrodynamic Models and Machine Learning Techniques10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175859 ↗
46. Bashir, B. (2023). Morphometric Parameters and Geospatial Analysis for Flash Flood Susceptibility Assessment: A Case Study of Jeddah City along the Red Sea Coast, Saudi Arabia. Water, 15.10.3390/w15050870 ↗
47. Identifying the impact of the built environment on flood damage in Texas10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01024.x ↗
48. Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world10.5194/nhess-10-509-2010 ↗
49. Navigating the Definition of Urban Flooding: A Conceptual and Systematic Review of the Literature10.2166/wst.2024.351 ↗
50. USGS (2025, September 15). NDVI, The Foundation for Remote Sensing Phenology, Available online: https://www.usgs.gov/special-topics/remote-sensing-phenology/science/ndvi-foundation-remote-sensing-phenology.
51. Demystifying normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) for greenness exposure assessments and policy interventions in urban greening10.1016/j.envres.2022.115155 ↗
52. Wang, Y., Zhao, H., Fan, J., Wang, C., Ji, X., Jin, D., and Chen, J. (2023). A Review of Earth’s Surface Soil Moisture Retrieval Models via Remote Sensing. Water, 15.10.3390/w15213757 ↗
53. Spatio-temporal analysis of water area variability in Poyang Lake (2012–2021) using remote sensing
54. Acharya, T.D., Subedi, A., and Lee, D.H. (2018). Evaluation of Water Indices for Surface Water Extraction in a Landsat 8 Scene of Nepal. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18082580 ↗
55. Towards Urban Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using Data-Driven Models in Berlin, Germany10.1080/19475705.2022.2097131 ↗
56. Pal, S.C., and Deswal, S. (2020). Flash Flood Susceptibility Modeling Using New Approaches of Hybrid and Ensemble Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12213568 ↗
57. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
58. Urban flood hazard assessment using FLA-optimized boost algorithms in Ankara, Türkiye10.1007/s13201-025-02424-2 ↗
59. A novel approach for flood hazard assessment using hybridized ensemble models and feature selection algorithms
60. (2025, September 02). Engineering ToolBox. Manning’s Roughness Coefficients for Open Channel Flow. Available online: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/mannings-roughness-d_799.html.
61. Dynamic Manning’s roughness coefficients for hydrological modelling in basins10.2166/nh.2018.175 ↗
62. Application of 2D numerical simulation for the analysis of the February 2014 Bolivian Amazonia flood: Application of the new HEC-RAS version 510.1016/j.riba.2015.12.001 ↗
63. Qureshi, M.U.A., Amiri, A., Ebtehaj, I., Guimere, S.J., Cunderlik, J., and Bonakdari, H. (2025). Coupling HEC-RAS and AI for River Morphodynamics Assessment Under Changing Flow Regimes: Enhancing Disaster Preparedness for the Ottawa River. Hydrology, 12.10.3390/hydrology12020025 ↗
64. Brunner, G. (2016). CEIWR-HEC. HEC-RAS 5.0 2D Modeling User’s Manual, US Army Corps Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center.
65. A Comparative Spatial Analysis of Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using Boosting Machine Learning Algorithms in Rathnapura, Sri Lanka10.1111/jfr3.12980 ↗
66. Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic
67. Flood Susceptibility Modelling using geospatial-based multi-criteria decision making in large scale areas
68. El Haou, M., Ourribane, M., Ismaili, M., Abdelrahman, K., Fnais, M.S., Krimissa, S., El Oudi, H., Hajji, S., El Bouzkraoui, M., and Tarchi, F. (2025). Advanced GIS-based modeling for flood hazards mapping in urban semi-arid regions: Insights from Beni Mellal, Morocco. Front. Environ. Sci., 13.10.3389/fenvs.2025.1585926 ↗
69. Ottawa River Regulation Planning Board (2025, August 30). Summary of the 2017 Spring Flood, Available online: https://ottawariver.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2017-Spring-Flood-Summary-vers.a.pdf.
70. (2025, August 30). Ottawa Riverkeeper. Available online: https://ottawariverkeeper.ca/6-things-you-should-know-about-the-2019-flooding/.
71. Analysis of exposure to vector-borne diseases due to flood duration, for a more complete flood hazard assessment: Llanos de Moxos, Bolivia10.1080/23863781.2017.1332816 ↗
72. Flood hazard mapping in Japan
73. Warming leads to both earlier and later snowmelt floods over the past 70 years10.1038/s41467-025-58832-0 ↗
74. Seasonal diversity of global flood changes and their drivers10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133976 ↗
75. Shifted dominant flood drivers of an alpine glacierized catchment in the Tianshan region revealed through interpretable deep learning10.1038/s41612-025-00918-z ↗
76. Simulation of compound flooding in Japan using a nationwide model10.1007/s11069-023-05962-7 ↗
77. Álvarez, M., Puertas, J., Peña, E., and Bermúdez, M. (2017). Two-Dimensional Dam-Break Flood Analysis in Data-Scarce Regions: The Case Study of Chipembe Dam, Mozambique. Water, 9.10.3390/w9060432 ↗
78. Khaing, Z.M., Zhang, K., Sawano, H., Shrestha, B.B., Sayama, T., and Nakamura, K. (2019). Flood hazard mapping and assessment in data-scarce Nyaungdon area, Myanmar. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0224558 ↗
79. Flood hazard mapping using FLO-2D and local management strategies of Dire Dawa city, Ethiopia10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.09.005 ↗